| This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sampajanna. |
| — Wikipedian — | |
 |
- GO AHEAD. Underestimate me.
- You won't be the first.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
PLEASE NOTE CAREFULLY- Please do not feed the trolls
en-5 This user can contribute with a professional level of English. 
This user is not an administrator on the English Wikipedia. ( verify) 
This user has a Diploma in Professional Communication.
This user believes that a user's edit count does not necessarily reflect on the value of their contributions to Wikipedia. This user has a Bachelor of Arts degree with a Humanities major.
en This user is a native speaker of the English language. This user has postgraduate qualifications in History and Philosophy. 
Because of real life, this user will be editing on and off.
 | It is approximately 4:07 PM where this user lives. |
In
Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the
Internet to distract and sow discord
by posting
inflammatory and
digressive,
[1]
extraneous, or
off-topic messages in an
online community (such as a
newsgroup,
forum,
chat room, or blog) with the
intent of provoking readers into displaying
emotional responses.
References
- ^ "Definition of troll". Collins English Dictionary. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to articles, categories, templates, talk page discussions, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted in Wikipedia is not for:
- Advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind: commercial, political, religious, sports-related, or otherwise. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to describe the topic from a neutral point of view. You might wish to start a blog or visit a forum if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views. [1] See Wikipedia:Advocacy.
- Opinion pieces. Although some topics, particularly those concerning current affairs and politics, may stir passions and tempt people to "climb soapboxes" (for example, passionately advocate their pet point of view), Wikipedia is not the medium for this. Articles must be balanced to put entries, especially for current events, in a reasonable perspective, and represent a neutral point of view. Furthermore, Wikipedia authors should strive to write articles that will not quickly become obsolete. However, Wikipedia's sister project Wikinews allows commentaries on its articles.
- Scandal mongering, something "heard through the grapevine" or gossip. Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy. Articles should not be written purely to attack the reputation of another person.
- Self-promotion. It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, do remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which is difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources is unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Autobiography, Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
- Advertising. All information about companies and products are written in an objective and unbiased style. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so.
References
- ^ Wikipedia pages may not be used for advocacy unrelated to Wikipedia, but pages in the Wikipedia namespace may be used to advocate for specific viewpoints regarding the improvement or organization of Wikipedia itself. So essays, portals, project pages, etc. are part of what Wikipedia is.
 |
A bargaining impasse occurs when the two sides negotiating an agreement are unable to reach an agreement and become deadlocked. The word may also refer to any situation in which no progress can be made. Impasses provide opportunities for problem solving to provide an insight that leads to progress. Some theorists contend that impasses are used by negotiating parties in situations of imperfect information as a method of signalling to the other side the seriousness of their position. Impasse provides a credible signal that a party’s position is genuine and not merely an ambit claim. Additionally, an impasse may arise if parties suffer from self-serving bias. Most disputes arise in situations where facts are able to be interpreted in multiple ways, and if parties interpret the facts to their own benefit they may be unable to accept the opposing party’s claim as reasonable. They may believe the other side is either bluffing or acting unfairly and deserves to be punished.
To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an
impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
Please do not feed trolls ...
In
Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the
Internet to distract and sow discord
by posting
inflammatory and
digressive,
extraneous, or
off-topic messages in an
online community (such as a
newsgroup,
forum,
chat room, or blog) with the
intent of provoking readers into displaying
emotional responses.
WP:HA
|
|
WP:BLP violation
| Closed discussion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||||
|
 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
|
Congratulations
 | This page in a nutshell: There are 47,357,684 Wikipedia
accounts, of which 122,687 are actively editing. |
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, type {{helpme}} on your own talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click
here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive
edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it.
Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
Browsers do not support all the fonts, so you need to use multiple fonts to be on safer side.
CSS font-family defines the priority for the browser to choose the font from multiple fonts.
There are 2 types of font families which you can use –
- Specific Font-Family – This is a specific type of font like Arial, Verdana, Tahoma
- Generic Font-Family – This is a General Font and almost all browsers support
this generic font family. Example: serif, Sans-serif etc. [1] Sampajanna
References
- ^ "CSS Font Family List". TutorialBrain. Retrieved 22 December 2020.
| Closed discussion |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
References
|
| Closed discussion | ||
|---|---|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||
|
|
| Closed discussion | ||
|---|---|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||
|
|
| Closed discussion |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses.
| Closed discussion |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
|
Hi Sampajanna! Thought I'd give some broader context because I saw your edit summary The text or punctuation of a direct quote is normally not altered
and though it's something I see sometimes, it's very far from what MOS actually says.
- Per
MOS:QWQ,
For a quotation within a quotation, use single quotes
. That's what applies in this case. The reason is because syntactically in the English language, an open quote,"
, closes as soon as the next time the same character appears,"
(one nuance at the end). So"From the very first headline about her being "(almost) straight outta Compton" and having "exotic" DNA, the racist treatment of Meghan has been impossible to ignore"
actually "quotes" the following passages: (1)From the very first headline about her being
; (2)exotic
; (3) typographical error with the last quote not being matched to anything. Obviously undesirable. (The one nuance is that this is evaluated "from the inside-out", so that nested quotes like "He said, 'I was listening to a speech and they said, "Punctuation is important."'" parse correctly.) - MOS:PMC permits changing of a noun within brackets when the context is different e.g. "I was sad" can become "[Smith] was sad".
- Typographical alignments like changing curly quotes within an original text to straight quotes ( MOS:CURLY, MOS:CONFORM) are made.
- Links e.g. to Wiktionary if an obscure term is used, or to an article if an obscure reference is made in the quote, are occasionally acceptable under MOS:LINKQUOTE.
- Per MOS:PMC, even corrections of typos are to be done silently, so quoting "It was essentailly a matter of taste" exactly is explicitly disallowed.
Just thought I'd let you know in future, as the actual MOS, A quotation is not a
facsimile and, in most cases, it is not a requirement that the original formatting be preserved
(
MOS:CONFORM), is not always applied correctly. Let me know if you have any questions! —
Bilorv (
talk) 23:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sampajanna. Please complete your new references in
Ben Roberts-Smith as {{
cite news}}: Empty citation (
help) and so on.
Errantios (
talk) 22:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
| This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sampajanna. |
| — Wikipedian — | |
|
- GO AHEAD. Underestimate me.
- You won't be the first.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
PLEASE NOTE CAREFULLY- Please do not feed the trolls
en-5 This user can contribute with a professional level of English. This user is not an administrator on the English Wikipedia. ( verify) This user has a Diploma in Professional Communication.
This user believes that a user's edit count does not necessarily reflect on the value of their contributions to Wikipedia. This user has a Bachelor of Arts degree with a Humanities major.
en This user is a native speaker of the English language. This user has postgraduate qualifications in History and Philosophy. Because of real life, this user will be editing on and off.
|
| It is approximately 4:07 PM where this user lives. |
In
Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the
Internet to distract and sow discord
by posting
inflammatory and
digressive,
[1]
extraneous, or
off-topic messages in an
online community (such as a
newsgroup,
forum,
chat room, or blog) with the
intent of provoking readers into displaying
emotional responses.
References
- ^ "Definition of troll". Collins English Dictionary. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to articles, categories, templates, talk page discussions, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted in Wikipedia is not for:
- Advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind: commercial, political, religious, sports-related, or otherwise. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to describe the topic from a neutral point of view. You might wish to start a blog or visit a forum if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views. [1] See Wikipedia:Advocacy.
- Opinion pieces. Although some topics, particularly those concerning current affairs and politics, may stir passions and tempt people to "climb soapboxes" (for example, passionately advocate their pet point of view), Wikipedia is not the medium for this. Articles must be balanced to put entries, especially for current events, in a reasonable perspective, and represent a neutral point of view. Furthermore, Wikipedia authors should strive to write articles that will not quickly become obsolete. However, Wikipedia's sister project Wikinews allows commentaries on its articles.
- Scandal mongering, something "heard through the grapevine" or gossip. Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy. Articles should not be written purely to attack the reputation of another person.
- Self-promotion. It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, do remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which is difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources is unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Autobiography, Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
- Advertising. All information about companies and products are written in an objective and unbiased style. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so.
References
- ^ Wikipedia pages may not be used for advocacy unrelated to Wikipedia, but pages in the Wikipedia namespace may be used to advocate for specific viewpoints regarding the improvement or organization of Wikipedia itself. So essays, portals, project pages, etc. are part of what Wikipedia is.
|
|
A bargaining impasse occurs when the two sides negotiating an agreement are unable to reach an agreement and become deadlocked. The word may also refer to any situation in which no progress can be made. Impasses provide opportunities for problem solving to provide an insight that leads to progress. Some theorists contend that impasses are used by negotiating parties in situations of imperfect information as a method of signalling to the other side the seriousness of their position. Impasse provides a credible signal that a party’s position is genuine and not merely an ambit claim. Additionally, an impasse may arise if parties suffer from self-serving bias. Most disputes arise in situations where facts are able to be interpreted in multiple ways, and if parties interpret the facts to their own benefit they may be unable to accept the opposing party’s claim as reasonable. They may believe the other side is either bluffing or acting unfairly and deserves to be punished.
To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an
impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
Please do not feed trolls ...
In
Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the
Internet to distract and sow discord
by posting
inflammatory and
digressive,
extraneous, or
off-topic messages in an
online community (such as a
newsgroup,
forum,
chat room, or blog) with the
intent of provoking readers into displaying
emotional responses.
WP:HA
|
|
WP:BLP violation
| Closed discussion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||||
|
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
|
Congratulations
| This page in a nutshell: There are 47,357,684 Wikipedia
accounts, of which 122,687 are actively editing. |
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, type {{helpme}} on your own talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click
here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes
~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive
edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it.
Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
Browsers do not support all the fonts, so you need to use multiple fonts to be on safer side.
CSS font-family defines the priority for the browser to choose the font from multiple fonts.
There are 2 types of font families which you can use –
- Specific Font-Family – This is a specific type of font like Arial, Verdana, Tahoma
- Generic Font-Family – This is a General Font and almost all browsers support
this generic font family. Example: serif, Sans-serif etc. [1] Sampajanna
References
- ^ "CSS Font Family List". TutorialBrain. Retrieved 22 December 2020.
| Closed discussion |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
References
|
| Closed discussion | ||
|---|---|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||
|
|
| Closed discussion | ||
|---|---|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||
|
|
| Closed discussion |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses.
| Closed discussion |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
|
Hi Sampajanna! Thought I'd give some broader context because I saw your edit summary The text or punctuation of a direct quote is normally not altered
and though it's something I see sometimes, it's very far from what MOS actually says.
- Per
MOS:QWQ,
For a quotation within a quotation, use single quotes
. That's what applies in this case. The reason is because syntactically in the English language, an open quote,"
, closes as soon as the next time the same character appears,"
(one nuance at the end). So"From the very first headline about her being "(almost) straight outta Compton" and having "exotic" DNA, the racist treatment of Meghan has been impossible to ignore"
actually "quotes" the following passages: (1)From the very first headline about her being
; (2)exotic
; (3) typographical error with the last quote not being matched to anything. Obviously undesirable. (The one nuance is that this is evaluated "from the inside-out", so that nested quotes like "He said, 'I was listening to a speech and they said, "Punctuation is important."'" parse correctly.) - MOS:PMC permits changing of a noun within brackets when the context is different e.g. "I was sad" can become "[Smith] was sad".
- Typographical alignments like changing curly quotes within an original text to straight quotes ( MOS:CURLY, MOS:CONFORM) are made.
- Links e.g. to Wiktionary if an obscure term is used, or to an article if an obscure reference is made in the quote, are occasionally acceptable under MOS:LINKQUOTE.
- Per MOS:PMC, even corrections of typos are to be done silently, so quoting "It was essentailly a matter of taste" exactly is explicitly disallowed.
Just thought I'd let you know in future, as the actual MOS, A quotation is not a
facsimile and, in most cases, it is not a requirement that the original formatting be preserved
(
MOS:CONFORM), is not always applied correctly. Let me know if you have any questions! —
Bilorv (
talk) 23:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sampajanna. Please complete your new references in
Ben Roberts-Smith as {{
cite news}}: Empty citation (
help) and so on.
Errantios (
talk) 22:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)