This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me to reverting lots of vandalism, including some to my user page. Keep it up! 10metreh ( talk) 21:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Tolly 4 bolly 09:32, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

I had put an edit request on page 'bollywood films of 2013', which has been marked by you as done. But this is nnt yet done. How can you let these major errors go unrectified?

Jazzy Prinker ( talk) 06:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC) Jazz

Thanks for note. I have done that now. It looked like some editor reverted that to the original state while editing. Tolly 4 bolly 09:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello Tolly4bolly, Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! Eduemoni ↑talk↓ 02:54, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Tolly4bolly. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection.
Message added 10:15, 2 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yunshui  雲‍ 水 10:15, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

I need someone to say what they thing about my new sinature before I decide completely. So what do u think about it? ( t) Josve05a ( c) 20:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Well it's ok. My opinion is that you could have made it shorter or add contributions and talk page on the username (like me) so that it could be more easier and also probably shorter. Anyway, I like the colors you have chosen on your signature. Tolly 4 bolly 06:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok. I will think of what you have said and try little codes. I noticed that when I send out messages to vandals it says something like: "[...] you might be blocked. Josve05a." Thats mot good. so...—  ( t)  Josve05a ( c) 10:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Re your message: It is rather odd, but I believe that I figured it out. The "Click here" to leave me a message on the header of your talk page was linked to your old account. I updated it as you can see. Hopefully that will fix the problem and a protection of your old talk page won't be necessary. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 16:00, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure how I missed that. You're right that I no longer need the protection. I think this should go. Thanks for your help. Tolly 4 bolly 16:08, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Who do you think you are? He is pretty attractive and you are not the judge of that. I would so apppreciate if you put my comment back on. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.113.50.76 ( talk) 16:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

The edits made by 86.47.2.38 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) appear to be relevant to the article and may not be vandalism. Instead, I have a feeling that the user is edit warring at Treehouse of Horror V (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Do you agree with this, or is this vandalism? — DragonLord^{( talk/ contribs)} 19:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

It looked like vandalism so I reverted that. Also that the same edits were reverted by Cluebot so I think it was vandalism rather than edit warring. Tolly 4 bolly 19:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The changes made to the Nebraska Lacrosse page were made by someone who is apart of the club. Not someone who is vindictive and self-centered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.234.247.165 ( talk) 19:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

When you remove contents from a page, then please add edit summary for why you removed that so that it's easier for other editors when they undo your changes. Thanks. Tolly 4 bolly 19:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! You've beaten me to a few reverts today too :) James086 ^Talk 20:01, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:29, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, if you understand what this is as a food, calling it a "Turnip" cake is a misnomer. It isn't made with turnips at all, but the large white daikon radish. I only wanted to clearify things. Perhaps you could change the name, and put a "redirected from turnip cake" type thing instead? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.27.46.195 ( talk) 16:45, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

I think you should discuss this in talk page. Tolly 4 bolly 16:50, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Please remove the content I previously removed from Lucy Allan's profile. This information is not correct and is offensive to the person aka Me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.109.198 ( talk) 07:59, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

 Done. Since it was not sourced, it has been removed. Tolly 4 bolly 08:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

on the taril of tears comment, this is a school computer and it was a student. my deepest apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.168.222.91 ( talk) 17:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Haha, I was trying to see if I could cheat on thewikigame.com but it didn't work... :(

I'll stop making edits now.

70.68.53.104 ( talk) 19:37, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

JMM - Please put back the grammar and punctuation edits I made. It was an improvement to my earlier and accepted content. If you dont like the quote box I inserted, fine. Question: do i need an account or some certification in order to avoid talk-page explanations of every edit I make?

Sorry, for that. I've restored your edits and also fixed some grammar. Tolly 4 bolly 15:43, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

JMM - Cheers. Im going to move the new quote box to a less cumbersome, and more contextually appropriate spot in the text.

Hello, Tolly4bolly. You have new messages at Arctic Kangaroo's talk page.
Message added 15:55, 10 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Arctic Kangaroo 15:55, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

The edits I made are 100% correct.

Also,He is no more a official with the IPS. Could you please tell me how do i Change it to "suspended IPS" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.201.18.97 ( talk) 19:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Since those were not sourced, I removed those. If you have to add something then provide a reliable source so that your edits can be saved here, otherwise they will be reverted. Tolly 4 bolly 19:27, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not delete new info re Negritude. I wrote several books on the subject and knew Senghor, Cesaire and Damas intimately. Because I'm new to this I did not change the part about "Negrerie", which only means, "Les choses qui concernent les Negres." What is said about Negreirie is not correct but it's inocuous. Best, ( Passy975 ( talk) 13:15, 11 April 2013 (UTC))

Hello, Tolly4bolly. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection.
Message added 17:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Protection requested for NDTV India... Technical 13 ( talk) 17:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for that but although I belive it's quite little vandalism to protect for admin. We'll see what happens next. Tolly 4 bolly 17:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

It is minor stuff, but it has been persistent for the last three days... I think they'll grant the PC1 protection. That will allow the IPs to make the edits, but no-one will see them unless they are approved. I have seen some IPs make semi-productive edits to the article, and didn't want to lock them out. Technical 13 ( talk) 17:15, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

I contributed to Commando - A One Man Army, by way of adding a Critical Reception section and starting it with a review site reference.

What was Wrong is this? Can you please educate me?

Cheers, Girish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Girish1inn ( talk • contribs) 09:28, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Well it was removed because the one you (IP) provided was not reliable source. If you have to add critical reception then you need to use reliable source. I hope this explains the reverts I made. Tolly 4 bolly 10:10, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

I mentioned www.reviewbol.com, which is a movie review aggregator site, it has reviews from timesofindia, ndtv, ibnlive so how can you claim its unreliable? on what basis? what logic?

You an easily goto the site and check. It is unfair on your part. Please go and check for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Girish1inn ( talk • contribs) 11:25, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Well if you it's reliable then you can probably add it but I am quite sure that your edits will be removed by other users. Tolly 4 bolly 11:29, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

I dont know about reviewbol either. if it is a reliable source in compiling and evaluating the quality reviews out there, it would be a good thing, but I dont really know if they have any repute expertise or are just attempting leech off the value of other sites. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:48, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok. The user is continuously adding the links and reviews from that sites to various articles (like new users or IPs do it for advertising). I will take this to rs noticeboard, probably there would be some conclusion. Thanks for your help. Tolly 4 bolly 11:56, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for updating the article to reflect his recent win. I have nominated it for ITN over here. You may support it if you wish to. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { T/ C} 13:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello. You recently messaged me to let me know about an edit I supposedly made you found non-constructive. I'd just like to clarify that I was aware of no such edit, and I actually haven't edited Wikipedia in several years. I have to suppose someone is using my IP address, and I may actually create an account of my own to rectify that.

Sorry for any inconveniences.

-- 173.161.196.113 ( talk) 13:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

My last edit was legit. You must not like happiness and puppies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.87.15.123 ( talk) 19:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Geez, man. You reverted so quickly I thought you were a bot. Sorry. Look carefully at the article. I did not remove any content. The lede part which I shortened is the same as the Syrian_civil_war#United_Nations_report section. By the way, there is no rule that I have to discuss anything before editing in Wikipedia.-- Emesik ( talk) 20:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I think you should probably discuss with others in the talk page and come to conclusion since this is a very popular topic here. Tolly 4 bolly 08:20, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

I am so sorry Tolly4bolly, but I am actually related to Nandha and I know that his birth date is 06/12/1985. By the way, the image posted was from a Facebook page. So I request that you do not alter my changes because they are true. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.201.178.209 ( talk) 08:51, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

BLP articles need to be sourced. I have updated tags also. Tolly 4 bolly 09:19, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

i want to tell you that mr.sheikh waqas all eduction degrees were fake as i working for express tribune in pakistan its my right to tell the truth to my nation and as the election commission of pakistan did give him a ticket to be a part of election in pakistan on may 11 so i want tell you please don't undid my contribution.if you don't believe google it . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.98.167 ( talk) 19:17, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

I haven't touched Sami People :'( .

Regards ( 153.110.241.233 ( talk) 09:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC))

Hi, Tolly4bolly. Regarding this edit: While it was reasonable to revert since there's no compelling reason for that to be in the infobox, the boilerplate in your edit summary left something to be desired because the content in question was neither unsourced nor negative. I don't use Huggle and have no idea what options it provides, but a manual undo with custom summary might be a better choice in such a context. Just a thought—no big deal. Happy editing! Rivertorch ( talk) 10:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I reverted that since it looked like vandalism (since I've not seen any sort of edits in the past) and reverted it as unsourced. Tolly 4 bolly 10:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello. I noticed that earlier today, you reverted an edit to Turban Cowboy. I understand that you're fighting vandalism, but that was a mistake. The removed section was an unsourced and speculative (i.e. a conspiracy theory) that attemped to link the Boston Marathon bombing to an episode of The Family Guy. Someone (rightfully) removed it, and you reverted that removal. Just a heads-up. Roodog2k ( talk) 19:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. In huggle, I only see the previous version and in that case the previous was vandalism which I reverted. I'm glad that everything is ok now. Tolly 4 bolly 19:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

hi i need to change a pargrath in yorkie wiki beacuse its in corected — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biewer1976 ( talk • contribs) 19:10, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

You're just vandalizing the article when you add inappropriate contents to the article. If you add something that is sourced and is related the article then your edit will be saved otherwise it will be reverted. Thanks. Tolly 4 bolly 19:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear friend i think you've done a mistake cause i've never contributed in this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.A._Jalil_Ananta — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.4.173.62 ( talk) 16:36, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the note but you did contribute there, just look at this and that your contribution was reverted since it was vandalism. Tolly 4 bolly 16:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Khiladi 786, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rahul Singh ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

I didn't make any change to any topic, let alone Chelsea Charms. Either you or the site is in error, since I've never made a topical or data contribution to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noiseinmyblood ( talk • contribs) 16:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I recently visited Wikipedia, and it said I had a message, so I clicked and it said I had made numerous destructive edits to the page parsley, which you fixed. I have not made any edits to the page. I don't think I've even visited the parsley page. Is it possible that someone else with and identical IP address did it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.20.23 ( talk) 20:57, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Tolly4bolly. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#Request to clarify WP:INDICSCRIPT.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Bejnar ( talk) 23:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar Tolly! Good wishes, and Best Regards. Faizan - Let's talk! 08:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

		The Wikipedia Motivation Barnstar
		For giving others motivation and encouragement. You really deserve it. Faizan - Let's talk! 08:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar. Really appreciate it. Tolly 4 bolly 08:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

	Love the shirt!
	Just got the shirt through the Merchandise Giveaway Programme. Thanks for your vote of confidence!  —  Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

What was the edit I made that you changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.14.79.231 ( talk) 13:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

It was a vandalism which I reverted. Tolly 4 bolly 14:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, started these, can you expand and I'll create 1944 then.

• The Law (1943 film) ‎
• Sanjog (1943 film) ‎
• Sahara (1943 Hindi film) ‎
• Rani (1943 film)
• Inkaar (1943 film) ‎
• Badla (1943 film)

♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 15:37, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing all the dabs on Shamshad Begum! I've never used dabsolver before, and thought it must be malfunctioning when it came up with no dabs to fix! Cheers, Espresso Addict ( talk) 00:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

No problem at all. I'm just glad to help. I would like to thank you for copy-editing and also expanding the article. Tolly 4 bolly 08:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I am a new user to Wikipedia and I have just updated couple of pages. I am adding a content which is totally related to pages I have updated. E.g. I tried to add main hoon na movie songs link for Wikipedia users. Dont you think users will be benefited by this? I can see other websites links like bollywoodhungama.com, they have added related content on wikipedia. and I am just trying to do the same. I am not doing any kinda promotion or something but trying to help Wikipedia users to get more information about it. So could you please let me know what is the best possible way to link websites which are related to contents?

Regards Zara — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zara Verma ( talk • contribs) 08:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

First of all welcome here. Secondly, you added spam links here (advertising lyrics website) and adding links are not appropriate here. If you continue add those spam links then you will be blocked (most likely indefinitely). Read what is spam and external links to know what is appropriate here. Thanks. Tolly 4 bolly 09:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Tolly,

You have just mentioned that the link i am adding is spam. could you check out this page link here and tell me is it valid or spam?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_of_Bollywood

At the bottom of this page in external links section there is a website called http://www.hindisongs.com.bd/ . and i don't think so its related to page content. and another links in external links section named Bollywood Complete Songs List and Bollywood Video and Audio Songs both are dead link which is not helpful to users.

Its misguiding users as well Zara Verma ( talk) 09:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that. They are spam links since they are advertising those sites. I've removed those links from the article. There are some editors who just add spam links to all the articles and those links stay quite long before getting removed and the same happened on that article. Tolly 4 bolly 09:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Tolly4bolly,

I just wanted to let you know that an IP address you recently dealth with continued to vandalize. I gave a warning in addition to yours on: User talk:164.104.135.92. Just letting you know. Thanks.

Sosthenes12 ( talk) 19:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Sosthenes12

Thanks. Btw, you don't need to inform me (or other editors) when you warn users. Good luck on fighting with vandalism. Tolly 4 bolly 19:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Indian Premier League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steven Smith and Rahul Sharma ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:50, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello,

I understand your concern with keeping Emily Jones page correct, but she made it very clear Wednesday May 1 on TheTicket in Dallas, that she didn't like to sit in urine left on the toilet seat. Well over 2 million people heard her make this claim and should be left on her wikipedia page for documentation. Please add it back.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.187.100.196 ( talk) 20:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, since it's a BLP article your edit is considered, we can't add any unsourced/trivia materials to articles. If you add it back it will likely be removed again and your IP address will likely be blocked if you continue vandalising wikipedia with adding unsourced materials to BLP articles. Tolly 4 bolly 20:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Please add it back. It is clearly source/referenced hear. http://www.theunticket.com/emily-jones-with-hardline-bathroom-talk/ listen for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.187.100.196 ( talk) 21:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Since I'm not so familiar with the subject, I think you should discuss with other contributors on the article on their talk page or on article's talk page. If they believe it's appropriate then you can add that. Good luck. Tolly 4 bolly 21:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Hey Tolly4bolly; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 14:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

You undid an edit on a questionable description of this company. The phrase "ethically questionable" has no factual basis. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/ethical defines ethical as "relating to beliefs about what is morally right and wrong" and "morally right". As both of these statements rely on the definition of "moral" http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/moral_1?q=moral defines "moral" as "relating to the standards of good or bad behaviour, fairness, honesty, etc. that each person believes in, rather than to laws" and "behaving in ways considered by most people to be correct and honest" - both of these definitions are subjective. Including a subjective descriptor in a factual way is intellectual dishonesty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.104.34.94 ( talk) 05:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

hi, i apologize as i accidentally removed the information and was simply viewing the page for reading reference, and went to add information to another page being created yet didnt change the window tab and thought i was in my page yet was still in the Wester Canon page. Sorry about that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historicarticles ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mahaakshay Chakraborty may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 09:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Why did you reverted this? -- 117.192.74.78 ( talk) 19:30, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

i made a few more changes on your reversion as there were incorrect film dates mentioned in the "actor" section. the vandal (from bangladesh!!!) also tried to destroy the 3 idiots page today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subhanu.bhattacharya ( talk • contribs) 18:25, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

There were some link breakups and mistakes so I restored back to the best version. Just feel free to add. Tolly 4 bolly 18:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

The two examples of edits that I reviewed and approved which you cited as "clearly vandalism" may have been vandalism, but it was not clear enough to reject in either case. Moreover, the second of the two examples was an edit made by you. You seem to be asserting that I should not have approved your edit because you (so you say) vandalized the page. Something doesn't add up. Anyway, I will continue to reject _clear_ cases of vandalism and approve edits which are not so clear. M Carling 14:52, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Well, at least I consider them vandalism since that made page look different. I'm sure Cluebot/or any other editor who fights against vadalism would have reverted those if you haven't accepted. Anyway, everyone makes some mistake in wikipedia and I'm also sure I have also done that. That note was to advice you, don't take that so seriously (at least I wouldn't have done that if I received that). Tolly 4 bolly 18:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Most of what I've been finding at 2013 Indian Premier League is pairs of changes, one reverting the other, in which case a reviewer is meant to accept them both. For a reviewer to reject an edit, it has to be a clear case of vandalism. That doesn't mean clear to someone who knows the subject and the article. It means clear to anyone. If in doubt, a reviewer should approve the edit and let someone revert it. Thanks for understanding. M Carling 18:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

actually brother i have edited th ego goa gone page , in which i have added the plot ... it is from Imdb ... the links here http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2436516/?ref_=sr_1 .... actually i wasnt able to add it in the references becaus ei am a new user and dont no much about editing ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khaja.moinuddin.24 ( talk • contribs) 17:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

First of all, welcome to wikipedia. You can't add copyrighted work from other sites (imdb in this case). Read Wikipedia:Copyrights for more. If you don't know how to add ref then read this, if you need further assistance then feel free to ask me. Tolly 4 bolly 18:35, 13 May 2013 (UTC)