Thanks and Cymru am byth —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hughey ( talk • contribs) 20:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC). reply

Category:American Christians is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for discussion policies. You may want to participate. -- Orange Mike 00:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi. I responded; thanks for the heads-up. Also, I'm a casualty (liability) actuary, not a life actuary; somewhat less morbid I think -- Avi 01:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your quick reply and even speedier action regarding the Robert Byrd article. I'll admit that I was apprehensive in adding the Supreme Court nominee confirmation fact. It's not a proud distinction by any means but I considered that many would agree that since both nominees were confirmed it would be of interest. I added it in Trivia to encourage others to extend on the issue with citations discussing his positions on both nominations. Once again thank you. Light Bulb 05:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello. Thanks for your message, but not so much for deleting the page. Again, thanks for the information on the requirements though. In the future I will list references to the local media coverage and downplay the law firm. It is not meant as an advertisment of or for the firm and by providing links to the expansive local media coverage I believe that both issues you mentioned for inclusion will be resolved. Thanks again for the input and information. -- Scfarrell 13:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for straightening out Category:Films Set in Vermont. A lot more user-friendly now for readers and researchers. Student7 15:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Money truly is the root of all evil and this mans life should be a prime example. The only gift that is really worth giving to anyone here on earth is the gift of eternal life through Christ Jesus. "For everyone born of God overcomes the world. This is the victory that has overcome the world, even our faith. Who is it that overcomes the world? Only he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God." 1John 5:4-5 Hopefully this experience will open Jack Whittakers eyes to see that money doesn't control people that have eternal life. It only controls people who satan have trapped in his lies. I pray that Jack Whittaker breaks free of all this bondage occurring in his life and is able to shake the strong holds of satan. It seems like he started doing the right thing. That is truly an awful lot of money to deal with and it is awfully sad. I will pray for this man and his family as well. I pray that his family sees the good this man tried to do and how satan was able to get an edge on it all! A Friend In Christ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.187.37.172 ( talk) 03:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC). reply

That, my friend, is why I don't buy lottery tickets. However, just blaming el diablo lets too many people off the hook. I blame all of the shitheads that felt they were intitled to some of the action, too. youngamerican ( ahoy hoy) 13:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks! -- Kimon ^talk 13:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Perhaps you know this, but I submitted the following comments on someone else's talk page and obviously, it's not getting fixed. Please investigate the following comments: ""In the second sentence of the first paragraph, the article states that "His father had also been a Klan member[2]." First, the external link is expired (MSNBC) and "father" needs to be clarified as to bio/adopted father. WikiTorch 17:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)"" reply

Thanks -WikiTorch

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wildness. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Orgone 00:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Check your e-mail. :-) Grand master ka 07:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Got it. Thanks. I'll let you know if it turns into something. :-) Grand master ka 22:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply

So, I'm sitting in North Carolina right now on that tour, and it doesn't look like we'll be able to go up to West Virginia this tour (We have a few holes in the schedule which we're filling in, but West Virginia is a little out of the way the way we've planned it out.) But, we're planning something through southern states this fall, maybe we'll be able to come up through West Virginia then. Grand master ka 00:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive. This week Ludwig van Beethoven was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help.

— Pious7 _Talk ^Contribs 10:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Although he is using gender-neutral insults now, finally. As for watchlisting pages - I'm your garden variety vandalblocking, speedy-deletin' admin. Just keep an eye on poop. – Riana _ऋ 18:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Yeah, I assumed it was correct. Maybe I was too hasty... All I saw was "advice on where to fish, and it reads like original research" so I pounced. I won't argue if you want to put it back (or something like it) -- I'm not a fisherman, so it won't hurt me to look away from that section :) Also, good work on the pictures for the Kenova article! -- Malepheasant 03:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Ha, yeah, my hunch was that that was the case, but sometimes it's hard to tell, so there you have it. :) -- Malepheasant 04:47, 6 May 2007 (UTC) reply

The Health and Wellness Center (Marshall University) article will be updated soon to reflect construction that will begin soon, and other updates. It came with additional renderings, but I won't add those to the article. However, would a link to the renderings and floor plans work just as well? Seicer ( talk) ( contribs) 19:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC) reply

This was actually my first post in wikipedia, if you find anything I can improove with my formatting or anything just let me know! --Big Dan 19:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm glad to provide community service :) For gerbils, of course. – Riana ⁂ 03:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC) reply

The May 2007 issue of the Virginia WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.-- Kubigula ( talk) 02:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Pullman Square has been nominated as a good article nominee. If you wish, you can review the article and make an input; your help may push it to A status! Cheers, Seicer ( talk) ( contribs) 02:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for all your editing help! It's been greatly appreciated; it seems like this has a good chance of being a good article. Seicer ( talk) ( contribs) 01:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I've also nominated Health and Wellness Center (Marshall University). I did major cleanups and additions today, and finished some other work. Seicer ( talk) ( contribs) 05:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Is it okay if I use your Rite Aid in Viriginia picture on an Uncyclopedia article as long as I give you proper credit? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{((( Broken clamshells •  Otter chirps)))} 00:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC) reply

• Okay, here's the link. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{((( Broken clamshells •  Otter chirps)))} 18:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Not a problem, I try to remove trivia sections as I see them, some are harder to do than others.-- Christopher Tanner, CCC 22:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I am curious to know what that means.

-- Bigmatt19 17:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC) reply

It merely got misplaced :) thanks! >Radiant< 09:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the message. I just happened to be in the area one day and decided to stop by and take some photos. I never knew that park existed till the day I took that photo. Embarrassing since I am an : Ashland native :P. I'll try to find out the date that I took it and add it to the photo. Campaigner444 01:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Yes, many thanks, I saw yesterday and I said ... uau very good article!!, very good!! And .... so on -- Tamorlan 18:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I placed the citation needed on the Huntington mayor information because it isn't common knowledge. I have found/discovered in my short time on wiki that any material that is not absolute should be cited, and for the Huntington article to receive more credibility, it definitely needs more outside sources to back up the claims, the statements, and the history. Vbofficial 23:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the response. Actually, I was just going through the article doing other grammar editing, etc. I noticed it and tagged it since, at the time, I did not have the time to find a source. I am doing this in between other "jobs" and committments. The Huntington article is definitely not my main focus but I thought I would lend a hand to add another point of view. Vbofficial 23:28, 23 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks! Vbofficial 23:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I agree, that is a good compromise for the time being. I've been trying my best to keep the pages professional but it hasn't been easy, especially last night when the Benoit article was literally being edited at a rate of 2 edits per minute. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 15:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I just discovered this page and I was wondering if you could take care of it. Thanks, Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 15:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Another one: 2007 benoit family tragedy. I think my talk page message may be responsible as it's under the exact same title that I posted there. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 15:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 15:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm excited about the season too. I hope that they win and they have a better team out there than last year. Now we got our New offensive line people and perhaps a new quarterback. I'm still hurting from the NBA finals. The Cleveland Browns are awesome! 17:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Not too sure about the hundreds thing, sorry. Abc30 17:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC) reply

No probs mate, you too. Thanks Abc30 00:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC) reply

this one? :) -- Y  not? 19:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't understand. The word "taint" does, in fact, refer to this region of the body. Regardless of its usage, the article cleary discusses what the word refers to, making a graphic representation entirely appropriate. Why would this article be any different? -- David Shankbone 14:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I think I see your point. I have a lot of body illustrations I undertook with a friend of mine that I have yet to upload, except the taint and Underarm and Underarm hair. Hopefully there won't be too much opposition. -- David Shankbone 19:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Great, thanks a lot. I have about 100 photos, covering every inch of his body (he's a well-known personal trainer here in New York), and I think they are some good body studies. I won't be able to seriously work on them until this weekend. I'll keep you posted on where I try to put them. The perenium article, just by the looks of things, will reject the addition. I haven't attempted yet, but I can only imagine the editors of that page are of the opinion there's no need for another gooch shot. -- David Shankbone 19:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Cool, thanks, appreciate it. The only reason I could see for it being reverted is the other one has numbers that correspond to the parts, but I agree about the shaving (blech). For that article, I actually have one with my friend more spread where I can reproduce the numbered shot, and add the graphic illustrations so that it doesn't look like a 10 year old boy's gooch. I think the perenium shot needs to go just because it's creepy. -- David Shankbone 19:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Gary Glitter! LOL! -- David Shankbone 19:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC) reply

One thing I've noticed is that guys who shave themselves are the ones who tend to take photographs of themselves and put them on Wikipedia. I wonder why that is. Here's the galllery I began for the body part project: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DavidShankBone/BodyParts. I'm hoping to get a woman willing to do this as well. -- David Shankbone 13:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Conventions The naming conventions are to do as I've been doing. The only instance where I've reverted back was where someone wrote me an e-mail saying that his stage name was, in fact, "J.J." not "J. J." Unless I know that the name is supposed to be "X.Y." (which is almost never the case), I assume that it is to be "X. Y." as per the naming conventions. - Justin (koavf)· T· C· M 18:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC) reply

No problem While my last post to you was a little curt, I appreciate it. And I have absolutely no problem with someone reverting me if I'm mistaken (as in the case above, which I actually changed myself), but since the overwhelming majority fit the rule, I'm not too terribly worried. Again, much thanks. - Justin (koavf)· T· C· M 18:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC) reply

A.J. and O.J. Good to know. Wiki on, brother! - Justin (koavf)· T· C· M 19:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Perhaps you can explain something for me that I don't understand. There have been several reverts on pages I have been watching (usually media - example WSAZ) with the comment "best left to webmasters". Is that supposed to mean that only company webmasters can add lists to their respective Wikipeida page? Perhaps it is excessive strictness where I work but if the webmaster at my company (which does have a page on Wikipedia) were caught adding information to the companies Wikipedia page (or any "non-official" source, for that matter) they would face disciplinary action. In fact, the rule is so strictly enforced that I do not touch my companies page. If that is the policy, it could lead to information not making it to Wikipedia at all. Thanks in advance for the clarification. Dblevins2 18:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC) reply

I see where you are coming from now and what you are saying makes sense. I also agree about the trend recently in Wikipedia to do away with lists. Thanks again for clarifying that for me. Dblevins2 18:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Far from the finest photo I've ever taken, so please replace or add another if you know of a better spot. I walked for a spell outside the Ceredo floodwall, but found myself too delicate to wade into the brush to get down to the creek -- maybe it'd be possible in winter? Anyway, at least it lacks the shocking colors of Symmes Creek :)

I had hoped to visit the great city of Wayne during my recent WV visit, but ran out of time (I ended up driving through Hamlin instead). Any chance of you getting down there for photos? -- Malepheasant 04:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC) reply

The article is a sham. I noticed a pattern on wikipedia. It seems sub-saharan Africans are on a mission to approriate North African civilization, culture and even identity. Almost all articles pertaining to the region are POV, inaccurate and novel interpretations of history and reality. If you read French wikipedia (as the region is mostly francophone) or any authoritative text, no such enmeshing occurs. It is absurd for an article not to differentiate between North African arch. & sub-saharan african arch., esp. considering the fact that Sub-saharan Africa has not contributed much to architecture, which might explain the pillaging of the southern Mediterranean's culture and achievements. You should have pursued the matter further. As a result of the passivity with which these gross errors are permitted, almost all articles blur the lines and have replaced truth and facts with wishful thinking, make belief and utter nonsense. The article on sub-saharan africa in particular even claims that the Sahara is an imaginary barrier, a nonsensical "idea" that is substantiated on "wikipedia" by a most questionable source. What a sad world we live in. Simonjk 04:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC) reply

MJCdetroit has asked me to inform you (and a few other users) that he is about to undergo the RFA process for the second time. Since he says you have offered to nominate him in the past, I am informing you before the RFA goes live. Shalom ^Hello 02:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC) reply

[1] Notable? That's just insane. Seicer ( talk) ( contribs) 04:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Actually I never created it, someone else did. I did however link almost all the articles representing the metro area to the category. I do think the name should be changed. The Punk 05:36, 21 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Oh, no problem. If I see anymore articles that repreent the Tri-State, I will add the new category name to it. I think I'm going to create a category that links to the Charleston metro area, since I did create the article for that page. The Punk 22:35, 22 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Sounds good. I'll check it out. As far as edit summaries go, I'll readily admit I can get lazy with those, especially when it comes to reverting vandalism. Pats1 19:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Seeing as our old Collaborations page at WP:VIRGINIA had no activity in the past year it was decided to replace it with a new Article Improvement/Request Help page that would allow members to list articles in need of attention. Its also a place to request help for an article taht you are working on to see if any other members would like to volunteer and help out. Thanks. T Rex | talk 01:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Am I correct in thinking that this anon edit is problematic under WP:WEIGHT and WP:NOR? (For one thing the YouTube link (which violates WP:EL, is to a C-SPAN video, not an AEI video.) THF 23:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Not sure why you would immediately remove a link to a good news story in the Jack Whittaker article. In case you don't know, Lottery Post has a ton of articles on the guy, and is very useful for someone researching Jack Whittaker. It's not spam.

Thanks for uploading Image:Idit Harel Caperton.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I know, I removed it and tagged it as rfu. Gotta love bots, :P youngamerican ( wtf?) 01:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I went ahead and deleted it. youngamerican ( wtf?) 01:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the barnstar! Much appreciated. ( Mind meal 05:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)) reply

I've added a third reference to Pleasant Ridge Chili, this another article in the Cincinnati Enquirer recommending sources of late night places to eat, including a quote from the reporter on their opinion as to the quality. Also added minor info on how it is a cultural gathering spot. If you have a chance, btw, go there next time you are in town. You'll see why its included. ( Mind meal 02:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)) reply

Re: Dixie Chili and Deli: I'll try to "spice" it up. Thanks for the compliments, btw. ( Mind meal 02:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)) reply

Thanks for the advice. Vandalism is a major problem sometimes, and although I've only been doing this a short time (2 days) I'm here to do my part to better Wikipedia for those it's meant to serve. I'm using Vandal Fighter to monitor changes, but I'd love to hear any suggestions or tips that you have. mjwilson ( ^Talk/ _Contrib) 18:42, 29 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Actually, not quite yet. I have a few issues I need to clear up (with some editors) that wouldn't look good at all at RfA, and I'll be busy for the next few weeks. So please check back in later in the month. Thanks. Pats1 23:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm ready now. The editor that I was having problems with ( jmfangio) has been banned indefinitely, so that'll no longer be a thorn in my side. So what is next? Pats1 00:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I just checked it out. What kind of things would be suggested there (or admin coaching)? I do know my way around most WP processes (I've done a bunch of 3RR, RfPP, and AfD's/TfD's) and I use and implement most if not all of the guidelines. If I had to work on things, it would definitely be edit summaries and civility (in a few cases, but a lot of those had to do with jmfangio.) So would this be what a reviewer would tell me? Pats1 ^T/ C 00:23, 22 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Ironically, I just filled out a request at Wikipedia:Editor review/Pats1. What should I do now? Pats1 ^T/ C 00:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Hmm, ER seems to have quite a backlog and I was only able to get a short review (about the edit summaries) in 5 days now. Should I move ahead to something else instead? Pats1 ^T/ C 02:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Any news? Still strangely haven't seen anything else on my review. Pats1 ^T/ C 13:34, 5 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Any news? Pats1 ^T/ C 00:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Any word on moving forward with this? Thanks. Pats1 ^T/ C 21:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Sounds good. Also, on an unrelated note (as you may have noticed on my talk page), would you consider this edit by Ksy92003 to be uncivil/a form of a PA (the "no reason at all part)? Or, the "shut your mouth" part of this one?. Or, the 1st "note" on User talk:Ksy92003. I don't want to turn this into a conflict with this user, but I'm getting a little fed up at this user's borderline jabs and am looking for a third opinion. Pats1 ^T/ C 23:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't see how any of these are incivil or personal attacks. I'll go through them one by one.

1. I don't see how "no reason at all" was uncivil or a personal attack. I don't see how this isn't a statement of fact; there really was no real reason why this comment needed to be removed. You said the only reason you removed it was because you like having discussions on two separate pages, and have said "my talk page, my rules" and "My policy is to carry on conversations on both talk pages. Please respect that if you are commenting on my talk page." I believe that if a discussion is on the same page, then it's easier to follow and makes more sense. You didn't even give a real reason why you changed it other than it was "your policy".
2. This comment was taken out of context. I wasn't telling you to shut your mouth altogether. I was saying that perhaps it is best to keep your mouth shut if the only comments you are gonna make are like this one: "Man, Ksy is really dying to find something incriminating against Chris."
3. This isn't a personal attack at all. I don't know why you believe it is one. All I said in that note is that my mood on Wikipedia has been bad because of how Chris has treated me in the past. No personal attack here. All I'm doing is expressing my feelings.

I don't see how there is anything bad with any of these comments/actions. Ksy92003 (talk) 01:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC) reply

I've answered the questions, accepted, and signed. I'll go ahead and post right now. Pats1 ^T/ C 20:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC) reply

What's your opinion on those optional questions from Kim Bruning and that oppose from Branyan Tree? To me, it seems like they both were part of the creation of those "5 pillars" and "Trifecta" and such, unwaveringly subscribe to that point of view. I almost got the impression that Kim Bruning was trying to promote his ideology more than ask me serious RfA questions, while Branyan Tree was opposing just to make a point and do the same. Does this usually go on at RfAs? Pats1 ^T/ C 22:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC) reply

What about just not responding at all? It seems like they're just two special interests users that have larger goals and won't play a factor in deciding the RfA. Pats1 ^T/ C 23:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Sounds good. Thanks for all your help, by the way. I appreciate it. Pats1 ^T/ C 21:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC) reply

I asked for a deletion review of Pleasant Ridge Chili. Since you voted in it and are an administrator, I thought you may like to be informed about it. ( Mind meal 04:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)) reply

What a bunch of crap. Cincinnati Enquirer, City Beat, CiN Weekly, NKU...right, not enough there. Delete, keep, delete...damn man. I'm not working on it period after this absolute disdain for guidelines. Yet another case of editors making up rules, and not following them. ( Mind meal 01:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)) reply

Any sources that come along in the future will always be of the local variety, because it is a small place and on the grand scale of things the place isn't all that important. But six references, local or not, meets all the Wikipedia:Notability guidelines. I feel robbed, because I played by the book. The "solid argument" the closer made, imo, is anything but solid or by the book. It is riddled with bias toward small business and local sourcing, as they have stated many restaurants could find sources in local newspapers. Why is that a problem? In other words, an article that establishes notability per our guidelines should not be kept when they are a small company with local coverage. That isn't anything our guidelines or policy state, and it is not in the spirit of this place. We thrive on reliable sources. It doesn't say, "reliable sources 100 miles or more away from the subject area." It seems to me that there is no solidity in an argument that is not even BASED on our own guidelines. As an administrator, I would never say I know better than reliable sources whether something deserved press. The way I read our notability guidelines makes it pretty clear to me that proper sourcing is what establishes notability. The very article on notability governing us states that it isn't fame or importance, only worthy of note. But all this talk of "awards don't establish notability", or "that fact doesn't establish notability", is absolutely missing the thrust of the guideline. It isn't about the facts presented or how many awards they get, but about whether the subject was mentioned in reliable sources unaffiliated with the subject matter. Several third parties feel Pleasant Ridge Chili is worthy of note, so what is this argument stating they aren't good enough based upon? Air, its based on hot air. It is not based on our policies or guidelines. By the way, I am honored that you would consider me good material for such a position as administrator. I do tend to speak my mind when I feel an injustice occurs, however. I thought once all those references and new materials were added that there was NO argument against inclusion that could pass a sniff test. And the arguments do not! But the votes to keep the article deleted continue onward. I'd like very much to be an administrator, but as one I would follow policy and guidelines; not imaginary criteria I make up. Thats just how I feel about it. ( Mind meal 02:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)) reply

Hello, Youngamerican, I've seen you in passing but haven't talked in person. I notices this morning a serial vandal on the American Southern States page, but I am unsure how to deal with it. My computer is old and when I tried to Undo his previous edits I get a "loss of session date" and my Undo doesn't take. Any suggestions? And how do I report someone who repeatedly vandalizes? Thanks, Dubyavee 18:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in commenting on in a speedy deletion process, Mark Warner (Canadian politician), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Warner (Canadian politician). Thank you. -- Canam1 11:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I saw your comments on reverting September 11th and tried another revision for better word flow. The version before I edited it used the phrase "September 11th attacks", which is among many different (albeit similar) phrases used. This is nothing to fight about but I made further edits for better flow. You don't need to respond. Feel free to suggest other wording and change it. Archtrain 19:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Come to SADD Highlands Palooza at Northern Highlands High School on Friday, September 21, 2007 at 5 PM (Eastern Daylight Time) to 11 PM (Eastern Daylight Time)! There will be refreshments, DJ, activities, and more! It will be a lot of fun. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonflySixty7 ( talk • contribs) 11:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Can I bring beer? youngamerican ( wtf?) 11:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC) reply

The Spicy TenderCrisp is coming back! This time it will be called the firecracker TenderCrisp. The sauce is going to be a little hotter. Keep this on QT though, it hasn't been announced yet.

Jerem43 01:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm unsure on how to handle the latest Robert Byrd incident. I've reverted the edits for a second time in hopes that it can be balanced out perhaps, but the editor in question has edit warred in the past over "left leaning" stuff like this in the past, and there have been numerous comments left on his talk page regarding this. I'll try to fill out the paragraph on-and-off today if I have time. Seicer ( talk) ( contribs) 16:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Glad you liked my change. JTRH 18:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the work to improve Robert Byrd, and I agree with your edits. I added a similar bit, but in a neutral tone to not point out any politicians (similar to what was done at RCB) at Strom Thurmond, but WatchingYouLikeAHawk is continuing to revert the edits and corrupt the references despite my edit summary. I initiated a discussion at Talk:Strom Thurmond stating my reasons why it should remain, since the source is not an "op-ed" piece, but an interview conducted by a notable and large newspaper (Charlotte Observer), that was reposted by the Slate. If you could look at it and possibly add a comment, it would be very helpful. Thanks! Seicer ( talk) ( contribs) 04:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Thank you for catching my spelling mistakes. Me lern too speld purty sumday. :) youngamerican ( wtf?) 11:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Good edits to my work on Robert Byrd, though. I think your work balanced out my work.-- Getaway 14:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, Youngamerican. We had a few urgent matters to communicate to you:

1. Please update your information at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Participants, our new centralized participant list. Those who have not done so by October 20th will be removed.
2. There are important discussions taking place at WT:USRD relating to whether WP:USRD, WP:HWY, or the state projects should hold the "power" in the roads projects.

Regards, Rschen7754 ( T C) 23:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Right... That seems vaguely familiar now; do you have a source? I would be happy to revert all my changes. - Justin (koavf)· T· C· M 00:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Ah A thousand thanks. - Justin (koavf)· T· C· M 01:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC) reply

You were right about the Teays Valley, West Virginia article with Winfield and Hurricane not being included in the CDP. (The area has grown so much over the years--I couldn't believe it was that big by itself until I researched further and saw the map!) However, I am having difficulties with the reference I have put on the page giving the new, correct data; the footnote looks hideous. Could you help it look better?

Thanks!

-- TarrVetus 21:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC) reply

No bias there, right? :) Thanks! Neil  ☎ 15:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC) reply

The October 2007 issue of the Virginia WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.-- Kubigula ( talk) 02:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Young American,

Perhaps I am not presenting this thing properly. The most prevalent Boelus, Nebraska historian (and Loup Fork Cemetery owner/caretaker) provided me with a "Kinkos" compilation of photos and verbal history of the residents of the cemetary and this school is part of that local history. The town of Boelus originated from my great great grandfather who immigrated from Denmark in 1862 and eventually became homesteaded about 600 feet from where he donated the land for the Boesen school (the mile reference is far off the makr, I've measured it off personally), he dragged mainstreet with his horses, became the constable of the town, owned the pool hall, and the town wanted to name it after him, but he didn't want that so the people decided to use "L" from another prominent citizen, and "US" for the rest of "US". Dopey. Nonetheless, he is listed as a prominent Nebraskan and this school lends credence to that fact. Can you help me validate this somehow? I rarely get to Wiki, would you please contact me at my personal e-mail address? Any Google search will take you to it (I don't want to leave it here because any webcrawler will take advantage of its presence). Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.160.249.126 ( talk) 21:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Hmm, all I have from you is a IP address. But, if you look under WP:CITE, I'm sure it'll tell you a way to cite the info you already have. youngamerican ( wtf?) 20:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC) reply

I replied on my talk page.► Chris Nelson ^Holla! 21:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC) reply

You had earlier expressed an interest in joining a project woking with articles relating to rabbits, mice, etc. That project is now active at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mammals/Pocket pets work group. John Carter 16:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the compliment about my creation of the browns starting qb page, youngamerican!

/s/ hanksummers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanksummers ( talk • contribs) 16:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Re Mullens-- Oh, but I didn't just stop for a picture, I got out and went for a stroll around town! And I, uh... decided to keep it brief. It's not that I was made to feel unwelcome -- the problem was that I felt too welcome, in that I sensed that I might be in danger of being beaten alive for the purpose of local entertainment. So I got the hell out of there. But I'm sure there are some fine & decent people who live and/or are trapped there -- I just didn't get to run into them because they weren't hanging around on the street, frightening away the visitors.

Thank you kindly again for the acknowledgment, it's much appreciated -- Best wishes, Malepheasant ( talk) 07:01, 22 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks dude —Preceding unsigned comment added by DatDoo ( talk • contribs) 23:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Food Network star enjoys Hillbilly Hot Dogs Seicer ( talk) ( contribs) 04:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC) reply

An article to which you have contributed too has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to comment on this, please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.

- Jeremy ( Jerem43 05:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)) reply

1. Firecracker TenderCrisp starts on Monday, December 10, LTO product.
2. To get the Big King, Ask for a BK Stacker add lettuce, pickle and onions with no bacon. Instant Big King. — Jeremy ( Jerem43 ( talk) 01:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)) reply

Little mistake on the makeup of a Big King. - Jeremy )( Jerem43 ( talk) 01:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply

I try... - Jeremy ( Jerem43 ( talk) 01:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)) reply