- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Data_erasure#Standards. No prejudice against changing the redirect target if someone writes the article that DGG has suggested. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 22:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
AFSSI-5020
- AFSSI-5020 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets any section of WP:NOTABILITY. It has previously been prodded (by @ Oo7565:) which was removed without a reason given by @ 76.66.195.159:. It was then re-prodded by @ Luk:, but this was removed because it had already been prodded, so needed to go to AfD. Has been tagged for notability for six years. Boleyn ( talk) 18:13, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 06:08, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (jaw) @ 19:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 12:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete – Obsolete method of deletion of information on hard-drives. ShoesssS Talk 12:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect Data erasure covers the subject in the "Standards" subsection in a level of detail similar to that of its standalone article. Seeing how AFSSI-5020 gets an average of 11 hits a day, making it into a redirect is preferable to deletion. Iaritmioawp ( talk) 06:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Retitle According to the article itself, this is an obsolete standard that has been replaced by a more current standard; wouldn't it make sense to write the article under the title of the current standard and include information about the prior one, with a redirect from its name? DGG ( talk ) 08:45, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty ( talk) 13:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Data_erasure#Standards. No prejudice against changing the redirect target if someone writes the article that DGG has suggested. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 22:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
AFSSI-5020
- AFSSI-5020 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets any section of WP:NOTABILITY. It has previously been prodded (by @ Oo7565:) which was removed without a reason given by @ 76.66.195.159:. It was then re-prodded by @ Luk:, but this was removed because it had already been prodded, so needed to go to AfD. Has been tagged for notability for six years. Boleyn ( talk) 18:13, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 06:08, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (jaw) @ 19:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 12:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete – Obsolete method of deletion of information on hard-drives. ShoesssS Talk 12:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect Data erasure covers the subject in the "Standards" subsection in a level of detail similar to that of its standalone article. Seeing how AFSSI-5020 gets an average of 11 hits a day, making it into a redirect is preferable to deletion. Iaritmioawp ( talk) 06:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Retitle According to the article itself, this is an obsolete standard that has been replaced by a more current standard; wouldn't it make sense to write the article under the title of the current standard and include information about the prior one, with a redirect from its name? DGG ( talk ) 08:45, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty ( talk) 13:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.