|
Hi Presidentbalut! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Consider, my friend, the words of that great man James Nicoll:
The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and riffle their pockets for new vocabulary.
Sometimes we keep the diacriticals in English, sometime we don't; look at the spelling of naïve and rôle, among others. -- Orange Mike | Talk 19:57, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Talk:List of Filipino inventions and discoveries
Hello Presidentbalut, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Talk:List of Filipino inventions and discoveries, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 ( talk) 13:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Presidentbalut. If you think the article should be deleted, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion is to place to go. Peter in Australia aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 13:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for you concern , but i have many links and basis to prove this, i will try to revise my article or you do so,and if you have a basis to your word, prove it!
you are welcome to show that and correct this article- not to delete it, i will tell you about karaoke, Filipinos are the Pioneers on that, and i like to ask you is this issue is a pure factual basis or this is an notion of Racism and Culture Superiority? o and if that's your reason - PLEASE STOP Filipinos invented some of what people using today, they just Modified that!
how well you are welcome to edit whats the you see wrong in your observations. and corrected it and Show me your basis either its facts or just a racism.
Filipinos has many inventions but the dominators claiming this, Thanks philipandrew ( talk) 12:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
bakit naman ako naging bobong unggoy ? eh sa katunayan Filipino inventions talaga naman ang mga nababanggit sa article ah
how could you say that im a disgrace!? im just telling Genuine Facts infact i am a corrector on that... hindi nila tayo sineseryoso dahil hindi natin pinapakita sa kanila kung ano ang mga Contributions at kakayahan ng pilipinas We are the PIONEERS of all that only i say you should Be a patriotic, Rather than Patronizing the Foreigners . . .
and about my Grammar Sorry for that Genius.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipandrew ( talk • contribs) 05:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Dennis Bratland. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
User talk:Kingchritian that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
See [1] at User talk:Kingchritian and [2] at User talk:Presidentbalut. Also: [3]. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 16:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hello! Stay civil and stay polite. We are a community here. If you need help let someone know. I want to see articles on Filipino-related topics improved too. Unfortunately to be civil that also means that things here are time consuming and it is difficult to understand processes, but most people feel like they get treated fairly by the rules. We do need more volunteers. Thanks! Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:07, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
When you edit, it is important that you remember to log in so that it does not appear that you are attempting to give the impression that your comments represent the thoughts of more than one person. [4] Thank you. - SummerPhD ( talk) 18:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Talk:Whoopi Goldberg. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
SummerPhD (
talk) 20:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Please note that your comment on my talk page was reverted by an admin. If you have serious questions relevant to building an encyclopedia, feel free to ask again. Otherwise, please consider this a further warning. Thank you. - SummerPhD ( talk) 03:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
About List of Filipino inventions and discoveries , I know that theirs a misunderstandings regarding the list , as i stated i have a references and sources upon those every lines of that article plus, i read book about Philippine History to make sure it was not a hoax.
Well brother , i respect your opinion , and thank you for your understanding and Contributions to the Article As a Volunteer , i like to give a free knowledge to Wikipedia. And to correct some unmentioned, and wrong statements and to add a new correcting knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipandrew ( talk • contribs) 08:43, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
pano naman ako naging sock puppet ?? eh ??? Does it proven? , i have only one account and that was Philipandrew! (my name it self )..
To tell you Even my account was block im still watching the Wiki to correct the some line to have Proper recognition. Although if i could not edit , Still some people will try to correct some false statements on every articles.
Marami na akong na contribute dito men so hindi ko hahayaan na ma=block ako dito .
And... Let me ask you, Do you really a User that implementing a Rules or------- You using this as advantage dahil na-confront ka sa Deletion ng Filipino Inventions at sa iba pang Filipio-related articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipandrew ( talk • contribs) 03:06, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
so have a nice day and One thing, Stay Civil akala mo di ko alam ang mga pinag sasabi mo bro sa Page ko tinangal lang ng mga Admins
any way Have a nice day bro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipandrew ( talk • contribs) 02:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
78.26. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
Talk:René Auberjonois that didn't seem very
civil. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Calling someone a troll is a personal attack, SummerPhD, who is a respected, experienced editor, was politely discussing an issue. Please refrain from unfounded accusations and name calling. Thanks, and happy editing!
78.26 (
I'm no IP, talk to me!) 03:04, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Message added 11:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
78.26 ( I'm no IP, talk to me!) 11:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did on
Talk:Genealogical DNA test. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
SummerPhD (
talk) 01:37, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
I asked two simple questions on this talk page in response for your requests for clarification. Your responses were not helpful. I have noticed that many of your talk page questions have repeating problems.
On at least four different articles, you have asked about the use of "foreign characters" in article titles. When you receive answers that 1) they are not "illegal" in American English and 2) follow Wikipedia's conventions, you seem to ignore the answers.
In several articles you insist that your knowledge of a subject is superior to the reliably sourced information in the article. What you know may or may not be correct. We are not here to judge that. For simplicity sake, Wikipedia is based on verifiability, not truth. It is one of our core principles. We cannot determine which of several competing ideas (if any) is or are true. We can, however, establish which are supported by reliable sources.
In several cases you are raising questions based facts you claim that no one else seems to be able to determine: "foreign characters" being illegal under New York state and federal law, the U.S. Navy using genetic testing to verify race, the widely accepted "Out of Africa" theory being widely rejected, etc. To answer your questions on these, we need to understand what you are asking, which requires you to explain these apparent discrepancies.
The possible explanations for these conflicts are limited in number. If you are right or simply confused in these cases, you can discuss the situations or make personal attacks. Discussing the situations is how Wikipedia works. Personal attacks will result in you being blocked. It is also possible that you don't want answers. That, too, will lead to a block. At your current rate, we'll have an outcome within a couple of days. - SummerPhD ( talk) 01:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Please be aware that comments like this and this are personal attacks. The community is very tolerant of misunderstandings, but it should be obvious that such personal attacks will lead to blocks. If that weren't the case, every page would be full of people abusing each other. If there is an issue, editors may ask questions and comment on the issue. However, do not comment on other editors. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bbb23 (
talk) 16:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)|
|
Hi Presidentbalut! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Consider, my friend, the words of that great man James Nicoll:
The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and riffle their pockets for new vocabulary.
Sometimes we keep the diacriticals in English, sometime we don't; look at the spelling of naïve and rôle, among others. -- Orange Mike | Talk 19:57, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Talk:List of Filipino inventions and discoveries
Hello Presidentbalut, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Talk:List of Filipino inventions and discoveries, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 ( talk) 13:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Presidentbalut. If you think the article should be deleted, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion is to place to go. Peter in Australia aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 13:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for you concern , but i have many links and basis to prove this, i will try to revise my article or you do so,and if you have a basis to your word, prove it!
you are welcome to show that and correct this article- not to delete it, i will tell you about karaoke, Filipinos are the Pioneers on that, and i like to ask you is this issue is a pure factual basis or this is an notion of Racism and Culture Superiority? o and if that's your reason - PLEASE STOP Filipinos invented some of what people using today, they just Modified that!
how well you are welcome to edit whats the you see wrong in your observations. and corrected it and Show me your basis either its facts or just a racism.
Filipinos has many inventions but the dominators claiming this, Thanks philipandrew ( talk) 12:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
bakit naman ako naging bobong unggoy ? eh sa katunayan Filipino inventions talaga naman ang mga nababanggit sa article ah
how could you say that im a disgrace!? im just telling Genuine Facts infact i am a corrector on that... hindi nila tayo sineseryoso dahil hindi natin pinapakita sa kanila kung ano ang mga Contributions at kakayahan ng pilipinas We are the PIONEERS of all that only i say you should Be a patriotic, Rather than Patronizing the Foreigners . . .
and about my Grammar Sorry for that Genius.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipandrew ( talk • contribs) 05:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Dennis Bratland. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
User talk:Kingchritian that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
See [1] at User talk:Kingchritian and [2] at User talk:Presidentbalut. Also: [3]. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 16:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hello! Stay civil and stay polite. We are a community here. If you need help let someone know. I want to see articles on Filipino-related topics improved too. Unfortunately to be civil that also means that things here are time consuming and it is difficult to understand processes, but most people feel like they get treated fairly by the rules. We do need more volunteers. Thanks! Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:07, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
When you edit, it is important that you remember to log in so that it does not appear that you are attempting to give the impression that your comments represent the thoughts of more than one person. [4] Thank you. - SummerPhD ( talk) 18:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Talk:Whoopi Goldberg. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
SummerPhD (
talk) 20:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Please note that your comment on my talk page was reverted by an admin. If you have serious questions relevant to building an encyclopedia, feel free to ask again. Otherwise, please consider this a further warning. Thank you. - SummerPhD ( talk) 03:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
About List of Filipino inventions and discoveries , I know that theirs a misunderstandings regarding the list , as i stated i have a references and sources upon those every lines of that article plus, i read book about Philippine History to make sure it was not a hoax.
Well brother , i respect your opinion , and thank you for your understanding and Contributions to the Article As a Volunteer , i like to give a free knowledge to Wikipedia. And to correct some unmentioned, and wrong statements and to add a new correcting knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipandrew ( talk • contribs) 08:43, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
pano naman ako naging sock puppet ?? eh ??? Does it proven? , i have only one account and that was Philipandrew! (my name it self )..
To tell you Even my account was block im still watching the Wiki to correct the some line to have Proper recognition. Although if i could not edit , Still some people will try to correct some false statements on every articles.
Marami na akong na contribute dito men so hindi ko hahayaan na ma=block ako dito .
And... Let me ask you, Do you really a User that implementing a Rules or------- You using this as advantage dahil na-confront ka sa Deletion ng Filipino Inventions at sa iba pang Filipio-related articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipandrew ( talk • contribs) 03:06, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
so have a nice day and One thing, Stay Civil akala mo di ko alam ang mga pinag sasabi mo bro sa Page ko tinangal lang ng mga Admins
any way Have a nice day bro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipandrew ( talk • contribs) 02:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
78.26. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
Talk:René Auberjonois that didn't seem very
civil. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Calling someone a troll is a personal attack, SummerPhD, who is a respected, experienced editor, was politely discussing an issue. Please refrain from unfounded accusations and name calling. Thanks, and happy editing!
78.26 (
I'm no IP, talk to me!) 03:04, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Message added 11:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
78.26 ( I'm no IP, talk to me!) 11:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did on
Talk:Genealogical DNA test. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
SummerPhD (
talk) 01:37, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
I asked two simple questions on this talk page in response for your requests for clarification. Your responses were not helpful. I have noticed that many of your talk page questions have repeating problems.
On at least four different articles, you have asked about the use of "foreign characters" in article titles. When you receive answers that 1) they are not "illegal" in American English and 2) follow Wikipedia's conventions, you seem to ignore the answers.
In several articles you insist that your knowledge of a subject is superior to the reliably sourced information in the article. What you know may or may not be correct. We are not here to judge that. For simplicity sake, Wikipedia is based on verifiability, not truth. It is one of our core principles. We cannot determine which of several competing ideas (if any) is or are true. We can, however, establish which are supported by reliable sources.
In several cases you are raising questions based facts you claim that no one else seems to be able to determine: "foreign characters" being illegal under New York state and federal law, the U.S. Navy using genetic testing to verify race, the widely accepted "Out of Africa" theory being widely rejected, etc. To answer your questions on these, we need to understand what you are asking, which requires you to explain these apparent discrepancies.
The possible explanations for these conflicts are limited in number. If you are right or simply confused in these cases, you can discuss the situations or make personal attacks. Discussing the situations is how Wikipedia works. Personal attacks will result in you being blocked. It is also possible that you don't want answers. That, too, will lead to a block. At your current rate, we'll have an outcome within a couple of days. - SummerPhD ( talk) 01:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Please be aware that comments like this and this are personal attacks. The community is very tolerant of misunderstandings, but it should be obvious that such personal attacks will lead to blocks. If that weren't the case, every page would be full of people abusing each other. If there is an issue, editors may ask questions and comment on the issue. However, do not comment on other editors. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bbb23 (
talk) 16:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)