This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Stephen Harper. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You can find citation templates here. -- Ħ MIESIANIACAL 18:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page Flexity Outlook (Toronto streetcar), you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 02:32, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toronto Blue Jays, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Shapiro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to One-child policy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
24 Sussex Drive may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Howdy. TBH, the Interim leadership section shoudl be removed entirely, if not trimmed down. The article is suppose to be about the Leadership race and Leadership candidates. Not the Interim leadership race or Interim leadership candidates. GoodDay ( talk) 23:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Peter K Burian 23:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Hello. I don't disagree. ... OK, I went in and deleted the entire section as to who ran for interim leader and condensed the issue as to who was allowed to vote.
Peter K Burian 23:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Yes, makes sense; are you satisfied with the current version? Cheers! Peter K Burian 23:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
See WP:SIGNATURES, for how to sign your posts in discussions. Also, see WP:INDENT for how to place your posts in discussions. GoodDay ( talk) 16:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
You also need to provide a link in your signature to back to your user, talk page or contributions. See wp:SIGLINK. 220 of Borg 18:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop using bare urls as citations. Templates are available at WP:CIT. Thanks. -- Ħ MIESIANIACAL 03:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hey Peter. I think you would find if you try to engage that placing basic referencing is not nearly as hard as it seems at first blush. First, you do not need to use citation templates. It is perfectly okay to place handwritten citations. It's not as good; lots of formatting will be missing and probably inconsistent; but if you provide good attribution to the source, that's what really matters and it's easily fixable by others. What is insufficient is a naked link, making verifiability much more difficult. So, let's take an example of a citation you added in your edit, this one. I know you already know how to make it into an inline citation by using ref tags around it (<ref>...</ref>) because you actually did that. Look how easy it is to make that into an acceptable citation.
All you would need to make this acceptable is add the attribution details of the source in prose after the URL (in red for emphasis):
However, using a citation template is not that hard. Each has documentation on their talk pages, and mostly you can just copy and paste them and then just add the obvious details after each equal sign. But let's break down one to see it's not all that hard.
{{
cite book}}
, {{
cite news}}
, {{
cite journal}}
and {{
cite web}}
. Clicking on them will lead you documentaton explaining them and allowing you to copy and paste.{{cite news |date= |title= |url= |newspaper= |location= |page= }}
</ref>You can even do it vertically to see it better, it makes no difference to the output:
<ref>{{cite news |date= |title= |url= |newspaper= |location= |page= }}</ref>
<ref>{{cite news |date= June 28, 1927 |title= Historic Rideau Hall Was Built in 1837 |url= https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2194&dat=19270628&id=N_AuAAAAIBAJ&sjid=qtkFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6772,4152719 |newspaper= Ottowa Citizen |location= Ottowa, Canada |page=24 }}</ref>
Placing that would format like this:
Hope this helps.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 01:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
template, but you placed that in further reading? You do understand that the cite templates just go between ref tags? So why didn't you use that citation template between ref tags in the text, instead of using a naked link? Replace the naked link that you placed between the ref tags for no. 98 with the filled-out cite book template you made and voilà, an attributed citation.--
Fuhghettaboutit (
talk) 01:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Tough to find journalists publishing any material claiming that a known fact is not true. But see this one [1] from Canada's National Capitol Commission. (I don't see any mention of it being the queen's residence in Canada.) The official residences in Canada’s Capital are owned and operated by the National Capital Commission. Rideau Hall, the home of the Governor General, is the only official residence open for public visits. Public Works and Government Services Canada provides the same role for The Citadelle, the Governor General's historic second residence in Quebec City. Peter K Burian 14:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
</ref>
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gogo Inflight Internet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Virgin Airlines. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Just letting you know, at Rideau Cottage, I didn't undo your good faith change to the coordinates to be obstinate; what I wrote in my edit summary is true. That is, for me, following the link the way I said I did. I don't know if it somehow appears differently on others' computers or using some of the other options (Bing Maps, MapTech, etc.) -- ₪ MIESIANIACAL 04:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
This is a continuation of the topic re: deleted sections from government reactions in other countries.
The other topic, Reactions, /info/en/?search=Reactions_to_the_November_2015_Paris_attacks, is very narrow in that it only discusses how sad other countries are that France was attacked. There is absolutely no coverage re: the countries' plans re: admitting refugees in the aftermath of the attacks.
