Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Gary Herbert, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Spalds (
talk) 16:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
JNW (
talk) 14:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
The content you are continuously deleting uses reliable sources as references. JNW ( talk) 14:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Additionally, you are using edit summaries to make a series of accusations against real persons, and that doesn't wash in Wikipedia. JNW ( talk) 14:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
JNW (
talk) 15:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
JNW (
talk) 15:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
I have requested a review of your edits at the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard located here. Spalds ( talk) 18:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. Your edits today added copyrighted information from
this website
SmartSE (
talk) 23:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Gary Herbert, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Spalds (
talk) 16:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
JNW (
talk) 14:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
The content you are continuously deleting uses reliable sources as references. JNW ( talk) 14:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Additionally, you are using edit summaries to make a series of accusations against real persons, and that doesn't wash in Wikipedia. JNW ( talk) 14:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
JNW (
talk) 15:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
JNW (
talk) 15:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
I have requested a review of your edits at the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard located here. Spalds ( talk) 18:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. Your edits today added copyrighted information from
this website
SmartSE (
talk) 23:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)