This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The request for formal mediation concerning Austrian economics, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
Sunray (
talk) 05:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
I took one long "political spectrum" test -- I can out within a millimeter of dead centre <g>, with a rating of 67% Libertarian, 65% Republican and 64% Democrat. Be sure to use a test which has a broad spectrum of options for each question -- some of them seem possible slanted a tad. Collect ( talk) 18:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Austrian economics and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, A Quest For Knowledge ( talk) 20:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert, but I have to say... 300,264 kb worth of 'crack' is pretty hilarious.
Cheers. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 06:08, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 8, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 01:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello TFD. I didn't want to prolong the RSN thread unduly, because I believe that the content issue has been resolved there. However, I have tried to replicate your research indicating that Fleet Publishing Corporation was acquired by MacMillan, and I am unable to do so. I found a single volume, published by Fleet, in a third party bibliography with the "MacMillan" in parentheses. Is that the sole basis of your conclusion that Fleet was acquired by MacMillan? Fleet appears to have been a very small independent press and much of its output seems to have been reprints of out-of-copyright old material. There is nothing to suggest that such a company would be of interest to a global publisher such as MacMillan. Is there some further basis for your view, or could it be that you made an unwarranted conclusion in this case? Thanks for any clarification you can offer. SPECIFICO talk 01:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm just reminding participants that East Germany fall within the scope WP:Discretionary sanctions per Arbcom here. Please see recent comments at talk:East Germany. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
There is a Split proposal discussion on the Gun politics in the U.S. talk page that may be of interest to you. Lightbreather ( talk) 04:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The request for formal mediation concerning Austrian economics, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
Sunray (
talk) 05:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
I took one long "political spectrum" test -- I can out within a millimeter of dead centre <g>, with a rating of 67% Libertarian, 65% Republican and 64% Democrat. Be sure to use a test which has a broad spectrum of options for each question -- some of them seem possible slanted a tad. Collect ( talk) 18:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Austrian economics and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, A Quest For Knowledge ( talk) 20:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert, but I have to say... 300,264 kb worth of 'crack' is pretty hilarious.
Cheers. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 06:08, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 8, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 01:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello TFD. I didn't want to prolong the RSN thread unduly, because I believe that the content issue has been resolved there. However, I have tried to replicate your research indicating that Fleet Publishing Corporation was acquired by MacMillan, and I am unable to do so. I found a single volume, published by Fleet, in a third party bibliography with the "MacMillan" in parentheses. Is that the sole basis of your conclusion that Fleet was acquired by MacMillan? Fleet appears to have been a very small independent press and much of its output seems to have been reprints of out-of-copyright old material. There is nothing to suggest that such a company would be of interest to a global publisher such as MacMillan. Is there some further basis for your view, or could it be that you made an unwarranted conclusion in this case? Thanks for any clarification you can offer. SPECIFICO talk 01:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm just reminding participants that East Germany fall within the scope WP:Discretionary sanctions per Arbcom here. Please see recent comments at talk:East Germany. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
There is a Split proposal discussion on the Gun politics in the U.S. talk page that may be of interest to you. Lightbreather ( talk) 04:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)