Main page | Talk page |
Submissions Category — List ( sorting) | Showcase |
Participants Apply — By subject |
Reviewing instructions | Help desk |
Backlog drives |
Ask a new question Please check back often for answers. |
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions |
---|
The Article I've written for Wikipedia has been rejected becaues:This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. I don't quite know how to correct this. I've sited with links to newspapers, and websites, but...
I just don't know what is wanted. Heilige Nikolaus ( talk) 01:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Landslides are a fascinating subject and Wikipedia even has a long list of landslides, but it seems that if there's no English text available, the landslide in question is considered to not have happened, eg. ignored by scientists.
I just spent several hours to translate
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordskredet_vid_Stenungsundsmotet
into
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Landslide_at_Stenungsund_junction&action=history
and I added 15 references, but sure enough, in stead of helping me to turn my draft into something worth publishing, somebody is trying to put my work on fire.
Who can please help to get this translation job finished? Help is not we destroy your work, so you can start all over again or Bring a lawyer to defend your attempt at helping Wikipedia I give up here 82.173.160.29 ( talk) 01:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, i understand that a made some mistakes in creating draft, and now i don't have a permission to fix it, how can i correct page? Boris Fevraly ( talk) 02:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I was told that submissions take months to review. This one was reviewed within hours. I suspect deliberate attempts to sabotage the entry. It was rejected claiming a lack of reliable sources. The sources are all completely reliable, mostly peer-reviwed articles and patent applications. Furthermore there is an interview on youtube from a respectable podcast series. Of course more sources will accumulate over time, but this is a first entry and the person in question is a respected scientist with numerous publications, with affiliations at Stanford and Berkeley, plus she is important as the co-founder and president on a non-profit research organisation. The non-profit has many other respected scientists as board members, it has 100s of followers on social media, it has given out stipends to scholars in the past, etc. - There is no reason to reject the entry as such, unless it is a witch hunt by envious competitors. If individual facts are not well enough documented, they can be deleted, or there could be a top entry about fixing this. Please address this problem, it seems to be a classic wikipedia attempt at sabotage. 79.199.170.144 ( talk) 05:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
They asked me to add more reliable sources. I added World Health Organization page https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/259085/9789290618188-eng.pdf?sequence=1, and Japanese Government website https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=345AC1000000019_20220617_504AC0000000068 I don't know what to do anymore. Please help. The English is my second language. Judo Therapist ( talk) 06:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I recently attempted to create an article on the 'Impact of Technology on Modern Travel Agencies,' which unfortunately got rejected. Could you please provide me with advice on improving my writing style and any general suggestions for creating better articles in the future? I'm particularly interested in understanding how to better source information, maintain neutrality, and format articles correctly. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Theuserwhowrites ( talk) 09:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to submit more references for the subject and also make the article more notable as i have more notable references. Clare Nassanga ( talk) 09:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
"Should i restart the whole process again since it has been rejected.", which I interpreted (possibly incorrectly) as the intention to duplicate the contents of the rejected draft and submit it as 'new', to which I said no. Now the advice from @ Timtrent is to start a new draft with entirely new content. I believe both pieces of advice are correct, and not contradictory. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 09:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Wikipedians, please recheck the draft Werner_Stiehler it was translated from German Wikipedia. Although it was thoroughly reviewed and approved on the German site. 𝒮- 𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, not sure what else I need to do to get this article on mainspace? I think this person is a notable and important British journalist and author. I could add more detail to the draft but I think these sentences are enough to showcase his qualifications Oneequalsequalsone ( talk · contribs) 11:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I wash about to upload my picture Taivur Islam ( talk) 12:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
publish that page cuh 2A00:A040:1A3:CE9A:F9C4:129D:39C4:479D ( talk) 13:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am trying to submit an article for creation about a disabled woman artist. User SafariScribe has rejected the article three times in less than a month with inaccurate reasons. The reasoning given is that the subject does not have reliable sources, however the subject's art is cited by multiple independent, non-interview, secondary, reliable sources. This repeated rejection without adequate explanation is beginning to feel like harassment. Is there anything I can do? Thank you for any explanation you can offer. Kapyidu ( talk) 16:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your help and discussion. This does not seem correct to me.
WP:BASIC states “People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." No where does it say “non-interviews” but even by that standard and by Timtrent’s reading, she has significant coverage in three (multiple) secondary sources in major newspapers and comics publications. She therefore passes WP:BASIC and qualifies as notable. No further qualifier is needed.
However, additionally, she is also an graphic narrative creator. Subject is notable for writing the only existing graphic memoir about an extremely rare disease, which follows the idea and spirit of WP:CREATIVE #2 “The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique." Furthermore, Subject also passes #4.c “won significant critical attention” as provable by the many reviews including from Publisher’s Weekly. Graphic Narrative is not Hollywood, significant does not mean an Oscar. Therefore in addition to qualifying by the standards of WP:BASIC, subject also passes WP:CREATIVE twice in her field as a Graphic Narrative Author. Subject is notable and warrants a page.
I will also simply note that Wikipedia has documentable bias against approving articles of women, as for example noted here: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14791420.2017.1386321?journalCode=rccc20 Kapyidu ( talk) 03:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
It has been declined a number of times perhaps you could list the three sources here that give significant coverage? You are of course free to move it yourself to main space where it would be at risk of WP:AFD. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
It is interesting that this comment says “your” poorly sourced article as opposed to “a” poorly sourced article, which suggests a personal attack.
The mention of bias is relevant because the article was rejected three times without explanation and without response to questions by the same user. This user has also just rejected that article without ability to be re-submitted while we are in the middle of a discussion.
Wikipedia is intended to be objective, and endearing shouldn’t be necessary to get an article approved.
User TimTrent stated that three resources qualified.
If the article cannot be approved, then it cannot be approved. But this does not seem right to me by the stated qualifications of Wikipedia, and I find it concerning that questions are provoking what seems to be attacks and retribution.
Kapyidu ( talk) 11:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)There was no comment left after declining. I need more insight on how the page article can be improve. I saw a lot of reference but i need to know clearly does the 8 reference provided doesn’t meet the WP:GNG. Gabriel (talk to me ) 17:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
My article has been rejected twice. I have several unique references attached to the article and removed anything from Facebook, etc. What is the issue with article publication? 69.7.65.195 ( talk) 18:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
I have cited all the authentic references just like the Persian vesion of the article. Unfortunately, the article is still being declined. I no not know what the issue is now. I would appreciate it if you helped me.
Kind Regards, Mohsenmarjmand ( talk) 04:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I have provided a lot of reliable sources, in fact, a few of them are government portals that authenticate the information provided by for the page creation of Gyan C Jain. He is a Padma Shree awardee and that should be more than enough to validate his presence in addition to that I have shared a lot more information from reliable sources, still the page is getting rejected for vague reasons. Could you please check again and help me with the same? Gracewith ( talk) 05:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I want to know but how? What kind of issues do I have? Tjiundje ( talk) 08:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
My article keeps getting rejected and I have put a lot of effort into researching and related all reference list and revised it multiple times, making sure it meets the 4 criteria for the sources. The last reviewer rejected my article and asked me to remove references that are not "reliable" without specifying which references are those. I have written and asked for a review and clarification yet no response for 2 weeks. Can someone assist me to improve this draft? Allewikiwriter ( talk) 09:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I am wondering why this page keeps getting declined, and how much more information needs to be added. Greenonion10 ( talk) 12:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
The reason I received for the article being rejected is that it is not supported by reliable sources.
I understand that some of the pictures were not sourced properly, however I believe that the sources I used for the article itself are reliable, as they are mainly articles from foundations (Yad Vashem and Shoah Foundation) and from an University (The University of Texas at Dallas).
Is there any area that I need to change specifically? Is2024 ( talk) 14:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I am not sure how the links provided are not acceptable. They are a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Can you please elaborate further. ArborChamp ( talk) 14:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello Sir I Created draft on Army Law College but it was not accepted for article creation because of some reason. So can you please suggest were to edit I am little bit confused. Akaayu ( talk) 15:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
After a great deal of constructive dialog and corresponding revision, the editor with whom I have been corresponding appears to be busy elsewhere. in Sirdog's last note he continued to dispute the notability of the subject. I responded substantively, no response. I need a third party opinion as to the notability and clearance to move this into mainspace (which I prefer not to do unilaterally). Our dialog is at /info/en/?search=User_talk:Sylvan1971#c-Sirdog-20240531033300-Sirdog's_reply
Thank you. Sylvan1971 ( talk) 18:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't really understand what the things I need to do are for this page? Can I have some more in depth help with the step by step? SageOst2024 ( talk) 19:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Can you please point out which specific claims need referencing? PaintPress ( talk) 19:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
what is double grazing Mukhtar Abbas Bhatti ( talk) 20:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I just submitted my first draft, which was declined by the Articles for Creation, and was told that it sounded more like an advertisement. Are there any words I should look out for when editing to prevent this tone from coming across? Are there some strategies I can use when editing to make sure my draft sounds more neutral? Wyneep ( talk) 20:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
How Can I Provide Verified information about my profile Mukhtar Abbas Bhatti ( talk) 20:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to check on my submission to see if there are any issues with the draft. It got declined in March so I edited it based on the notes I received. I received a message on LinkedIn today saying that I should tell this person if everything looks good to be published. I responded that it looks good and they responded asking for my WhatsApp number. Is this a scam or real? It was outside of Wikipedia but they linked to the draft of the page. Km302427 ( talk) 23:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
My submission was declined on 7 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk), because "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". Can you please be more specific as to which sources you consider to be "unreliable", or which facts you feel are not adequately supported? There are countless reliable sources and references given, as well as a listing of 41 published works in print. My submission is: /info/en/?search=Draft:Marc_Tedeschi . Thank you. Ndmmeyhhsn ( talk) 00:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please review this page, I've been waiting a while for it to get approved. Rincemermaid ( talk) 00:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
To verify if the draft is complete. Thank you. SLMSLMJS ( talk) 00:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I created the Victra page, but it's frequently rejected. I've maintained all Wikipedia terms, but it's still being rejected. May I know the reasons? Cathriewe1 ( talk) 03:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please review this article 2404:3100:140D:FBD2:ACE5:F6FF:FE71:9EDF ( talk) 05:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am writing here seeking some assistance in understanding the reason for rejection of the submitted draft. The article I am trying to submit is for a well known malayalam film director - Ullas Chemban. I have included all the available legitimate references about him in the draft. And the references has more elaborate details about him and his work. So not sure what specifically needs to be added for the draft to be published. It would be much appreciated if you can give me a more specific feedback on what else is missing with regards to significant coverage. Thank you very much! Appreciate your help !!! Tincee Hema ( talk) 06:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Why was it rejected?!?!?!? Non so che nome scegliere ( talk) 10:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
My article got rejected but it wasn't offensive nor it was a hoax or such stuff Paolo Maldini è il miglior difensore della storia del calcio ( talk) 10:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Team,
I'm reaching out on behalf of Metrix Pakistan, a notable organization in Pakistan focused on youth empowerment, education, and community development. Recently, an article about Metrix Pakistan was created on Wikipedia, but it was promptly rejected due to concerns about notability and reliability of sources. We at Metrix Pakistan are surprised and concerned by this decision, as our organization has a significant impact in Pakistan and has collaborated with government entities, educational institutions, and international organizations. Our work has been recognized and reported by reputable media outlets and sources. We kindly request a reassessment of the article, as we believe it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. We would appreciate it if an experienced editor could review the article and provide guidance on how to improve it to meet Wikipedia's standards. We look forward to your response and assistance in showcasing Metrix Pakistan's contributions to the global community.
Best regards,
Metrix Pakistan
Metrixpk ( talk) 12:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I have been working on the draft Henrik von Scheel for while. It´s the second time. I used allot of time to build the verifiable links, and to improve the text. I am new and I am fell I am stuck. I would appreciate some help to learn from the some of the senior guards. RichardMeier33 ( talk) 13:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I see that my draft article has been refused and I am somewhat confused. I have been told that Charles Schneider doesn't meet the notability and reliable sources criteria, but I have included a plethora of links and sources to his works and publications which provide proof of his extensive output. I am in need of guidance about what I can do to improve this article so it can meet the standards referenced. I have some additional newspaper articles and podcast interviews--will these help meet the standard? Are actual book publications not suitable in themselves, but one needs to have actual reviews of the books written in order to indicate that they were published? Specifically, how many additional citations would be needed for this draft article to be accepted? Thank you for your assistance. Amphoracat ( talk) 18:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
It's a REAL country. Please bring back this article. Artem 2013 123 ( talk) 22:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
he is cool 2601:18E:D000:4DD0:54FA:196:EC4D:E57D ( talk) 23:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please what do I do? Frankincense Diala ( talk) 00:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Why was it declined? There was enough citation to prove it's notable. So now what should I do? Frankincense Diala ( talk) 00:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano, I blocked the user: too many COI/UPE suspicions here, and too much IDIDNOTHEARTHAT. Drmies ( talk) 00:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Can someone please let me know any specific items that led to this article being declined? Anything specific we can address? The reason I see it was declined is fairly general - lack of credible sources.
However, we have listed links to Washington's diary where he specifically mentions staying at the house multiple times, a letter he wrote to a friend stating his visit there, the NPS, a few Historical Societies, VF Park, a person with the PA Historical Society that did her Penn State thesis on the house, ArbNet, the official designator of Arboretums, Independence National Historical Park among many other sources. Curious how it took roughly 11 minutes from initial submission to review all of the sources.
Please let me know anything specific we need to provide, update or change.
Thank you CBrookUM ( talk) 01:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Why my Draft has been rejected Akaayu ( talk) 07:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Can you help me Prince kumar 2.0 ( talk) 08:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I submitted an article for review but it was declined. I was trying to add about a company in the encyclopedia that is helping students in grooming them for preparation for MAANG companies. Please guide me how to write the article and also highlight in the article where I made mistake. Sanya Wadhwani ( talk) 08:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I have found many sources to put in my article, why is my article considered to lack reliable sources? Junurita ( talk) 09:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
hello sir
here is some more reference of this article
https://www.miragenews.com/research-inspires-journey-into-politics/ https://www.canterbury.ac.nz/news-and-events/news/research-inspires-journey-into-politics https://crs.org.nz/the-crs-board https://cginz.org/Event?Action=View&Event_id=842 https://www.shirleyroadcentral.nz/community-boards/ https://www.odt.co.nz/star-news/star-christchurch/results-linwood-central-heathcote-community-board-election-revealed https://www.ncwnz.org.nz/tags/ncwnzchch https://www.nzibt.ac.nz/profile/ https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/431088/failed-ousting-exposes-party-political-influence-in-local-government-chairperson https://www.peopleschoice.co.nz/christchurch-community-board-candidates https://multiculturaltimes.news/profiles/2019/9/22/sunita-gautam-candidate-for-linwood-central-heathcote-community-board-central-ward https://www.neighbourly.co.nz/public/christchurch/edgeware/message/61335528 https://policy.nz/2022/waipapa-papanui-innes-central-community-board-central-subdivision/candidates/sunita-gautam https://venuefinder.nz/wedding-profile/sunita-gautam-celebrant/73566 https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2024/05/PCBCC_20240509_AGN_9126_AT.HTM AngelynAsrisch ( talk) 09:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi everyone,
After my submission for this translated article was denied because it wasn't backed by enough reliable sources (it relied too much on the organization's references), I have been working on improving it. I have now gathered and incorporated information from reliable articles and documents from various sources around the web to rewrite the article.
I hope the revisions are now satisfactory. Could someone please review the article before I resubmit it for approval?
Thank you very much for your assistance.
All the best, ArtsSquareWiki ( talk) 12:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, this was my first attempt at a Wikipedia Page.
I mistakenly focused more on the notable works of the company rather than the company itself. I've since edited the page to include more about the company including an external reference to a piece about the company itself, rather than just the news articles about their notable pieces. I've added a comment in reply to the reviewer that I've addressed their issues. I've resubmitted for review.
My question is, does this now join the back of the queue and sit there, waiting another couple of months or more before it gets picked up by someone else to review?
If I've not done enough and need to edit it again, this could become a long process. Is there anyway to get feedback as to if I've done enough?
Thanks. CaptainTavish ( talk) 14:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, the draft rejected because the resources I have presented in the draft - I quote - "do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject".
To my humble understanding the official website of India' Prime Minister is quite a reliable for the article, isn't it? Also, the YouTube link present India' PM himself meet Hiroko Takayama.
An explanation what i am doing wrong or what additional resources are need to make this draft appropraite for publication will be much appreciated, thank you very much. Avi Gazit ( talk) 15:30, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello sir, why my article submission was declined, please post my article. Sushil Dobhal ( talk) 16:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I created this page to be informative about a social networking service. It is similar to other articles already on Wikipedia, however it was rejected due to notability. Can you give a more specific reason on why or how I can fix this to have the page published? Thanks Woodgrain1 ( talk) 19:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Recently I created my first wiki page which got declined first and since then I've implemented some recommended changes. I would value it a lot if you could please have a look into it and let me know if you see anything that would need more work and improvement so I can make sure the page gets published when it has a second review. This is the link to it: /info/en/?search=Draft:Mark_Kotter
Thank you in advance for your guidance and support, what a great community of people I'm learning a lot from all of you.
Best wishes, Damjana Damjana12 ( talk) 22:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, a little while back I submitted a page draft for this company (in full disclosure I do work here, I have taken every action I know of of disclosing this on my page and keeping the language of the page as neutral as possible).
The post got rejected due to a few reasons, including some language which I can see to be a bit promotional. I've got a question regarding frequency/type of references:
My post was taken down because not every single sentence came with a reference, including each bullet in a very long list. Another point was that there were non secondary sources, even though the article hit the minimum of 5 reputable secondary sources per Wikipedia's guidelines. What is the guideline behind these aspects? Here are two pages I'm also curious about:
Both of these pages have a few reliable sources based on the Wikipedia guidelines, but they also resort to using company information publicly available, as well as leaving out references when it becomes redunant (see the bulleted list on the Masterclass page). I based my page entirely off of Masterclasses page since we are in the same industry, but the points I was knocked down for seem to also be violated by MasterClass's and Spotify's page. I asked the individual who approved the rejection of my post but haven't heard back in a month.
If someone could clarify why these two companies are allowed to have their pages formatted the way they are and tonebase is not, that would be super helpful and save me from submitting another invalid draft to AoC. Tonebase is a very well established company with plenty of reputable media coverage in line with the Wikipedia policy, so I'm willing to be flexible to adhere to any rule set forth. Thank you! Aidantonebase ( talk) 23:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
HEY DEAR I WANT TO CLAIM MY SPOTIFY ARTIST PROFILE THATS WHY THEY ARE DEMANDING MY WIKIPEDIA I REALLY WANT TO PUBLISH THIS Thugpoetak ( talk) 00:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I received feedback about the article submitted for publication that it did not demonstrate enough solo works outside of her group NewJeans, and does not have enough individual notability. I then edited the article as per these recommendations by adding information about a campaign she did for the the South Korean National Elections Commission and information about her campaign with Chanel Beauty's N°1 de Chanel Red Camellia line. I was wondering if I have improved the article to better show individual notability? Additionally, I did my best to properly cite the sources, however I would appreciate someone checking that I did so correctly. AlexBW0524 ( talk) 03:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional because it provides general company information that is of public interest. The content has been revised to remove any promotional elements, including the phone number. This page aims to offer neutral and factual information about the company that may be useful to internet users. Helposys ( talk) 04:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I will added 6 reference for proof Mahroos Siddiquee Nadim is a notable person why not accept it . Please told me details I will recover my mistake. Sukhi vale ( talk) 07:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
The submission was declined for unreliable sources, however the main sources used throughout the article are a book from R. P. Hunnicutt's A History of American Armor, which are considered to be a highly reputable source on American armor, and are used throughout other Wikipedia articles on the subject, ( /info/en/?search=M48_Patton, /info/en/?search=M103_heavy_tank etc). The other main source used is various Jane's publications, which are also considered a highly reputable source for information on defense related topics, e.g. armored vehicles, and are also used in other Wikipedia articles on similar topics ( /info/en/?search=M1_Abrams, /info/en/?search=High_Survivability_Test_Vehicle_(Lightweight) etc). Due to this I am unsure why my submission was declined for the given reason, and any assistance would be appreciated. Huntere123 ( talk) 09:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
How i got approval this Biography ? 103.135.255.194 ( talk) 09:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
how do i add sources? is it like adding citations? Danny8384535 ( talk) 19:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Amirsohelkhan993 ( talk) 20:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Where is Mahroos Siddiquee Nadim Indian footballer article page ? Sukhi vale ( talk) 21:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
how do I add properly please help me Sukhi vale ( talk) 21:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
There is a detailed article on Gustav Maier (WriterI in the German Wikipedia:: Gustav Maier (Schriftsteller) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Maier_(Schriftsteller) Since Gustav Maier has been described in the first volume of the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein as an important benefactor and sponsor of the young Albert Einstein at Zurich, from 1895-1901 and in all biographies on Albert Einstein, I have submitted a shortened version of the German Wikipedia article on Gustav Maier (Schriftsteller) in English, hence, this is a well referenced and notorious personality who definitely deserves an aticle also in the English version of Wikipedia. Thank you very much for looking into this matter. Beamai2004 ( talk) 08:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
please let me know why my draft is not being accepted. how may I improve it
BasharatAli254 ( talk) 10:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, can someone briefly review this and see if it sounds promotional or not and if it is ready for submission. I'd also appreciate any advice for improvements. Thank you. ExoField ( talk) 10:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
How can i publish this article Mahendra Umesh Nayaka ( talk) 10:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
i wonder why my article has been deleted. I got accused of vandalism, however, this story is true. Just because it isn't in history books or anything doesn't mean that it never happened. John H Backflip was a relative of mine and this story has been going round in my family for ions. it really means a lot to me and my family if it would stay on wikipedia, because i would like to share this story with the world. There are a LOT of vandals on this site, and their pages sometimes stay up, but my page, that isn't meant to be funny got taken down. I would really appriciate it if you can take another look. UnknownHistoryFacts ( talk) 11:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I wrote an article about a Turkish entrepreneur. It was declined because of the lack of references at some parts of the article. I got my info about the person at a live event that her company hosted a few months ago. How can I add proof about the person's life in this situation. I would appreciate if you can help me with my first article. 185.252.40.36 ( talk) 11:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
How can we get this page posted? There seems to be enough reputable sources. A similar company to ours is on here: /info/en/?search=DocuWare 24.45.213.68 ( talk) 13:18, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
THIS PAGE IS ALWAYS REJECTED SO I MADE A MISTAKE I DONT KNOW HOW TO FIX THIS BAD PAGE ANYWAYS CAN U DELETE THIS PAGE INSTEAD Roblox678956568 ( talk) 13:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
To whom it may concern need to delete my drafts need thy assistance Your guidance is at my mercy truly yours The Summum Bonum ( talk) 13:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
{{
db-g7}}
. —
Jéské Couriano
v^_^v
threads
critiques
15:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
why my draft deleted Gautamparmaraone ( talk) 13:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Sirs. Please I need help to format the Accolades Table. I did som,ething wrong and now I don't know ho to fix the prolem that I caused. In particular some cells "Nominated" don't show correctly. Some cells "Won" are in the wrong column. It seems thare is an extra column at right, that I don't know how to delete. Thank you very much. Robert20654
Robert20654 ( talk) 15:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
We received feedback that the subject was not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The subject is one of the largest hedge funds in the world. We have sited multiple large news sources. What else are we missing? What can we add? Adamcat222 ( talk) 16:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Why was this declined Ricrickey ( talk) 19:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
hello what i should do to creat my own biography ? Abdelalinour ( talk) 21:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I created a page that is for an active duty army battalion. The page was not approved to be published and I don't understand why. Our higher headquarters at the Army level (3 echelons up), Division level (2 echelons up) and Brigade level (1 echelon up), both have approved pages. They are First Army, First Army Division East, and 157th Infantry Brigade respectively. Our battalion is even mentioned on the 157th Infantry Brigade as a subordinate battalion. The source that I provided is used to populate our entire page. The notification didn't mention what part of the page was not supported by an article.
Thanks for your help. 1-335 Warriors ( talk) 21:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey there. I understand why my draft was declined and I am not contesting that. While I will try to find more sources, are my non-independent sources, 2 and 3, completely out of the question or can I keep them? Yes, they do contain interviews but what I use the sources for isn't the information from the interviews (rather, I use what the authors themselves of the articles say about the company). Thank you! Win8x ( talk) 21:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Customer Support,
My submission was rejected without stating a reason, as I am sure that my submission does not violate Wikipedia's rules. Is there a possibility to get a reason for cancellation and work it through?
Best, Naruba. 91.105.102.125 ( talk) 22:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
The draft was last declined in 2022 and should be reviewed once again because now the actor has attained WP:N with his lead roles in Hero - Gayab Mode On, Ali Baba: Ek Andaaz Andekha. He had a prominent role in Amazon mini TV series Jab We Matched. Also, he is currently doing a lead role in the show. Pukaar - Dil Se Dil Tak. So kindly review the draft once again. 202.41.10.107 ( talk) 04:45, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello.
As I usually do so, I did a search in Wikipedia about a software component that has been trending within the software development community ( ==> HTMX )
However, I was surprised to find "no entry" related to such software component in the main "English" pages.
Even more surprised I was when I noticed that there is an entry about the HTMX software component in the Czech wikipedia pages.
Therefore, I decided to help the community and write the English version of the HTMX software component.
After registering in Wikipedia and after starting editing of the HTMX article, I was shown the current draft of the HTMX article with many "article submission declined" entries ( x4 ).
I am very familiar and experienced writing technical articles, and after reading the current draft article of "HTMX" I found it to be good enough for submission acceptance.
Nevertheless, I am a true beginner when it comes to editing Wikipedia articles. I noticed that the "submission declines" suggest to "ask for help" to get guidance into how to "fix" the article to have its submission accepted.
Can you provide guidance into what is wrong with the current draft so I can contribute to edit and fix it?
Thank you !!!
Mamorenor ( talk) 07:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I need help with three issues regarding the UFO 50 draft page. 1) Two of the references show as broken, even though I can see nothing wrong with them. In fact, some of the references appear as broken and then fix themselves when editing unrelated parts of the page or moving them around, which is quite puzzling. 2) Would the current draft be a reasonable submission for approval? 3) If someone with image upload permissions could upload the game's cover ( https://50games.fun/images/logo.jpg) as the article image, it would be very much appreciated. Thank you very much! Weltall Zero ( talk) 16:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, can someone Review this article Draft:Buchi Babu Sana please? BubbleWombleBee12 ( talk) 17:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Wikipedia Team,
I am reaching out in utter frustration regarding my article submission. Since the start of the year, I have been diligently re-drafting this article to meet all the requirements specified by your guidelines. It is outrageous that editor Johannes Maximilian has now reiterated the same feedback previously given by other editors, claiming the article lacks the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia and fails to adhere to a neutral point of view. I have meticulously revised the submission to eliminate any peacock terms and ensure it is written from a neutral perspective, as per your instructions.
Furthermore, the accusation that the submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources is simply untrue. I have invested countless hours referencing independent, reliable, published sources to verify every piece of information in the article. It is incredibly disheartening to have my efforts continuously dismissed by editors who seem to be trigger-happy in rejecting submissions without offering constructive feedback.
This process is beginning to feel discriminatory and marginalizing. Wikipedia is supposed to be an open, free space for sharing knowledge, yet I am encountering constant obstacles and encountering editors who appear to be mean-spirited and resentful, rejecting my efforts without due consideration.
This cannot continue indefinitely. I have poured significant time and effort into ensuring my submission meets Wikipedia's standards, and it is unacceptable for it to be continually undermined by dismissive editorial behavior. I urge you to review my submission again, taking into account the extensive work I have done to comply with your requirements.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Best regards,
Adefolarin Adefolarin1 ( talk) 19:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Main page | Talk page |
Submissions Category — List ( sorting) | Showcase |
Participants Apply — By subject |
Reviewing instructions | Help desk |
Backlog drives |
Ask a new question Please check back often for answers. |
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions |
---|
The Article I've written for Wikipedia has been rejected becaues:This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. I don't quite know how to correct this. I've sited with links to newspapers, and websites, but...
I just don't know what is wanted. Heilige Nikolaus ( talk) 01:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Landslides are a fascinating subject and Wikipedia even has a long list of landslides, but it seems that if there's no English text available, the landslide in question is considered to not have happened, eg. ignored by scientists.
I just spent several hours to translate
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordskredet_vid_Stenungsundsmotet
into
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Landslide_at_Stenungsund_junction&action=history
and I added 15 references, but sure enough, in stead of helping me to turn my draft into something worth publishing, somebody is trying to put my work on fire.
Who can please help to get this translation job finished? Help is not we destroy your work, so you can start all over again or Bring a lawyer to defend your attempt at helping Wikipedia I give up here 82.173.160.29 ( talk) 01:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, i understand that a made some mistakes in creating draft, and now i don't have a permission to fix it, how can i correct page? Boris Fevraly ( talk) 02:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I was told that submissions take months to review. This one was reviewed within hours. I suspect deliberate attempts to sabotage the entry. It was rejected claiming a lack of reliable sources. The sources are all completely reliable, mostly peer-reviwed articles and patent applications. Furthermore there is an interview on youtube from a respectable podcast series. Of course more sources will accumulate over time, but this is a first entry and the person in question is a respected scientist with numerous publications, with affiliations at Stanford and Berkeley, plus she is important as the co-founder and president on a non-profit research organisation. The non-profit has many other respected scientists as board members, it has 100s of followers on social media, it has given out stipends to scholars in the past, etc. - There is no reason to reject the entry as such, unless it is a witch hunt by envious competitors. If individual facts are not well enough documented, they can be deleted, or there could be a top entry about fixing this. Please address this problem, it seems to be a classic wikipedia attempt at sabotage. 79.199.170.144 ( talk) 05:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
They asked me to add more reliable sources. I added World Health Organization page https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/259085/9789290618188-eng.pdf?sequence=1, and Japanese Government website https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=345AC1000000019_20220617_504AC0000000068 I don't know what to do anymore. Please help. The English is my second language. Judo Therapist ( talk) 06:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I recently attempted to create an article on the 'Impact of Technology on Modern Travel Agencies,' which unfortunately got rejected. Could you please provide me with advice on improving my writing style and any general suggestions for creating better articles in the future? I'm particularly interested in understanding how to better source information, maintain neutrality, and format articles correctly. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Theuserwhowrites ( talk) 09:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to submit more references for the subject and also make the article more notable as i have more notable references. Clare Nassanga ( talk) 09:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
"Should i restart the whole process again since it has been rejected.", which I interpreted (possibly incorrectly) as the intention to duplicate the contents of the rejected draft and submit it as 'new', to which I said no. Now the advice from @ Timtrent is to start a new draft with entirely new content. I believe both pieces of advice are correct, and not contradictory. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 09:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Wikipedians, please recheck the draft Werner_Stiehler it was translated from German Wikipedia. Although it was thoroughly reviewed and approved on the German site. 𝒮- 𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, not sure what else I need to do to get this article on mainspace? I think this person is a notable and important British journalist and author. I could add more detail to the draft but I think these sentences are enough to showcase his qualifications Oneequalsequalsone ( talk · contribs) 11:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I wash about to upload my picture Taivur Islam ( talk) 12:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
publish that page cuh 2A00:A040:1A3:CE9A:F9C4:129D:39C4:479D ( talk) 13:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am trying to submit an article for creation about a disabled woman artist. User SafariScribe has rejected the article three times in less than a month with inaccurate reasons. The reasoning given is that the subject does not have reliable sources, however the subject's art is cited by multiple independent, non-interview, secondary, reliable sources. This repeated rejection without adequate explanation is beginning to feel like harassment. Is there anything I can do? Thank you for any explanation you can offer. Kapyidu ( talk) 16:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your help and discussion. This does not seem correct to me.
WP:BASIC states “People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." No where does it say “non-interviews” but even by that standard and by Timtrent’s reading, she has significant coverage in three (multiple) secondary sources in major newspapers and comics publications. She therefore passes WP:BASIC and qualifies as notable. No further qualifier is needed.
However, additionally, she is also an graphic narrative creator. Subject is notable for writing the only existing graphic memoir about an extremely rare disease, which follows the idea and spirit of WP:CREATIVE #2 “The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique." Furthermore, Subject also passes #4.c “won significant critical attention” as provable by the many reviews including from Publisher’s Weekly. Graphic Narrative is not Hollywood, significant does not mean an Oscar. Therefore in addition to qualifying by the standards of WP:BASIC, subject also passes WP:CREATIVE twice in her field as a Graphic Narrative Author. Subject is notable and warrants a page.
I will also simply note that Wikipedia has documentable bias against approving articles of women, as for example noted here: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14791420.2017.1386321?journalCode=rccc20 Kapyidu ( talk) 03:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
It has been declined a number of times perhaps you could list the three sources here that give significant coverage? You are of course free to move it yourself to main space where it would be at risk of WP:AFD. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
It is interesting that this comment says “your” poorly sourced article as opposed to “a” poorly sourced article, which suggests a personal attack.
The mention of bias is relevant because the article was rejected three times without explanation and without response to questions by the same user. This user has also just rejected that article without ability to be re-submitted while we are in the middle of a discussion.
Wikipedia is intended to be objective, and endearing shouldn’t be necessary to get an article approved.
User TimTrent stated that three resources qualified.
If the article cannot be approved, then it cannot be approved. But this does not seem right to me by the stated qualifications of Wikipedia, and I find it concerning that questions are provoking what seems to be attacks and retribution.
Kapyidu ( talk) 11:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)There was no comment left after declining. I need more insight on how the page article can be improve. I saw a lot of reference but i need to know clearly does the 8 reference provided doesn’t meet the WP:GNG. Gabriel (talk to me ) 17:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
My article has been rejected twice. I have several unique references attached to the article and removed anything from Facebook, etc. What is the issue with article publication? 69.7.65.195 ( talk) 18:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
I have cited all the authentic references just like the Persian vesion of the article. Unfortunately, the article is still being declined. I no not know what the issue is now. I would appreciate it if you helped me.
Kind Regards, Mohsenmarjmand ( talk) 04:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I have provided a lot of reliable sources, in fact, a few of them are government portals that authenticate the information provided by for the page creation of Gyan C Jain. He is a Padma Shree awardee and that should be more than enough to validate his presence in addition to that I have shared a lot more information from reliable sources, still the page is getting rejected for vague reasons. Could you please check again and help me with the same? Gracewith ( talk) 05:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I want to know but how? What kind of issues do I have? Tjiundje ( talk) 08:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
My article keeps getting rejected and I have put a lot of effort into researching and related all reference list and revised it multiple times, making sure it meets the 4 criteria for the sources. The last reviewer rejected my article and asked me to remove references that are not "reliable" without specifying which references are those. I have written and asked for a review and clarification yet no response for 2 weeks. Can someone assist me to improve this draft? Allewikiwriter ( talk) 09:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I am wondering why this page keeps getting declined, and how much more information needs to be added. Greenonion10 ( talk) 12:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
The reason I received for the article being rejected is that it is not supported by reliable sources.
I understand that some of the pictures were not sourced properly, however I believe that the sources I used for the article itself are reliable, as they are mainly articles from foundations (Yad Vashem and Shoah Foundation) and from an University (The University of Texas at Dallas).
Is there any area that I need to change specifically? Is2024 ( talk) 14:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I am not sure how the links provided are not acceptable. They are a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Can you please elaborate further. ArborChamp ( talk) 14:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello Sir I Created draft on Army Law College but it was not accepted for article creation because of some reason. So can you please suggest were to edit I am little bit confused. Akaayu ( talk) 15:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
After a great deal of constructive dialog and corresponding revision, the editor with whom I have been corresponding appears to be busy elsewhere. in Sirdog's last note he continued to dispute the notability of the subject. I responded substantively, no response. I need a third party opinion as to the notability and clearance to move this into mainspace (which I prefer not to do unilaterally). Our dialog is at /info/en/?search=User_talk:Sylvan1971#c-Sirdog-20240531033300-Sirdog's_reply
Thank you. Sylvan1971 ( talk) 18:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't really understand what the things I need to do are for this page? Can I have some more in depth help with the step by step? SageOst2024 ( talk) 19:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Can you please point out which specific claims need referencing? PaintPress ( talk) 19:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
what is double grazing Mukhtar Abbas Bhatti ( talk) 20:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I just submitted my first draft, which was declined by the Articles for Creation, and was told that it sounded more like an advertisement. Are there any words I should look out for when editing to prevent this tone from coming across? Are there some strategies I can use when editing to make sure my draft sounds more neutral? Wyneep ( talk) 20:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
How Can I Provide Verified information about my profile Mukhtar Abbas Bhatti ( talk) 20:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to check on my submission to see if there are any issues with the draft. It got declined in March so I edited it based on the notes I received. I received a message on LinkedIn today saying that I should tell this person if everything looks good to be published. I responded that it looks good and they responded asking for my WhatsApp number. Is this a scam or real? It was outside of Wikipedia but they linked to the draft of the page. Km302427 ( talk) 23:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
My submission was declined on 7 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk), because "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". Can you please be more specific as to which sources you consider to be "unreliable", or which facts you feel are not adequately supported? There are countless reliable sources and references given, as well as a listing of 41 published works in print. My submission is: /info/en/?search=Draft:Marc_Tedeschi . Thank you. Ndmmeyhhsn ( talk) 00:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please review this page, I've been waiting a while for it to get approved. Rincemermaid ( talk) 00:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
To verify if the draft is complete. Thank you. SLMSLMJS ( talk) 00:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I created the Victra page, but it's frequently rejected. I've maintained all Wikipedia terms, but it's still being rejected. May I know the reasons? Cathriewe1 ( talk) 03:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please review this article 2404:3100:140D:FBD2:ACE5:F6FF:FE71:9EDF ( talk) 05:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am writing here seeking some assistance in understanding the reason for rejection of the submitted draft. The article I am trying to submit is for a well known malayalam film director - Ullas Chemban. I have included all the available legitimate references about him in the draft. And the references has more elaborate details about him and his work. So not sure what specifically needs to be added for the draft to be published. It would be much appreciated if you can give me a more specific feedback on what else is missing with regards to significant coverage. Thank you very much! Appreciate your help !!! Tincee Hema ( talk) 06:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Why was it rejected?!?!?!? Non so che nome scegliere ( talk) 10:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
My article got rejected but it wasn't offensive nor it was a hoax or such stuff Paolo Maldini è il miglior difensore della storia del calcio ( talk) 10:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Team,
I'm reaching out on behalf of Metrix Pakistan, a notable organization in Pakistan focused on youth empowerment, education, and community development. Recently, an article about Metrix Pakistan was created on Wikipedia, but it was promptly rejected due to concerns about notability and reliability of sources. We at Metrix Pakistan are surprised and concerned by this decision, as our organization has a significant impact in Pakistan and has collaborated with government entities, educational institutions, and international organizations. Our work has been recognized and reported by reputable media outlets and sources. We kindly request a reassessment of the article, as we believe it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. We would appreciate it if an experienced editor could review the article and provide guidance on how to improve it to meet Wikipedia's standards. We look forward to your response and assistance in showcasing Metrix Pakistan's contributions to the global community.
Best regards,
Metrix Pakistan
Metrixpk ( talk) 12:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I have been working on the draft Henrik von Scheel for while. It´s the second time. I used allot of time to build the verifiable links, and to improve the text. I am new and I am fell I am stuck. I would appreciate some help to learn from the some of the senior guards. RichardMeier33 ( talk) 13:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I see that my draft article has been refused and I am somewhat confused. I have been told that Charles Schneider doesn't meet the notability and reliable sources criteria, but I have included a plethora of links and sources to his works and publications which provide proof of his extensive output. I am in need of guidance about what I can do to improve this article so it can meet the standards referenced. I have some additional newspaper articles and podcast interviews--will these help meet the standard? Are actual book publications not suitable in themselves, but one needs to have actual reviews of the books written in order to indicate that they were published? Specifically, how many additional citations would be needed for this draft article to be accepted? Thank you for your assistance. Amphoracat ( talk) 18:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
It's a REAL country. Please bring back this article. Artem 2013 123 ( talk) 22:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
he is cool 2601:18E:D000:4DD0:54FA:196:EC4D:E57D ( talk) 23:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please what do I do? Frankincense Diala ( talk) 00:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Why was it declined? There was enough citation to prove it's notable. So now what should I do? Frankincense Diala ( talk) 00:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano, I blocked the user: too many COI/UPE suspicions here, and too much IDIDNOTHEARTHAT. Drmies ( talk) 00:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Can someone please let me know any specific items that led to this article being declined? Anything specific we can address? The reason I see it was declined is fairly general - lack of credible sources.
However, we have listed links to Washington's diary where he specifically mentions staying at the house multiple times, a letter he wrote to a friend stating his visit there, the NPS, a few Historical Societies, VF Park, a person with the PA Historical Society that did her Penn State thesis on the house, ArbNet, the official designator of Arboretums, Independence National Historical Park among many other sources. Curious how it took roughly 11 minutes from initial submission to review all of the sources.
Please let me know anything specific we need to provide, update or change.
