From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

IP address blocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SidChat2048 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 49.36.183.59. This is my router's network. SidChat2048 ( talk) 17:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You seem to have been editing OK for a couple of hours now. — Daniel Case ( talk) 05:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2021

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 15:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply
You're using 1q2w3e4r5t6yt67 to do something we call good hand/bad hand editing (such as at Soundtrap). Please limit yourself to just using this single account once your block expires. You may wish to re-authenticate your Discord account. Thank you ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 15:04, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SidChat2048. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 15:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Effectively site banned

Per the banning policy, you are considered effectively site banned by the Wikipedia community. ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 15:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Please unblock me. I won't create new accounts anymore and will make good contributions using this account.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SidChat2048 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I promise that I won't create new accounts and I promise I am going to make good contributions using this account. I now also know about Wikipedia's policy.

Decline reason:

Declining per Deepfriedokra's response to your UTRS appeal. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 23:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SidChat2048 ( talk) 15:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

My six months are over. What do I do now? SidChat2048 ( talk and contributions) 08:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC) reply

( talk page stalker) (Non-administrator comment) Since you are banned per WP:3X, the most conventional way to request an unblock would be to post an {{ unblock}} template here and ask for someone to post it to WP:AN, where the community will scrutinize and find out if you are worthy of unbanning. To be honest, right now it looks like you do not have much credibility (edits across other WMF projects that are mainly translations and userboxes, which are helpful but not in a sense that the community wants to unban you). If I would offer some advice, it would to be actively editing on another WMF project, preferably by editing a significant amount in the article space (content creation, anti-vandalism, copy-edits), and building a reputation for being a pillar of its society. Then, the community typically sees the efforts you have made and will most likely support your unban. So, I'm not going to stop you from posting an {{ unblock}} template right now, but I would suggest doing much more on another significant project (dewiki, simplewiki, commons) before you begin the last process of WP:SO. (Administrators, this is me trying to help this user make a good case, since, as Jimbo Wales said it, "Wikipedia can always use more faithful editors". If you think I'm endorsing this user or this comment is otherwise unhelpful, revert me or let me know.)3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS — 12:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Also, before unblocking, administrators will have to consult with a CheckUser, since your block is a "CheckUser block". Blocks like this have to be reviewed by a CheckUser given the potential for more sockpuppetry. Alternatively, you can email the Arbitration Committee for the purposes of appeal at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. — 3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS — 13:57, 16 June 2022 (UTC) reply

UTRS 48613

UTRS appeal #48613 is closed. Noting Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SidChat2048. Noting WP:CBAN. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2021 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2021.

                 Current and upcoming events

September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!

Drive and Blitz reports

June Blitz: From 20 to 26 June, 6 participating editors claimed 16 copy edits, focusing on requests and articles tagged in March and April. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

July Drive: Almost 575,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 24 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here.

August Blitz: From 15 to 21 August, we copy edited articles tagged in April and May 2021 and requests. 9 participating editors completed 17 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Other news

June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis.

New maintenance template added to our project scope: After a short discussion in June, we added {{ cleanup tense}} to the list of maintenance templates that adds articles to the Guild's copy editing backlog categories. This change added 198 articles, spread over 97 months of backlog, to our queue. We processed all of those articles except for those from the three or four most recent months during the July backlog elimination drive (Here's a link to a "tense" discussion during the drive).

Progress report: As of 18:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 468 requests since 1 January and there were 60 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above).

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

How should communication work in the Wikipedia Android app?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

IP address blocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SidChat2048 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 49.36.183.59. This is my router's network. SidChat2048 ( talk) 17:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You seem to have been editing OK for a couple of hours now. — Daniel Case ( talk) 05:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2021

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 15:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply
You're using 1q2w3e4r5t6yt67 to do something we call good hand/bad hand editing (such as at Soundtrap). Please limit yourself to just using this single account once your block expires. You may wish to re-authenticate your Discord account. Thank you ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 15:04, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SidChat2048. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 15:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Effectively site banned

Per the banning policy, you are considered effectively site banned by the Wikipedia community. ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 15:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Please unblock me. I won't create new accounts anymore and will make good contributions using this account.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SidChat2048 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I promise that I won't create new accounts and I promise I am going to make good contributions using this account. I now also know about Wikipedia's policy.

Decline reason:

Declining per Deepfriedokra's response to your UTRS appeal. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 23:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SidChat2048 ( talk) 15:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

My six months are over. What do I do now? SidChat2048 ( talk and contributions) 08:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC) reply

( talk page stalker) (Non-administrator comment) Since you are banned per WP:3X, the most conventional way to request an unblock would be to post an {{ unblock}} template here and ask for someone to post it to WP:AN, where the community will scrutinize and find out if you are worthy of unbanning. To be honest, right now it looks like you do not have much credibility (edits across other WMF projects that are mainly translations and userboxes, which are helpful but not in a sense that the community wants to unban you). If I would offer some advice, it would to be actively editing on another WMF project, preferably by editing a significant amount in the article space (content creation, anti-vandalism, copy-edits), and building a reputation for being a pillar of its society. Then, the community typically sees the efforts you have made and will most likely support your unban. So, I'm not going to stop you from posting an {{ unblock}} template right now, but I would suggest doing much more on another significant project (dewiki, simplewiki, commons) before you begin the last process of WP:SO. (Administrators, this is me trying to help this user make a good case, since, as Jimbo Wales said it, "Wikipedia can always use more faithful editors". If you think I'm endorsing this user or this comment is otherwise unhelpful, revert me or let me know.)3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS — 12:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Also, before unblocking, administrators will have to consult with a CheckUser, since your block is a "CheckUser block". Blocks like this have to be reviewed by a CheckUser given the potential for more sockpuppetry. Alternatively, you can email the Arbitration Committee for the purposes of appeal at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. — 3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS — 13:57, 16 June 2022 (UTC) reply

UTRS 48613

UTRS appeal #48613 is closed. Noting Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SidChat2048. Noting WP:CBAN. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2021 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2021.

                 Current and upcoming events

September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!

Drive and Blitz reports

June Blitz: From 20 to 26 June, 6 participating editors claimed 16 copy edits, focusing on requests and articles tagged in March and April. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

July Drive: Almost 575,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 24 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here.

August Blitz: From 15 to 21 August, we copy edited articles tagged in April and May 2021 and requests. 9 participating editors completed 17 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Other news

June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis.

New maintenance template added to our project scope: After a short discussion in June, we added {{ cleanup tense}} to the list of maintenance templates that adds articles to the Guild's copy editing backlog categories. This change added 198 articles, spread over 97 months of backlog, to our queue. We processed all of those articles except for those from the three or four most recent months during the July backlog elimination drive (Here's a link to a "tense" discussion during the drive).

Progress report: As of 18:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 468 requests since 1 January and there were 60 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above).

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

How should communication work in the Wikipedia Android app?


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook