This user may have left Wikipedia. Takinginterest01 has not edited Wikipedia since 19 March 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

An article you recently created, Then I Was Guided, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Nihlus 21:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC) reply

I have reverted your edits on Deir ez-Zor offensive (September 2017–present) because one incident of a retaliatory airstrike by US for SAA'S attack on an SDF headquarters isn't enought to add SAA or anyone as a combatant. If there are sustained and continous clashes, then it may be added. However, recent reports on Twitter of further clashes between SDF and Syrian Army seem to be false ( https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/reports-offensive-us-led-forces-syrian-army-deir-ezzor-may-false-opposition-media-begins-scare-campaign/). We generally avoid Twitter as it is not generally reliable because anyone can claim anything on social media. So please don't use it when other more reliable sources like well-known news sites contradict it. MonsterHunter32 ( talk) 00:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 02:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

-- NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:25, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Blanking means you have read the message. Will you be self-reverting? -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taliban, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hazara ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Salih Muslim Muhammad, you may be blocked from editing. Khirurg ( talk) 07:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg ( talk) 07:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Editor abcdef ( talk) 10:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Turkish military operation in Afrin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

If you continue to edit this way, the next step will be a topic ban. -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Your addition to Turkish military operation in Afrin‎ has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 23:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Why did you move this page to your userspace? I see that you then copied a version of this article from your sandbox to replace it. If you need help with merging or moving pages, please let me or someone know - don't try doing it yourself. Otherwise, it just makes undoing any issues and merging or moving everything more difficult to fix and get done correctly. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Something weird happened Im not sure what, please just remove all pages regarding Ahrar Al-Sharkas made by me thank you Takinginterest01 ( talk) 05:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply

I moved everything back for you. I also saw that you had some revisions in your user sandbox; I went ahead and merged those articles for you. Let me know if you need anything else. Best - ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply

My user page is Ahrar al-Sharkas please change it and remove it from my user page Takinginterest01 ( talk) 05:39, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply

It's moved back into the article space where it belongs. Your repeated attempts to move and blank it are disruptive - please stop. Why do you want this page deleted exactly? I don't understand... ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply

I was writing an article for a group in southern Syria active in 2014, but in my sandbox I was writing an article for a group called the Dzhokhar Dudayev Battalion which is active in Ukraine. I had to leave the Dudayev battalion page in my sandbox because when I tried to publish it, I got an error saying a page for it already exists but I didn't want my work to be deleted so I left it there and put in a request to an administrator to work it out.

Then I began writing about this other group in southern Syria in my sandbox but accidentally copied the Ukrainian group in instead then hit publish and some so I tried to move it back to my user page as I couldnt move it back to sandbox then from there I would just copy and paste the article's code into my sandbox and remove it from my USER PAGE and also to prevent it from being out on Wikipedia as it is all inaccurate, unfinished and an accident.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Republic of Florida (Militia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Florida (Militia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello Takinginterest01,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dmitry Utkin for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Androphobia (Phobia), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 01:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi - thanks for your input for this page. I created it and have done most of the content (though plenty of people have worked on it_) I know it needs a big grammar check,... however it is up for AFD so I have been waiting for the results of that before I put a whole lot of work into it. Its been on AFD for 8 days, so there should be some resolution (one way or the other) in a couple of days or so. Cheers Deathlibrarian ( talk) 23:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syrian Liberation Front–Tahrir al-Sham conflict, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Dana ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Takinginterest01, I am obligated to warn you that you have made more than 1 revert in less than 24 hours on this article, which is under a 1RR policy as all Syrian war-related articles. I would ask that you cancel your last revert of me, withhold from any more reverts and use the talk page so we can find a compromise solution. I have already left you a message on the article's talk page, explaining step-by-step all of my actions and I am awaiting a reply. If you still have issues with my actions I will be ready to listen to a compromise proposal and I have high hopes we can resolve the problem since we have had a good working relationship so far. Cheers! EkoGraf ( talk) 17:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for creating Sabireen Movement, Takinginterest01!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add a citation to the final paragraph.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 09:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:18, 8 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Takinginterest01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Then I Was Guided".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh ( talk) 10:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sham Liberation Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afrin ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:33, 19 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LiwaAsifaAlShamal logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 16:11, 5 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:AlFurqanFoundationLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:RousetheBeliversLOGO.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Waharidulmumininlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:54, 30 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 23:40, 30 October 2018 (UTC) reply

