Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Democratic Party presidential candidates, 2016 page, your edit caused a broken reference name ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC) reply

As a significant contributor to the article United States presidential election, 2016, your participation in this discussion would be helpful and appreciated. Thank you. -- William S. Saturn ( talk) 21:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States presidential election, 2016, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Green Party and Libertarian Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

If you decide to write an update/interview on Jack Fellure for Wikinews, let me know if you need any assistance. I am an administrator on the site.-- William S. Saturn ( talk) 09:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC) reply

:Thanks! Although, somethings telling me I'm not going to be getting the interview or anything close to that. I called the number and it rang twice and went right to voicemail. I did that some time ago, and I have yet to get anything back. Probably should wait a while longer, but I'm not holding my breath for anything. Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 17:12, 28 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Scratch that- he's alive and I will be calling him back later. Thanks for offering and I will definitely need assistance! Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 19:26, 28 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Did you record the phone call? -- William S. Saturn ( talk) 07:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC) reply

I haven't been able to do the call yet (dead phone), and I can't record my phone. I was just going to listen and write down the questions and answers. I need to record it, don't I?

It isn't necessary but it would make it much easier. There's many apps you can install for free that would be able to record the call. -- William S. Saturn ( talk) 07:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Problem with my phone is its a hand-me-down phone from 2003. No apps available for awhile for me. Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 07:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Any updates on this story? -- William S. Saturn ( talk) 08:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply

I tried doing it yesterday- but I'm sick and my phone is so bad he couldn't understand anything I was saying. I tried doing it but it was impossible. Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 15:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply

At least you confirmed that he's still alive.-- William S. Saturn ( talk) 23:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Yeah- that at the very least is a great thing to know! Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 00:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:United States presidential election, 2016, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 18:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Does this source [1] help prove that Jon Huntsman, Jr. is a potential candidate? -- TDKR Chicago 101 ( talk) 03:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I think it does. However- I'd look for a more recent source than 2012 (for any candidate). Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 03:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

This link would be a bit better I think (as it was made within the last year). http://www.business2community.com/government-politics/top-25-people-we-wish-were-running-for-u-s-president-01378469#sGclJGabsdLkRWCv.97 Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 03:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you for adding more candidates to the page! But the source you provided [2] has a lot more candidates, would it be good or bad to add all 25 people to the page? I'm a pro at screwing things up and you seem to be the great and only user to be updating this page! -- TDKR Chicago 101 ( talk) 03:47, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks! And I only included candidates who were specified as potential candidates for 2020. The article, itself, just focuses on candidates they wanted to run in 2016 (somewhat jokingly, somewhat true- as many would agree a Joe Biden/Stephen Colbert debate would be amazing), so I only looked for those few listed as 2020 candidates. Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 03:57, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Does this source -> [3] might be use to prove that Matt Bevin is a potential candidate in the 2020 elections? -- TDKR Chicago 101 ( talk) 01:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Not really- it just says that he was in New Hampshire making a speech. It was speculated by some, but his spokesperson said that it was nothing more than a speech. If another source is available, then he should be added. Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 19:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States presidential election, 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertarian Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history at United States presidential election, 2020 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- IceFrappe ( talk) 23:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply

I've explained myself here. I'm doing as the guidelines established on the talk page for the 2016 page. I am simply making sure those guidelines are met. Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 23:44, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Vote 4 DJH2036. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Howdy. I know those officials haven't left or assumed their offices yet as of December 2016. However, the article-in-question is about an event that takes place in 2020. A time when those officials will has left or assumed their offices. GoodDay ( talk) 02:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

I removed Deleware from Biden's entry, because it looks like we're saying he's Vice President of Delaware. GoodDay ( talk) 04:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC) reply

It's fine- don't worry about it. We can add "US Vice President" before it. Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 04:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Trump's campaign filed the paperwork on the day he was inaugurated. It has sponsored many rallies since then. He has said he would serve EIGHT years. Why don't you believe he didn't? Why doesn't this count any more that mentions in the others by the media? Arglebargle79 ( talk) 20:41, 18 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Trump filed paperwork saying he had met requirements for 2020. Holding rallies doesn't mean much of anything. Him saying he will isn't technically declaring. All Presidents say they'll serve 8 years. It matters when he officially declares his candidacy- either via FEC paperwork or via something else. Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 20:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Having filed the paperwork, saying that one's going to serve EIGHT years says that he is interested, which means, like EVERYONE else who's done so, that they should be listed and the article, which has been vetted as both notable and accurate, is relevant to the article and should have a link. why should we hide it? Here is proof it's a genuine campaign. and if you go to the campaign's website, you will see a paragraph titled "Donald J. Trump For President, Inc. –– Why Now?" The paperwork has been completed. He now doesn't HAVE to announce until after the primaries are over. He has a permanent campaign that can raise money and keep the base riled up. Jack Fellure doesn't even have a campaign. in 2015-16, the FEC didn't even know what his address was and he got ZERO votes in the primaries. Arglebargle79 ( talk) 22:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC) reply

which reminds me

The Donald Trump for President, inc. website has a listing for a rally this weekend. How is an authorized organization called Donald Trump for President, inc. NOT a campaign? Arglebargle79 ( talk) 22:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Because it can be considered an exploration committee. At the moment, Trump isn't doing anything different than what someone who's exploring would be. Let me put it this way: Trump hasn't officially stated he's going to run. He's said he plans on it- plans change quite a bit, and with Presidential politics, there's a great chance something could. We all know Trump's going to run- but we can't use our own opinions. Until he actually states or files that he is going to run for President (which he hasn't)- we can't include him as a declared candidate. As for Fellure- if you sign up for the FEC, it's counted as an official candidate as long as they have a page. Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk) 22:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC) reply

But why delete a link to a relevant article on the subject? If you say it's an "exploration committee" (which it isn't, but I'll concede that for the moment) why try to hide it? The link deserves to be there. In 2012 and '16, all the candidates with an exploratory committee were listed with links to a campaign article. Why not Trump this time? Arglebargle79 ( talk) 12:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC) reply

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Ks0stm ^{( T• C• G• E)} 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

You may want to participate in this RfC regarding the inclusion of candidates in election infoboxes. MB298 ( talk) 02:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Just because you've acted in a certain way before and it's not been questioned, that doesn't mean it's ever been okay. There is no evidence that the Schweinsteiger deal is complete, i.e. that he has passed a medical or been granted a visa. Until he has been, both you and the Chicago Fire are acting prematurely. – Pee Jay 19:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC) reply

I noticed that you reverted my edit placing Gov. Malloy with speculative candidates for 2020. If you go to the Talk page, you'll find i DO have two sources. Inspector Semenych ( talk) 17:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Delaney presidential campaign, 2020 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Delaney presidential campaign, 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat ( talk) 01:41, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Vote 4 DJH2036. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Chicago Fire season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rafael Ramos ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Chicago Fire season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Russell ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Chicago Fire season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Gordon ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Chicago Fire season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Gordon ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Chicago Fire season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Gruezo ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 18 July 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Chicago Fire season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Bradley ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 29 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Vote 4 DJH2036. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Chicago Fire season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orlando City ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:11, 21 December 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Chicago Fire season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loyola University ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 15 January 2019 (UTC) reply

I kindly invited you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn ( talk) 19:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, 2020 Chicago Fire season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^{( talk)} 12:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Chicago Fire FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orlando City ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Chicago Fire FC season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stanislav Ivanov and Mauricio Pineda.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Chicago Fire FC II season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brighton, New York.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 Chicago Fire FC season. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:03, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Just to let you know, editor Vote 4 DJH2036, Javier Casas is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the player, the way you did at 2024 Chicago Fire FC season, please use:

[[Javier Casas (soccer, born 2003)|Javier Casas]]

See more about linking at the help page and the project page. Thank you for your edits and for your support in this! P.I. Ellsworth ,  ed.  ^{put'er there} 07:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for fixing that! Vote 4 DJH2036 ( talk)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Chicago Fire FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allan.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC) reply