Nomination of PornstarGlobal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PornstarGlobal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PornstarGlobal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 00:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Solidcontrib. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Sunny Leone, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 07:05, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
This is quite the 360 from your past harassment & conduct and is very hard to take seriously. I advise you to please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view as well. I would ask that you also refrain from contacting me in regard to this until proper Mediation has been reached here: [1] Thank you Solidcontrib ( talk) 07:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Your request for mediation on my end is denied. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 07:34, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:PornstarGlobal.com-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nymf hideliho! 08:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Your mediation request regarding PornstarGlobal has been closed since that article has been deleted through Articles for deletion and the content portion of your request is now moot. (Mediation being for content, not conduct, issues.) As for the conduct issues which you raised in your mediation request, if you still wish to pursue them the proper forum would be either Wikiquette assistance if you would just like other editor's opinions about the conduct or Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents if you wish to seek sanctions against other editors. Should you wish to contest the deletion of the article, the proper forum is Deletion Review. Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) (as MedCab clerk) 13:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of PornstarGlobal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PornstarGlobal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PornstarGlobal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 00:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Solidcontrib. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Sunny Leone, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 07:05, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
This is quite the 360 from your past harassment & conduct and is very hard to take seriously. I advise you to please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view as well. I would ask that you also refrain from contacting me in regard to this until proper Mediation has been reached here: [1] Thank you Solidcontrib ( talk) 07:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Your request for mediation on my end is denied. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 07:34, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:PornstarGlobal.com-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nymf hideliho! 08:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Your mediation request regarding PornstarGlobal has been closed since that article has been deleted through Articles for deletion and the content portion of your request is now moot. (Mediation being for content, not conduct, issues.) As for the conduct issues which you raised in your mediation request, if you still wish to pursue them the proper forum would be either Wikiquette assistance if you would just like other editor's opinions about the conduct or Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents if you wish to seek sanctions against other editors. Should you wish to contest the deletion of the article, the proper forum is Deletion Review. Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) (as MedCab clerk) 13:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC)