This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Hi, you'll need to put a reference regarding Rodin on the Ravioli page - Most people would associate Rodin with sculpture. Clovis Sangrail ( talk) 04:04, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.
Thank you for your time,
the wub (
talk) 17:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using
Global message delivery)
Thanks for the barnstar! You seem to have all the qualities (and the dedication) to be an excellent wiki-editor. Hope you learn the essential tools and scripts quickly, for contributing without being hampered. You are welcome to ask me for help, or can simply use the advanced search (ticking only the "help" option). Anir1uph ( talk) 03:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello Irondome! Please do not forget to add references for the content you add to Wikipedia. Adding a well formatted references is very easy to do.
This will add a well formatted reference that would be helpful in case the website link ( web URL) becomes inactive ( dead/link rot) after some time. You can read more about it on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv. thanks and regards -- DBig Xray 07:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
{{subst:
User:DBigXray/ref}}
on User_talk DBig Xray 07:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
for being WP:CIVIL, helping other editors and getting into discussion with others , cheers DBig Xray 08:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
Please type reasonable edit summary about your changes. typing four tildes "~~~~" is not needed in edit summaries anywhere. typing four tildes "~~~~" is only needed when you are posting a comment on talk page, even there you should only sign at the end of "your comment" on the talk page and not in the edit box. I hope this helps, feel free to ask any further clarification. Happy editing , cheers. -- DBig Xray 08:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
A gerbil on steroids is not a good motivator. Damn! :) Irondome ( talk) 10:10, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello Irondome, I figured out that there was a minor typo in the template you pasted on User:Irondome I have corrected it over here. You can also drop a message to an editor of your choice from the list at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters for this. regards-- DBig Xray 10:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Appreciate that mate. You know, Im thinking its just better to stick with good collaborators like you and a couple of others :) Appreciated! Irondome ( talk) 10:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
I may sometimes hassle you with dumb questions, but I wont be a major pain. I think we will contribute and interact on projects in the future, so that would be cool my friend. Irondome ( talk) 10:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
DBig
Xray has given you a
dove! Doves promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{ subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
the wub "?!" 14:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Mrt3366 (Talk?) 07:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:INDENT for more. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 07:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Irondome ( talk) 15:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
So that you can carry on your civil discussions. Just a note , please check WP:V WP:OR, WP:SYNTHESIS , WP:RS and wp:SPS . They will help you to improve your discussion and editing. cheers DBig Xray 15:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC) |
Most welcome! Irondome ( talk) 15:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Baklava is a rich, sweet pastry made of layers of filo pastry filled with chopped nuts and sweetened with syrup or honey. Enjoy! Mrt3366 (Talk?) 07:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC) |
hi, please see Wikipedia:Tutorial/Talk_pages to know how to indent. We feel that leaving a space after newline will indent the line but one needs to use Colon : to create indents. you can check out the full Wikipedia:Tutorial its short and good. -- DBig Xray 15:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Irondome ( talk) 15:13, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
≫TheStrike Σagle≪ 15:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Anir1uph ( talk) 15:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on this (again). Should you choose to respond to this invitation, your feedback would be valued. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 11:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
See Comparison of ICBMs. Thanks for your help. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 07:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I have some important things to discuss with you on my talk page. Your feedback would be greatly valued. I think your opinion may come in handy. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 08:52, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Mrt3366 (Talk?) 14:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Awarded to Irondome for the great spirit of Teamwork and collaboration he has shown in the extensive discussions on the ICBM articles. Hope you keep up this spirit and continue your valuable contributions here. DBig Xray 13:47, 1 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, how are you. I saw a decrease in your activity here after the Op Missile was over. why dont you give a try to SuggestBot for topics of your interest or helping wikipedia fight WP:Vandalism or joining WP:CVUA let me know if you have any special interest. cheers DBig Xray 21:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC) |
Just drop a message at Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy/Enroll and someone will look into it. the editors at CVUA are very supportive and helpful.-- DBig Xray 05:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
To keep you going, esp. through the graveyard shifts. Thanks for the cooperation and the barnstar. I'd like you to keep commenting on my talk page. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 08:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
Help me build this page. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 11:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
help me build the page. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 12:19, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, Simon Adler! There's been a reply to your request for enrollment over at the
CVUA Enroll Page - why don't you give it a look? You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Template:CVUA Enroll Talkback}} template. |
Dan653 ( talk) 22:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Irondrome. On the enWiki at least, there's is nothing to stop very new users from voting at RfA. However, it's an important process and some us have been trying hard to reduce the 'dramafest' effect. Please take a moment to learn more about the process, the research that is required before voting, and above all do understand that not all users may be on the time zone as you. Thanks, and I support your request for adoption. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Irondome! I'll be your instructor here at the CVUA, and I can't wait to get started. :) First, I've got just a few quick questions - if you'd answer here and then leave me a {{ talkback}} template when you're done, that'd be great. Again, can't wait!
See, those were short! :) Theopolisme TALK 11:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Please stop leaving talkback templates... Theopolisme TALK 22:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No hurry, take your time! But if you wouldn't mind dropping a {{talkback|Irondome}} on my talk when you finish, that would be great (to ensure that I don't miss it in my watchlist). Thanks! Theopolisme TALK 14:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Dan653 ( talk) 02:23, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Iron I saw your comment on the SPI before it got deleted, Glad to see your concern against my tormentors. This is a bad side of editing at Wikipedia where some users, who have no intention of contributing positively to discussions , jump into it merely for the sake of WP:Trolling , They disrupt the process and enjoy hurling WP:AOBFs against editors with complete disregard to their contributions. ANI is often misused by them and it has earned the name of WP:Drama Stage. Their main intention is to malign editors by any means hook or by crook, you already saw a good example at the false SPI initiated against me. Sadly one has to deal with it. When this crosses the limits of endurance, the editors (and even many admins whom I have seen) are forced to leave due to the poisonous atmosphere created. regards -- DBig Xray 11:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Irondome! Just reaching out - your CVUA page is still looking a bit blank - are you having problems answering the questions or something? Here's a link: User:Theopolisme/CVUA/Irondome. :) Theo polisme :) 23:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC) Hello. You have a new message at Theopolisme's talk page. Theo polisme :) 00:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
I am humbled by the Special Barnstar. Thank you! AuthorAuthor ( talk) 00:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey there IronDome,
I noticed you're seeking adoption. I'm not part of the program, but if you'd like, I can still adopt you. -- Activism 1234 23:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! AustralianRupert ( talk) 23:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators ( about the project • what coordinators do) 09:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sandwich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:35, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
LittleWink ( talk) 19:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Is there a particular reason why you removed my contribution to the talk page and replaced it with your own? Poliocretes ( talk) 19:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fried fish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andalusian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
This important information was removed from an article by Pluto2012, despite he is the only one who inserted repeated information about territorial and demographic changes. Perhaps you could restore the missing content and finish this nonsense. Thanks.-- 201.231.95.189 ( talk) 00:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 17:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Mrt3366/Xmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 21:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 13:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
The Village Pump is a good place to start when unsure of one's route. With regard to the article you hope to create, I see nothing at all wrong with starting in your own userspace as a sub page and working it into at east a decent stub with references before moving t to main namespace. the problem you face is the synthesis of original research unless you are remarkably careful. Never let inexperience stand in your way. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 13:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Irondome, I hope you don't mind but I fixed the indentation of your comments in the talk page since it was a bit messy. If you find it not acceptable that I edit your comments, please feel free to revert my edit. I will be responding your comment over there. Regards. Gaba p ( talk) 18:58, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
As you're aware, I value your ability to provide a neutral summary of debates in closing RFC. Would you be prepared to look at the RFC currently running at Talk:Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute and consider closing it? I think the debate has run its course. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 18:53, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Since you are a relatively new editor (although not more so than myself) with your permission I'll give you some advice: comments like this are not helpful. Sarcasm never aims at bringing the parties involved in a discussion closer together, quite the opposite in fact. I would definitely not recommend following Wee's war-like attitude, it only makes you less likely to be treated with civility down the line. Regards. Gaba p ( talk) 22:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you! Yours is my first star ever :) Cheers mate. Gaba p ( talk) 15:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry I keep fixing your indentations but I only do it so the flow of the discussion isn't disrupted. Please tell me if you find this not acceptable and I will of course stop doing it. Regards. Gaba p ( talk) 22:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited K-ration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wrigley ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry I could not comment for a while but I was blocked for 31 hours for a perceived
WP:NPA violation. Look, I know you are a relatively new user and most of these
wiki-lawyering concepts might not be familiar to you but I need you to understand something. Right now Wee and Kahastok are claiming they had consensus for deleting the whole section. This is not correct. As you well know, the consensus was to apply my proposed re-factoring of the section. Now, you might wonder "what's the difference? Just draft the new section and apply it, there's no need to restore the old section back". See, this has two problems. First: both Wee and Kahastok are violating the outcome of an RfC and this can not be allowed to happen because it sets a precedent that they can pretty much get away with anything they want. Second: if they are allowed to disregard the consensus reached in the talk page to apply my proposed edit based on the source you brought in among others, they will base all new attempts at introducing the re-factored section on "no consensus" given that the status-quo of the article is to have no section at all. You don't have to take my word for it, in the section you opened
Talk:Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute#I_agree_with_Gabas_proposed_sources._Lets_rebuild_the_section_here. they immediately jumped to oppose the addition of the re-factored section that was agreed during the discussion. They will use the "no consensus" card to prevent the re-factored section to be added with the aim of having no section at all or merely a two line comment saying absolutely nothing of value.
Please do not take any of this as an insult to your intelligence or abilities as a WP editor. I just point these things out because it looks to me that you have had the fortune so far to not encounter editors like Wee in your previous editing in WP and you should be very aware of what they are capable of in terms of manipulation. I know you hold him in a somewhat high esteem but I also know that you will, if not now, in time, see through his actions. Regards and please don't be discouraged to provide your input at the talk page. Gaba p ( talk) 17:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC) PS: the issue is now being discussed at ANI.
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
Though my original message may have been directed to you mistakenly, the reason for not changing was not embarassment but I saw no need as you were doing a good job. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 19:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC) |
I'd like to second this barnstar. Thank you, Irondome. --
Langus (
t) 00:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
I apologize again for my suspicion. It all makes sense now.
Regards. -- Langus ( t) 00:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm assuming here that you've read my reply at ANI. My full closure statement is at Talk:Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute#RFC: Removal of section titled "International position". I'm not sure it's off much use from a learning about dispute resolution point of view apart from an example of how not to do it. I don't close many discussions although when they're often the more contentious ones so I do have some experience with more heated discussions. In this instance I point out the problems as I saw them (without naming names) and tried to make it clear that one "side" wasn't the winner and that I hoped that a compromise could be reached as it looked like good progress was being made. This last bit was an effort at trying to keep all sides happy while also being the truth. The reason I closed the RfC rather than just let it run and see what compromise might be reached in the meantime was two fold. Firstly I did not think it would be helpful for people, especially those involved, to be saying there was a consensus there and secondly I did not think it would be fair on other editors finding the RfC (via for example the RfC listings) to comment in a process that I thought had clearly already failed. I note that a lot of good work has gone on towards a compromise in the last few hours although there are obviously still differences. At the very least this should make any future RfC be able to be more focused on specific issues and offer specific ideas although I remain hopeful that this won't be necessary and a compromise will be reached without the need for another RfC. Dpmuk ( talk) 07:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Generally, it was a failure. It took some time, before the production could start, and then it was quickly wiped off by RPG-2. If you're interested, I can send you a scan of a source article, with photos of surviving exhibit (if you write me your mail or send me a message). Pibwl ←« 23:19, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- John ( talk) 06:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
That edit you reverted as a "personal attack" was actually just a comment that contained no personal attack. Certainly not on you, and not one you are entitled to revert. Please do not refactor the comments of others unless there is a clear personal attack. Thanks :> Doc talk 08:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
And we're at an impasse again, with Gaba p refusing to give ground or compromise and insisting on more and more weight to his edit. RFC?
Do you still have an appetite for starting a neutral RFC? Wee Curry Monster talk 16:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Your white helmet routine may be required again. As one of my section leaders once said "blessed are the peace keepers, for they are shot at by both sides". Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 01:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Centurion tank, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ( Hohum @) 22:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 07:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your input on the talk page for the eponymous missile system. I'm sure we're getting somewhere! Sweet dreams... 201.230.175.86 ( talk) 01:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 04:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Irondome.
You are invited to join
WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of
breakfast-related topics. |
---|
Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this.
You are receiving this as you have recently reverted a user removing interwiki links.
Removal of interwiki links on a page linked to a wikidata item that contains the links is NOT vandalism. Please use this script which can identify if the links are found on wikidata.
If you have any questions regarding wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata. 86.45.216.32 ( talk) 03:24, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
A stub article has been created. Cheers, Northamerica1000 (talk) 13:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for your offer. The article is in sandbox now. I can email you with more details if you wish.User:Canoe1967|Canoe1967]] ( talk) 22:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
-- Canoe1967 ( talk) 22:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
I enjoyed your comment at Thomas Savage. Thanks for reminding me (us) that I/we all need to lighten up and have fun :-) — Keithbob • Talk • 23:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dieppe Raid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFV ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 15:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Careful with reverting vandalism, you actually put it back in! I recommend using Twinkle until obtaining rollback rights, if you wish. Cheers — MusikAnimal talk 16:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
It happens sometimes. When my browser loads my watchlist, it does a sudden jump down a line or two. If an entry is very long, it wraps and the "rollback" option sits among the left side. Just as I click a "diff" on an item, the page jumps and I accidentally click "rollback" on another item. It happens every month or so. A thousand pardons. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
By the way, it happens so often that the above is a boilerplate post. :) I will actually save it to my toolbox for further use. Again, so sorry. The RfA page keeps floating to the top of my watchlist, so that is why. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Could you help me with this? I don't know who are the current Head of the Government Deputies.-- Michael Zeev ( talk) 03:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 09:21, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Can you read what I wrote at his talk page? Thank you. Mistico ( talk) 20:22, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LITENING targeting pod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
fair enough, though I'd still like to note that the original, german-made weapons remained in service in various countries at least into 1950s, but I guess the current version is good enough. Ape89 ( talk) 20:06, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
When you gave the opportunity, please explain the rationale for your recent edits to this page on the articles talk page. I find your edit summaries to be incoherent. In the first one you say "let the source do the talking", then you repeat the exact same edit with the summary: "patently POV choice of "sources"". What is your claimed justification for the edit, accurate representation of the source or source selection? In any case it looks like a clearly non-neutral edit as you removed information cited to an academic source without reasonable explanation. Further if someone reverts your edit, the next step is to go to the talk page to discuss the edit not edit war the content. Dlv999 ( talk) 02:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
While it's great to add actual historical information to the article - the addition of the claimed date is being "supported" by a 100% irrelevant source. It contains zero information about Spam - none, zilch, nothing. Given the inappropriate addition of a fake ref, it's hard to accept the date provided by that same editor as anything even remotely reliable. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 02:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you participated in the first deletion discussion for this article; it's up for deletion again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Korean War (2nd nomination). If you'd like to comment again, feel free. Thanks, Ansh 666 03:49, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
moved from User talk:79.176.149.254
Saw your question at Anna's talk page, you may want to have a look at Help:Archiving a talk page. Basically you can either copy/paste it to a subpage of your talk page manually (i.e. User talk:Irondome/Archive 1), or you can setup Autoarchiving that will be done by a bot. Anna does it manually, I use a bot. You can have a look at the code on my talk page for the settings for MiszaBot III, but it's all listed at the help page I listed above. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 22:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Cheers! | |
Very true, so we must go behind the bar and make our own. :-) MarshalN20 | Talk 02:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC) |
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 15:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 22:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 21:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 00:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
In that case undelete Aspies and Talk:Aspies temporarily and move content in full to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism, and then we can relink the from Aspies to Sociological and cultural aspects of autism and then redirect Talk:Aspies to Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism, and I can get everyone else to work on merging Aspies and Talk: Aspies into that document?
Is this possible solution to your problems? Please have my userpage undeleted, then we can get to work? AspieNo1 ( talk) 18:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC) AspieNo1 ( talk) 18:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Please take the time to read the following explaination. The hotlinking of the publisher name is NOT the url to the cite, that citation is a non-linked cite. The linking of publisher names to the relevant Wikipedia article is standard convention, as you can see on many, many articles here (if you wish for examples, I can give one). The hotlinked publisher name is NOT a link to the source, there is no URL/hotlinking present to the source, which is also acceptable practice. Please familiarize yourself with these common conventions. For greater detail, see the following discussion at: Talk:IAI_Kfir#Regarding_recent_edit_conflicts, perhaps double-checking the situation and explanation before reverting in under a minute's time would have been a useful exercise as well. Kyteto ( talk) 22:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 02:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
EyeTruth, I would like to see a version of V1 incorporating my proposed extra sentence (see hatted V1 comments for detail.) I believe it adds to it, and leads more logically to the debate on blitzkrieg linked in the notes. Cheers! Irondome ( talk) 23:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for advice. To be honest, I stronly despise any media as source, regardless is it New York Times, BBC, Jerusalem Post, PressTV, RT, etc. Especially when it comes about political conflicts. If I'm in charge about source policy, I would ban absolutely everything except books produced by academic publishers. Regarding Iranian history, personally I prefer British and American sources ("enemy" countries) from Cambridge University or Columbia University. Nationality of scholars isn't important, for example book about Bahai persecution in Iran by Israeli scholar Soli Shahvar is available in any Iranian university, I've read it at UT. If you rely on media too much, even that situation would be "impossible". Cheers! :) -- HistorNE ( talk) 20:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 08:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm EuroCarGT. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Burning shoe leather, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. ///EuroCar GT 00:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
A while ago, in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Serbs and other non-Albanians in Kosovo, you said the subject had potential under a different title, but didn't address the issue of improper synthesis. Would you be interested in working on that subject in a less contentious scope? I noticed we don't have a human rights in Kosovo article yet, and a lot of that content sounds like it might fit there. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
///EuroCar GT 01:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
///EuroCar GT 01:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
///EuroCar GT 01:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
///EuroCar GT 02:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Hi, you'll need to put a reference regarding Rodin on the Ravioli page - Most people would associate Rodin with sculpture. Clovis Sangrail ( talk) 04:04, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.
Thank you for your time,
the wub (
talk) 17:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using
Global message delivery)
Thanks for the barnstar! You seem to have all the qualities (and the dedication) to be an excellent wiki-editor. Hope you learn the essential tools and scripts quickly, for contributing without being hampered. You are welcome to ask me for help, or can simply use the advanced search (ticking only the "help" option). Anir1uph ( talk) 03:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello Irondome! Please do not forget to add references for the content you add to Wikipedia. Adding a well formatted references is very easy to do.
This will add a well formatted reference that would be helpful in case the website link ( web URL) becomes inactive ( dead/link rot) after some time. You can read more about it on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv. thanks and regards -- DBig Xray 07:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
{{subst:
User:DBigXray/ref}}
on User_talk DBig Xray 07:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
for being WP:CIVIL, helping other editors and getting into discussion with others , cheers DBig Xray 08:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
Please type reasonable edit summary about your changes. typing four tildes "~~~~" is not needed in edit summaries anywhere. typing four tildes "~~~~" is only needed when you are posting a comment on talk page, even there you should only sign at the end of "your comment" on the talk page and not in the edit box. I hope this helps, feel free to ask any further clarification. Happy editing , cheers. -- DBig Xray 08:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
A gerbil on steroids is not a good motivator. Damn! :) Irondome ( talk) 10:10, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello Irondome, I figured out that there was a minor typo in the template you pasted on User:Irondome I have corrected it over here. You can also drop a message to an editor of your choice from the list at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters for this. regards-- DBig Xray 10:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Appreciate that mate. You know, Im thinking its just better to stick with good collaborators like you and a couple of others :) Appreciated! Irondome ( talk) 10:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
I may sometimes hassle you with dumb questions, but I wont be a major pain. I think we will contribute and interact on projects in the future, so that would be cool my friend. Irondome ( talk) 10:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
DBig
Xray has given you a
dove! Doves promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{ subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
the wub "?!" 14:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Mrt3366 (Talk?) 07:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:INDENT for more. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 07:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Irondome ( talk) 15:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
So that you can carry on your civil discussions. Just a note , please check WP:V WP:OR, WP:SYNTHESIS , WP:RS and wp:SPS . They will help you to improve your discussion and editing. cheers DBig Xray 15:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC) |
Most welcome! Irondome ( talk) 15:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Baklava is a rich, sweet pastry made of layers of filo pastry filled with chopped nuts and sweetened with syrup or honey. Enjoy! Mrt3366 (Talk?) 07:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC) |
hi, please see Wikipedia:Tutorial/Talk_pages to know how to indent. We feel that leaving a space after newline will indent the line but one needs to use Colon : to create indents. you can check out the full Wikipedia:Tutorial its short and good. -- DBig Xray 15:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Irondome ( talk) 15:13, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
≫TheStrike Σagle≪ 15:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Anir1uph ( talk) 15:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on this (again). Should you choose to respond to this invitation, your feedback would be valued. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 11:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
See Comparison of ICBMs. Thanks for your help. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 07:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I have some important things to discuss with you on my talk page. Your feedback would be greatly valued. I think your opinion may come in handy. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 08:52, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Mrt3366 (Talk?) 14:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Awarded to Irondome for the great spirit of Teamwork and collaboration he has shown in the extensive discussions on the ICBM articles. Hope you keep up this spirit and continue your valuable contributions here. DBig Xray 13:47, 1 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, how are you. I saw a decrease in your activity here after the Op Missile was over. why dont you give a try to SuggestBot for topics of your interest or helping wikipedia fight WP:Vandalism or joining WP:CVUA let me know if you have any special interest. cheers DBig Xray 21:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC) |
Just drop a message at Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy/Enroll and someone will look into it. the editors at CVUA are very supportive and helpful.-- DBig Xray 05:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
To keep you going, esp. through the graveyard shifts. Thanks for the cooperation and the barnstar. I'd like you to keep commenting on my talk page. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 08:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
Help me build this page. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 11:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
help me build the page. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 12:19, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, Simon Adler! There's been a reply to your request for enrollment over at the
CVUA Enroll Page - why don't you give it a look? You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Template:CVUA Enroll Talkback}} template. |
Dan653 ( talk) 22:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Irondrome. On the enWiki at least, there's is nothing to stop very new users from voting at RfA. However, it's an important process and some us have been trying hard to reduce the 'dramafest' effect. Please take a moment to learn more about the process, the research that is required before voting, and above all do understand that not all users may be on the time zone as you. Thanks, and I support your request for adoption. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Irondome! I'll be your instructor here at the CVUA, and I can't wait to get started. :) First, I've got just a few quick questions - if you'd answer here and then leave me a {{ talkback}} template when you're done, that'd be great. Again, can't wait!
See, those were short! :) Theopolisme TALK 11:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Please stop leaving talkback templates... Theopolisme TALK 22:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No hurry, take your time! But if you wouldn't mind dropping a {{talkback|Irondome}} on my talk when you finish, that would be great (to ensure that I don't miss it in my watchlist). Thanks! Theopolisme TALK 14:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Dan653 ( talk) 02:23, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Iron I saw your comment on the SPI before it got deleted, Glad to see your concern against my tormentors. This is a bad side of editing at Wikipedia where some users, who have no intention of contributing positively to discussions , jump into it merely for the sake of WP:Trolling , They disrupt the process and enjoy hurling WP:AOBFs against editors with complete disregard to their contributions. ANI is often misused by them and it has earned the name of WP:Drama Stage. Their main intention is to malign editors by any means hook or by crook, you already saw a good example at the false SPI initiated against me. Sadly one has to deal with it. When this crosses the limits of endurance, the editors (and even many admins whom I have seen) are forced to leave due to the poisonous atmosphere created. regards -- DBig Xray 11:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Irondome! Just reaching out - your CVUA page is still looking a bit blank - are you having problems answering the questions or something? Here's a link: User:Theopolisme/CVUA/Irondome. :) Theo polisme :) 23:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC) Hello. You have a new message at Theopolisme's talk page. Theo polisme :) 00:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
I am humbled by the Special Barnstar. Thank you! AuthorAuthor ( talk) 00:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey there IronDome,
I noticed you're seeking adoption. I'm not part of the program, but if you'd like, I can still adopt you. -- Activism 1234 23:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! AustralianRupert ( talk) 23:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators ( about the project • what coordinators do) 09:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sandwich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:35, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
LittleWink ( talk) 19:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Is there a particular reason why you removed my contribution to the talk page and replaced it with your own? Poliocretes ( talk) 19:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fried fish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andalusian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
This important information was removed from an article by Pluto2012, despite he is the only one who inserted repeated information about territorial and demographic changes. Perhaps you could restore the missing content and finish this nonsense. Thanks.-- 201.231.95.189 ( talk) 00:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 17:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Mrt3366/Xmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 21:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 13:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
The Village Pump is a good place to start when unsure of one's route. With regard to the article you hope to create, I see nothing at all wrong with starting in your own userspace as a sub page and working it into at east a decent stub with references before moving t to main namespace. the problem you face is the synthesis of original research unless you are remarkably careful. Never let inexperience stand in your way. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 13:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Irondome, I hope you don't mind but I fixed the indentation of your comments in the talk page since it was a bit messy. If you find it not acceptable that I edit your comments, please feel free to revert my edit. I will be responding your comment over there. Regards. Gaba p ( talk) 18:58, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
As you're aware, I value your ability to provide a neutral summary of debates in closing RFC. Would you be prepared to look at the RFC currently running at Talk:Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute and consider closing it? I think the debate has run its course. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 18:53, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Since you are a relatively new editor (although not more so than myself) with your permission I'll give you some advice: comments like this are not helpful. Sarcasm never aims at bringing the parties involved in a discussion closer together, quite the opposite in fact. I would definitely not recommend following Wee's war-like attitude, it only makes you less likely to be treated with civility down the line. Regards. Gaba p ( talk) 22:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you! Yours is my first star ever :) Cheers mate. Gaba p ( talk) 15:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry I keep fixing your indentations but I only do it so the flow of the discussion isn't disrupted. Please tell me if you find this not acceptable and I will of course stop doing it. Regards. Gaba p ( talk) 22:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited K-ration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wrigley ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry I could not comment for a while but I was blocked for 31 hours for a perceived
WP:NPA violation. Look, I know you are a relatively new user and most of these
wiki-lawyering concepts might not be familiar to you but I need you to understand something. Right now Wee and Kahastok are claiming they had consensus for deleting the whole section. This is not correct. As you well know, the consensus was to apply my proposed re-factoring of the section. Now, you might wonder "what's the difference? Just draft the new section and apply it, there's no need to restore the old section back". See, this has two problems. First: both Wee and Kahastok are violating the outcome of an RfC and this can not be allowed to happen because it sets a precedent that they can pretty much get away with anything they want. Second: if they are allowed to disregard the consensus reached in the talk page to apply my proposed edit based on the source you brought in among others, they will base all new attempts at introducing the re-factored section on "no consensus" given that the status-quo of the article is to have no section at all. You don't have to take my word for it, in the section you opened
Talk:Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute#I_agree_with_Gabas_proposed_sources._Lets_rebuild_the_section_here. they immediately jumped to oppose the addition of the re-factored section that was agreed during the discussion. They will use the "no consensus" card to prevent the re-factored section to be added with the aim of having no section at all or merely a two line comment saying absolutely nothing of value.