However, the article about the attacks already does include comments of that type, so that is where I will be discussing this sub-topic: in the European Council section and in the International section re: Canada's intentions and plans. Peter K Burian 16:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
[1] I know we disagree on this but just wanted to let you know that if you have any questions about Wikipedia, policy, structure, governance, ambiance or anything else, please let me know. It's very easy to get lost in all the rules, regulations, policies, bureaucracy etc. and I'm genuinely willing to help out. Volunteer Marek 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello again. Please keep in mind in edits such as this and this one that when you use the {{cite web}} template, you must provide a URL, otherwise the citation won't work correctly. If you want to cite an offline newspaper, then you should use {{cite news}} instead, which does not require a URL. LjL ( talk) 00:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Toronto Blue Jays, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 03:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yahoo! may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Peter. I see that the issue with your signature isn't solved yet, and that you seem to have made an attempt. That's good, but it's not good that your signature still is not a clickable link. Have you checked your preferences? Try that. There is a big box about "Signature". In that box is a smaller box which can be edited. Insert this content:
Then check the box immediate below it that says "Treat the above as wiki markup." Then save your work, go back to the talk page, use four tildes, save, and see if it makes a proper signature (don't worry about the "talk" link not working. It won't on your own talk page, but it will everywhere else. Let me know if this works for you, because this needs to be fixed. -- BullRangifer ( talk) 20:22, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Hmmm... it may have worked!! Thanks for your help. Cheers! Peter Peter K Burian ( talk) 20:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Did you delete too much here? -- BullRangifer ( talk) 18:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
OK, I added the deleted citations back, although I felt we had plenty of citations without doing so. Peter K Burian ( talk) 20:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Cosby sexual assault allegations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
Can I point you to an essay, its not policy, WP:RECENTISM. There is a tendency to pile more and more stuff into Falkland's articles about the sovereignty dispute. Sorry but does it really need it, Argentine politician A recently said the same thing as the last guy, the British politician B said the same thing they replied last time and it doesn't change. Please if we could resist the temptation to report on recent events it makes for a better article.
Regards, W C M email 22:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the History lesson but we spent weeks discussing The Falklands in the International History Course in fourth year of University. Peter K Burian ( talk) 22:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Please read the talk section on Cosby's sex assault page as I have added a Link on California Laws which is not the entire set of laws , some cover 10 years and in the case of Agravated Sexual Assault there is no statute of limitations, this is all explained in the talk sextion which I added to under Chloe Goins Statute of limitation on Cosby's sex assault allegations page Wwdamron ( talk) 22:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Here it is for the Still Possible State Charges, He can also be possibly federally prosecuted but this I could not look up yesterday since I had limited time and was on my cell phone Date December 30, 2015.---
http://www.dailynews.com/general-news/20151230/could-felony-charges-against-bill-cosby-help-ex-models-playboy-mansion-case
Sorry... Can you use " <ref name= > " for same references? Thanks. -- Gastón Cuello ( talk) 17:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, yes, I noticed after I submitted that the lede was starting to repeat that section you mentioned. I reorganized the article, shortening the lede a lot, and moved most of what I took out to other sections. Feel free to change it more if you see anything that looks out of place. — AySz88 \ ^-^ 19:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Perrault, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sleeping Beauty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!.
Could you check this? — Obsuser ( talk) 22:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Conservative Party of Canada may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Stephen Harper. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You can find citation templates here. -- Ħ MIESIANIACAL 18:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page Flexity Outlook (Toronto streetcar), you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 02:32, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toronto Blue Jays, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Shapiro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to One-child policy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
24 Sussex Drive may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Howdy. TBH, the Interim leadership section shoudl be removed entirely, if not trimmed down. The article is suppose to be about the Leadership race and Leadership candidates. Not the Interim leadership race or Interim leadership candidates. GoodDay ( talk) 23:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Peter K Burian 23:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Hello. I don't disagree. ... OK, I went in and deleted the entire section as to who ran for interim leader and condensed the issue as to who was allowed to vote.
Peter K Burian 23:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Yes, makes sense; are you satisfied with the current version? Cheers! Peter K Burian 23:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
See WP:SIGNATURES, for how to sign your posts in discussions. Also, see WP:INDENT for how to place your posts in discussions. GoodDay ( talk) 16:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
You also need to provide a link in your signature to back to your user, talk page or contributions. See wp:SIGLINK. 220 of Borg 18:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop using bare urls as citations. Templates are available at WP:CIT. Thanks. -- Ħ MIESIANIACAL 03:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hey Peter. I think you would find if you try to engage that placing basic referencing is not nearly as hard as it seems at first blush. First, you do not need to use citation templates. It is perfectly okay to place handwritten citations. It's not as good; lots of formatting will be missing and probably inconsistent; but if you provide good attribution to the source, that's what really matters and it's easily fixable by others. What is insufficient is a naked link, making verifiability much more difficult. So, let's take an example of a citation you added in your edit, this one. I know you already know how to make it into an inline citation by using ref tags around it (<ref>...</ref>) because you actually did that. Look how easy it is to make that into an acceptable citation.
All you would need to make this acceptable is add the attribution details of the source in prose after the URL (in red for emphasis):
However, using a citation template is not that hard. Each has documentation on their talk pages, and mostly you can just copy and paste them and then just add the obvious details after each equal sign. But let's break down one to see it's not all that hard.
{{
cite book}}
, {{
cite news}}
, {{
cite journal}}
and {{
cite web}}
. Clicking on them will lead you documentaton explaining them and allowing you to copy and paste.{{cite news |date= |title= |url= |newspaper= |location= |page= }}
</ref>You can even do it vertically to see it better, it makes no difference to the output:
<ref>{{cite news |date= |title= |url= |newspaper= |location= |page= }}</ref>
<ref>{{cite news |date= June 28, 1927 |title= Historic Rideau Hall Was Built in 1837 |url= https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2194&dat=19270628&id=N_AuAAAAIBAJ&sjid=qtkFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6772,4152719 |newspaper= Ottowa Citizen |location= Ottowa, Canada |page=24 }}</ref>
Placing that would format like this:
Hope this helps.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 01:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
template, but you placed that in further reading? You do understand that the cite templates just go between ref tags? So why didn't you use that citation template between ref tags in the text, instead of using a naked link? Replace the naked link that you placed between the ref tags for no. 98 with the filled-out cite book template you made and voilà, an attributed citation.--
Fuhghettaboutit (
talk) 01:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Tough to find journalists publishing any material claiming that a known fact is not true. But see this one [1] from Canada's National Capitol Commission. (I don't see any mention of it being the queen's residence in Canada.) The official residences in Canada’s Capital are owned and operated by the National Capital Commission. Rideau Hall, the home of the Governor General, is the only official residence open for public visits. Public Works and Government Services Canada provides the same role for The Citadelle, the Governor General's historic second residence in Quebec City. Peter K Burian 14:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
</ref>
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gogo Inflight Internet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Virgin Airlines. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Just letting you know, at Rideau Cottage, I didn't undo your good faith change to the coordinates to be obstinate; what I wrote in my edit summary is true. That is, for me, following the link the way I said I did. I don't know if it somehow appears differently on others' computers or using some of the other options (Bing Maps, MapTech, etc.) -- ₪ MIESIANIACAL 04:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
This is a continuation of the topic re: deleted sections from government reactions in other countries.
The other topic, Reactions, /info/en/?search=Reactions_to_the_November_2015_Paris_attacks, is very narrow in that it only discusses how sad other countries are that France was attacked. There is absolutely no coverage re: the countries' plans re: admitting refugees in the aftermath of the attacks.
However, the article about the attacks already does include comments of that type, so that is where I will be discussing this sub-topic: in the European Council section and in the International section re: Canada's intentions and plans. Peter K Burian 16:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
[1] I know we disagree on this but just wanted to let you know that if you have any questions about Wikipedia, policy, structure, governance, ambiance or anything else, please let me know. It's very easy to get lost in all the rules, regulations, policies, bureaucracy etc. and I'm genuinely willing to help out. Volunteer Marek 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello again. Please keep in mind in edits such as this and this one that when you use the {{cite web}} template, you must provide a URL, otherwise the citation won't work correctly. If you want to cite an offline newspaper, then you should use {{cite news}} instead, which does not require a URL. LjL ( talk) 00:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Toronto Blue Jays, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 03:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yahoo! may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Peter. I see that the issue with your signature isn't solved yet, and that you seem to have made an attempt. That's good, but it's not good that your signature still is not a clickable link. Have you checked your preferences? Try that. There is a big box about "Signature". In that box is a smaller box which can be edited. Insert this content:
Then check the box immediate below it that says "Treat the above as wiki markup." Then save your work, go back to the talk page, use four tildes, save, and see if it makes a proper signature (don't worry about the "talk" link not working. It won't on your own talk page, but it will everywhere else. Let me know if this works for you, because this needs to be fixed. -- BullRangifer ( talk) 20:22, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Hmmm... it may have worked!! Thanks for your help. Cheers! Peter Peter K Burian ( talk) 20:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Did you delete too much here? -- BullRangifer ( talk) 18:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
OK, I added the deleted citations back, although I felt we had plenty of citations without doing so. Peter K Burian ( talk) 20:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Cosby sexual assault allegations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
Can I point you to an essay, its not policy, WP:RECENTISM. There is a tendency to pile more and more stuff into Falkland's articles about the sovereignty dispute. Sorry but does it really need it, Argentine politician A recently said the same thing as the last guy, the British politician B said the same thing they replied last time and it doesn't change. Please if we could resist the temptation to report on recent events it makes for a better article.
Regards, W C M email 22:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the History lesson but we spent weeks discussing The Falklands in the International History Course in fourth year of University. Peter K Burian ( talk) 22:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Please read the talk section on Cosby's sex assault page as I have added a Link on California Laws which is not the entire set of laws , some cover 10 years and in the case of Agravated Sexual Assault there is no statute of limitations, this is all explained in the talk sextion which I added to under Chloe Goins Statute of limitation on Cosby's sex assault allegations page Wwdamron ( talk) 22:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Here it is for the Still Possible State Charges, He can also be possibly federally prosecuted but this I could not look up yesterday since I had limited time and was on my cell phone Date December 30, 2015.---
http://www.dailynews.com/general-news/20151230/could-felony-charges-against-bill-cosby-help-ex-models-playboy-mansion-case
Sorry... Can you use " <ref name= > " for same references? Thanks. -- Gastón Cuello ( talk) 17:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, yes, I noticed after I submitted that the lede was starting to repeat that section you mentioned. I reorganized the article, shortening the lede a lot, and moved most of what I took out to other sections. Feel free to change it more if you see anything that looks out of place. — AySz88 \ ^-^ 19:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Perrault, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sleeping Beauty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!.
Could you check this? — Obsuser ( talk) 22:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Conservative Party of Canada may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)