Hello, Ponor, and
welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Ponor. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC) |
Hi Ponor; I've done my best to c/e this article but I found it quite confusing because of the mathematics and the technical jargon so feel free to correct my edits if I've messed anything up. I've tagged it with {{ jargon}}} and {{ refimprove}}. Good luck with your planned GA nom. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you claimed that there is no relation between graphene and PAHs. In fact there is more than just a relation. There is no rational distinction between the two concepts: a graphene flake is just a large PAH, and the PAHs of chemists are just tiny graphene fragments. The atomic structure and the bonding are exactly the same -- apart from edge effects that gradually become less important as the size of the molecule increases. The "single-double bond resonance" is not real, in either case: it is just a pedagogical/formal trick that chemists use to "explain" the bonding of aromatic structures in terms of the simplistic "covalent bond" model.
Likewise, graphene and nanotubes are very closely related concepts, with basically the same bonding and local structure, and many common properties. And it is useful to view fullerenes and glassy carbon as graphene with structural defects...
All the best, --
Jorge Stolfi (
talk) 16:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 ( talk) 20:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The article Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 ( talk) 20:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ponor, I have put a request in to amend the name of the article, see ARPES's talk page for details and where you can add a comment. Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 13:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ Ponor: Hüfner on p. 4 states the photoelectric equation (), but this differes from the Principle section in the article (). Have I misunderstood something here? Amitchell125 ( talk) 14:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Oof thank you for your diagram in the page ionization energies. Bruh I've been merely inferring the exceptions, and have you tried to count repeatedly and alternately? Tis hard work. Anyways thank you very muchhhh :>>>! Ice bear johny ( talk) 14:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Ok. I agree too. Plus you are a chemist, whereas I'm just a high school student hahaha. Really appreciated your edits tho. Thanks! Ice bear johny ( talk) 15:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Woah I can't help but commend your painstaking edits in ionization energies! Thank you really. Ice bear johny ( talk) 16:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
To be honest, after tirelessly working for 4 days about that blasted topic, i wonder really what caused lead's sudden rise in IE. I've already stated reasons as to why that's extremely weird, but if you have suggestions, feel free to edit that part/whichever part you want to improve. Like bruh, no research has any leads whatsoever. And my parents are grinding me to move on ;-;. Thanks po! Ice bear johny ( talk) 15:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Wait, I've read an answer in quora tho, which states that lead's IE is caused by 4-hedral symmetry. I kinda believe him, as he's a hitherto physics researcher and made a book. Ice bear johny ( talk) 15:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Anyways, imma move on first to another topic. Cheers professor! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ice bear johny ( talk • contribs) 15:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Yes i put copyright only for the images. Forgot i copied those verbatim. Anyways imma remove po the uh lead argument because it's all rubbish and pure inanity. Thanks for the help sir! Ice bear johny ( talk) 16:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | ||
Thank you for helping me edit Ionization energies! Really appreciated your help :))) Ice bear johny meowy123 16:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC) |
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
Here's a second one, for good measure :))) Ice bear johny meowy123 16:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC) |
Hello! I think I haven't reached out to you regarding your idea Text layout on desktop that is not like www of 1990s, which is a bit odd, because I've noticed that right away... Never mind, though. I'm glad you've shared that. This is a great idea and at first glance, it was well received by the Web team. 🙇 for that!
Have you read about the Desktop Improvements? Not only you can turn the new Vector on, but also (and this is actually what I'd like to ask you for) write down and share exactly what you like and what you don't. The frames of the project (to be executed in 2020-Q1&2 2021) are set now and we can't promise we'd definitely put images in the margins soon. But maybe that could be taken into consideration in the more distant future (Q3&4 2021/2022?) So... share your feedback! SGrabarczuk (WMF) ( talk) 12:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:X24/styles.css, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.
You aren't supposed to create subpages of sandboxes for testing purposes; these are explicitly included by the G2 speedy deletion criterion. The correct venue for experimental TemplateStyles stylesheets is Template:TemplateStyles sandbox or your userspace. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Ponor. I should have read the source more closely before reverting. If the ref does indeed mention the exodus of Italians in 1920 (which it looks like it does), this should be mentioned in the article in the first paragraph of the Yugoslav period section. I don't think the sentence should be removed entirely because it incorrectly alluded to the post-1945 period. Your thoughts? Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 19:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks but tbh it would be more useful if you would say something at the discussion, because right now mine appears to be the only dissenting voice. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 16:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Ok, but the other webarchive citation is dead, help add a new one thanks. Ffffrr ( talk) 04:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Condensing osteitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CT. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, You were mentioned today as a Lua coder who might be interested in working on the {{ Cite Q}} template. If that is of interest User:Mike Peel and I can brief you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Absolutely, go ahead and fix it up, I've fiddled with it a bit but don't really know how to improve it further offhand. I just wanted to make sure there's a link to the page element for clear traceability of text, just like there is for other transclusions. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 13:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The granting criteria for edit filter helper are a little strict here, but let me know if you'd be interested — you clearly have proficiency in filter syntax — TheresNoTime ( talk • she/her) 10:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I saw your post about how ORES was trained on the mediawiki. I thought you might be interested in our ongoing study, which aims to develop a tool that facilitates the curation of data that can train or evaluate existing or prospective machine learning models used in Wikipedia. If you're interested, please find more information on our recruitment page. Thanks for your consideration! Tzusheng ( talk) 03:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello Ponor, You hastily closed my edits to the Fourier Transform page without any reasonable discussion ( Latest revision as of 16:21, 27 September 2023 ( ) ( undo). I am new to Wikipedia and don't know all the features available and I had not bee on the site for about 2 years... The edits I had put in were about the applications of the Fourier Transform with reference to scalar field theory and specifically in the context of the wave equation. It is true that there is a common author in all four references but it is important to note that these are in four different fields of applied physics and the works cited are over a relatively large span of time, as the references show. Moreover they were all published in peer-reviewed prestigious journals and I had carefully put my edits under the “Applications of Fourier Transform” not the theory section. Furthermore those papers were published before the age of internet and it is important for the readers to be aware of pre-internet literature. They do add value to the article and it is unreasonable to remove my edits because, evidently, in your mind you don't seem to like the authors! You say there are 100s of similar papers but you have not cited even one! I emphasize that the papers I cited were from the era before the internet and they deal with original work and even if now one were to find similar material, the papers I cited would predate all of them. I want to work with you to see what would be a good solution and/or compromise before resorting to dispute resolution or arbitration on this matter. One way I would yeild would be if you were find something in the literature that predates the papers cited. Thanks.
( thank). Writingking ( talk) 23:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Maybe add some generic sanity checks for disambiguation and set indices? Can you have it access wikidata perhaps? I see you had to revert a fair bit with the same pattern. -- Joy ( talk) 01:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Was this edit meant for the one near Vrbovsko or the one near Brod Moravice? -- Joy ( talk) 08:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sinj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Krka.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kninska Krajina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Završje.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Ponor, and
welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Ponor. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC) |
Hi Ponor; I've done my best to c/e this article but I found it quite confusing because of the mathematics and the technical jargon so feel free to correct my edits if I've messed anything up. I've tagged it with {{ jargon}}} and {{ refimprove}}. Good luck with your planned GA nom. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you claimed that there is no relation between graphene and PAHs. In fact there is more than just a relation. There is no rational distinction between the two concepts: a graphene flake is just a large PAH, and the PAHs of chemists are just tiny graphene fragments. The atomic structure and the bonding are exactly the same -- apart from edge effects that gradually become less important as the size of the molecule increases. The "single-double bond resonance" is not real, in either case: it is just a pedagogical/formal trick that chemists use to "explain" the bonding of aromatic structures in terms of the simplistic "covalent bond" model.
Likewise, graphene and nanotubes are very closely related concepts, with basically the same bonding and local structure, and many common properties. And it is useful to view fullerenes and glassy carbon as graphene with structural defects...
All the best, --
Jorge Stolfi (
talk) 16:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 ( talk) 20:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The article Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 ( talk) 20:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ponor, I have put a request in to amend the name of the article, see ARPES's talk page for details and where you can add a comment. Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 13:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ Ponor: Hüfner on p. 4 states the photoelectric equation (), but this differes from the Principle section in the article (). Have I misunderstood something here? Amitchell125 ( talk) 14:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Oof thank you for your diagram in the page ionization energies. Bruh I've been merely inferring the exceptions, and have you tried to count repeatedly and alternately? Tis hard work. Anyways thank you very muchhhh :>>>! Ice bear johny ( talk) 14:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Ok. I agree too. Plus you are a chemist, whereas I'm just a high school student hahaha. Really appreciated your edits tho. Thanks! Ice bear johny ( talk) 15:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Woah I can't help but commend your painstaking edits in ionization energies! Thank you really. Ice bear johny ( talk) 16:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
To be honest, after tirelessly working for 4 days about that blasted topic, i wonder really what caused lead's sudden rise in IE. I've already stated reasons as to why that's extremely weird, but if you have suggestions, feel free to edit that part/whichever part you want to improve. Like bruh, no research has any leads whatsoever. And my parents are grinding me to move on ;-;. Thanks po! Ice bear johny ( talk) 15:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Wait, I've read an answer in quora tho, which states that lead's IE is caused by 4-hedral symmetry. I kinda believe him, as he's a hitherto physics researcher and made a book. Ice bear johny ( talk) 15:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Anyways, imma move on first to another topic. Cheers professor! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ice bear johny ( talk • contribs) 15:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Yes i put copyright only for the images. Forgot i copied those verbatim. Anyways imma remove po the uh lead argument because it's all rubbish and pure inanity. Thanks for the help sir! Ice bear johny ( talk) 16:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | ||
Thank you for helping me edit Ionization energies! Really appreciated your help :))) Ice bear johny meowy123 16:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC) |
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
Here's a second one, for good measure :))) Ice bear johny meowy123 16:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC) |
Hello! I think I haven't reached out to you regarding your idea Text layout on desktop that is not like www of 1990s, which is a bit odd, because I've noticed that right away... Never mind, though. I'm glad you've shared that. This is a great idea and at first glance, it was well received by the Web team. 🙇 for that!
Have you read about the Desktop Improvements? Not only you can turn the new Vector on, but also (and this is actually what I'd like to ask you for) write down and share exactly what you like and what you don't. The frames of the project (to be executed in 2020-Q1&2 2021) are set now and we can't promise we'd definitely put images in the margins soon. But maybe that could be taken into consideration in the more distant future (Q3&4 2021/2022?) So... share your feedback! SGrabarczuk (WMF) ( talk) 12:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:X24/styles.css, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.
You aren't supposed to create subpages of sandboxes for testing purposes; these are explicitly included by the G2 speedy deletion criterion. The correct venue for experimental TemplateStyles stylesheets is Template:TemplateStyles sandbox or your userspace. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Ponor. I should have read the source more closely before reverting. If the ref does indeed mention the exodus of Italians in 1920 (which it looks like it does), this should be mentioned in the article in the first paragraph of the Yugoslav period section. I don't think the sentence should be removed entirely because it incorrectly alluded to the post-1945 period. Your thoughts? Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 19:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks but tbh it would be more useful if you would say something at the discussion, because right now mine appears to be the only dissenting voice. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 16:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Ok, but the other webarchive citation is dead, help add a new one thanks. Ffffrr ( talk) 04:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Condensing osteitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CT. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, You were mentioned today as a Lua coder who might be interested in working on the {{ Cite Q}} template. If that is of interest User:Mike Peel and I can brief you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Absolutely, go ahead and fix it up, I've fiddled with it a bit but don't really know how to improve it further offhand. I just wanted to make sure there's a link to the page element for clear traceability of text, just like there is for other transclusions. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 13:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The granting criteria for edit filter helper are a little strict here, but let me know if you'd be interested — you clearly have proficiency in filter syntax — TheresNoTime ( talk • she/her) 10:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I saw your post about how ORES was trained on the mediawiki. I thought you might be interested in our ongoing study, which aims to develop a tool that facilitates the curation of data that can train or evaluate existing or prospective machine learning models used in Wikipedia. If you're interested, please find more information on our recruitment page. Thanks for your consideration! Tzusheng ( talk) 03:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello Ponor, You hastily closed my edits to the Fourier Transform page without any reasonable discussion ( Latest revision as of 16:21, 27 September 2023 ( ) ( undo). I am new to Wikipedia and don't know all the features available and I had not bee on the site for about 2 years... The edits I had put in were about the applications of the Fourier Transform with reference to scalar field theory and specifically in the context of the wave equation. It is true that there is a common author in all four references but it is important to note that these are in four different fields of applied physics and the works cited are over a relatively large span of time, as the references show. Moreover they were all published in peer-reviewed prestigious journals and I had carefully put my edits under the “Applications of Fourier Transform” not the theory section. Furthermore those papers were published before the age of internet and it is important for the readers to be aware of pre-internet literature. They do add value to the article and it is unreasonable to remove my edits because, evidently, in your mind you don't seem to like the authors! You say there are 100s of similar papers but you have not cited even one! I emphasize that the papers I cited were from the era before the internet and they deal with original work and even if now one were to find similar material, the papers I cited would predate all of them. I want to work with you to see what would be a good solution and/or compromise before resorting to dispute resolution or arbitration on this matter. One way I would yeild would be if you were find something in the literature that predates the papers cited. Thanks.
( thank). Writingking ( talk) 23:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Maybe add some generic sanity checks for disambiguation and set indices? Can you have it access wikidata perhaps? I see you had to revert a fair bit with the same pattern. -- Joy ( talk) 01:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Was this edit meant for the one near Vrbovsko or the one near Brod Moravice? -- Joy ( talk) 08:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sinj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Krka.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kninska Krajina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Završje.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)