This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The article USS Bismarck Sea you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Bismarck Sea for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kges1901 -- Kges1901 ( talk) 11:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
In recognition of your improvements of escort carrier articles. Kges1901 ( talk) 13:49, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Liscome Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 03:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Ommaney Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 ( talk) 09:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Salamaua you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV ( talk) 05:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Salamaua you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Salamaua for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV ( talk) 07:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Takanis Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 15:40, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Takanis Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Takanis Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 16:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Takanis Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Takanis Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 16:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Makin Island (CVE-93) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 20:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Makin Island (CVE-93) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Makin Island (CVE-93) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 14:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Makin Island (CVE-93) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Makin Island (CVE-93) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 21:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Ommaney Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Ommaney Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 19:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Ommaney Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Ommaney Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 22:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Which sentences do you think use "wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information."? I have deleted some sentences and moved others into the Reception part of the article, which should contain critic, which is always subjective. I corrected the grammar and spelling that I could, as I am not a natural English speaker I do not know what else is wrong. Anywayway thanks a lot for your patients. Dynara23 ( talk) 08:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that the corrections I've made to your Good Article submissions are not a reflection on you. You've done a great job to some articles that I had every intention to work on but just didn't have the time. I corrected a few things that I feel were missed during the GA review, minor things that I feel should be consistent with other military ship articles. I hope this explains my actions. Let me know if you have any questions. Pennsy22 ( talk) 15:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Saginaw Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 15:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Kadashan Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed ( talk) 20:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Steamer Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed ( talk) 20:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, could you please review the request you have made for the User:RoundSquare account. I am a bit confused. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi - would you be prepared to explain why you think HMS Cadmus is notable? I'm not saying you're wrong, I'd just like to get your perspective. I haven't done a full-on BEFORE, but on a brief search I wasn't able to find any more sources on this particular ship (note that there appear to have been several ships of this name), aside from the source already used in the article which appears to be a self-published research blog. Thanks GirthSummit (blether) 10:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Mission Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of L293D -- L293D ( talk) 02:20, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Mission Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Mission Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of L293D -- L293D ( talk) 13:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Saginaw Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Saginaw Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 21:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The article USS Bismarck Sea you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Bismarck Sea for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kges1901 -- Kges1901 ( talk) 11:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
In recognition of your improvements of escort carrier articles. Kges1901 ( talk) 13:49, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Liscome Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 03:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Ommaney Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 ( talk) 09:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Salamaua you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV ( talk) 05:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Salamaua you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Salamaua for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV ( talk) 07:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Takanis Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 15:40, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Takanis Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Takanis Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 16:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Takanis Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Takanis Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 16:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Makin Island (CVE-93) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 20:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Makin Island (CVE-93) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Makin Island (CVE-93) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 14:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Makin Island (CVE-93) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Makin Island (CVE-93) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 21:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Ommaney Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Ommaney Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 19:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Ommaney Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Ommaney Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 22:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Which sentences do you think use "wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information."? I have deleted some sentences and moved others into the Reception part of the article, which should contain critic, which is always subjective. I corrected the grammar and spelling that I could, as I am not a natural English speaker I do not know what else is wrong. Anywayway thanks a lot for your patients. Dynara23 ( talk) 08:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that the corrections I've made to your Good Article submissions are not a reflection on you. You've done a great job to some articles that I had every intention to work on but just didn't have the time. I corrected a few things that I feel were missed during the GA review, minor things that I feel should be consistent with other military ship articles. I hope this explains my actions. Let me know if you have any questions. Pennsy22 ( talk) 15:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Saginaw Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 15:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Kadashan Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed ( talk) 20:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Steamer Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed ( talk) 20:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, could you please review the request you have made for the User:RoundSquare account. I am a bit confused. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi - would you be prepared to explain why you think HMS Cadmus is notable? I'm not saying you're wrong, I'd just like to get your perspective. I haven't done a full-on BEFORE, but on a brief search I wasn't able to find any more sources on this particular ship (note that there appear to have been several ships of this name), aside from the source already used in the article which appears to be a self-published research blog. Thanks GirthSummit (blether) 10:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Mission Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of L293D -- L293D ( talk) 02:20, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Mission Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Mission Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of L293D -- L293D ( talk) 13:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
The article USS Saginaw Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Saginaw Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 ( talk) 21:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)