From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on NJK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dpmuk ( talk) 22:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC) reply

September 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rudaj Organization, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Zephyrad ( talk) 21:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Overdubbing, you will be blocked from editing. Zephyrad ( talk) 21:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC) reply

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Howard Stern Show has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Blanchardb - MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 13:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion of Njk

A tag has been placed on Njk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CultureDrone ( talk) 14:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Apologies - I used the wrong CSD reason - it should be section A7 regarding a club or organisation which does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant. CultureDrone ( talk) 14:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on NJK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dpmuk ( talk) 22:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC) reply

September 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rudaj Organization, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Zephyrad ( talk) 21:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Overdubbing, you will be blocked from editing. Zephyrad ( talk) 21:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC) reply

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Howard Stern Show has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Blanchardb - MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 13:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion of Njk

A tag has been placed on Njk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CultureDrone ( talk) 14:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Apologies - I used the wrong CSD reason - it should be section A7 regarding a club or organisation which does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant. CultureDrone ( talk) 14:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook