- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). A merge/redirect discussion can continue on an article talk page if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 04:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Grantville Gazette III
- Grantville Gazette III ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No outside third-party source, in line with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette VIII and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette IV from years ago. Suggest not userifying as the last ones stayed around and are now up at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette IV as well. Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 02:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to The Grantville Gazettes and merge the review only. Then shorten the awful section title "Reception of printed volumes that do not have their own page yet" to just "Reception". Clarityfiend ( talk) 20:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 02:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). A merge/redirect discussion can continue on an article talk page if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 04:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Grantville Gazette III
- Grantville Gazette III ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No outside third-party source, in line with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette VIII and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette IV from years ago. Suggest not userifying as the last ones stayed around and are now up at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette IV as well. Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 02:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to The Grantville Gazettes and merge the review only. Then shorten the awful section title "Reception of printed volumes that do not have their own page yet" to just "Reception". Clarityfiend ( talk) 20:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 02:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.