I would request moving the page 2018 northern Syria border clashes, to something like Turkish military operation in Kobani or Tell Abyad or Eastern Euphrates whatever you prefer but i think the current page name does not fit the topic. The bombings are limited to mainly Kobani area, so entire northern syria is incorrect. Also there are for now only bombardments by the Turkish Air Force and no clashes yet, only preparations. In addition, it will fit the other military interventions from Turkey in Syria better; Turkish military operation in Afrin and Turkish military operation in Idlib. I Know I'm Not Alone ( talk) 16:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC) reply

I didn't name it applodion did Takinginterest01 ( talk) 16:11, 2 November 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 northern Syria border clashes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afrin ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Takinginterest01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 19:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 19:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 19:25, 7 December 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nour al-Din al-Zenki Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamza Division ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply

We are in the same boat, and I sympathize, but you should probably self-revert this one. When administrators block users for violating the 1RR, they make no difference between veteran contributors and disruptive users. (That's how I lost my own clean slate). Thanks for commenting on the noticeboard. Cheers, Mikrobølgeovn ( talk) 03:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:03, 17 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahrar al-Sharqiya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamza Division ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Ahrar al Sharqiya Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:The logo of the leon sedov brigade.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:49, 10 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, Takinginterest01,

Thanks for creating Ansar al-Khilafah! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on Ansar al-Khilafah. I recommend more sources to verify the points made in the "Background" section and most of the "History" section.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 17:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC) reply

The Eastern Syria insurgency (2017–present) article is about the ISIL/TFSA/Popular resistance fight against the SDF. For the ISIL vs government campaign being waged around the ISIL-controlled desert pocket we have a separate article Syrian Desert campaign (December 2017–present). Feel free to conduct updates on the Syrian Desert campaign article, any improvements on your part would be appreciated. EkoGraf ( talk) 12:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Takinginterest01, the most common name for that rebel faction is the TFSA (Turkish-backed Free Syrian Army), per Wiki policy we use the most common name. The Wikipedia article on them itself is not called the Syrian National Army. Also, there are no sources supporting that the so-called "interim government" is in a conflict with the SDF. And besides, not one of our Syria battle articles list the "interim government" as a combatant, regardless if various rebel factions claim allegiance to it. This is the standard template that we have been using for years. EkoGraf ( talk) 13:11, 14 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Takinginterest01, I would please ask that you cancel your revert of me here [1] because the topic of that article is about the ISIL vs SAA desert campaign, not about any potential FSA/HTS insurgency in the province against the SAA which is a totally separate thing. You can create an article for the possible opposition insurgency against the SAA if you wish and I would be glad to help you out in expanding the article. EkoGraf ( talk) 19:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Here we go, I have created the article Deir ez-Zor insurgency (2019). Feel free to let me know if I can help out in any other way in expanding the article. EkoGraf ( talk) 19:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Air navigation, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. John from Idegon ( talk) 05:33, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Dear Takinginterest01, I have seen that you have reverted my deletion of clearly unsourced phrases. Could you explain to me why? From my point of view, if you give a source, it should say so in the source. Some of the phrases are supported by the source, but some clearly not. And a Rudaw article is rather a bad source (as only source) for such delicate phrases you have used it, since they are known to be against the SDF anyway and hardly have access to the area they have written about in the article. Maybe you find something from Wladimir von Wilgenburg who is staying in the area from time to time. He is more pro SDF, ok, but most serious journalists are and he usually reports fair and mostly actually has visited the places he reports about. Best, Lean Anael ( talk) 08:27, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

You keep reverting my edits of Syria's role in the Iraq Insurgency. Your sources are allegations and/or contradicted by many other sources. One of your articles claims that Syria helped ferry/encourage fighters to go to Iraq in 2003, not true, military officials noted no Syrian role in recruiting fighters to go to Iraq, ( https://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/15/world/a-nation-at-war-damascus-syria-fears-the-unknown-what-s-behind-us-threats.html) the official Syrian position was dissuading going to Iraq ( https://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/02/world/a-nation-at-war-the-islamic-world-for-arabs-new-jihad-is-in-iraq.html) and alleged Syrian intelligence spooks like the radical anti-American Islamist Abu al-Qa'qa' dissuaded his followers from going to Iraq in 2003. ( https://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1003/p06s01-wome.html) These volunteers were recruited and bused by the Iraqi government at consulates around the Arab world not by the Syrian government ( https://www.economist.com/special-report/2003/03/27/volunteers-for-the-war). These fighters flowed in from Jordan as well, ( https://www.npr.org/news/specials/iraq2003/northam_alkarana.html) as well as Lebanon ( https://www.upi.com/Arab-volunteers-join-Iraq-battle/96171048954848/). In 2004 Syria was involved in the killing of an AQ smuggler to Iraq, something unlikely if Syria was supporting them ( http://joshualandis.oucreate.com//syriablog/archives/2004_09_01_faculty-staff_archive.htm). The Syrian government claimed in 2005 over 1k fighters were arrested by Syria, on the charge of heading to Iraq ( https://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/24/politics/syria-stops-cooperating-with-us-forces-and-cia.html). Corroborated by clashes with Syrian security forces ( https://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/05/world/middleeast/syrians-clash-with-fighters-linked-to-the-iraqi-insurgency.html) Razan Zaitouneh noted forced disappearances and acknowledges the arrests by the Syrian government of those trying to get to Iraq, although she inaccurately reports of Syrian government encouragement during the first month of the war.( http://archive.is/N6N6S#selection-45.1-50.0) Jihadist forums as well refer to Assad as an "American boot-licker" for his crackdowns ( http://archive.is/9SdxO#selection-45.1-50.0) and furthermore this was noted by Abizaid, other US military officials ( http://archive.is/iGtYr) and as well as major opposition leader and former Syrian VP Abdul Halim Khaddam ( http://archive.is/SFtDi#selection-45.1-50.0). They all note of either Syrian crackdowns or lack of Syrian government involvement in the insurgency. In 2007 a US spokesman noted Syrian efforts to crack down on the fighters trying to get into Iraq and a reduction of the the flow, ( https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rice-to-meet-with-syria-at-iraq-conference/) even Petraeus who contradicts his own narrative notes of "robust efforts" by the Syrian government ( https://www.joshualandis.com/blog/syria-gets-credit-for-gains-in-iraq-jihadists-come-from-us-allies/). Wikileaks cables document over 100 repatriations of Libyan fighters trying to get into Iraq by the Syrian government and heavy cooperation with the Libyan government ( https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08TRIPOLI500_a.html). Trials for suspected militants attempting to sneak into Iraq ( https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07DAMASCUS1143_a.html) and meetings on Syrian efforts on the border issue ( https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07DAMASCUS836_a.html). In 2008, more appraisal from US officials ( https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/28/world/middleeast/28syria.htm) and a US commander noted helpful cooperation with the Syrians, though noted isolated instances of corruption in both Syrian and Iraqi border patrols ( https://www.thenational.ae/world/mena/syria-stops-insurgents-on-iraq-border-1.525878?videoId=5771275459001). By 2009, the border crossings were fully under control. ( https://www.newsday.com/news/world/on-syria-border-no-sign-of-saddam-loyalists-1.1646990). The Syrian government actively attempted to crack down on the smugglers, however this was a difficult task as smuggling had been a tradition in the area for centuries and the Iraq-Syria border was really just a formality and top this off with local corruption which plagues Syria. Even the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies noted that "preventing militants from crossing its [Syria's] 380-mile border with Iraq is daunting" and that Syria "lacks sufficient resources to do so" ( https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/media/csis/pubs/050919_saudimiltantsiraq.pdf). The idea that Syria ever supported the insurgency are just allegations and/or from inaccurate or contradicting sources.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Iraq War; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SharabSalam ( talk) 16:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:SyrianNationalResistanceFlag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 Deir ez-Zor Protests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Deir ez-Zor Protests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 𝓛𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓼 06:03, 12 June 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightspecs ( talk • contribs)

