- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- 2014 in home video ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
per WP:INDISCRIMINATE; if a user wants to know when a movie came out to DVD and blu-ray and how much money it made, they can look at the films article. This list is just unnecessary. LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Most years since 1979 have a 'year in home video' article, all compiled by the List of years in home video article. Current article is well-sourced enough, and video and theater releases aren't the same thing, especially considering rare cases where theatrical films wait years for home release. Nate • ( chatter) 16:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. It is well sourced, definitely a notable topic, and it has the potential to be more than just what came out in home video that year. There can be a history section similar to List of years in home video, explaining different updates to Blu-ray, DVD's, 3D technology, etc. Tavix | Talk 01:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep AfD is not for suggesting new ideas. OccultZone ( Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:01, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- User:OccultZone, could you please explain? The nominator is not suggesting new ideas and your comment does nothing to explain why you think the article should be kept. Tavix | Talk 23:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- These issues are resolved through this link [1], so far the nominator has not even attempted. Nominator is only suggesting new ideas about composing articles and those ideas are contrary to the format of every other years related articles. OccultZone ( Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep because I think this kind of article is an appropriate way to group home media releases. Home Media Magazine provides weekly details, and I know that Variety and The Hollywood Reporter at the very least report such details. This kind of list could include DVD/Blu-ray sales figures as well as comparative ranks. EDIT: However, the article title should be changed to reflect that these are U.S. releases. I am not familiar enough with such releases in other territories to know if there is appropriate coverage about them. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 17:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- 2014 in home video ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
per WP:INDISCRIMINATE; if a user wants to know when a movie came out to DVD and blu-ray and how much money it made, they can look at the films article. This list is just unnecessary. LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Most years since 1979 have a 'year in home video' article, all compiled by the List of years in home video article. Current article is well-sourced enough, and video and theater releases aren't the same thing, especially considering rare cases where theatrical films wait years for home release. Nate • ( chatter) 16:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. It is well sourced, definitely a notable topic, and it has the potential to be more than just what came out in home video that year. There can be a history section similar to List of years in home video, explaining different updates to Blu-ray, DVD's, 3D technology, etc. Tavix | Talk 01:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep AfD is not for suggesting new ideas. OccultZone ( Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:01, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- User:OccultZone, could you please explain? The nominator is not suggesting new ideas and your comment does nothing to explain why you think the article should be kept. Tavix | Talk 23:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- These issues are resolved through this link [1], so far the nominator has not even attempted. Nominator is only suggesting new ideas about composing articles and those ideas are contrary to the format of every other years related articles. OccultZone ( Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep because I think this kind of article is an appropriate way to group home media releases. Home Media Magazine provides weekly details, and I know that Variety and The Hollywood Reporter at the very least report such details. This kind of list could include DVD/Blu-ray sales figures as well as comparative ranks. EDIT: However, the article title should be changed to reflect that these are U.S. releases. I am not familiar enough with such releases in other territories to know if there is appropriate coverage about them. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 17:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.