This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sean William @ 15:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Its getting large. Do you think a bot should archive it if, say, a section is older than 30 days? Simply south 12:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
What took you so long? The article has been around for, oh, at least five minutes. Slacker. -- Tagishsimon (talk)
I clicked on your reference link to Heddon on the Wall site and it says "Waggon" not "WagGon"! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.122.65.138 ( talk • contribs) 19:40, June 28, 2007.
I accept what you have said in your reply, but surely it was just an accidental miss-key on their part, why would anyone want to put such a spelling intentionally? especially as they spell it correctly elsewere. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.131.52.249 ( talk • contribs) 12:57, June 29, 2007.
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sean William @ 15:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Its getting large. Do you think a bot should archive it if, say, a section is older than 30 days? Simply south 12:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
What took you so long? The article has been around for, oh, at least five minutes. Slacker. -- Tagishsimon (talk)
I clicked on your reference link to Heddon on the Wall site and it says "Waggon" not "WagGon"! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.122.65.138 ( talk • contribs) 19:40, June 28, 2007.
I accept what you have said in your reply, but surely it was just an accidental miss-key on their part, why would anyone want to put such a spelling intentionally? especially as they spell it correctly elsewere. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.131.52.249 ( talk • contribs) 12:57, June 29, 2007.