Main page | Talk page |
Submissions Category — List ( sorting) | Showcase |
Participants Apply — By subject |
Reviewing instructions | Help desk |
Backlog drives |
Ask a new question Please check back often for answers. |
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions |
---|
I am having a hard time trying to find sufficient sources for Duvalín despite its prevalence in Mexico. Help Love o3oz ( talk) 01:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
i have created the draft with all the necessary info regarding TMS before Kyokuichi however how long does it take to get approved? VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 ( talk) 05:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
"This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,112 pending submissions waiting for review."-- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 05:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
After drafting, I resubmitted it reflecting the feedback. But why isn't it still uploaded? What additional modifications should I make? Happypanda0720 ( talk) 06:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I have seen wikipedia with no quality content, citations and references. those pages are doing just fine. wikipedia moderators are taking bribes from companies to publish pages and demotivating genuine users to post their content if there is no bribe involved. This is the ground reality. Quillandinksociety ( talk) 06:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the comments. I think I did the necessary changes citing sources and removing external links. My sources are major international art magazines,major museum mages and international exhibitions pages. Are these considered reliable sources? If not what other sources do you propose for a contemporary Greek artist? Since Wikipedia does not list many contemporary Greek artists it would be helpful for me to know more and add more artists in the future. About the work section do you find the citations long? Would you prefer a shorter mention without putting quotes like "writer Stephanie Bailey" or "in an interview the artist has stated" etc? As for example in Wikipedia page for FYTA. Thank you in advance. 46.190.72.218 ( talk) 07:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
cause i need this information Jeo Ayapana ( talk) 08:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Correction in Title as "Indian Drugs" the current title is wrong (India Drugs) 106.201.241.199 ( talk) 12:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi
This article has been declined due to "Several sections are unsourced". Could you please point me toward which section needs more sources? Is it the filmography, books, paper..?
Thank you for you help Lionel888555 ( talk) 15:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Hi,
I recently submitted an article draft for Tobias Dray, which was declined due to concerns about the reliability of sources and notability criteria. The decline notice mentioned that my references did not adequately demonstrate significant coverage from reliable, independent sources.
I have reviewed similar articles, such as the one on Verzache, which seem to use a comparable range of sources and references. Could you please provide more detailed guidance on what specific aspects of my references or sources were insufficient?
Here is a brief overview of the references I used:
Anime News Network - Announced Tobias Dray's collaboration project. Flaunt Magazine - Premiered Tobias Dray's visual for "Twice". The FADER - Listed one of Tobias Dray's songs as one of the best rock songs. Nettwerk Music Group - Profiled Tobias Dray. Ones To Watch - Featured an article on Tobias Dray. EARMILK - Reviewed Tobias Dray’s song "FUK IT". Genius - Credits for Tobias Dray's work. HiphopKR - Covered Tobias Dray's EP. 360 Magazine - Reviewed Tobias Dray's work. The Guardian - Discussed the revival of drum and bass
I would greatly appreciate your assistance in identifying how I can improve my submission. Any detailed feedback or pointers on how to address the issues raised would be extremely helpful.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Paulanthonylevi ( talk) 16:31, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Bonjour. I would like to have this draft for a "speedy deletion". No better sources available for me than what I have already given. The text is now in my sandbox but it will probably take years before new sources will appear for me. Merci beaucoup. -- Edelmiro Lopez ( talk) 18:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
{{
db-g7}}
. —
Jéské Couriano
v^_^v
threads
critiques
18:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Hello. I'd like to know why this subject is not notable enough, like what is the criteria that Freshly Shopping did not pass. Also, why was this rejected even before the article was submitted for review? Cisaa11 ( talk) 19:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to create an article about Win-Doors INT LTD a business in south-east London however it keeps getting declined. I have all the information about it yet I still cannot publish it. M Hanan Asif ( talk) 22:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
This page is already existent in German Wikipedia. I have taken the liberty to spend the time verifiying the accuracy of the information present on the german version of the page. Then I tried to do a translation via the draft, but it got declined, since I was unable to provide an interlanguage link. If I try to translate an english page into german that works no problem but for some reason translating any non-eglish wikipedia pages into english is a pain. And please do not bring up the argument that it is unnecesary due to being about a german speaking nation, there are refugees and asylum seekers here who do NOT speak german and would probably also want to look up information about government ministries. RedMacryon ( talk) 10:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
given that the page already contains enough credible sourcing to be verified? '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk • contribs) 12:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello sir ,Is there something wrong with writing my article? If there is a mistake, please correct it. Then I will benefit. Rani147 ( talk) 12:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, very simple question, how do i make my draft better? He says that there are two sources with an unknown amount of reliability, I think both sources are pretty reliable, and i argued my reasons here ( /info/en/?search=User_talk:Natieboi#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_S%C3%BCleyman_Ulu%C3%A7ay_(June_28) ) but he as not responded. I also can't find any more sources on this guy, i don't know why im talking about this here as im not sure anyone can really help me with this. Thanks Natieboi ( talk) 14:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm requesting my article to be uploaded, because the person i wrote about it a Namibian artist and he is still in the Music industry, in Namibian music soon he will be one at the top. His Name Is Wessie Hastings . Simon Tuliameni ( talk) 14:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This draft was turned down for lack of citations. I'm not sure what in the article is not supported by a citation. The photo is substatiated by his obituary. The awards are supported by his photo. His published articles are cited to the journals which published them and a list hosted by Google Scholar. While there is more to add in terms of his career and academic path, I don't see anything lacking a citation in what's included at this point. Mrtony77 ( talk) 17:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I got a notification for citing reliable sources and im trying to figure out which sources cited in the references should be removed and how do I delete them? I tried editing the reference list but it won't let me remove any it only lets me add more. Need assistance with removing of references. Nenarodz ( talk) 17:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I have drafted a wiki article I believe is worthy of inclusion to Wikpedia. As Safari Scribe instructed, I have ensured that I have written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. I have also provided news coverage from mutiple soures including Arise News, the Punch Newspaper, This Day Newspaper etc. and I have covered the INGO's contribution to parliamentary reports and its acknowlegdement and interraction with various Civil servants, Diplomats and Government Officials in the UK & Nigeria. Please could you kindly explain to me why my article is still not Wikipeadia worthy? I would be extremely grateful for as much detail as you can give. Abiola adeola ( talk) 18:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
An article of mine was recently deleted. I just wanted to know if it would be possible for me to edit it and re-submit it? To edit it I will need to have it returned to my account, and I can try to remove whatever offending sections there were.
Thank you,
Shahidi
Shahidi Islam (
talk)
01:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
I need help to improve the article i'm submitting.
Currently I'm working on an article about a special coins in Sri Lanka. As I'm on the island, owe this collection of real coins in use. The reason is that I've been digging information on this subject for a long time now, as there is almost nothing online. Ish. I love collecting coins and would be really happy to shine the light on the subject, the thing is that my submission is declines as it's lucking some info and references. How can i make it work? Ie i would be happy to send a request to the central bank of sri lanka, if needed to prove the relevance of my words, or please tell me what would be helpful?
many thanks, Evgeniia Zorina ENZorina ( talk) 08:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Updated the article
added official networks and information
removed unnecessary web pages
Help me add to wikipedia I have all the official data in the registry of the United States, Texas. Arahi991 ( talk) 08:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
My submission was originally declined based on the lack of notability, the original article only had AnimeNewsNetwork as a source, I added 4 more after the initial decline (Natalie, PR Times, Oricon, Weekly Shonen Jump official site) which are the sources typically referenced for this type of article but still got declined, the reviewer incorrectly mentions I only added 1 more source. I should mention that the subject of my article already have a Japanese language page if that helps clear the confusion around the notability https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%87%91%E6%9C%AA%E6%9D%A5%E6%9D%AF Randomanon37 ( talk) 10:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I want to create a page but my page decline. Plz suggest me why my page decline Rajesh Kumar Noida ( talk) 11:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have written an article on a notable person living in Cyprus. She is an actress but also a politician. I got a response within about a couple of hours of submitting the article. I have gone through the guidelines. The reason left by the person assessing my contribution was this: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. My question is how could a person review it in such a short time when the references that I have links to this person are mostly in Greek and Turkish as she lives in Cyprus????
Maximos2017 ( talk) 14:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Why my submitting project cancelled by team Wikipedia ? please solve this problem and may notify me. Project URL -- https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft%3ASadik_Laskar&diff=1232958301&oldid=1232950817&variant=en Technology research ( talk) 15:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Suzane Reatig is one of the most prominent women architects in the eastern United States and she has already been mentioned in a Wikipedia article about one of her most well known buildings. I cannot understand why Wikipedia editors keep saying a biographical article about her is not appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. Is it because she's a woman? Because she is Jewish and was educated in Israel? I'm starting to get concerned about motives here. Please advise me on how to improve this article so that it can be posted in final. Tradelady2 ( talk) 16:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
"one of the most prominent women architects in the eastern United States"is not a notability criterion, nor is being mentioned in a Wikipedia article. The relevant notability guidelines are WP:ARCHITECT and WP:GNG, at least one of which must be satisfied, as evidenced by reliable sources. As this wasn't done, the draft was eventually rejected (over six months ago). If evidence is now available which wasn't considered at the time, you may appeal the rejection, by contacting the rejecting reviewer directly. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 16:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
"the latest posted draft"you mean as it currently stands following your 2 April edit, then please note that that edit was several months after the draft was rejected on 12 December, and it is quite likely that no one has even looked at the draft since the rejection, other than you of course (and now me). -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 17:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
, which doesn't require a page number parametre.The Article I've written for Wikipedia has been rejected becaues:This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. I don't quite know how to correct this. I've sited with links to newspapers, and websites, but...
I just don't know what is wanted. Heilige Nikolaus ( talk) 01:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Landslides are a fascinating subject and Wikipedia even has a long list of landslides, but it seems that if there's no English text available, the landslide in question is considered to not have happened, eg. ignored by scientists.
I just spent several hours to translate
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordskredet_vid_Stenungsundsmotet
into
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Landslide_at_Stenungsund_junction&action=history
and I added 15 references, but sure enough, in stead of helping me to turn my draft into something worth publishing, somebody is trying to put my work on fire.
Who can please help to get this translation job finished? Help is not we destroy your work, so you can start all over again or Bring a lawyer to defend your attempt at helping Wikipedia I give up here 82.173.160.29 ( talk) 01:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, i understand that a made some mistakes in creating draft, and now i don't have a permission to fix it, how can i correct page? Boris Fevraly ( talk) 02:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I was told that submissions take months to review. This one was reviewed within hours. I suspect deliberate attempts to sabotage the entry. It was rejected claiming a lack of reliable sources. The sources are all completely reliable, mostly peer-reviwed articles and patent applications. Furthermore there is an interview on youtube from a respectable podcast series. Of course more sources will accumulate over time, but this is a first entry and the person in question is a respected scientist with numerous publications, with affiliations at Stanford and Berkeley, plus she is important as the co-founder and president on a non-profit research organisation. The non-profit has many other respected scientists as board members, it has 100s of followers on social media, it has given out stipends to scholars in the past, etc. - There is no reason to reject the entry as such, unless it is a witch hunt by envious competitors. If individual facts are not well enough documented, they can be deleted, or there could be a top entry about fixing this. Please address this problem, it seems to be a classic wikipedia attempt at sabotage. 79.199.170.144 ( talk) 05:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
They asked me to add more reliable sources. I added World Health Organization page https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/259085/9789290618188-eng.pdf?sequence=1, and Japanese Government website https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=345AC1000000019_20220617_504AC0000000068 I don't know what to do anymore. Please help. The English is my second language. Judo Therapist ( talk) 06:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I recently attempted to create an article on the 'Impact of Technology on Modern Travel Agencies,' which unfortunately got rejected. Could you please provide me with advice on improving my writing style and any general suggestions for creating better articles in the future? I'm particularly interested in understanding how to better source information, maintain neutrality, and format articles correctly. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Theuserwhowrites ( talk) 09:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to submit more references for the subject and also make the article more notable as i have more notable references. Clare Nassanga ( talk) 09:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
"Should i restart the whole process again since it has been rejected.", which I interpreted (possibly incorrectly) as the intention to duplicate the contents of the rejected draft and submit it as 'new', to which I said no. Now the advice from @ Timtrent is to start a new draft with entirely new content. I believe both pieces of advice are correct, and not contradictory. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 09:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Wikipedians, please recheck the draft Werner_Stiehler it was translated from German Wikipedia. Although it was thoroughly reviewed and approved on the German site. 𝒮- 𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, not sure what else I need to do to get this article on mainspace? I think this person is a notable and important British journalist and author. I could add more detail to the draft but I think these sentences are enough to showcase his qualifications Oneequalsequalsone ( talk · contribs) 11:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I wash about to upload my picture Taivur Islam ( talk) 12:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
publish that page cuh 2A00:A040:1A3:CE9A:F9C4:129D:39C4:479D ( talk) 13:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am trying to submit an article for creation about a disabled woman artist. User SafariScribe has rejected the article three times in less than a month with inaccurate reasons. The reasoning given is that the subject does not have reliable sources, however the subject's art is cited by multiple independent, non-interview, secondary, reliable sources. This repeated rejection without adequate explanation is beginning to feel like harassment. Is there anything I can do? Thank you for any explanation you can offer. Kapyidu ( talk) 16:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your help and discussion. This does not seem correct to me.
WP:BASIC states “People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." No where does it say “non-interviews” but even by that standard and by Timtrent’s reading, she has significant coverage in three (multiple) secondary sources in major newspapers and comics publications. She therefore passes WP:BASIC and qualifies as notable. No further qualifier is needed.
However, additionally, she is also an graphic narrative creator. Subject is notable for writing the only existing graphic memoir about an extremely rare disease, which follows the idea and spirit of WP:CREATIVE #2 “The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique." Furthermore, Subject also passes #4.c “won significant critical attention” as provable by the many reviews including from Publisher’s Weekly. Graphic Narrative is not Hollywood, significant does not mean an Oscar. Therefore in addition to qualifying by the standards of WP:BASIC, subject also passes WP:CREATIVE twice in her field as a Graphic Narrative Author. Subject is notable and warrants a page.
I will also simply note that Wikipedia has documentable bias against approving articles of women, as for example noted here: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14791420.2017.1386321?journalCode=rccc20 Kapyidu ( talk) 03:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
It has been declined a number of times perhaps you could list the three sources here that give significant coverage? You are of course free to move it yourself to main space where it would be at risk of WP:AFD. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
It is interesting that this comment says “your” poorly sourced article as opposed to “a” poorly sourced article, which suggests a personal attack.
The mention of bias is relevant because the article was rejected three times without explanation and without response to questions by the same user. This user has also just rejected that article without ability to be re-submitted while we are in the middle of a discussion.
Wikipedia is intended to be objective, and endearing shouldn’t be necessary to get an article approved.
User TimTrent stated that three resources qualified.
If the article cannot be approved, then it cannot be approved. But this does not seem right to me by the stated qualifications of Wikipedia, and I find it concerning that questions are provoking what seems to be attacks and retribution.
Kapyidu ( talk) 11:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)There was no comment left after declining. I need more insight on how the page article can be improve. I saw a lot of reference but i need to know clearly does the 8 reference provided doesn’t meet the WP:GNG. Gabriel (talk to me ) 17:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
My article has been rejected twice. I have several unique references attached to the article and removed anything from Facebook, etc. What is the issue with article publication? 69.7.65.195 ( talk) 18:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
I have cited all the authentic references just like the Persian vesion of the article. Unfortunately, the article is still being declined. I no not know what the issue is now. I would appreciate it if you helped me.
Kind Regards, Mohsenmarjmand ( talk) 04:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I have provided a lot of reliable sources, in fact, a few of them are government portals that authenticate the information provided by for the page creation of Gyan C Jain. He is a Padma Shree awardee and that should be more than enough to validate his presence in addition to that I have shared a lot more information from reliable sources, still the page is getting rejected for vague reasons. Could you please check again and help me with the same? Gracewith ( talk) 05:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I want to know but how? What kind of issues do I have? Tjiundje ( talk) 08:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
My article keeps getting rejected and I have put a lot of effort into researching and related all reference list and revised it multiple times, making sure it meets the 4 criteria for the sources. The last reviewer rejected my article and asked me to remove references that are not "reliable" without specifying which references are those. I have written and asked for a review and clarification yet no response for 2 weeks. Can someone assist me to improve this draft? Allewikiwriter ( talk) 09:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I am wondering why this page keeps getting declined, and how much more information needs to be added. Greenonion10 ( talk) 12:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
The reason I received for the article being rejected is that it is not supported by reliable sources.
I understand that some of the pictures were not sourced properly, however I believe that the sources I used for the article itself are reliable, as they are mainly articles from foundations (Yad Vashem and Shoah Foundation) and from an University (The University of Texas at Dallas).
Is there any area that I need to change specifically? Is2024 ( talk) 14:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I am not sure how the links provided are not acceptable. They are a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Can you please elaborate further. ArborChamp ( talk) 14:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello Sir I Created draft on Army Law College but it was not accepted for article creation because of some reason. So can you please suggest were to edit I am little bit confused. Akaayu ( talk) 15:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
After a great deal of constructive dialog and corresponding revision, the editor with whom I have been corresponding appears to be busy elsewhere. in Sirdog's last note he continued to dispute the notability of the subject. I responded substantively, no response. I need a third party opinion as to the notability and clearance to move this into mainspace (which I prefer not to do unilaterally). Our dialog is at /info/en/?search=User_talk:Sylvan1971#c-Sirdog-20240531033300-Sirdog's_reply
Thank you. Sylvan1971 ( talk) 18:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't really understand what the things I need to do are for this page? Can I have some more in depth help with the step by step? SageOst2024 ( talk) 19:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Can you please point out which specific claims need referencing? PaintPress ( talk) 19:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
what is double grazing Mukhtar Abbas Bhatti ( talk) 20:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I just submitted my first draft, which was declined by the Articles for Creation, and was told that it sounded more like an advertisement. Are there any words I should look out for when editing to prevent this tone from coming across? Are there some strategies I can use when editing to make sure my draft sounds more neutral? Wyneep ( talk) 20:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
How Can I Provide Verified information about my profile Mukhtar Abbas Bhatti ( talk) 20:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to check on my submission to see if there are any issues with the draft. It got declined in March so I edited it based on the notes I received. I received a message on LinkedIn today saying that I should tell this person if everything looks good to be published. I responded that it looks good and they responded asking for my WhatsApp number. Is this a scam or real? It was outside of Wikipedia but they linked to the draft of the page. Km302427 ( talk) 23:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
My submission was declined on 7 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk), because "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". Can you please be more specific as to which sources you consider to be "unreliable", or which facts you feel are not adequately supported? There are countless reliable sources and references given, as well as a listing of 41 published works in print. My submission is: /info/en/?search=Draft:Marc_Tedeschi . Thank you. Ndmmeyhhsn ( talk) 00:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please review this page, I've been waiting a while for it to get approved. Rincemermaid ( talk) 00:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
To verify if the draft is complete. Thank you. SLMSLMJS ( talk) 00:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I created the Victra page, but it's frequently rejected. I've maintained all Wikipedia terms, but it's still being rejected. May I know the reasons? Cathriewe1 ( talk) 03:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please review this article 2404:3100:140D:FBD2:ACE5:F6FF:FE71:9EDF ( talk) 05:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am writing here seeking some assistance in understanding the reason for rejection of the submitted draft. The article I am trying to submit is for a well known malayalam film director - Ullas Chemban. I have included all the available legitimate references about him in the draft. And the references has more elaborate details about him and his work. So not sure what specifically needs to be added for the draft to be published. It would be much appreciated if you can give me a more specific feedback on what else is missing with regards to significant coverage. Thank you very much! Appreciate your help !!! Tincee Hema ( talk) 06:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Why was it rejected?!?!?!? Non so che nome scegliere ( talk) 10:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
My article got rejected but it wasn't offensive nor it was a hoax or such stuff Paolo Maldini è il miglior difensore della storia del calcio ( talk) 10:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Team,
I'm reaching out on behalf of Metrix Pakistan, a notable organization in Pakistan focused on youth empowerment, education, and community development. Recently, an article about Metrix Pakistan was created on Wikipedia, but it was promptly rejected due to concerns about notability and reliability of sources. We at Metrix Pakistan are surprised and concerned by this decision, as our organization has a significant impact in Pakistan and has collaborated with government entities, educational institutions, and international organizations. Our work has been recognized and reported by reputable media outlets and sources. We kindly request a reassessment of the article, as we believe it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. We would appreciate it if an experienced editor could review the article and provide guidance on how to improve it to meet Wikipedia's standards. We look forward to your response and assistance in showcasing Metrix Pakistan's contributions to the global community.
Best regards,
Metrix Pakistan
Metrixpk ( talk) 12:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I have been working on the draft Henrik von Scheel for while. It´s the second time. I used allot of time to build the verifiable links, and to improve the text. I am new and I am fell I am stuck. I would appreciate some help to learn from the some of the senior guards. RichardMeier33 ( talk) 13:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I see that my draft article has been refused and I am somewhat confused. I have been told that Charles Schneider doesn't meet the notability and reliable sources criteria, but I have included a plethora of links and sources to his works and publications which provide proof of his extensive output. I am in need of guidance about what I can do to improve this article so it can meet the standards referenced. I have some additional newspaper articles and podcast interviews--will these help meet the standard? Are actual book publications not suitable in themselves, but one needs to have actual reviews of the books written in order to indicate that they were published? Specifically, how many additional citations would be needed for this draft article to be accepted? Thank you for your assistance. Amphoracat ( talk) 18:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
It's a REAL country. Please bring back this article. Artem 2013 123 ( talk) 22:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
he is cool 2601:18E:D000:4DD0:54FA:196:EC4D:E57D ( talk) 23:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please what do I do? Frankincense Diala ( talk) 00:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Why was it declined? There was enough citation to prove it's notable. So now what should I do? Frankincense Diala ( talk) 00:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano, I blocked the user: too many COI/UPE suspicions here, and too much IDIDNOTHEARTHAT. Drmies ( talk) 00:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Can someone please let me know any specific items that led to this article being declined? Anything specific we can address? The reason I see it was declined is fairly general - lack of credible sources.
However, we have listed links to Washington's diary where he specifically mentions staying at the house multiple times, a letter he wrote to a friend stating his visit there, the NPS, a few Historical Societies, VF Park, a person with the PA Historical Society that did her Penn State thesis on the house, ArbNet, the official designator of Arboretums, Independence National Historical Park among many other sources. Curious how it took roughly 11 minutes from initial submission to review all of the sources.
Please let me know anything specific we need to provide, update or change.
Thank you CBrookUM ( talk) 01:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Why my Draft has been rejected Akaayu ( talk) 07:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Can you help me Prince kumar 2.0 ( talk) 08:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I submitted an article for review but it was declined. I was trying to add about a company in the encyclopedia that is helping students in grooming them for preparation for MAANG companies. Please guide me how to write the article and also highlight in the article where I made mistake. Sanya Wadhwani ( talk) 08:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I have found many sources to put in my article, why is my article considered to lack reliable sources? Junurita ( talk) 09:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Main page | Talk page |
Submissions Category — List ( sorting) | Showcase |
Participants Apply — By subject |
Reviewing instructions | Help desk |
Backlog drives |
Ask a new question Please check back often for answers. |
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions |
---|
I am having a hard time trying to find sufficient sources for Duvalín despite its prevalence in Mexico. Help Love o3oz ( talk) 01:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
i have created the draft with all the necessary info regarding TMS before Kyokuichi however how long does it take to get approved? VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 ( talk) 05:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
"This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,112 pending submissions waiting for review."-- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 05:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
After drafting, I resubmitted it reflecting the feedback. But why isn't it still uploaded? What additional modifications should I make? Happypanda0720 ( talk) 06:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I have seen wikipedia with no quality content, citations and references. those pages are doing just fine. wikipedia moderators are taking bribes from companies to publish pages and demotivating genuine users to post their content if there is no bribe involved. This is the ground reality. Quillandinksociety ( talk) 06:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the comments. I think I did the necessary changes citing sources and removing external links. My sources are major international art magazines,major museum mages and international exhibitions pages. Are these considered reliable sources? If not what other sources do you propose for a contemporary Greek artist? Since Wikipedia does not list many contemporary Greek artists it would be helpful for me to know more and add more artists in the future. About the work section do you find the citations long? Would you prefer a shorter mention without putting quotes like "writer Stephanie Bailey" or "in an interview the artist has stated" etc? As for example in Wikipedia page for FYTA. Thank you in advance. 46.190.72.218 ( talk) 07:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
cause i need this information Jeo Ayapana ( talk) 08:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Correction in Title as "Indian Drugs" the current title is wrong (India Drugs) 106.201.241.199 ( talk) 12:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi
This article has been declined due to "Several sections are unsourced". Could you please point me toward which section needs more sources? Is it the filmography, books, paper..?
Thank you for you help Lionel888555 ( talk) 15:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Hi,
I recently submitted an article draft for Tobias Dray, which was declined due to concerns about the reliability of sources and notability criteria. The decline notice mentioned that my references did not adequately demonstrate significant coverage from reliable, independent sources.
I have reviewed similar articles, such as the one on Verzache, which seem to use a comparable range of sources and references. Could you please provide more detailed guidance on what specific aspects of my references or sources were insufficient?
Here is a brief overview of the references I used:
Anime News Network - Announced Tobias Dray's collaboration project. Flaunt Magazine - Premiered Tobias Dray's visual for "Twice". The FADER - Listed one of Tobias Dray's songs as one of the best rock songs. Nettwerk Music Group - Profiled Tobias Dray. Ones To Watch - Featured an article on Tobias Dray. EARMILK - Reviewed Tobias Dray’s song "FUK IT". Genius - Credits for Tobias Dray's work. HiphopKR - Covered Tobias Dray's EP. 360 Magazine - Reviewed Tobias Dray's work. The Guardian - Discussed the revival of drum and bass
I would greatly appreciate your assistance in identifying how I can improve my submission. Any detailed feedback or pointers on how to address the issues raised would be extremely helpful.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Paulanthonylevi ( talk) 16:31, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Bonjour. I would like to have this draft for a "speedy deletion". No better sources available for me than what I have already given. The text is now in my sandbox but it will probably take years before new sources will appear for me. Merci beaucoup. -- Edelmiro Lopez ( talk) 18:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
{{
db-g7}}
. —
Jéské Couriano
v^_^v
threads
critiques
18:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Hello. I'd like to know why this subject is not notable enough, like what is the criteria that Freshly Shopping did not pass. Also, why was this rejected even before the article was submitted for review? Cisaa11 ( talk) 19:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to create an article about Win-Doors INT LTD a business in south-east London however it keeps getting declined. I have all the information about it yet I still cannot publish it. M Hanan Asif ( talk) 22:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
This page is already existent in German Wikipedia. I have taken the liberty to spend the time verifiying the accuracy of the information present on the german version of the page. Then I tried to do a translation via the draft, but it got declined, since I was unable to provide an interlanguage link. If I try to translate an english page into german that works no problem but for some reason translating any non-eglish wikipedia pages into english is a pain. And please do not bring up the argument that it is unnecesary due to being about a german speaking nation, there are refugees and asylum seekers here who do NOT speak german and would probably also want to look up information about government ministries. RedMacryon ( talk) 10:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
given that the page already contains enough credible sourcing to be verified? '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk • contribs) 12:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello sir ,Is there something wrong with writing my article? If there is a mistake, please correct it. Then I will benefit. Rani147 ( talk) 12:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, very simple question, how do i make my draft better? He says that there are two sources with an unknown amount of reliability, I think both sources are pretty reliable, and i argued my reasons here ( /info/en/?search=User_talk:Natieboi#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_S%C3%BCleyman_Ulu%C3%A7ay_(June_28) ) but he as not responded. I also can't find any more sources on this guy, i don't know why im talking about this here as im not sure anyone can really help me with this. Thanks Natieboi ( talk) 14:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm requesting my article to be uploaded, because the person i wrote about it a Namibian artist and he is still in the Music industry, in Namibian music soon he will be one at the top. His Name Is Wessie Hastings . Simon Tuliameni ( talk) 14:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This draft was turned down for lack of citations. I'm not sure what in the article is not supported by a citation. The photo is substatiated by his obituary. The awards are supported by his photo. His published articles are cited to the journals which published them and a list hosted by Google Scholar. While there is more to add in terms of his career and academic path, I don't see anything lacking a citation in what's included at this point. Mrtony77 ( talk) 17:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I got a notification for citing reliable sources and im trying to figure out which sources cited in the references should be removed and how do I delete them? I tried editing the reference list but it won't let me remove any it only lets me add more. Need assistance with removing of references. Nenarodz ( talk) 17:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I have drafted a wiki article I believe is worthy of inclusion to Wikpedia. As Safari Scribe instructed, I have ensured that I have written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. I have also provided news coverage from mutiple soures including Arise News, the Punch Newspaper, This Day Newspaper etc. and I have covered the INGO's contribution to parliamentary reports and its acknowlegdement and interraction with various Civil servants, Diplomats and Government Officials in the UK & Nigeria. Please could you kindly explain to me why my article is still not Wikipeadia worthy? I would be extremely grateful for as much detail as you can give. Abiola adeola ( talk) 18:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
An article of mine was recently deleted. I just wanted to know if it would be possible for me to edit it and re-submit it? To edit it I will need to have it returned to my account, and I can try to remove whatever offending sections there were.
Thank you,
Shahidi
Shahidi Islam (
talk)
01:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
I need help to improve the article i'm submitting.
Currently I'm working on an article about a special coins in Sri Lanka. As I'm on the island, owe this collection of real coins in use. The reason is that I've been digging information on this subject for a long time now, as there is almost nothing online. Ish. I love collecting coins and would be really happy to shine the light on the subject, the thing is that my submission is declines as it's lucking some info and references. How can i make it work? Ie i would be happy to send a request to the central bank of sri lanka, if needed to prove the relevance of my words, or please tell me what would be helpful?
many thanks, Evgeniia Zorina ENZorina ( talk) 08:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Updated the article
added official networks and information
removed unnecessary web pages
Help me add to wikipedia I have all the official data in the registry of the United States, Texas. Arahi991 ( talk) 08:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
My submission was originally declined based on the lack of notability, the original article only had AnimeNewsNetwork as a source, I added 4 more after the initial decline (Natalie, PR Times, Oricon, Weekly Shonen Jump official site) which are the sources typically referenced for this type of article but still got declined, the reviewer incorrectly mentions I only added 1 more source. I should mention that the subject of my article already have a Japanese language page if that helps clear the confusion around the notability https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%87%91%E6%9C%AA%E6%9D%A5%E6%9D%AF Randomanon37 ( talk) 10:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I want to create a page but my page decline. Plz suggest me why my page decline Rajesh Kumar Noida ( talk) 11:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have written an article on a notable person living in Cyprus. She is an actress but also a politician. I got a response within about a couple of hours of submitting the article. I have gone through the guidelines. The reason left by the person assessing my contribution was this: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. My question is how could a person review it in such a short time when the references that I have links to this person are mostly in Greek and Turkish as she lives in Cyprus????
Maximos2017 ( talk) 14:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Why my submitting project cancelled by team Wikipedia ? please solve this problem and may notify me. Project URL -- https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft%3ASadik_Laskar&diff=1232958301&oldid=1232950817&variant=en Technology research ( talk) 15:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Suzane Reatig is one of the most prominent women architects in the eastern United States and she has already been mentioned in a Wikipedia article about one of her most well known buildings. I cannot understand why Wikipedia editors keep saying a biographical article about her is not appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. Is it because she's a woman? Because she is Jewish and was educated in Israel? I'm starting to get concerned about motives here. Please advise me on how to improve this article so that it can be posted in final. Tradelady2 ( talk) 16:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
"one of the most prominent women architects in the eastern United States"is not a notability criterion, nor is being mentioned in a Wikipedia article. The relevant notability guidelines are WP:ARCHITECT and WP:GNG, at least one of which must be satisfied, as evidenced by reliable sources. As this wasn't done, the draft was eventually rejected (over six months ago). If evidence is now available which wasn't considered at the time, you may appeal the rejection, by contacting the rejecting reviewer directly. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 16:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
"the latest posted draft"you mean as it currently stands following your 2 April edit, then please note that that edit was several months after the draft was rejected on 12 December, and it is quite likely that no one has even looked at the draft since the rejection, other than you of course (and now me). -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 17:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
, which doesn't require a page number parametre.The Article I've written for Wikipedia has been rejected becaues:This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. I don't quite know how to correct this. I've sited with links to newspapers, and websites, but...
I just don't know what is wanted. Heilige Nikolaus ( talk) 01:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Landslides are a fascinating subject and Wikipedia even has a long list of landslides, but it seems that if there's no English text available, the landslide in question is considered to not have happened, eg. ignored by scientists.
I just spent several hours to translate
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordskredet_vid_Stenungsundsmotet
into
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Landslide_at_Stenungsund_junction&action=history
and I added 15 references, but sure enough, in stead of helping me to turn my draft into something worth publishing, somebody is trying to put my work on fire.
Who can please help to get this translation job finished? Help is not we destroy your work, so you can start all over again or Bring a lawyer to defend your attempt at helping Wikipedia I give up here 82.173.160.29 ( talk) 01:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, i understand that a made some mistakes in creating draft, and now i don't have a permission to fix it, how can i correct page? Boris Fevraly ( talk) 02:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I was told that submissions take months to review. This one was reviewed within hours. I suspect deliberate attempts to sabotage the entry. It was rejected claiming a lack of reliable sources. The sources are all completely reliable, mostly peer-reviwed articles and patent applications. Furthermore there is an interview on youtube from a respectable podcast series. Of course more sources will accumulate over time, but this is a first entry and the person in question is a respected scientist with numerous publications, with affiliations at Stanford and Berkeley, plus she is important as the co-founder and president on a non-profit research organisation. The non-profit has many other respected scientists as board members, it has 100s of followers on social media, it has given out stipends to scholars in the past, etc. - There is no reason to reject the entry as such, unless it is a witch hunt by envious competitors. If individual facts are not well enough documented, they can be deleted, or there could be a top entry about fixing this. Please address this problem, it seems to be a classic wikipedia attempt at sabotage. 79.199.170.144 ( talk) 05:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
They asked me to add more reliable sources. I added World Health Organization page https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/259085/9789290618188-eng.pdf?sequence=1, and Japanese Government website https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=345AC1000000019_20220617_504AC0000000068 I don't know what to do anymore. Please help. The English is my second language. Judo Therapist ( talk) 06:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I recently attempted to create an article on the 'Impact of Technology on Modern Travel Agencies,' which unfortunately got rejected. Could you please provide me with advice on improving my writing style and any general suggestions for creating better articles in the future? I'm particularly interested in understanding how to better source information, maintain neutrality, and format articles correctly. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Theuserwhowrites ( talk) 09:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to submit more references for the subject and also make the article more notable as i have more notable references. Clare Nassanga ( talk) 09:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
"Should i restart the whole process again since it has been rejected.", which I interpreted (possibly incorrectly) as the intention to duplicate the contents of the rejected draft and submit it as 'new', to which I said no. Now the advice from @ Timtrent is to start a new draft with entirely new content. I believe both pieces of advice are correct, and not contradictory. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 09:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Wikipedians, please recheck the draft Werner_Stiehler it was translated from German Wikipedia. Although it was thoroughly reviewed and approved on the German site. 𝒮- 𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, not sure what else I need to do to get this article on mainspace? I think this person is a notable and important British journalist and author. I could add more detail to the draft but I think these sentences are enough to showcase his qualifications Oneequalsequalsone ( talk · contribs) 11:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I wash about to upload my picture Taivur Islam ( talk) 12:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
publish that page cuh 2A00:A040:1A3:CE9A:F9C4:129D:39C4:479D ( talk) 13:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am trying to submit an article for creation about a disabled woman artist. User SafariScribe has rejected the article three times in less than a month with inaccurate reasons. The reasoning given is that the subject does not have reliable sources, however the subject's art is cited by multiple independent, non-interview, secondary, reliable sources. This repeated rejection without adequate explanation is beginning to feel like harassment. Is there anything I can do? Thank you for any explanation you can offer. Kapyidu ( talk) 16:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your help and discussion. This does not seem correct to me.
WP:BASIC states “People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." No where does it say “non-interviews” but even by that standard and by Timtrent’s reading, she has significant coverage in three (multiple) secondary sources in major newspapers and comics publications. She therefore passes WP:BASIC and qualifies as notable. No further qualifier is needed.
However, additionally, she is also an graphic narrative creator. Subject is notable for writing the only existing graphic memoir about an extremely rare disease, which follows the idea and spirit of WP:CREATIVE #2 “The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique." Furthermore, Subject also passes #4.c “won significant critical attention” as provable by the many reviews including from Publisher’s Weekly. Graphic Narrative is not Hollywood, significant does not mean an Oscar. Therefore in addition to qualifying by the standards of WP:BASIC, subject also passes WP:CREATIVE twice in her field as a Graphic Narrative Author. Subject is notable and warrants a page.
I will also simply note that Wikipedia has documentable bias against approving articles of women, as for example noted here: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14791420.2017.1386321?journalCode=rccc20 Kapyidu ( talk) 03:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
It has been declined a number of times perhaps you could list the three sources here that give significant coverage? You are of course free to move it yourself to main space where it would be at risk of WP:AFD. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
It is interesting that this comment says “your” poorly sourced article as opposed to “a” poorly sourced article, which suggests a personal attack.
The mention of bias is relevant because the article was rejected three times without explanation and without response to questions by the same user. This user has also just rejected that article without ability to be re-submitted while we are in the middle of a discussion.
Wikipedia is intended to be objective, and endearing shouldn’t be necessary to get an article approved.
User TimTrent stated that three resources qualified.
If the article cannot be approved, then it cannot be approved. But this does not seem right to me by the stated qualifications of Wikipedia, and I find it concerning that questions are provoking what seems to be attacks and retribution.
Kapyidu ( talk) 11:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)There was no comment left after declining. I need more insight on how the page article can be improve. I saw a lot of reference but i need to know clearly does the 8 reference provided doesn’t meet the WP:GNG. Gabriel (talk to me ) 17:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
My article has been rejected twice. I have several unique references attached to the article and removed anything from Facebook, etc. What is the issue with article publication? 69.7.65.195 ( talk) 18:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
I have cited all the authentic references just like the Persian vesion of the article. Unfortunately, the article is still being declined. I no not know what the issue is now. I would appreciate it if you helped me.
Kind Regards, Mohsenmarjmand ( talk) 04:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I have provided a lot of reliable sources, in fact, a few of them are government portals that authenticate the information provided by for the page creation of Gyan C Jain. He is a Padma Shree awardee and that should be more than enough to validate his presence in addition to that I have shared a lot more information from reliable sources, still the page is getting rejected for vague reasons. Could you please check again and help me with the same? Gracewith ( talk) 05:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I want to know but how? What kind of issues do I have? Tjiundje ( talk) 08:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
My article keeps getting rejected and I have put a lot of effort into researching and related all reference list and revised it multiple times, making sure it meets the 4 criteria for the sources. The last reviewer rejected my article and asked me to remove references that are not "reliable" without specifying which references are those. I have written and asked for a review and clarification yet no response for 2 weeks. Can someone assist me to improve this draft? Allewikiwriter ( talk) 09:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I am wondering why this page keeps getting declined, and how much more information needs to be added. Greenonion10 ( talk) 12:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
The reason I received for the article being rejected is that it is not supported by reliable sources.
I understand that some of the pictures were not sourced properly, however I believe that the sources I used for the article itself are reliable, as they are mainly articles from foundations (Yad Vashem and Shoah Foundation) and from an University (The University of Texas at Dallas).
Is there any area that I need to change specifically? Is2024 ( talk) 14:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I am not sure how the links provided are not acceptable. They are a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Can you please elaborate further. ArborChamp ( talk) 14:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello Sir I Created draft on Army Law College but it was not accepted for article creation because of some reason. So can you please suggest were to edit I am little bit confused. Akaayu ( talk) 15:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
After a great deal of constructive dialog and corresponding revision, the editor with whom I have been corresponding appears to be busy elsewhere. in Sirdog's last note he continued to dispute the notability of the subject. I responded substantively, no response. I need a third party opinion as to the notability and clearance to move this into mainspace (which I prefer not to do unilaterally). Our dialog is at /info/en/?search=User_talk:Sylvan1971#c-Sirdog-20240531033300-Sirdog's_reply
Thank you. Sylvan1971 ( talk) 18:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't really understand what the things I need to do are for this page? Can I have some more in depth help with the step by step? SageOst2024 ( talk) 19:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Can you please point out which specific claims need referencing? PaintPress ( talk) 19:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
what is double grazing Mukhtar Abbas Bhatti ( talk) 20:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I just submitted my first draft, which was declined by the Articles for Creation, and was told that it sounded more like an advertisement. Are there any words I should look out for when editing to prevent this tone from coming across? Are there some strategies I can use when editing to make sure my draft sounds more neutral? Wyneep ( talk) 20:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
How Can I Provide Verified information about my profile Mukhtar Abbas Bhatti ( talk) 20:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to check on my submission to see if there are any issues with the draft. It got declined in March so I edited it based on the notes I received. I received a message on LinkedIn today saying that I should tell this person if everything looks good to be published. I responded that it looks good and they responded asking for my WhatsApp number. Is this a scam or real? It was outside of Wikipedia but they linked to the draft of the page. Km302427 ( talk) 23:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
My submission was declined on 7 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk), because "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". Can you please be more specific as to which sources you consider to be "unreliable", or which facts you feel are not adequately supported? There are countless reliable sources and references given, as well as a listing of 41 published works in print. My submission is: /info/en/?search=Draft:Marc_Tedeschi . Thank you. Ndmmeyhhsn ( talk) 00:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please review this page, I've been waiting a while for it to get approved. Rincemermaid ( talk) 00:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
To verify if the draft is complete. Thank you. SLMSLMJS ( talk) 00:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I created the Victra page, but it's frequently rejected. I've maintained all Wikipedia terms, but it's still being rejected. May I know the reasons? Cathriewe1 ( talk) 03:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please review this article 2404:3100:140D:FBD2:ACE5:F6FF:FE71:9EDF ( talk) 05:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am writing here seeking some assistance in understanding the reason for rejection of the submitted draft. The article I am trying to submit is for a well known malayalam film director - Ullas Chemban. I have included all the available legitimate references about him in the draft. And the references has more elaborate details about him and his work. So not sure what specifically needs to be added for the draft to be published. It would be much appreciated if you can give me a more specific feedback on what else is missing with regards to significant coverage. Thank you very much! Appreciate your help !!! Tincee Hema ( talk) 06:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Why was it rejected?!?!?!? Non so che nome scegliere ( talk) 10:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
My article got rejected but it wasn't offensive nor it was a hoax or such stuff Paolo Maldini è il miglior difensore della storia del calcio ( talk) 10:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Team,
I'm reaching out on behalf of Metrix Pakistan, a notable organization in Pakistan focused on youth empowerment, education, and community development. Recently, an article about Metrix Pakistan was created on Wikipedia, but it was promptly rejected due to concerns about notability and reliability of sources. We at Metrix Pakistan are surprised and concerned by this decision, as our organization has a significant impact in Pakistan and has collaborated with government entities, educational institutions, and international organizations. Our work has been recognized and reported by reputable media outlets and sources. We kindly request a reassessment of the article, as we believe it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. We would appreciate it if an experienced editor could review the article and provide guidance on how to improve it to meet Wikipedia's standards. We look forward to your response and assistance in showcasing Metrix Pakistan's contributions to the global community.
Best regards,
Metrix Pakistan
Metrixpk ( talk) 12:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I have been working on the draft Henrik von Scheel for while. It´s the second time. I used allot of time to build the verifiable links, and to improve the text. I am new and I am fell I am stuck. I would appreciate some help to learn from the some of the senior guards. RichardMeier33 ( talk) 13:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I see that my draft article has been refused and I am somewhat confused. I have been told that Charles Schneider doesn't meet the notability and reliable sources criteria, but I have included a plethora of links and sources to his works and publications which provide proof of his extensive output. I am in need of guidance about what I can do to improve this article so it can meet the standards referenced. I have some additional newspaper articles and podcast interviews--will these help meet the standard? Are actual book publications not suitable in themselves, but one needs to have actual reviews of the books written in order to indicate that they were published? Specifically, how many additional citations would be needed for this draft article to be accepted? Thank you for your assistance. Amphoracat ( talk) 18:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
It's a REAL country. Please bring back this article. Artem 2013 123 ( talk) 22:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
he is cool 2601:18E:D000:4DD0:54FA:196:EC4D:E57D ( talk) 23:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Please what do I do? Frankincense Diala ( talk) 00:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Why was it declined? There was enough citation to prove it's notable. So now what should I do? Frankincense Diala ( talk) 00:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano, I blocked the user: too many COI/UPE suspicions here, and too much IDIDNOTHEARTHAT. Drmies ( talk) 00:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Can someone please let me know any specific items that led to this article being declined? Anything specific we can address? The reason I see it was declined is fairly general - lack of credible sources.
However, we have listed links to Washington's diary where he specifically mentions staying at the house multiple times, a letter he wrote to a friend stating his visit there, the NPS, a few Historical Societies, VF Park, a person with the PA Historical Society that did her Penn State thesis on the house, ArbNet, the official designator of Arboretums, Independence National Historical Park among many other sources. Curious how it took roughly 11 minutes from initial submission to review all of the sources.
Please let me know anything specific we need to provide, update or change.
Thank you CBrookUM ( talk) 01:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Why my Draft has been rejected Akaayu ( talk) 07:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Can you help me Prince kumar 2.0 ( talk) 08:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I submitted an article for review but it was declined. I was trying to add about a company in the encyclopedia that is helping students in grooming them for preparation for MAANG companies. Please guide me how to write the article and also highlight in the article where I made mistake. Sanya Wadhwani ( talk) 08:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I have found many sources to put in my article, why is my article considered to lack reliable sources? Junurita ( talk) 09:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)