Please do not take any of this as an insult to your intelligence or abilities as a WP editor. I just point these things out because it looks to me that you have had the fortune so far to not encounter editors like Wee in your previous editing in WP and you should be very aware of what they are capable of in terms of manipulation. I know you hold him in a somewhat high esteem but I also know that you will, if not now, in time, see through his actions. Regards and please don't be discouraged to provide your input at the talk page. Gaba p ( talk) 17:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC) PS: the issue is now being discussed at ANI.
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
Though my original message may have been directed to you mistakenly, the reason for not changing was not embarassment but I saw no need as you were doing a good job. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 19:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC) |
I'd like to second this barnstar. Thank you, Irondome. --
Langus (
t) 00:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
I apologize again for my suspicion. It all makes sense now.
Regards. -- Langus ( t) 00:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm assuming here that you've read my reply at ANI. My full closure statement is at Talk:Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute#RFC: Removal of section titled "International position". I'm not sure it's off much use from a learning about dispute resolution point of view apart from an example of how not to do it. I don't close many discussions although when they're often the more contentious ones so I do have some experience with more heated discussions. In this instance I point out the problems as I saw them (without naming names) and tried to make it clear that one "side" wasn't the winner and that I hoped that a compromise could be reached as it looked like good progress was being made. This last bit was an effort at trying to keep all sides happy while also being the truth. The reason I closed the RfC rather than just let it run and see what compromise might be reached in the meantime was two fold. Firstly I did not think it would be helpful for people, especially those involved, to be saying there was a consensus there and secondly I did not think it would be fair on other editors finding the RfC (via for example the RfC listings) to comment in a process that I thought had clearly already failed. I note that a lot of good work has gone on towards a compromise in the last few hours although there are obviously still differences. At the very least this should make any future RfC be able to be more focused on specific issues and offer specific ideas although I remain hopeful that this won't be necessary and a compromise will be reached without the need for another RfC. Dpmuk ( talk) 07:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Generally, it was a failure. It took some time, before the production could start, and then it was quickly wiped off by RPG-2. If you're interested, I can send you a scan of a source article, with photos of surviving exhibit (if you write me your mail or send me a message). Pibwl ←« 23:19, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- John ( talk) 06:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
That edit you reverted as a "personal attack" was actually just a comment that contained no personal attack. Certainly not on you, and not one you are entitled to revert. Please do not refactor the comments of others unless there is a clear personal attack. Thanks :> Doc talk 08:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
And we're at an impasse again, with Gaba p refusing to give ground or compromise and insisting on more and more weight to his edit. RFC?
Do you still have an appetite for starting a neutral RFC? Wee Curry Monster talk 16:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Your white helmet routine may be required again. As one of my section leaders once said "blessed are the peace keepers, for they are shot at by both sides". Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 01:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Centurion tank, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ( Hohum @) 22:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 07:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your input on the talk page for the eponymous missile system. I'm sure we're getting somewhere! Sweet dreams... 201.230.175.86 ( talk) 01:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 04:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Irondome.
You are invited to join
WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of
breakfast-related topics. |
---|
Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this.
You are receiving this as you have recently reverted a user removing interwiki links.
Removal of interwiki links on a page linked to a wikidata item that contains the links is NOT vandalism. Please use this script which can identify if the links are found on wikidata.
