Hi, red link in your message about talkpage discussion ... on my talkpage. Tony (talk) 08:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello there Trizek,
I'm currently taking a small WikiBreak. I'll certainly be able to help, but will be slow to respond. Thanks for leaving me a message on my talk page though (which is a rare occurrence XD)
Rebestalic [dubious—discuss] 20:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
I received some message at de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Bookku since I do not know German language, I tried google translator but it was not clear enough to me. Is there any thing I can be of help ?
Thanks & Warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 10:37, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Re: Call for submissions for the Community Growth space at Wikimania_2019. This comes a little late. You are probably unaware that applications for a scholarship to Wikimania were closed and decided already some time ago. As on of the major participants working with Community Tech for years in some highly important new policies/software developments for the quality control of new articles, I am naturally disappointed that my application for a scholarship has again been declined. Unlike the many privileged salaried staff who enjoy the same 'business' trip every year, very few users are accorded help with attending the Wikimania conferences. It is too much to expect volunteers who spend 1000s of hours contributing to Wikipedia and its development to spend upwards of $2000 to attend this event and provide their input. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:00, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
if i do not know how to say a certain word or word in english, then is it allowed to help yourself in using google translate? i know that some websites are against rules, is that so? (i'm really right now so if there is no permission then please avoid punishment. Atlantic Channel ( talk) 21:32, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, John's reading is not active till then, I tried to ask him before reading the notice at the top, but I can not Atlantic Channel ( talk) 12:23, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
salut trizek, juste pour te dire, j'ai laissé un message là.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)#reverts
je pointe une situation bizarre. statistiquement je suis souvent réverté ici, et rarement sur wiki francais.
la situation pourrai etre la même pour un russe qui écrit sur wikipedia en francais et source avec des sources russes.
grosso modo, si je suis réverté, comme il est difficile de dėbattre dans une langue qui n'est pas la notre, on laisse le révert. Si il y a trop de réverts, on ne contribue plus.
je ne vois pas comment améliorer ça. mais je pense que c'est mesurable.
Ce n'est pas le fait d'avoir été réverté et par qui, on s'en fout. C'est la situation qui est bizarre quand elle est vécue. Cette impression d'etre accueilli dans une wikipedia, et rejetée d'une autre alors même que la personne n'a pas changé (et son type de contribution non plus).
Le problème est encore plus important du fait que wiki en est une wikipedia DEPUIS laquelle les articles sont traduits ensuite vers d'autres langues un peu comme le centre d'une toile d'araignėe. Hors je ne pense pas que les petits articles(bout de la toile) soient traduits vers la wiki en. Je suppose que la plupart du temps, ça va de l'intérieur vers l'extérieur de la toile. (grosses langues vers petites langues ). Donc je pense qu'il est important que des gens de petites langue puissent écrire sur "wiki en" pour l'enrichir.
Bref. Je ne sais pas si ce problème est valable pour wiki fr aussi. Seul un étranger le saurait.
Comme c'est ton job l'accueil, je pointait juste un exemple de problème, qui pourrai être évalué pour estimer si il y a besoin d'une action ou non. Wikiscan indique le pourcentage de revert par exemple. Comparer les pourcentages de reverts sur les différentes wikipedia, voir même sur les différents projets pourrai être un indice vraiment interessant pour vous. Je veux dire que les gens sont découragés par les réverts et les conflits. Un révert peut être une bonne chose. Mais si on considère les contributions comme une continuité, soit je ne suis pas assez réverté sur wiki fr, soit je suis trop réverté sur wiki en.
Bref, j'espère que tu aura compris la bizarreté que je pointe. Je pense que c'est mesurable.
Je ne sais pas vraiment la cause par contre. Si c'est mon anglais qui est horrible, ils devraient reformuler en belle phrase au lieu de reverter. Je suis un panneau fluo quand j'écris anglais peut être, et ça dis frappez moi?
Pour des idées d'amélioration, il pourrai y avoir accès au taux de revert de la wikipedia principale de la personne par exemple, pour les patrouilleurs et quelque chose qui indiquerai que ce n'est pas "sa wikipedia principale/sa wikipedia de langue native".
