The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Those advocating to keep failed to provide any policy-based arguments. --
RoySmith(talk) 15:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)reply
This article has only one source, AMG, and that is not independent. There's no evidence presented that this is a notable album in any way. Guy (
Help!) 20:17, 2 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep - While I agree there needs to be more references added, this is not a hoax and
WP:OUTCOMES says "Albums are often kept as notable in and of themselves, if the artist is notable."--
CNMall41 (
talk) 22:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)reply
That's a guideline as to what is likely to have sources. Policy says we require reliable independent sources, not just directories that can be updated by the subject, which is all we have here. Guy (
Help!) 23:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC):reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 22:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
sst✈ 04:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Would be nice if there were some !votes with a rationale based on guidelines/policies. Delete - Searches on News, Newspapers, some brief mentions on Books and Highbeam, but no in-depth coverage. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NMUSIC.
Onel5969TT me 03:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Those advocating to keep failed to provide any policy-based arguments. --
RoySmith(talk) 15:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)reply
This article has only one source, AMG, and that is not independent. There's no evidence presented that this is a notable album in any way. Guy (
Help!) 20:17, 2 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep - While I agree there needs to be more references added, this is not a hoax and
WP:OUTCOMES says "Albums are often kept as notable in and of themselves, if the artist is notable."--
CNMall41 (
talk) 22:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)reply
That's a guideline as to what is likely to have sources. Policy says we require reliable independent sources, not just directories that can be updated by the subject, which is all we have here. Guy (
Help!) 23:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC):reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 22:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
sst✈ 04:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Would be nice if there were some !votes with a rationale based on guidelines/policies. Delete - Searches on News, Newspapers, some brief mentions on Books and Highbeam, but no in-depth coverage. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NMUSIC.
Onel5969TT me 03:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.