Thanks for uploading File:IdlibMilitaryCouncil.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:JayshAlIslamlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The article Inner-SDF conflict during the Syrian Civil War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Literally not notable or significant, can simply be covered in the SDF article; it already is. There is no need for an entire article dedicated to this "conflict", consisting of sporadic incidents—the last of which was over a year ago, just like there's no need for inner- TFSA, inner- Ahrar al-Sham, or inner Tahrir al-Sham articles; all of these conflicts are innumerably more frequent than the few cases of inner-SDF fighting.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 𝓛𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓼 ( talk) 12:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inner-SDF conflict during the Syrian Civil War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inner-SDF conflict during the Syrian Civil War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 𝓛𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓼 ( talk) 12:11, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Inner-SDF conflict during the Syrian Civil War. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:Shuhada al Yarmouk.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurdish Islamic Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PYD ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:C7osure Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC) reply

The community has authorized general sanctions for articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics. This means that any editor who is aware of this, can be sanctioned by an uninvolved admin if their edits violate our basic policies. The notice you were given was just that, a notification. Any user can post it to your talk page, and log the notification here. The notification isn't any sort of sanction on you; it's to make sure you are aware of the general sanctions regime. So, feel free to notify any other editors working in this topic, but only if have not already been notified. Details of how this process works are here. I hope that helps. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:15, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Vanamonde93:, thanks for the notification and apologies for the confusion. Takinginterest01 ( talk) 04:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply

I was literally trying to notify this editor out of good-faith. I have disagreement with this editor but I love their enthusiasm and how they are trying to improve articles. They made some mistakes in some areas which I believe are innocent and I am discussing this in the talk page waiting for their response here. I am so sorry if you feel that I was being personal. Happy editting!.-- SharabSalam ( talk) 04:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history at Atomwaffen Division shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please be advised that you have made your third addition of content that another editor has objected to at Atomwaffen Division; this editor has also explicitly asked that you discuss your change on the article's talk page, in keeping with the WP:BRD cycle. Please discuss your addition there before adding it again. Thank you. SamHolt6 ( talk) 19:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Can get you to the WP:ANI.-- SharabSalam ( talk) 05:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. SharabSalam ( talk) 03:09, 7 October 2019 (UTC) reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Troubles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

In addition the topic area of the Troubles is subject to a one revert per 24 hours restriction (see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles#Amendment (February 2019) for details). FDW777 ( talk) 10:44, 29 September 2019 (UTC) reply

I believe you were correct in removing this, but please don't go around saying "this is propaganda" in your edit summary. It was a factoid that some people thought was meaningful but should be removed as OR/synthesis, that's it. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 16:22, 9 October 2019 (UTC) reply

It would be best if you looked at the talk page of the article in question. There is a consensus there that you are currently violating by continually reverting. Abductive ( reasoning) 05:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 02:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Generally there is no need to cite sources in a film article's Plot section because the film itself is the primary source used to write the section. If you feel there is a need for additional sources, please explain your reasoning on the article's Talk page. You may want to read WP:FILMPLOT as well. Thank you. DonIago ( talk) 04:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdul Hadi al Iraqi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:SealofISIS.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SealofISIS.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi there, this looks like an accident or spam edit so it's possible your password was compromised? I have removed the link. If you haven't done so, I'd encourage you to change your password. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Protein_folding&diff=prev&oldid=912675748 .- Ich ( talk) 15:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Syrian Salvation Government logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:42, 15 February 2020 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on File:CSPO Party Switzerland logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ezhao02 ( talk) 17:04, 26 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You have been deliberately reverting edits of mine and others and blanking related articles due to disputes in Syrian War related articles. Diff: Errasing Info
First
Second
Third
Mr.User200 ( talk) 21:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wang Jingwei regime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internationalism ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 M4 Highway shootout is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 M4 Highway shootout until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BillOReallyy ( talk) 08:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC) reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 05:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Usbet al-Thaireen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra ( talk) 22:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Takinginterest01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Usbet al-Thaireen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 21:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eastern Syria insurgency, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern Syria insurgency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:AhrarAlSharqiya.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:TuranGroup logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Mountain of Islam Battalion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Inadequately supported by reliable, secondary sources. The first three referenced are all generally unreliable. Also little evidence of sustained, significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 ( talk) 10:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Jamaat Bayt al-Maqdis al-Islamiya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extremely dubious sourcing. Either confirmed generally unreliable or suspect web sources. Little evidence of sustained, significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 ( talk) 10:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:IslamDagiTaburu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Minorax^{«¦ talk¦»} 03:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply