- Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or sock puppetry
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller ( talk) 17:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller ( talk) 17:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with
Turkic ideograms. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.
Dougweller (
talk) 09:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue removing
Articles for deletion without addressing the issue, as you did with
Khazarian Rovas, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Dougweller (
talk) 09:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- thank you for your notification. I supposed that there is a vandalism from Evertype, who is uncooperative, because He/She simply wants to delete the pages instead of starting debate on the Discussion page. Please check User Evertype, because of this behaviour as well. Apart from this any help is welcomed.
- Anyone can take an article to AfD. Don't delete these templates again please. They simply mean that an editor does not believe an article meets our policies and guidelines, and this is the process to see if they do. Dougweller ( talk) 10:02, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 | Blocked for sock puppetry
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rovosaman. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. —
HelloAnnyong
(say whaaat?!) 14:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC) |
Rovosaman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here: Rovosaman is not same with Rovasscript. Check IPs Rovosaman (talk) 4:51 am, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
As Jeske points out quite well, below, meatpuppetry is not permitted. TN X Man 11:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- It is absolutely unfair. Please check IP-s. User Rovosaman is NOT same with user Rovasscript. The whole war is generated by Evertype who can not accept well established information (with references) about the
Szekely-Hungarian Rovas,
Carpathian Basin Rovas and
Khazarian Rovas and
Rovas Script Family,
Rovas Atlas. It is vandalism, in two steps: (1) nominating for deletion instead of using Discussion pages, (2) blocking users who are not same. Please keep and follow Wikipedia rules. I propose to block user Evertype to stop vandalism against Hungarian-related scripts, because it is a personal issue. The core problem is that Evertype has not been able to write an acceptable Unicode proposal on Szekely-Hungarian rovas alternatively:
Old Hungarian script since 1998... (N1686, remember?). That is 13 years. It is a shame, that followers of Evertype accept everything without any control. I need help to build Wikipedia pages following NPOV rules with other users (yes, with user rovasscript as well). I am open to discuss and accept any contributions, but do not delete, please.
Rovosaman (
talk) 08:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Part of the wonders of registering is that it hides your IP address. Also of interest may be
WP:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppets, which states simply that any user found to behaving in a manner akin to a blocked user is to be sanctioned in the same way as the user he's emulating. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:
V
S
M 10:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- "The term meatpuppet is derogatory and should be used with care, in keeping with Wikipedia's civility policy. Because of the processes above, it may be counterproductive to directly accuse someone of being a "meatpuppet", and doing so will often only inflame the dispute." I agree with this, I am not meatpuppet. Abuse is done by Evertype, not me. You (blockers) should read related Wiki policy. Rovosaman ( talk) 13:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Part of the wonders of registering is that it hides your IP address. Also of interest may be
WP:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppets, which states simply that any user found to behaving in a manner akin to a blocked user is to be sanctioned in the same way as the user he's emulating. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:
V
S
M 10:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Rovosaman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Not meatpuppet
Decline reason:
Please read the guide to appealing a block and try to avoid blaming others when arguing to be unblocked. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- It's clearly not just Evertype who sees a problem with your articles, and a problem with all the IPs (and different IP addresses do not prove different editors) and accounts suddenly popping up all defending you or attacking Evertype. This is clearly not spontaneous. Dougweller ( talk) 13:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
For the record, I have in fact been able to write an acceptable Unicode proposal for Old Hungarian. -- Evertype· ✆ 23:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Category:Rovas Scripts, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Evertype· ✆ 10:55, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or sock puppetry
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller ( talk) 17:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller ( talk) 17:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with
Turkic ideograms. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.
Dougweller (
talk) 09:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue removing
Articles for deletion without addressing the issue, as you did with
Khazarian Rovas, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Dougweller (
talk) 09:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- thank you for your notification. I supposed that there is a vandalism from Evertype, who is uncooperative, because He/She simply wants to delete the pages instead of starting debate on the Discussion page. Please check User Evertype, because of this behaviour as well. Apart from this any help is welcomed.
- Anyone can take an article to AfD. Don't delete these templates again please. They simply mean that an editor does not believe an article meets our policies and guidelines, and this is the process to see if they do. Dougweller ( talk) 10:02, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
|
| Blocked for sock puppetry
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rovosaman. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. —
HelloAnnyong
(say whaaat?!) 14:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC) |
Rovosaman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here: Rovosaman is not same with Rovasscript. Check IPs Rovosaman (talk) 4:51 am, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
As Jeske points out quite well, below, meatpuppetry is not permitted. TN X Man 11:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- It is absolutely unfair. Please check IP-s. User Rovosaman is NOT same with user Rovasscript. The whole war is generated by Evertype who can not accept well established information (with references) about the
Szekely-Hungarian Rovas,
Carpathian Basin Rovas and
Khazarian Rovas and
Rovas Script Family,
Rovas Atlas. It is vandalism, in two steps: (1) nominating for deletion instead of using Discussion pages, (2) blocking users who are not same. Please keep and follow Wikipedia rules. I propose to block user Evertype to stop vandalism against Hungarian-related scripts, because it is a personal issue. The core problem is that Evertype has not been able to write an acceptable Unicode proposal on Szekely-Hungarian rovas alternatively:
Old Hungarian script since 1998... (N1686, remember?). That is 13 years. It is a shame, that followers of Evertype accept everything without any control. I need help to build Wikipedia pages following NPOV rules with other users (yes, with user rovasscript as well). I am open to discuss and accept any contributions, but do not delete, please.
Rovosaman (
talk) 08:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Part of the wonders of registering is that it hides your IP address. Also of interest may be
WP:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppets, which states simply that any user found to behaving in a manner akin to a blocked user is to be sanctioned in the same way as the user he's emulating. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:
V
S
M 10:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- "The term meatpuppet is derogatory and should be used with care, in keeping with Wikipedia's civility policy. Because of the processes above, it may be counterproductive to directly accuse someone of being a "meatpuppet", and doing so will often only inflame the dispute." I agree with this, I am not meatpuppet. Abuse is done by Evertype, not me. You (blockers) should read related Wiki policy. Rovosaman ( talk) 13:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Part of the wonders of registering is that it hides your IP address. Also of interest may be
WP:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppets, which states simply that any user found to behaving in a manner akin to a blocked user is to be sanctioned in the same way as the user he's emulating. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:
V
S
M 10:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Rovosaman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Not meatpuppet
Decline reason:
Please read the guide to appealing a block and try to avoid blaming others when arguing to be unblocked. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- It's clearly not just Evertype who sees a problem with your articles, and a problem with all the IPs (and different IP addresses do not prove different editors) and accounts suddenly popping up all defending you or attacking Evertype. This is clearly not spontaneous. Dougweller ( talk) 13:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
For the record, I have in fact been able to write an acceptable Unicode proposal for Old Hungarian. -- Evertype· ✆ 23:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Category:Rovas Scripts, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Evertype· ✆ 10:55, 1 July 2011 (UTC)