This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Hi: My edits to the Baek Ji Young page are not disruptive. I wanted to mention Baek's popularity in terms of endearment from the Korean public, which is something that was not mentioned on the page... -- Nctserf ( talk) 07:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)nctserf
I'm awfully sorry, if you still can see, search EEL ULF 2 in 'Images', the engine this EEL ULF 2 airplane installed is a twin-flat, 2 cylinder air-cooled, the description indicates is an engine from Citroën Visa car, and the only air cooled engine these cars had (there was also a four cylinder liquid cooled engine in some later versions of Visa), was a 652 cc, Flat-twin engine, please, before deleting, it takes my time, and takes valuable information away from readers, check, double check, and think for a while. It seems some people have deep in their minds the pleasure of throwing stones to dissidents, they're looking for an occasion, and as lapidation is not practised today, search for less notorius equivalents. My addition was right, please correct your serious mistake, your overzealous action. By the way, Citroën lovers indicate alloy in crankcase of Visa was worse than in Citroën Series A (2CV, Ami, Dyane, Mehari) Twin-flat, 602 cc engines, some suggest purchasing an specially machined crankcase able to fit the Visa Cylinders, pistons and heads, e.g. the one sold by Filip van Gool, www.vgs2cv.be. Aufwiedersehen. Gesund +
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 14:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC) |
There is an open Talk about the latest "edit war" of the Spanish Empire article header.
As I have seen that you agreed in my edition (Reverting that of Barjimoa) I thought you would like to contribute your opinion.
Greetings. SmithGraves ( talk) 09:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
The reason for the removal of the content is that it is not relevant enough for being where it is, at the top of the page. There is a section within the article related to the Apito Dourado affair, which is enough.
Furhter, the user that is always adding that content has SLB in its name, which is the acronym of the main rival of the club that Pinto da Costa presides.
There was no explanation for the removal because it is the same reason as before, it is not relevant enough to be where it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.155.99.19 ( talk) 13:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the changes made by Wamaka2018. From its editing history it seem the account was only created to remove large portions of the Shepherd Bushiri page. I have no special interest in the page, I found it by accident. It piqued my interest so I have it on my watch list and sometimes make minor additions. Wyatt Tyrone Smith ( talk) 14:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Janbery. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Oluwaseyi Makinde—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
janbery (
talk) 19:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
I hope I'm doing this correctly. My edit on the "slave catcher" page was removed by you. I had previously included two citations with page numbers that included instances of "Black slave catchers". One was an anti-slavery manual from the 1850s and the other was a scholarly work by Kellie Carter Jackson. Both were removed by an editor. The current citation is only limited to the Carolinas and Virginia and makes no reference to the rest of the US during the period before the Civil War, therefore the current definitive sentence included in the Wikipedia entry is not accurate. I simply asked for additional sourcing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.251.104.10 ( talk) 21:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
You had reverted my edit of The Year of the Mouse from Tom & Jerry. What you removed was that Chuck Jones was a co-writer of the cartoon. I have seen the cartoon many times, & I remember Chuck Jones' name being in the story credits. I even had a reference link for the evidence, & you deleted it without any warning. I hope you understand, & I'm sorry if I had wasted your time.
OH, also, you changed Don Towsley to Don Towsley. I'll give you some time to find the mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.135.4.140 ( talk) 21:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Psimonson's contributions. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Exactly what is wrong with category sorting the article Akira (franchise) to becoming the topic article of the category Category:Akira (franchise)? Why did you revert me? -- 67.70.33.184 ( talk) 09:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi: Why is a news article used as a source on a Wikipedia page that discusses statistics? Neither of these articles can be accessed, one is behind a pay wall and the other unavalable? And why is snopes cited on a page in which statistics are being presented? This is very unscientific practice on a page dealing with statistics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.255.236.142 ( talk) 10:18, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Hi: My edits to the Baek Ji Young page are not disruptive. I wanted to mention Baek's popularity in terms of endearment from the Korean public, which is something that was not mentioned on the page... -- Nctserf ( talk) 07:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)nctserf
I'm awfully sorry, if you still can see, search EEL ULF 2 in 'Images', the engine this EEL ULF 2 airplane installed is a twin-flat, 2 cylinder air-cooled, the description indicates is an engine from Citroën Visa car, and the only air cooled engine these cars had (there was also a four cylinder liquid cooled engine in some later versions of Visa), was a 652 cc, Flat-twin engine, please, before deleting, it takes my time, and takes valuable information away from readers, check, double check, and think for a while. It seems some people have deep in their minds the pleasure of throwing stones to dissidents, they're looking for an occasion, and as lapidation is not practised today, search for less notorius equivalents. My addition was right, please correct your serious mistake, your overzealous action. By the way, Citroën lovers indicate alloy in crankcase of Visa was worse than in Citroën Series A (2CV, Ami, Dyane, Mehari) Twin-flat, 602 cc engines, some suggest purchasing an specially machined crankcase able to fit the Visa Cylinders, pistons and heads, e.g. the one sold by Filip van Gool, www.vgs2cv.be. Aufwiedersehen. Gesund +
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 14:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC) |
There is an open Talk about the latest "edit war" of the Spanish Empire article header.
As I have seen that you agreed in my edition (Reverting that of Barjimoa) I thought you would like to contribute your opinion.
Greetings. SmithGraves ( talk) 09:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
The reason for the removal of the content is that it is not relevant enough for being where it is, at the top of the page. There is a section within the article related to the Apito Dourado affair, which is enough.
Furhter, the user that is always adding that content has SLB in its name, which is the acronym of the main rival of the club that Pinto da Costa presides.
There was no explanation for the removal because it is the same reason as before, it is not relevant enough to be where it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.155.99.19 ( talk) 13:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the changes made by Wamaka2018. From its editing history it seem the account was only created to remove large portions of the Shepherd Bushiri page. I have no special interest in the page, I found it by accident. It piqued my interest so I have it on my watch list and sometimes make minor additions. Wyatt Tyrone Smith ( talk) 14:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Janbery. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Oluwaseyi Makinde—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
janbery (
talk) 19:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
I hope I'm doing this correctly. My edit on the "slave catcher" page was removed by you. I had previously included two citations with page numbers that included instances of "Black slave catchers". One was an anti-slavery manual from the 1850s and the other was a scholarly work by Kellie Carter Jackson. Both were removed by an editor. The current citation is only limited to the Carolinas and Virginia and makes no reference to the rest of the US during the period before the Civil War, therefore the current definitive sentence included in the Wikipedia entry is not accurate. I simply asked for additional sourcing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.251.104.10 ( talk) 21:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
You had reverted my edit of The Year of the Mouse from Tom & Jerry. What you removed was that Chuck Jones was a co-writer of the cartoon. I have seen the cartoon many times, & I remember Chuck Jones' name being in the story credits. I even had a reference link for the evidence, & you deleted it without any warning. I hope you understand, & I'm sorry if I had wasted your time.
OH, also, you changed Don Towsley to Don Towsley. I'll give you some time to find the mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.135.4.140 ( talk) 21:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Psimonson's contributions. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Exactly what is wrong with category sorting the article Akira (franchise) to becoming the topic article of the category Category:Akira (franchise)? Why did you revert me? -- 67.70.33.184 ( talk) 09:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi: Why is a news article used as a source on a Wikipedia page that discusses statistics? Neither of these articles can be accessed, one is behind a pay wall and the other unavalable? And why is snopes cited on a page in which statistics are being presented? This is very unscientific practice on a page dealing with statistics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.255.236.142 ( talk) 10:18, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also: