 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
As the second largest contributor to this article, would you be interested in cosponsoring it at FAC? Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Infobox power station
Hi, Wwoods. You have been one of contributors to the {{ Infobox power station}} or its preceding templates. Therefore I notify you that there is a discussion about changes to the power station infobox template. Your contribution is appreciated. Beagel ( talk) 18:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to {{ Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
- This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of {{U| Technical 13}} ( t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Minden an der weser.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Minden an der weser.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Grantville Gazette III for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grantville Gazette III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Virginia-namesake1211.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Virginia-namesake1211.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EoRdE6 ( talk) 01:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Carl A. Weeden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl A. Weeden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl A. Weeden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
As the second largest contributor to this article, would you be interested in cosponsoring it at FAC? Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Infobox power station
Hi, Wwoods. You have been one of contributors to the {{ Infobox power station}} or its preceding templates. Therefore I notify you that there is a discussion about changes to the power station infobox template. Your contribution is appreciated. Beagel ( talk) 18:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to {{ Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
- This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of {{U| Technical 13}} ( t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Minden an der weser.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Minden an der weser.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Grantville Gazette III for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grantville Gazette III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Virginia-namesake1211.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Virginia-namesake1211.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EoRdE6 ( talk) 01:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Carl A. Weeden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl A. Weeden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl A. Weeden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)