Vatadoshu french 21:37, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
l'impression esf peut être d'autant plus frappante, qu'en général, j'ai mis presque la même contribution sur l'article wiki fr 2 minutes auparavant sans révert. Vatadoshu french 21:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Trizek, I noticed that you contribute to Growth Team Features talk page on a fairly regular basis. There's an active thread now which, in my opinion, will benefit from contribution on your part as a WMF employee. Thank you. Thread: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Growth_Team_features#Some_newcomers_need_a_lot_more_attention 188.66.34.165 ( talk) 18:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Would you have an issue with me rejoining the list of mentors? I had paused my involvement due to a break from Wikipedia but it extended past the time allotted for and I felt I needed more time. Editor retention and education is important to me. Wikipedia has given me so much over the years, even before I joined as an editor. I read three to four times as much as I edit. I am believe strongly in the pillars of the community, primarily civility in discussion and kindness in our interactions, especially with those we may disagree with. I wasn't sure if I could just go back an re-add my name or not so I thought best to just ask. -- ARose Wolf 15:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi Trizek! I saw you started the recent feedback discussion on a few different places. For next time, it might be helpful to just use one central location and {{ Please see}} invites to everywhere else, as this makes it easier to keep track of everything. Cheers, {{u| Sdkb}} talk 14:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
{{Please see}}
is not being effective, there are a few steps you can take. The first is to use the |heading=
and |more=
parameters to improve (concisely) the invitation. Editors are more likely to click on an invite if it communicates to us what the discussion is about. The second is to craft a good edit summary that links to the discussion, e.g. Invite to [[Link to discussion|discussion on topic]]
, as this allows us to navigate to it directly from our watchlist. Lastly, if a discussion is really needing more participation, there's the {{
Bump}} template, which can be used in moderation.{{Please see}}
template the next time, and I will. What I missed there was the information regarding the community consensus: no one explained it to me and hence I didn't knew how important it was.❄️ Happy holidays! ❄️
Hi Benoît! I'd like to wish you a splendid solstice season as we wrap up the year. Here is an artwork, made individually for you, to celebrate. Looking forward to collaborating with you on the development of Edit check in the coming year! Take care, and thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia better!Cheers,{{u| Sdkb}} talk 07:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Trizek (WMF),Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Dantus21 ( talk) 00:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Thank you for all your work on the Wikimedia Foundation! Although it was a while ago, I still appreciate the kindness you showed me here Dantus21 ( talk) 00:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi, red link in your message about talkpage discussion ... on my talkpage. Tony (talk) 08:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello there Trizek,
I'm currently taking a small WikiBreak. I'll certainly be able to help, but will be slow to respond. Thanks for leaving me a message on my talk page though (which is a rare occurrence XD)
Rebestalic [dubious—discuss] 20:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
I received some message at de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Bookku since I do not know German language, I tried google translator but it was not clear enough to me. Is there any thing I can be of help ?
Thanks & Warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 10:37, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Re: Call for submissions for the Community Growth space at Wikimania_2019. This comes a little late. You are probably unaware that applications for a scholarship to Wikimania were closed and decided already some time ago. As on of the major participants working with Community Tech for years in some highly important new policies/software developments for the quality control of new articles, I am naturally disappointed that my application for a scholarship has again been declined. Unlike the many privileged salaried staff who enjoy the same 'business' trip every year, very few users are accorded help with attending the Wikimania conferences. It is too much to expect volunteers who spend 1000s of hours contributing to Wikipedia and its development to spend upwards of $2000 to attend this event and provide their input. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:00, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
if i do not know how to say a certain word or word in english, then is it allowed to help yourself in using google translate? i know that some websites are against rules, is that so? (i'm really right now so if there is no permission then please avoid punishment. Atlantic Channel ( talk) 21:32, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, John's reading is not active till then, I tried to ask him before reading the notice at the top, but I can not Atlantic Channel ( talk) 12:23, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
salut trizek, juste pour te dire, j'ai laissé un message là.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)#reverts
je pointe une situation bizarre. statistiquement je suis souvent réverté ici, et rarement sur wiki francais.
la situation pourrai etre la même pour un russe qui écrit sur wikipedia en francais et source avec des sources russes.
grosso modo, si je suis réverté, comme il est difficile de dėbattre dans une langue qui n'est pas la notre, on laisse le révert. Si il y a trop de réverts, on ne contribue plus.
je ne vois pas comment améliorer ça. mais je pense que c'est mesurable.
Ce n'est pas le fait d'avoir été réverté et par qui, on s'en fout. C'est la situation qui est bizarre quand elle est vécue. Cette impression d'etre accueilli dans une wikipedia, et rejetée d'une autre alors même que la personne n'a pas changé (et son type de contribution non plus).
Le problème est encore plus important du fait que wiki en est une wikipedia DEPUIS laquelle les articles sont traduits ensuite vers d'autres langues un peu comme le centre d'une toile d'araignėe. Hors je ne pense pas que les petits articles(bout de la toile) soient traduits vers la wiki en. Je suppose que la plupart du temps, ça va de l'intérieur vers l'extérieur de la toile. (grosses langues vers petites langues ). Donc je pense qu'il est important que des gens de petites langue puissent écrire sur "wiki en" pour l'enrichir.
Bref. Je ne sais pas si ce problème est valable pour wiki fr aussi. Seul un étranger le saurait.
Comme c'est ton job l'accueil, je pointait juste un exemple de problème, qui pourrai être évalué pour estimer si il y a besoin d'une action ou non. Wikiscan indique le pourcentage de revert par exemple. Comparer les pourcentages de reverts sur les différentes wikipedia, voir même sur les différents projets pourrai être un indice vraiment interessant pour vous. Je veux dire que les gens sont découragés par les réverts et les conflits. Un révert peut être une bonne chose. Mais si on considère les contributions comme une continuité, soit je ne suis pas assez réverté sur wiki fr, soit je suis trop réverté sur wiki en.
Bref, j'espère que tu aura compris la bizarreté que je pointe. Je pense que c'est mesurable.
Je ne sais pas vraiment la cause par contre. Si c'est mon anglais qui est horrible, ils devraient reformuler en belle phrase au lieu de reverter. Je suis un panneau fluo quand j'écris anglais peut être, et ça dis frappez moi?
Pour des idées d'amélioration, il pourrai y avoir accès au taux de revert de la wikipedia principale de la personne par exemple, pour les patrouilleurs et quelque chose qui indiquerai que ce n'est pas "sa wikipedia principale/sa wikipedia de langue native".
Vatadoshu french 21:37, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
l'impression esf peut être d'autant plus frappante, qu'en général, j'ai mis presque la même contribution sur l'article wiki fr 2 minutes auparavant sans révert. Vatadoshu french 21:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Trizek, I noticed that you contribute to Growth Team Features talk page on a fairly regular basis. There's an active thread now which, in my opinion, will benefit from contribution on your part as a WMF employee. Thank you. Thread: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Growth_Team_features#Some_newcomers_need_a_lot_more_attention 188.66.34.165 ( talk) 18:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Would you have an issue with me rejoining the list of mentors? I had paused my involvement due to a break from Wikipedia but it extended past the time allotted for and I felt I needed more time. Editor retention and education is important to me. Wikipedia has given me so much over the years, even before I joined as an editor. I read three to four times as much as I edit. I am believe strongly in the pillars of the community, primarily civility in discussion and kindness in our interactions, especially with those we may disagree with. I wasn't sure if I could just go back an re-add my name or not so I thought best to just ask. -- ARose Wolf 15:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi Trizek! I saw you started the recent feedback discussion on a few different places. For next time, it might be helpful to just use one central location and {{ Please see}} invites to everywhere else, as this makes it easier to keep track of everything. Cheers, {{u| Sdkb}} talk 14:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
{{Please see}}
is not being effective, there are a few steps you can take. The first is to use the |heading=
and |more=
parameters to improve (concisely) the invitation. Editors are more likely to click on an invite if it communicates to us what the discussion is about. The second is to craft a good edit summary that links to the discussion, e.g. Invite to [[Link to discussion|discussion on topic]]
, as this allows us to navigate to it directly from our watchlist. Lastly, if a discussion is really needing more participation, there's the {{
Bump}} template, which can be used in moderation.{{Please see}}
template the next time, and I will. What I missed there was the information regarding the community consensus: no one explained it to me and hence I didn't knew how important it was.❄️ Happy holidays! ❄️
Hi Benoît! I'd like to wish you a splendid solstice season as we wrap up the year. Here is an artwork, made individually for you, to celebrate. Looking forward to collaborating with you on the development of Edit check in the coming year! Take care, and thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia better!Cheers,{{u| Sdkb}} talk 07:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Trizek (WMF),Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Dantus21 ( talk) 00:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Thank you for all your work on the Wikimedia Foundation! Although it was a while ago, I still appreciate the kindness you showed me here Dantus21 ( talk) 00:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)