- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 19:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
2002 Vitim event
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2002 Vitim event ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
At noted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geology#Candidate for AFD - "2002_Vitim_event", this appears to be an unremarkable event that did not generate any WP:SIGCOV. Fireball events of comparable magnitude are not uncommon. The only sources covering this event only mention it in passing or are fringe. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 19:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Russia, Science and Paranormal. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 19:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per my comments to that effect at WP:GEOLOGY. tried to find sources, only found citogenesis and conspiracy theories. -- Licks-rocks ( talk) 20:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unable to find any reliable sources from which to create an article. In addition, I looked at fireballs reported by the US Government sensors for April 15, 1988, to February 19, 2023 and found that the "2002 Vitim event" at 2 / 4-5 (?) kilotons is typical of such events and completely lacks any notability. In fact, according that data, at 2 / 4-5 (?) kilotons, the "2002 Vitim event" is quite small compared to the largest known event, 440 kilotons, which happened February 15, 2013. Paul H. ( talk) 01:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete If it were true that the situation on the ground was similar to the Tunguska event, then it would be a different story. But with respect to the reported 100 square kilometers of burnt trees, the CCNet source is quite clear: "How should these stories be interpreted? With skepticism, I believe. A meteoritic explosion of 2 kilotons energy taking place at an altitude of 30 km is unlikely to have generated a serious shock wave or induced seismic signals. It is extremely unlikely to have started a forest fire". Remove this from the article and what you are left with is a rather common bolide event. If we have a list of such events, mention it there but I am afraid this is not enough for an own article. -- Proofreader ( talk) 20:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete There are no good sources for this being anything but a run of the mill bolide.
- AtFirstLight ( talk) 22:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE and falls short of meeting WP:SIGCOV and thus fails WP:GNG, although I am open to considering someone else’s take on this. Shawn Teller ( talk) 14:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 19:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
2002 Vitim event
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2002 Vitim event ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
At noted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geology#Candidate for AFD - "2002_Vitim_event", this appears to be an unremarkable event that did not generate any WP:SIGCOV. Fireball events of comparable magnitude are not uncommon. The only sources covering this event only mention it in passing or are fringe. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 19:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Russia, Science and Paranormal. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 19:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per my comments to that effect at WP:GEOLOGY. tried to find sources, only found citogenesis and conspiracy theories. -- Licks-rocks ( talk) 20:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unable to find any reliable sources from which to create an article. In addition, I looked at fireballs reported by the US Government sensors for April 15, 1988, to February 19, 2023 and found that the "2002 Vitim event" at 2 / 4-5 (?) kilotons is typical of such events and completely lacks any notability. In fact, according that data, at 2 / 4-5 (?) kilotons, the "2002 Vitim event" is quite small compared to the largest known event, 440 kilotons, which happened February 15, 2013. Paul H. ( talk) 01:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete If it were true that the situation on the ground was similar to the Tunguska event, then it would be a different story. But with respect to the reported 100 square kilometers of burnt trees, the CCNet source is quite clear: "How should these stories be interpreted? With skepticism, I believe. A meteoritic explosion of 2 kilotons energy taking place at an altitude of 30 km is unlikely to have generated a serious shock wave or induced seismic signals. It is extremely unlikely to have started a forest fire". Remove this from the article and what you are left with is a rather common bolide event. If we have a list of such events, mention it there but I am afraid this is not enough for an own article. -- Proofreader ( talk) 20:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete There are no good sources for this being anything but a run of the mill bolide.
- AtFirstLight ( talk) 22:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE and falls short of meeting WP:SIGCOV and thus fails WP:GNG, although I am open to considering someone else’s take on this. Shawn Teller ( talk) 14:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.