If you have any questions regarding wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata. 86.45.216.32 ( talk) 03:24, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
A stub article has been created. Cheers, Northamerica1000 (talk) 13:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for your offer. The article is in sandbox now. I can email you with more details if you wish.User:Canoe1967|Canoe1967]] ( talk) 22:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
-- Canoe1967 ( talk) 22:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
I enjoyed your comment at Thomas Savage. Thanks for reminding me (us) that I/we all need to lighten up and have fun :-) — Keithbob • Talk • 23:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dieppe Raid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFV ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 15:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Careful with reverting vandalism, you actually put it back in! I recommend using Twinkle until obtaining rollback rights, if you wish. Cheers — MusikAnimal talk 16:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
It happens sometimes. When my browser loads my watchlist, it does a sudden jump down a line or two. If an entry is very long, it wraps and the "rollback" option sits among the left side. Just as I click a "diff" on an item, the page jumps and I accidentally click "rollback" on another item. It happens every month or so. A thousand pardons. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
By the way, it happens so often that the above is a boilerplate post. :) I will actually save it to my toolbox for further use. Again, so sorry. The RfA page keeps floating to the top of my watchlist, so that is why. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Could you help me with this? I don't know who are the current Head of the Government Deputies.-- Michael Zeev ( talk) 03:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 09:21, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Can you read what I wrote at his talk page? Thank you. Mistico ( talk) 20:22, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LITENING targeting pod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
fair enough, though I'd still like to note that the original, german-made weapons remained in service in various countries at least into 1950s, but I guess the current version is good enough. Ape89 ( talk) 20:06, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
When you gave the opportunity, please explain the rationale for your recent edits to this page on the articles talk page. I find your edit summaries to be incoherent. In the first one you say "let the source do the talking", then you repeat the exact same edit with the summary: "patently POV choice of "sources"". What is your claimed justification for the edit, accurate representation of the source or source selection? In any case it looks like a clearly non-neutral edit as you removed information cited to an academic source without reasonable explanation. Further if someone reverts your edit, the next step is to go to the talk page to discuss the edit not edit war the content. Dlv999 ( talk) 02:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
While it's great to add actual historical information to the article - the addition of the claimed date is being "supported" by a 100% irrelevant source. It contains zero information about Spam - none, zilch, nothing. Given the inappropriate addition of a fake ref, it's hard to accept the date provided by that same editor as anything even remotely reliable. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 02:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you participated in the first deletion discussion for this article; it's up for deletion again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Korean War (2nd nomination). If you'd like to comment again, feel free. Thanks, Ansh 666 03:49, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
moved from User talk:79.176.149.254
Saw your question at Anna's talk page, you may want to have a look at Help:Archiving a talk page. Basically you can either copy/paste it to a subpage of your talk page manually (i.e. User talk:Irondome/Archive 1), or you can setup Autoarchiving that will be done by a bot. Anna does it manually, I use a bot. You can have a look at the code on my talk page for the settings for MiszaBot III, but it's all listed at the help page I listed above. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 22:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Cheers! | |
Very true, so we must go behind the bar and make our own. :-) MarshalN20 | Talk 02:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC) |
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 15:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 22:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 21:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 00:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
In that case undelete Aspies and Talk:Aspies temporarily and move content in full to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism, and then we can relink the from Aspies to Sociological and cultural aspects of autism and then redirect Talk:Aspies to Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism, and I can get everyone else to work on merging Aspies and Talk: Aspies into that document?
Is this possible solution to your problems? Please have my userpage undeleted, then we can get to work? AspieNo1 ( talk) 18:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC) AspieNo1 ( talk) 18:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Please take the time to read the following explaination. The hotlinking of the publisher name is NOT the url to the cite, that citation is a non-linked cite. The linking of publisher names to the relevant Wikipedia article is standard convention, as you can see on many, many articles here (if you wish for examples, I can give one). The hotlinked publisher name is NOT a link to the source, there is no URL/hotlinking present to the source, which is also acceptable practice. Please familiarize yourself with these common conventions. For greater detail, see the following discussion at: Talk:IAI_Kfir#Regarding_recent_edit_conflicts, perhaps double-checking the situation and explanation before reverting in under a minute's time would have been a useful exercise as well. Kyteto ( talk) 22:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 02:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
EyeTruth, I would like to see a version of V1 incorporating my proposed extra sentence (see hatted V1 comments for detail.) I believe it adds to it, and leads more logically to the debate on blitzkrieg linked in the notes. Cheers! Irondome ( talk) 23:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for advice. To be honest, I stronly despise any media as source, regardless is it New York Times, BBC, Jerusalem Post, PressTV, RT, etc. Especially when it comes about political conflicts. If I'm in charge about source policy, I would ban absolutely everything except books produced by academic publishers. Regarding Iranian history, personally I prefer British and American sources ("enemy" countries) from Cambridge University or Columbia University. Nationality of scholars isn't important, for example book about Bahai persecution in Iran by Israeli scholar Soli Shahvar is available in any Iranian university, I've read it at UT. If you rely on media too much, even that situation would be "impossible". Cheers! :) -- HistorNE ( talk) 20:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 08:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm EuroCarGT. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Burning shoe leather, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. ///EuroCar GT 00:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
A while ago, in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Serbs and other non-Albanians in Kosovo, you said the subject had potential under a different title, but didn't address the issue of improper synthesis. Would you be interested in working on that subject in a less contentious scope? I noticed we don't have a human rights in Kosovo article yet, and a lot of that content sounds like it might fit there. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
///EuroCar GT 01:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
///EuroCar GT 01:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
///EuroCar GT 01:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
///EuroCar GT 02:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)