Welcome to my talk page! My actions are often labelled "controversial", this is because I’m still learning the ropes on certain policies; so I hope you can look past my blunders, composedly tell me the policy I should’ve followed, and focus on the issue I raise/the reasoning behind my actions! | |||||||
|
Feel free to drop me a comment TheSpacebook ( talk) 11:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk) 18:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)TheSpacebook ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It seems unfair, and out of policy to start up a new proposal on a page which I can’t edit to defend myself. Two lies/misrepresentations have already been made about me particularly after their reply to Yamla "I would suggest if you are tired of the poster, you skip over his material"
is a complete lie. I was sanctioned for editing my comments and haven’t done anything since by block, so opening this new sanction doesn’t seem to be policy based. We've already lost one good admin over this user, it's time to put an end to the nonsense
violates
WP:NOPUNISH as per, Blocks should not be used: to retaliate, to disparage, to punish; or if there is no current conduct issue of concern.
:Most importantly, the reasoning behind the new sanction is (underline added) banned from posting to project space and project talk space, with the sole exception of responding to complaints against them
, which is nonsensical, with the reasoning because they edit their posts repeatedly after posting, and that they don't know when to post to noticeboards
as the comments I edited (the reason for the sanction) were the ones I was responding to complaints against me. So how does this solve the "problem" the proposer is trying to solve? I quite busy this weekend, so I won’t be as active on this, but I hope the discussion is bought back to policy, and not to
WP:PUNISH me, and also note that I’ve already been sanctioned for editing comments, and haven’t done it since my block. To note, I have began to edit articles since my block, albeit three. But I hope editors can assume good faith. I bought the Nazi symbolism issue straight to the AN, as I didn’t want to open up a lengthy deletion debate which could turn anti-Semitic, by those defending the userbox. I recently programmed a solution to the suicide line issue which met in the middle of the debate about disclaimers and inclusion (
User:TheSpacebook/lifeline). I also have some drafts for some main-space articles, but I must go through each claim and fact-check each source. This is getting long, but I hope editors can look past my blunders, and focus on my intentions. I feel as though this is how intentional-vandals are dealt with. But admitted, I do need to work on comment-editing. But I have made improvements as I haven’t: edit-warred, canvassed, and I have been sensitive around contentious topics (hence keeping my drafts offline and checking each claim). No one can deny that I’ve made improvements, but now my room for improvement is the comment-editing. The improvements on those other issues shouldn’t be ignored.
Decline reason:
You have made 202 edits at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard in the last 19 days. It has been explained at that noticeboard and this talk page how excessive tweaking is unnecessary and disruptive. The block was to prevent disruption to other editors. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Cut the head off the snake, let them actually edit articles, and grow up a bitseems to also violate WP:NOPUNISH. TheSpacebook ( talk) 06:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure if you want to hear from me right now, but as I said at AN, I think you've been doing good too. So, when you return:
Regards, — Usedtobecool ☎️ 20:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Per the consensus at this AN thread, you are topic banned from project space and project talk space, which would be Wikipedia: and Wikipedia talk:. An exception is responding to complaints about yourself. At this time, I will not enforce this with a partial block, but another admin is free to levy one if appropriate. Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 16:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to my talk page! My actions are often labelled "controversial", this is because I’m still learning the ropes on certain policies; so I hope you can look past my blunders, composedly tell me the policy I should’ve followed, and focus on the issue I raise/the reasoning behind my actions! | |||||||
|
Feel free to drop me a comment TheSpacebook ( talk) 11:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk) 18:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)TheSpacebook ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It seems unfair, and out of policy to start up a new proposal on a page which I can’t edit to defend myself. Two lies/misrepresentations have already been made about me particularly after their reply to Yamla "I would suggest if you are tired of the poster, you skip over his material"
is a complete lie. I was sanctioned for editing my comments and haven’t done anything since by block, so opening this new sanction doesn’t seem to be policy based. We've already lost one good admin over this user, it's time to put an end to the nonsense
violates
WP:NOPUNISH as per, Blocks should not be used: to retaliate, to disparage, to punish; or if there is no current conduct issue of concern.
:Most importantly, the reasoning behind the new sanction is (underline added) banned from posting to project space and project talk space, with the sole exception of responding to complaints against them
, which is nonsensical, with the reasoning because they edit their posts repeatedly after posting, and that they don't know when to post to noticeboards
as the comments I edited (the reason for the sanction) were the ones I was responding to complaints against me. So how does this solve the "problem" the proposer is trying to solve? I quite busy this weekend, so I won’t be as active on this, but I hope the discussion is bought back to policy, and not to
WP:PUNISH me, and also note that I’ve already been sanctioned for editing comments, and haven’t done it since my block. To note, I have began to edit articles since my block, albeit three. But I hope editors can assume good faith. I bought the Nazi symbolism issue straight to the AN, as I didn’t want to open up a lengthy deletion debate which could turn anti-Semitic, by those defending the userbox. I recently programmed a solution to the suicide line issue which met in the middle of the debate about disclaimers and inclusion (
User:TheSpacebook/lifeline). I also have some drafts for some main-space articles, but I must go through each claim and fact-check each source. This is getting long, but I hope editors can look past my blunders, and focus on my intentions. I feel as though this is how intentional-vandals are dealt with. But admitted, I do need to work on comment-editing. But I have made improvements as I haven’t: edit-warred, canvassed, and I have been sensitive around contentious topics (hence keeping my drafts offline and checking each claim). No one can deny that I’ve made improvements, but now my room for improvement is the comment-editing. The improvements on those other issues shouldn’t be ignored.
Decline reason:
You have made 202 edits at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard in the last 19 days. It has been explained at that noticeboard and this talk page how excessive tweaking is unnecessary and disruptive. The block was to prevent disruption to other editors. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Cut the head off the snake, let them actually edit articles, and grow up a bitseems to also violate WP:NOPUNISH. TheSpacebook ( talk) 06:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure if you want to hear from me right now, but as I said at AN, I think you've been doing good too. So, when you return:
Regards, — Usedtobecool ☎️ 20:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Per the consensus at this AN thread, you are topic banned from project space and project talk space, which would be Wikipedia: and Wikipedia talk:. An exception is responding to complaints about yourself. At this time, I will not enforce this with a partial block, but another admin is free to levy one if appropriate. Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 16:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)