Thank you CBrookUM ( talk) 01:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Why my Draft has been rejected Akaayu ( talk) 07:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Can you help me Prince kumar 2.0 ( talk) 08:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I submitted an article for review but it was declined. I was trying to add about a company in the encyclopedia that is helping students in grooming them for preparation for MAANG companies. Please guide me how to write the article and also highlight in the article where I made mistake. Sanya Wadhwani ( talk) 08:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I have found many sources to put in my article, why is my article considered to lack reliable sources? Junurita ( talk) 09:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
hello sir
here is some more reference of this article
https://www.miragenews.com/research-inspires-journey-into-politics/ https://www.canterbury.ac.nz/news-and-events/news/research-inspires-journey-into-politics https://crs.org.nz/the-crs-board https://cginz.org/Event?Action=View&Event_id=842 https://www.shirleyroadcentral.nz/community-boards/ https://www.odt.co.nz/star-news/star-christchurch/results-linwood-central-heathcote-community-board-election-revealed https://www.ncwnz.org.nz/tags/ncwnzchch https://www.nzibt.ac.nz/profile/ https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/431088/failed-ousting-exposes-party-political-influence-in-local-government-chairperson https://www.peopleschoice.co.nz/christchurch-community-board-candidates https://multiculturaltimes.news/profiles/2019/9/22/sunita-gautam-candidate-for-linwood-central-heathcote-community-board-central-ward https://www.neighbourly.co.nz/public/christchurch/edgeware/message/61335528 https://policy.nz/2022/waipapa-papanui-innes-central-community-board-central-subdivision/candidates/sunita-gautam https://venuefinder.nz/wedding-profile/sunita-gautam-celebrant/73566 https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2024/05/PCBCC_20240509_AGN_9126_AT.HTM AngelynAsrisch ( talk) 09:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi everyone,
After my submission for this translated article was denied because it wasn't backed by enough reliable sources (it relied too much on the organization's references), I have been working on improving it. I have now gathered and incorporated information from reliable articles and documents from various sources around the web to rewrite the article.
I hope the revisions are now satisfactory. Could someone please review the article before I resubmit it for approval?
Thank you very much for your assistance.
All the best, ArtsSquareWiki ( talk) 12:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, this was my first attempt at a Wikipedia Page.
I mistakenly focused more on the notable works of the company rather than the company itself. I've since edited the page to include more about the company including an external reference to a piece about the company itself, rather than just the news articles about their notable pieces. I've added a comment in reply to the reviewer that I've addressed their issues. I've resubmitted for review.
My question is, does this now join the back of the queue and sit there, waiting another couple of months or more before it gets picked up by someone else to review?
If I've not done enough and need to edit it again, this could become a long process. Is there anyway to get feedback as to if I've done enough?
Thanks. CaptainTavish ( talk) 14:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, the draft rejected because the resources I have presented in the draft - I quote - "do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject".
To my humble understanding the official website of India' Prime Minister is quite a reliable for the article, isn't it? Also, the YouTube link present India' PM himself meet Hiroko Takayama.
An explanation what i am doing wrong or what additional resources are need to make this draft appropraite for publication will be much appreciated, thank you very much. Avi Gazit ( talk) 15:30, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello sir, why my article submission was declined, please post my article. Sushil Dobhal ( talk) 16:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I created this page to be informative about a social networking service. It is similar to other articles already on Wikipedia, however it was rejected due to notability. Can you give a more specific reason on why or how I can fix this to have the page published? Thanks Woodgrain1 ( talk) 19:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Recently I created my first wiki page which got declined first and since then I've implemented some recommended changes. I would value it a lot if you could please have a look into it and let me know if you see anything that would need more work and improvement so I can make sure the page gets published when it has a second review. This is the link to it: /info/en/?search=Draft:Mark_Kotter
Thank you in advance for your guidance and support, what a great community of people I'm learning a lot from all of you.
Best wishes, Damjana Damjana12 ( talk) 22:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, a little while back I submitted a page draft for this company (in full disclosure I do work here, I have taken every action I know of of disclosing this on my page and keeping the language of the page as neutral as possible).
The post got rejected due to a few reasons, including some language which I can see to be a bit promotional. I've got a question regarding frequency/type of references:
My post was taken down because not every single sentence came with a reference, including each bullet in a very long list. Another point was that there were non secondary sources, even though the article hit the minimum of 5 reputable secondary sources per Wikipedia's guidelines. What is the guideline behind these aspects? Here are two pages I'm also curious about:
Both of these pages have a few reliable sources based on the Wikipedia guidelines, but they also resort to using company information publicly available, as well as leaving out references when it becomes redunant (see the bulleted list on the Masterclass page). I based my page entirely off of Masterclasses page since we are in the same industry, but the points I was knocked down for seem to also be violated by MasterClass's and Spotify's page. I asked the individual who approved the rejection of my post but haven't heard back in a month.
If someone could clarify why these two companies are allowed to have their pages formatted the way they are and tonebase is not, that would be super helpful and save me from submitting another invalid draft to AoC. Tonebase is a very well established company with plenty of reputable media coverage in line with the Wikipedia policy, so I'm willing to be flexible to adhere to any rule set forth. Thank you! Aidantonebase ( talk) 23:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
HEY DEAR I WANT TO CLAIM MY SPOTIFY ARTIST PROFILE THATS WHY THEY ARE DEMANDING MY WIKIPEDIA I REALLY WANT TO PUBLISH THIS Thugpoetak ( talk) 00:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I received feedback about the article submitted for publication that it did not demonstrate enough solo works outside of her group NewJeans, and does not have enough individual notability. I then edited the article as per these recommendations by adding information about a campaign she did for the the South Korean National Elections Commission and information about her campaign with Chanel Beauty's N°1 de Chanel Red Camellia line. I was wondering if I have improved the article to better show individual notability? Additionally, I did my best to properly cite the sources, however I would appreciate someone checking that I did so correctly. AlexBW0524 ( talk) 03:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional because it provides general company information that is of public interest. The content has been revised to remove any promotional elements, including the phone number. This page aims to offer neutral and factual information about the company that may be useful to internet users. Helposys ( talk) 04:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I will added 6 reference for proof Mahroos Siddiquee Nadim is a notable person why not accept it . Please told me details I will recover my mistake. Sukhi vale ( talk) 07:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
The submission was declined for unreliable sources, however the main sources used throughout the article are a book from R. P. Hunnicutt's A History of American Armor, which are considered to be a highly reputable source on American armor, and are used throughout other Wikipedia articles on the subject, ( /info/en/?search=M48_Patton, /info/en/?search=M103_heavy_tank etc). The other main source used is various Jane's publications, which are also considered a highly reputable source for information on defense related topics, e.g. armored vehicles, and are also used in other Wikipedia articles on similar topics ( /info/en/?search=M1_Abrams, /info/en/?search=High_Survivability_Test_Vehicle_(Lightweight) etc). Due to this I am unsure why my submission was declined for the given reason, and any assistance would be appreciated. Huntere123 ( talk) 09:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
How i got approval this Biography ? 103.135.255.194 ( talk) 09:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
how do i add sources? is it like adding citations? Danny8384535 ( talk) 19:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Amirsohelkhan993 ( talk) 20:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Where is Mahroos Siddiquee Nadim Indian footballer article page ? Sukhi vale ( talk) 21:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
how do I add properly please help me Sukhi vale ( talk) 21:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
There is a detailed article on Gustav Maier (WriterI in the German Wikipedia:: Gustav Maier (Schriftsteller) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Maier_(Schriftsteller) Since Gustav Maier has been described in the first volume of the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein as an important benefactor and sponsor of the young Albert Einstein at Zurich, from 1895-1901 and in all biographies on Albert Einstein, I have submitted a shortened version of the German Wikipedia article on Gustav Maier (Schriftsteller) in English, hence, this is a well referenced and notorious personality who definitely deserves an aticle also in the English version of Wikipedia. Thank you very much for looking into this matter. Beamai2004 ( talk) 08:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
please let me know why my draft is not being accepted. how may I improve it
BasharatAli254 ( talk) 10:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, can someone briefly review this and see if it sounds promotional or not and if it is ready for submission. I'd also appreciate any advice for improvements. Thank you. ExoField ( talk) 10:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
How can i publish this article Mahendra Umesh Nayaka ( talk) 10:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
i wonder why my article has been deleted. I got accused of vandalism, however, this story is true. Just because it isn't in history books or anything doesn't mean that it never happened. John H Backflip was a relative of mine and this story has been going round in my family for ions. it really means a lot to me and my family if it would stay on wikipedia, because i would like to share this story with the world. There are a LOT of vandals on this site, and their pages sometimes stay up, but my page, that isn't meant to be funny got taken down. I would really appriciate it if you can take another look. UnknownHistoryFacts ( talk) 11:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I wrote an article about a Turkish entrepreneur. It was declined because of the lack of references at some parts of the article. I got my info about the person at a live event that her company hosted a few months ago. How can I add proof about the person's life in this situation. I would appreciate if you can help me with my first article. 185.252.40.36 ( talk) 11:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
How can we get this page posted? There seems to be enough reputable sources. A similar company to ours is on here: /info/en/?search=DocuWare 24.45.213.68 ( talk) 13:18, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
THIS PAGE IS ALWAYS REJECTED SO I MADE A MISTAKE I DONT KNOW HOW TO FIX THIS BAD PAGE ANYWAYS CAN U DELETE THIS PAGE INSTEAD Roblox678956568 ( talk) 13:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
To whom it may concern need to delete my drafts need thy assistance Your guidance is at my mercy truly yours The Summum Bonum ( talk) 13:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
{{
db-g7}}
. —
Jéské Couriano
v^_^v
threads
critiques
15:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
why my draft deleted Gautamparmaraone ( talk) 13:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Sirs. Please I need help to format the Accolades Table. I did som,ething wrong and now I don't know ho to fix the prolem that I caused. In particular some cells "Nominated" don't show correctly. Some cells "Won" are in the wrong column. It seems thare is an extra column at right, that I don't know how to delete. Thank you very much. Robert20654
Robert20654 ( talk) 15:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
We received feedback that the subject was not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The subject is one of the largest hedge funds in the world. We have sited multiple large news sources. What else are we missing? What can we add? Adamcat222 ( talk) 16:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Why was this declined Ricrickey ( talk) 19:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
hello what i should do to creat my own biography ? Abdelalinour ( talk) 21:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I created a page that is for an active duty army battalion. The page was not approved to be published and I don't understand why. Our higher headquarters at the Army level (3 echelons up), Division level (2 echelons up) and Brigade level (1 echelon up), both have approved pages. They are First Army, First Army Division East, and 157th Infantry Brigade respectively. Our battalion is even mentioned on the 157th Infantry Brigade as a subordinate battalion. The source that I provided is used to populate our entire page. The notification didn't mention what part of the page was not supported by an article.
Thanks for your help. 1-335 Warriors ( talk) 21:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey there. I understand why my draft was declined and I am not contesting that. While I will try to find more sources, are my non-independent sources, 2 and 3, completely out of the question or can I keep them? Yes, they do contain interviews but what I use the sources for isn't the information from the interviews (rather, I use what the authors themselves of the articles say about the company). Thank you! Win8x ( talk) 21:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Customer Support,
My submission was rejected without stating a reason, as I am sure that my submission does not violate Wikipedia's rules. Is there a possibility to get a reason for cancellation and work it through?
Best, Naruba. 91.105.102.125 ( talk) 22:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
The draft was last declined in 2022 and should be reviewed once again because now the actor has attained WP:N with his lead roles in Hero - Gayab Mode On, Ali Baba: Ek Andaaz Andekha. He had a prominent role in Amazon mini TV series Jab We Matched. Also, he is currently doing a lead role in the show. Pukaar - Dil Se Dil Tak. So kindly review the draft once again. 202.41.10.107 ( talk) 04:45, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello.
As I usually do so, I did a search in Wikipedia about a software component that has been trending within the software development community ( ==> HTMX )
However, I was surprised to find "no entry" related to such software component in the main "English" pages.
Even more surprised I was when I noticed that there is an entry about the HTMX software component in the Czech wikipedia pages.
Therefore, I decided to help the community and write the English version of the HTMX software component.
After registering in Wikipedia and after starting editing of the HTMX article, I was shown the current draft of the HTMX article with many "article submission declined" entries ( x4 ).
I am very familiar and experienced writing technical articles, and after reading the current draft article of "HTMX" I found it to be good enough for submission acceptance.
Nevertheless, I am a true beginner when it comes to editing Wikipedia articles. I noticed that the "submission declines" suggest to "ask for help" to get guidance into how to "fix" the article to have its submission accepted.
Can you provide guidance into what is wrong with the current draft so I can contribute to edit and fix it?
Thank you !!!
Mamorenor ( talk) 07:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I need help with three issues regarding the UFO 50 draft page. 1) Two of the references show as broken, even though I can see nothing wrong with them. In fact, some of the references appear as broken and then fix themselves when editing unrelated parts of the page or moving them around, which is quite puzzling. 2) Would the current draft be a reasonable submission for approval? 3) If someone with image upload permissions could upload the game's cover ( https://50games.fun/images/logo.jpg) as the article image, it would be very much appreciated. Thank you very much! Weltall Zero ( talk) 16:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, can someone Review this article Draft:Buchi Babu Sana please? BubbleWombleBee12 ( talk) 17:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Wikipedia Team,
I am reaching out in utter frustration regarding my article submission. Since the start of the year, I have been diligently re-drafting this article to meet all the requirements specified by your guidelines. It is outrageous that editor Johannes Maximilian has now reiterated the same feedback previously given by other editors, claiming the article lacks the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia and fails to adhere to a neutral point of view. I have meticulously revised the submission to eliminate any peacock terms and ensure it is written from a neutral perspective, as per your instructions.
Furthermore, the accusation that the submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources is simply untrue. I have invested countless hours referencing independent, reliable, published sources to verify every piece of information in the article. It is incredibly disheartening to have my efforts continuously dismissed by editors who seem to be trigger-happy in rejecting submissions without offering constructive feedback.
This process is beginning to feel discriminatory and marginalizing. Wikipedia is supposed to be an open, free space for sharing knowledge, yet I am encountering constant obstacles and encountering editors who appear to be mean-spirited and resentful, rejecting my efforts without due consideration.
This cannot continue indefinitely. I have poured significant time and effort into ensuring my submission meets Wikipedia's standards, and it is unacceptable for it to be continually undermined by dismissive editorial behavior. I urge you to review my submission again, taking into account the extensive work I have done to comply with your requirements.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Best regards,
Adefolarin Adefolarin1 ( talk) 19:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)