This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yamaha P-115 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamaha P-115 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America 1000 17:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to History of Indian law: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Please leave another warning notice on User talk:2605:E000:ABA4:EA00:8558:790B:3994:901B at your earliest convenience. Thanks! - lollerwaffle ( talk) 04:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
The fallen astronaut picture is rubbish, instead of sanctimoniously reverting my post - how about you get a better picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.186.250.8 ( talk) 03:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. You reverted an editor for "removing warnings" from their talk page, but per WP:OWNTALK, removing warnings is actually fine. If anything it's useful for signifying that the user has seen them. -- McGeddon ( talk) 16:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm unamused by your nastygram and revert of my contribution to knots information --to wit, you write: "Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Jury mast knot. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing." Well, accurate information was what I was delivering, not mere humor --it was NOT a "joke edit". (Sadly, much of what comes to us in knots books is more deserving of the assertion "joke".) Elsewhere, I was rather happy --bit amused, bit bothered-- to see my words echoed in some knotty entries by someone else's doing --finding my many posts on the IGKT forum, and some rockclimbing forums, I guess. Now, go revert your revert --to give that "accurate information" we both are keen for (and one of us is delivering). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.34.108 ( talk) 00:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yamaha P-115 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamaha P-115 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America 1000 17:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to History of Indian law: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Please leave another warning notice on User talk:2605:E000:ABA4:EA00:8558:790B:3994:901B at your earliest convenience. Thanks! - lollerwaffle ( talk) 04:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
The fallen astronaut picture is rubbish, instead of sanctimoniously reverting my post - how about you get a better picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.186.250.8 ( talk) 03:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. You reverted an editor for "removing warnings" from their talk page, but per WP:OWNTALK, removing warnings is actually fine. If anything it's useful for signifying that the user has seen them. -- McGeddon ( talk) 16:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm unamused by your nastygram and revert of my contribution to knots information --to wit, you write: "Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Jury mast knot. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing." Well, accurate information was what I was delivering, not mere humor --it was NOT a "joke edit". (Sadly, much of what comes to us in knots books is more deserving of the assertion "joke".) Elsewhere, I was rather happy --bit amused, bit bothered-- to see my words echoed in some knotty entries by someone else's doing --finding my many posts on the IGKT forum, and some rockclimbing forums, I guess. Now, go revert your revert --to give that "accurate information" we both are keen for (and one of us is delivering). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.34.108 ( talk) 00:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)