Hello, I'm Karl 334. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Windsor have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Karl 334 Talk- -Contribs 17:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Windsor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Karl 334 Talk- -Contribs 18:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Windawindawinda, information on Wikipedia should follow the WP:Verifiability policy. I don't see any source included in your various attempts of creating the article. Do you have any sources establishing WP:Notability? Just i yaya 12:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Windawindawinda! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
David Windsor several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:David Windsor, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Wikishovel ( talk) 14:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you assume ownership of articles, as you did at Edward VIII. Equine-man ( talk) 12:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Windsor. Equine-man ( talk) 12:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Windawindawinda! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Wikishovel ( talk) 14:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The article David Windsor has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wikishovel ( talk) 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Windawindawinda. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page David Windsor, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Equine-man ( talk) 11:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Windawindawinda!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
CoconutOctopus
talk 12:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
|
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Windawindawinda reported by User:Equine-man (Result: ). Thank you. Equine-man ( talk) 12:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk) 14:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Windawindawinda ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't find any disruptive editing on my side. Can you please elaborate what do you mean by disruptive editing? Redirecting someone else's page to another page is disruptive to me disruptive edits
Decline reason:
Massive edit warring at David Windsor. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Windawindawinda ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Others users had massive editing and disruptive edits in the page David Windsor (David_Windsor) - David Windsor Page is being redirected to Edward VIII page
Decline reason:
See WP:NOTTHEM. There are many issues with your behavior, focus on those and not the actions of others. Only you can control your actions. 331dot ( talk) 17:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'm Karl 334. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Windsor have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Karl 334 Talk- -Contribs 17:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Windsor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Karl 334 Talk- -Contribs 18:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Windawindawinda, information on Wikipedia should follow the WP:Verifiability policy. I don't see any source included in your various attempts of creating the article. Do you have any sources establishing WP:Notability? Just i yaya 12:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Windawindawinda! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
David Windsor several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:David Windsor, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Wikishovel ( talk) 14:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you assume ownership of articles, as you did at Edward VIII. Equine-man ( talk) 12:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Windsor. Equine-man ( talk) 12:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Windawindawinda! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Wikishovel ( talk) 14:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The article David Windsor has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wikishovel ( talk) 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Windawindawinda. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page David Windsor, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Equine-man ( talk) 11:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Windawindawinda!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
CoconutOctopus
talk 12:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
|
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Windawindawinda reported by User:Equine-man (Result: ). Thank you. Equine-man ( talk) 12:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk) 14:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Windawindawinda ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't find any disruptive editing on my side. Can you please elaborate what do you mean by disruptive editing? Redirecting someone else's page to another page is disruptive to me disruptive edits
Decline reason:
Massive edit warring at David Windsor. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Windawindawinda ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Others users had massive editing and disruptive edits in the page David Windsor (David_Windsor) - David Windsor Page is being redirected to Edward VIII page
Decline reason:
See WP:NOTTHEM. There are many issues with your behavior, focus on those and not the actions of others. Only you can control your actions. 331dot ( talk) 17:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.