This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Hi
Regarding your comments, I never meant that I was the owner of the page, merely that it's very much a work in progress and I was asking that it not be marked for deletion, style, quality, or content until I am able to finish it
Pete Guthroth 12:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thanks for fixing vandalisum, from my page :} ♥Eternal Pink-ready for love and grace♥ 17:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks agaen :} ♥Eternal Pink-ready for love and grace♥ 18:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This is for always being all over my watchlist. :) · AO Talk 18:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
I hereby award Qxz this barnstar for throwing up over 20,000 edits since January 2007. Keep up the tireless contributions! >Kamope< Talk · Contribs 01:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC) |
Hi and sorry for this. I did not notice that you had reverted before I did.
In any case, that IP belongs to a notorious vandal User:Bonaparte, and the insults he introduces and has introduced in edit summaries and talk pages probably make the fact that he also vandalizes less relevant. I will contact an admin to get him blocked. Thanks for your vigilance, btw. Dahn 12:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
why was the stuff on the nation page considered vandalism?
Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Nation is an all-purpose term and is an accepted part of the lexicon in several major Western cities.
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 15:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
You're a great wikipedian, and now I got somethnig to try and beat. You've stopped a lot of edits and I've been trying to beat you, but failing miserably so far. Great fast work and stuff.
In case you can't tell, I'm trying to compliment you. – SBKT 15:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I simply forgot. a bad habit of mine, I guess. SBKT 16:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Is there a way to change one's user name here? Thanx. Rboesen 16:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I, DSRH | talk 16:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC), award you this barnstar for your tireless efforts in smiting the vandals. |
Lots of Barnstars | ||
I award this " Lots of Barnstars" because you got too many barnstars. → Aza Toth 16:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC) |
I'm working on improving Twerp. I'd apreciate it if I could have 3 days to work on it without deletion. Bloddyfriday 17:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I think this ad thing is spectacular. Just thought I'd say so. -- Ali'i 15:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Those ads are really neat! Good work :) – riana_ dzasta 10:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Hammertime | ||
This non-barnstar entity is awarded to Qxz for fighting vandalism with a smile. Well, maybe not, but it sounds catchy. This award does not give you license to bite newcomers, and is ineligible for exchange with any other award. | It does not grant you permission to climb the Reichstag. Please contact the now-baleeted Barnstar Brigade for more details and disclaimers. Important: this award is not intended for use in the bathroom. All refunds will be in part; please see a representative for a form. Gracenotes T § 05:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC) |
How about an ad related to Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links? It's been hit kind of hard lately (see the link numbers at Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages maintenance) and would have the sort of widespread appeal you seem to be looking for. I love the ads, by the way... especially the one on edit summaries. Dekimasu よ! 13:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
File:Disambiguation pages.gif → Aza Toth 15:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Have already appointed it at Image:Qxz-ad10.gif
→ Aza Toth 17:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
How long does it take for you to fix vandilism? – Noalslob 19:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
lol, Qxz, I'm amazed that whatever page I go to, I notice that you've made some kind of reversion. You're everywhere! ~ Rollo44 22:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Could you please make a banner which advertises this? We need more help! Thank you so much! Real96 21:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Error: Image is invalid or non-existent.
Awesome adds, I'm glad that someone who is not a participant in WP:WPUS is that gifted in computer coding, especially in Cascading Style Sheets (I have seen a total of 2 Wikipedians who appear gifted in .css and are not participants in the aforementioned project). ~ Step trip 23:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you're using the ads I've made. It might be better if you transclude {{User:Qxz/ad.css}} directly, rather than copying it into a separate page. The reason for this is that I'm adding (and possibly removing) ads all the time, and so while my copy is updated, yours will get out-of-date. As it's a .css page, nobody can edit it except me (and administrators), so you don't have to worry about it being vandalised. Thanks – Qxz 17:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Qxz: thanks for leaving a note on my talk page. My I suggest that you do an XML-type thing? That is, having content on one page. Having the format on another default page, whereas another format page can be changed by a user. See User:Gracenotes/Quotes source, User:Gracenotes/Quotes, and User:Gracenotes for an example. Of course, that set up is more complicated than your needs to be. Gracenotes T § 12:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
You caught the vandalism just before I did. I wasn't expecting the user to vandalise my page, but I guess the person had a right to be angy. You undid it just a second quicker than I did. Thanks again! Computerman45 16:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, nice job on the ads!
I was wondering whether you can include an ad for the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. Thanks! + A.0u 00:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not try to push the use of my work in such an inappropriate context. I would be very much against using the images anywhere outside of userspace, and certainly not above articles. The negative responses your suggestion has recieved will likely reflect badly on me, despite being outside of my control. Thanks – Qxz 11:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't mean to cause you trouble (the ads thing on CP). Thanks anyway. --
Ali'i 13:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
How can discussing war crimes on the article of the perpatrator be vandalism? -- WelshDoctor 14:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Please keep an eye on this one Qxz—his edit history is not cause for optimism... Baccyak4H ( Yak!) 15:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Qxz! I think your ads are a great idea to promote wikiprojects and other such things. I was wondering if you could make one for Concordia. I would have made the animation, but unfortunately my computer doesn't have the neccisary program (whatever it may be). Again, thanks for the ads! Ry Guy 15:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
The page as it was presented non-Christian groups as if they are Christians. I was clarifing the difference. Cis2002 16:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Would it be possible for you to reply on your talk page instead of others talk page, it makes it rather difficult to follow discussions. → Aza Toth 16:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I erased the article on Philip Morath because it is about me. I do not want that information on the web. I have contacted Wikipedia a few times with no response. I realize the history is still there, but at least it won't be accessed as easily. – 71.61.28.154, 00:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
We need a few more people at WP:PR and WP:FAC. Something that could help is something like this:
Your opinion counts! Help us improve articles! |
---|
Please join and help us peer review articles to featured status. |
A modification of Image:Unclesamwantyou.jpg would be really nice... :) Nice job with this, by the way. Excellent idea. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 06:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Or at least to a page that points the Free Content images to commons. Wikipedia:Fromowner is a start ... it still points at en:wp. I'd hope this doesn't have to wait until Single User Logon - David Gerard 10:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi.
Your comment that non-Wikpedia stuff is likley to be rejected, but would it be possible for you to consider if an advert for the Wikiversity project is possible?
An 'ad' for WikiCast would also be appreciated longer term, but as you know WikiCast is not 'foundation' approved at the moment, so I doubt it falls within your criteria...
ShakespeareFan00 14:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
This is the anonymous vandal of the Nami page. I didn't get your message immeadiatley but have fixed the stuff I have edited since. I didn't know the rules here. Just wanted to say sorry. – 71.77.78.193 21:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I want to say sorryfor the vandalism again and ask if you could tell sir_james_paul for me I don't know how to talk to him.
That edit was a mistake. I did not see that all he did was remove a space. My bad :( -- James, La gloria è a dio 21:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
i did leave other stuff on there I shouldn't have but fixed it all and am really sorry I didn't know the rules. I actually thought it would just show it on this computer. once again I'm sorry, it won't happen again and please don't ban be I didn't know – 71.77.78.193 21:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
How do you get the you have knew message thing to go away? I read them and it is still there.
p.s. please don't ban me
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | ||
Awarded for creating fun, yet very educational ads. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
Sweeeet. :p I'll let you know if I think of any more. – Luna Santin ( talk) 01:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Could you possibly make something up for WP:WPSPAM. We can always use new volenteers to help deal with spam and advertising links. Enjoy the irony, and thanks ;) Eagle 101 00:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Could you please add these to your ad:
Please sign your posts on talk pages
Counter-Vandalism Unit
I would suggest a change where it asks "Have you edited for six months?" because it makes it sound like that is the required amount. It may put users who are perfectly capable off requesting, when users like myself, Husond, Arjun01, Ryanpostlethwaite and Yandman had less than that amount (recent examples) and passed. Also not too sure about the featured article thing either, or the clean block log; it just seems like these are just set standards being advertised and people may take them seriously. Majorly (o rly?) 02:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I found you here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jesserich If you look at the history on the comet page, between this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Comet&oldid=114730362 and this one by Jesserich: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Comet&oldid=114829467 the article seems to have "reproduced" itself multiple times. I would try to fix it but I'm a bit a noob about that sort of thing. So I am leaving you this note, thinking you can fix it quickly and properly. Feel free to drop me a note at my talk page if you think I could have figured how to do it myself! Thanks much, human 02:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I saw this page in recent edits and got curious, so I clicked it. Do you mind if I use any of those images? I don't want to use them without your permission. Bsroiaadn 02:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure that linking to from owner is a good idea since it only offers one lisence option and most wikipedians want more. Geni 03:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi - you wrote: I'd appreciate it if you could actually read nominations before commenting on them. Please look carefully at the name: this page is an article, not a template, which is why I brought it to AfD. ... As it's technically an article, and I'm arguing for its deletion based on its inappropriateness as an article, not its inappropriateness as a template, AfD is surely the preferred venue. I've now been told to take it to TfD (by another person who I suspect didn't read the nomination) and I won't be at all surprised if it gets referred back to AfD. Please don't just read the word "template" and trot out that same old quip about which door to try. Thanks
While I adore your formal style, I think what you are proposing is over-reaction. There are plenty of other templates, and I cannot see the reason why this one (Blade Runner) is not suitable, and if it is, why others are not to be deleted? Besides, I don't want to offend you, but you couldn't be more vague than in comment on my talk page... Broken soul 14:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
For your absolutely hysterical RfA gif, in which you prove that the truth is funnier than fiction can ever be. Kudos!! -- Avi 18:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
→ Aza Toth 19:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey Qxz, I'm concerned that Conservapedia has been added to "Related projects and forks" in this template. To be honest, I'm not sure how it's related to Wikipedia at all (except for their baseless assertions of bias, but that's irrelevant). I think that including Conservapedia in this list (and I haven't checked the other members) could imply that it is, in fact, "related" to Wikipedia in an official way, which isn't at all accurate. Could you clarify your reasons for adding it? Thanks! — bbatsell ¿? ✍ 19:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the help on this! Your tweaked layout is much nicer than my original... - Denny 19:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Do you think Citizendium should be there as a fork of Wikipedia? I added it, feel free to rv it out if you don't think so. Also, how can I get your ads centered on my user page? I can't seem to get the code right to have it center-aligned... - Denny 20:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NSR77 23:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Is it possible for you to make an ad that represents joining for the Counter-Vandalism Unit? zero » 00:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
What's with the {{ permprot}} rollout? Has this been discussed? Are you going to follow up by protecting these? Or is someone else? Or should I? Hesperian 03:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Hi
Regarding your comments, I never meant that I was the owner of the page, merely that it's very much a work in progress and I was asking that it not be marked for deletion, style, quality, or content until I am able to finish it
Pete Guthroth 12:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thanks for fixing vandalisum, from my page :} ♥Eternal Pink-ready for love and grace♥ 17:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks agaen :} ♥Eternal Pink-ready for love and grace♥ 18:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This is for always being all over my watchlist. :) · AO Talk 18:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
I hereby award Qxz this barnstar for throwing up over 20,000 edits since January 2007. Keep up the tireless contributions! >Kamope< Talk · Contribs 01:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC) |
Hi and sorry for this. I did not notice that you had reverted before I did.
In any case, that IP belongs to a notorious vandal User:Bonaparte, and the insults he introduces and has introduced in edit summaries and talk pages probably make the fact that he also vandalizes less relevant. I will contact an admin to get him blocked. Thanks for your vigilance, btw. Dahn 12:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
why was the stuff on the nation page considered vandalism?
Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Nation is an all-purpose term and is an accepted part of the lexicon in several major Western cities.
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 15:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
You're a great wikipedian, and now I got somethnig to try and beat. You've stopped a lot of edits and I've been trying to beat you, but failing miserably so far. Great fast work and stuff.
In case you can't tell, I'm trying to compliment you. – SBKT 15:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I simply forgot. a bad habit of mine, I guess. SBKT 16:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Is there a way to change one's user name here? Thanx. Rboesen 16:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I, DSRH | talk 16:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC), award you this barnstar for your tireless efforts in smiting the vandals. |
Lots of Barnstars | ||
I award this " Lots of Barnstars" because you got too many barnstars. → Aza Toth 16:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC) |
I'm working on improving Twerp. I'd apreciate it if I could have 3 days to work on it without deletion. Bloddyfriday 17:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I think this ad thing is spectacular. Just thought I'd say so. -- Ali'i 15:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Those ads are really neat! Good work :) – riana_ dzasta 10:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Hammertime | ||
This non-barnstar entity is awarded to Qxz for fighting vandalism with a smile. Well, maybe not, but it sounds catchy. This award does not give you license to bite newcomers, and is ineligible for exchange with any other award. | It does not grant you permission to climb the Reichstag. Please contact the now-baleeted Barnstar Brigade for more details and disclaimers. Important: this award is not intended for use in the bathroom. All refunds will be in part; please see a representative for a form. Gracenotes T § 05:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC) |
How about an ad related to Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links? It's been hit kind of hard lately (see the link numbers at Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages maintenance) and would have the sort of widespread appeal you seem to be looking for. I love the ads, by the way... especially the one on edit summaries. Dekimasu よ! 13:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
File:Disambiguation pages.gif → Aza Toth 15:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Have already appointed it at Image:Qxz-ad10.gif
→ Aza Toth 17:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
How long does it take for you to fix vandilism? – Noalslob 19:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
lol, Qxz, I'm amazed that whatever page I go to, I notice that you've made some kind of reversion. You're everywhere! ~ Rollo44 22:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Could you please make a banner which advertises this? We need more help! Thank you so much! Real96 21:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Error: Image is invalid or non-existent.
Awesome adds, I'm glad that someone who is not a participant in WP:WPUS is that gifted in computer coding, especially in Cascading Style Sheets (I have seen a total of 2 Wikipedians who appear gifted in .css and are not participants in the aforementioned project). ~ Step trip 23:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you're using the ads I've made. It might be better if you transclude {{User:Qxz/ad.css}} directly, rather than copying it into a separate page. The reason for this is that I'm adding (and possibly removing) ads all the time, and so while my copy is updated, yours will get out-of-date. As it's a .css page, nobody can edit it except me (and administrators), so you don't have to worry about it being vandalised. Thanks – Qxz 17:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Qxz: thanks for leaving a note on my talk page. My I suggest that you do an XML-type thing? That is, having content on one page. Having the format on another default page, whereas another format page can be changed by a user. See User:Gracenotes/Quotes source, User:Gracenotes/Quotes, and User:Gracenotes for an example. Of course, that set up is more complicated than your needs to be. Gracenotes T § 12:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
You caught the vandalism just before I did. I wasn't expecting the user to vandalise my page, but I guess the person had a right to be angy. You undid it just a second quicker than I did. Thanks again! Computerman45 16:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, nice job on the ads!
I was wondering whether you can include an ad for the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. Thanks! + A.0u 00:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not try to push the use of my work in such an inappropriate context. I would be very much against using the images anywhere outside of userspace, and certainly not above articles. The negative responses your suggestion has recieved will likely reflect badly on me, despite being outside of my control. Thanks – Qxz 11:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't mean to cause you trouble (the ads thing on CP). Thanks anyway. --
Ali'i 13:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
How can discussing war crimes on the article of the perpatrator be vandalism? -- WelshDoctor 14:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Please keep an eye on this one Qxz—his edit history is not cause for optimism... Baccyak4H ( Yak!) 15:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Qxz! I think your ads are a great idea to promote wikiprojects and other such things. I was wondering if you could make one for Concordia. I would have made the animation, but unfortunately my computer doesn't have the neccisary program (whatever it may be). Again, thanks for the ads! Ry Guy 15:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
The page as it was presented non-Christian groups as if they are Christians. I was clarifing the difference. Cis2002 16:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Would it be possible for you to reply on your talk page instead of others talk page, it makes it rather difficult to follow discussions. → Aza Toth 16:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I erased the article on Philip Morath because it is about me. I do not want that information on the web. I have contacted Wikipedia a few times with no response. I realize the history is still there, but at least it won't be accessed as easily. – 71.61.28.154, 00:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
We need a few more people at WP:PR and WP:FAC. Something that could help is something like this:
Your opinion counts! Help us improve articles! |
---|
Please join and help us peer review articles to featured status. |
A modification of Image:Unclesamwantyou.jpg would be really nice... :) Nice job with this, by the way. Excellent idea. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 06:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Or at least to a page that points the Free Content images to commons. Wikipedia:Fromowner is a start ... it still points at en:wp. I'd hope this doesn't have to wait until Single User Logon - David Gerard 10:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi.
Your comment that non-Wikpedia stuff is likley to be rejected, but would it be possible for you to consider if an advert for the Wikiversity project is possible?
An 'ad' for WikiCast would also be appreciated longer term, but as you know WikiCast is not 'foundation' approved at the moment, so I doubt it falls within your criteria...
ShakespeareFan00 14:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
This is the anonymous vandal of the Nami page. I didn't get your message immeadiatley but have fixed the stuff I have edited since. I didn't know the rules here. Just wanted to say sorry. – 71.77.78.193 21:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I want to say sorryfor the vandalism again and ask if you could tell sir_james_paul for me I don't know how to talk to him.
That edit was a mistake. I did not see that all he did was remove a space. My bad :( -- James, La gloria è a dio 21:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
i did leave other stuff on there I shouldn't have but fixed it all and am really sorry I didn't know the rules. I actually thought it would just show it on this computer. once again I'm sorry, it won't happen again and please don't ban be I didn't know – 71.77.78.193 21:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
How do you get the you have knew message thing to go away? I read them and it is still there.
p.s. please don't ban me
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | ||
Awarded for creating fun, yet very educational ads. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
Sweeeet. :p I'll let you know if I think of any more. – Luna Santin ( talk) 01:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Could you possibly make something up for WP:WPSPAM. We can always use new volenteers to help deal with spam and advertising links. Enjoy the irony, and thanks ;) Eagle 101 00:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Could you please add these to your ad:
Please sign your posts on talk pages
Counter-Vandalism Unit
I would suggest a change where it asks "Have you edited for six months?" because it makes it sound like that is the required amount. It may put users who are perfectly capable off requesting, when users like myself, Husond, Arjun01, Ryanpostlethwaite and Yandman had less than that amount (recent examples) and passed. Also not too sure about the featured article thing either, or the clean block log; it just seems like these are just set standards being advertised and people may take them seriously. Majorly (o rly?) 02:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I found you here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jesserich If you look at the history on the comet page, between this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Comet&oldid=114730362 and this one by Jesserich: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Comet&oldid=114829467 the article seems to have "reproduced" itself multiple times. I would try to fix it but I'm a bit a noob about that sort of thing. So I am leaving you this note, thinking you can fix it quickly and properly. Feel free to drop me a note at my talk page if you think I could have figured how to do it myself! Thanks much, human 02:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I saw this page in recent edits and got curious, so I clicked it. Do you mind if I use any of those images? I don't want to use them without your permission. Bsroiaadn 02:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure that linking to from owner is a good idea since it only offers one lisence option and most wikipedians want more. Geni 03:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi - you wrote: I'd appreciate it if you could actually read nominations before commenting on them. Please look carefully at the name: this page is an article, not a template, which is why I brought it to AfD. ... As it's technically an article, and I'm arguing for its deletion based on its inappropriateness as an article, not its inappropriateness as a template, AfD is surely the preferred venue. I've now been told to take it to TfD (by another person who I suspect didn't read the nomination) and I won't be at all surprised if it gets referred back to AfD. Please don't just read the word "template" and trot out that same old quip about which door to try. Thanks
While I adore your formal style, I think what you are proposing is over-reaction. There are plenty of other templates, and I cannot see the reason why this one (Blade Runner) is not suitable, and if it is, why others are not to be deleted? Besides, I don't want to offend you, but you couldn't be more vague than in comment on my talk page... Broken soul 14:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
For your absolutely hysterical RfA gif, in which you prove that the truth is funnier than fiction can ever be. Kudos!! -- Avi 18:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
→ Aza Toth 19:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey Qxz, I'm concerned that Conservapedia has been added to "Related projects and forks" in this template. To be honest, I'm not sure how it's related to Wikipedia at all (except for their baseless assertions of bias, but that's irrelevant). I think that including Conservapedia in this list (and I haven't checked the other members) could imply that it is, in fact, "related" to Wikipedia in an official way, which isn't at all accurate. Could you clarify your reasons for adding it? Thanks! — bbatsell ¿? ✍ 19:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the help on this! Your tweaked layout is much nicer than my original... - Denny 19:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Do you think Citizendium should be there as a fork of Wikipedia? I added it, feel free to rv it out if you don't think so. Also, how can I get your ads centered on my user page? I can't seem to get the code right to have it center-aligned... - Denny 20:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NSR77 23:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Is it possible for you to make an ad that represents joining for the Counter-Vandalism Unit? zero » 00:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
What's with the {{ permprot}} rollout? Has this been discussed? Are you going to follow up by protecting these? Or is someone else? Or should I? Hesperian 03:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)