I don't think so — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.68.223 ( talk) 12:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Long-winded rant
|
|---|
|
It was quite aggressive deletion of content I had taken time to build up which had been around for two years. I was called a dumb ass or a dumb ass ranter at one point just for claiming the obvious which was that I was being bullied on Wikipedia.I do not like bullies .
You claim that it is an encyclopedia in the making so shouldn't be allowed yet Wikipedia is exactly that a Social encyclopedia for the spread of encyclopaedic knowledge which should be free for everyone not for someone to suddenly get all their content deleted so yes there is something wrong, and yes it did feel like bullying. It was an irrational perspective to hold, to say the least!!! To call someone a dumb ass is a vulgar terminology to use but it was the other user Cullen who began all the bullying by his constant deletions of any input whatsoever, not so much only those things he disagreed with. Although I coolly made my point and told it like it was to him I was by no means angry or aggressive and did not display this type of behaviour at all. Often bullies will distort the facts to make themselves look in the right and put you in the wrong when the reality of the facts is that they are the aggressors. This is a time honoured tradition whenever censorship or oppression has been afoot!!..Also the fact that you are deleting and blocking indefinitely through some kind of narrow minded pomposity seems to denote jealousy of some kind. Perhaps this is due to the fact that I can spontaneously provide facts and knowledge on an interesting range of subjects!! The constant deletions were in fact coming across not only as bullying behaviour but also wholly unconstructive, demeaning and childish behaviour! There is nothing remotely aggressive in appealing to say I felt bullied, it isn't anger, it was detached observation so to reiterate into make out otherwise is downright fact distortion!! Also I wasn't so much mourning our monarch on Wikipedia I was merely making a factual dedication in light of the present state of national mourning in our country the UK but I wasn't elaborating on the issue as I am now. I was just showing due deference on my page as there is not often such a historical occurrence. When people don't rationalise what is being presented or don't want to read interesting information they can mark it off as a rant or calling dumb 😹🤣 but surely this is irony in the making. A complete parody of that which is real which is probably that it wasn't dumb , far from it lol 😅 I take it you are totally against Facebook links so will not antagonise whoever by creating links to them, especially not my Facebook group which had the title Cut the Crap..and think like a barrister!! I fear it could only make you become more obstreperous and persecutory towards me, and who knows I would never be free to edit again despite the craziness of the logic itself 😂 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peonydanvers ( talk • contribs) September 10, 2022 17:41 (UTC) |
- FYI: I do have to admit this user frustrated me, with their rants and all (I called those dumb and they doubled down), but honestly? This rant is so long, I put it in a collapsible, and I can't even imagine how long their unblock request would be... at least it's all over. Thank god. -- WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 09:34, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) -- Peonydanvers ( talk) 22:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
It is my personal property band has viable information about dogs and astrology on it.It is a family history site.
Peony Danvers Peonydanvers ( talk) 22:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Per
WP: User pages,
While considerable leeway is allowed in personalizing and managing your user pages, they are community project pages, not a personal website, blog, social networking medium, or a Wikipedia article. They should be used to better participate in the community, and not used to excess for unrelated purposes nor to bring the project into disrepute.
. Cullen328 ( talk) 22:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Stop persecuting please, this is just not on!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Do not restore your inappropriate user page after an administrator has deleted it. That is disruptive editing. Cullen328 ( talk) 23:45, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, Peonydanvers,
- All Wikipedia pages are the property of Wikipedia, they are not yours or mine. All content on them should exist to enhance this encyclopedia. If you want to have a personal profile about your interests, please start a blog or website or make use of social media. We are in the business of working on an encyclopedia here, not getting to know each other better. Liz Read! Talk! 23:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
It wasn't purely about my interests there as a lot of valuable information upon dogs, ancestors and also some on astrology which was entirely useful and was of no harm to anyone . So entirely no need to block it which was what happened when after constant deletion I Ike out. It was persecutory and definitely bullying in nature and as I'd had my page for the past two years with no trouble from any other people and then suddenly a whole load of deletions I dedicated it instead to the late monarch, Elizabeth 11 and also to King Charles 111 knowing them to be liberal representative s of the nation. Blocking any form of learning and research is clearly censorship which is bad news!!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 17:02, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
|
I don't want to be part of Teahouse, anymore, I'm sure it's a minority but articles I've had for two years have been deleted and when I try to conserve them they threaten to delete them again only if it's one person, I can present my own knowledge with minimal citation and this obviously bugs this one person, I have a good memory for details and facts, I don't want to belong to such forums due to this one person at present, I can't even present knowledge and all I'm currently being permitted to do is read, read, read which is something I've done from infancy anyway to laugh out loud.. unfortunately U will have to leave the forum because of this one person, please permit me to do this before I get any more of this misery, such a shame!!
Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I will have to leave the forum to correct the typo because of this bully!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Someone is bullying me about a harmless inoffensive page I have had running for two years, they won't let me publish my research, it is getting quite persecutory and nasty!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 23:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- You must comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. This is not negotiable. Cullen328 ( talk) 00:00, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
You are unstable surely !! Peonydanvers ( talk) 06:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Yes sincerely I do feel I am being bullied of recent days quite a shame because of recent years I have always felt proud of my page!! And will continue to assert my rights to use Wikipedia freely because this is what it was originally intended for, Penelope Clare Davies, how absolutely crazy!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 06:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
This person says it is non negotiable to keep removing my pages, he shouldn't have this right , it should be negotiable otherwise it is psychopathology!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I've never had any such problems before over a whole two year period and more, seems a nasty piece of work, something must've have skewered the guy?? Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- All we are trying to tell you is that you, like every other editor here, has to abide by Wikipedia policies and guidelines. And it is not permitted to use your User page to list your family and personal history along with a list of your interests. Every page on Wikipedia is devoted to improving this encyclopedia. This is not persecution, you just don't seem to understand what it is we do here. I couldn't have a page like that and I've been an active editor here since 2013! It's not personal. This is just not the place to assemble a personal profile. What you have now is fine, just leave it with a short introduction and it won't be tagged for deletion.
- This will probably not help but hundreds of pages get deleted daily for exactly this reason. You are not being singled out. Any User page that is not being used properly is tagged for deletion as soon as an editor spots it. If you want this to change, you'll need to get support for changing Wikipedia policies. But this project has been around for 21 years so changing policy is like trying to change the direction of a cargo ship...difficult to do and it requires the help of a lot of other people who share your opinion for how things should be changed. Liz Read! Talk! 00:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
It should be permitted because it was a reference to genealogy rather than individual traits. There was plenty of useful information on different subject areas such as animals and new philosophies, Wikipedia should be free to use without useful information being deleted, absolutely crazy. It's principles of freedom of input should be abided by or else it becomes repressive and unpleasant!!..how do I report to Wikipedia itself, although I've already made my opinions pretty clear on the matter I would have thought!!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I've had a user page and been using Wikipedia for a good two years by the way!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:28, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Not permitted!!..It was totally innocuous not harming anybody!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- WP:UP is a guideline for what is and what is not appropriate for a User page. Anything else, and it will be deleted by an Administrator. Matters naught for how long it has been there. David notMD ( talk) 02:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
The latest version of your userpage has been deleted per WP:POLEMIC since it contained personal attacks on other Wikipedia editors, which is not permitted on this website. Do not engage in any more disruptive editing. Cullen328 ( talk) 05:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- The next time you engage in polemical personal attacks, you will be blocked. If you want to keep editing Wikipedia, you must stop your misconduct now.
Cullen328 (
talk) 06:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Voted the article for speedy - this person now just some dumb ass rant badmouthing high-ranked editors and mourning the Royal Family (???) WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 13:28, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey! Please don't make frankly crappy user pages that say "the admins are BULLIES and I have every right to make my own fucking page!!!" because that counts as bad manners. As such, I've marked it as deletion.
Like, people have told you countless times not to behave like this. As cranky as you are, Wikipedia is not for your band (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not). I might as well tell you this until you actually listen.
Thank you. WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 12:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- As such, I've reported your userpage on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Restrict creation of User:Peonydanvers to staff? to be restricted to Wikipedia staff members. Until further notice, people are going to keep telling you to stop throwing around insults. WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 13:25, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
DatGuy
Talk
Contribs 14:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)My concern is that when I reported bullying it as seen as a personal attack/s. Clearly people who report bullies are trying to get the bully to account for their behaviour/s. It is not a personal attack on them it is just a call for them to diminish their persecutory behaviours and assaults in whatever form it takes.It is unpleasant human behaviour and Wikipedia in its advice pages suggest that discouraging those who are newcomers and unnecessary overbearing deletions goes well against the grain and could count as bullying. So no to cite Anthony Bradbury so called reason to complain feeling bullied and overly harassed/discriminated against, rather than encouraged and speaking out against people for having content removed that has been there for over two years is not personally attacking anyone.How can reporting bullying or harassment be personally attacking people?? Maybe I was telling it how it was and the people involved couldn't bear to be thought of as overbearing bullies and decided to get worse , accuse me of personal attacks and block me from making any contribution whatever which is completely O.T.T.! Also calling my well outlined argument a long winded rant is a form of attack!! The person who has accused me is doing the very thing they have tried to accuse me of!! It merely shows that they cannot be bothered to read or digest the information presented to them and so scoff at it pompously or mark it off as long-winded. What is long -winded to them may indeed not prove long -winded to the more educated or erudite person. Indeed the Wikipedia forum often attracts the more educated person, myself included! However passing people off by remarking upon them with very basic vocabulary which doesn't ascribe much meaning or value comes across as using a little bit of an ignoramus system which I'm sure the more conscientious and welcoming Wikipedia administrator or editor wouldn't use. It was simply my hard luck then to come across rather a small bunch of bad apples 🤣, indeed in that respect!! Certainly if with limited administrative powers they seek to indefinitely block or censor my creative input I may have come across a very bad bunch indeed, in consideration of the fact that I am certainly not evil or a terrorist myself, the mind boggles at some of the people who gain power and authority over such forums?? Peonydanvers ( talk) 19:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm sure you're much smarter than all of us. You're welcome to go be very smart on some other website. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 20:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- "I do not attack people! The admins are just bullies! Anyway, I wrote a userpage mourning the Royal Family and mocking the admins for telling me what to do!"
- Surely a smart person, indeed! Thank GOD all of this is over. That, and their wall of texts surely aren't helping. WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 07:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thats disciminatory snide language 2.25.68.223 ( talk) 12:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I know you are blocked, but the "people" are following policy.
71.228.112.175 (
talk) 09:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Funny they also complain about censorship of their disruptive edits, considering
WP:CENSOR. (Wouldn't be surprised if they don't read the essays)
WannurSyafiqah74 (
talk) 10:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- I also reported the user on WP:ANI for their dumbass rant on their userpage that blatantly attacked high-ranked editors. Needless to say, I'm not sure how much convincing it takes until this weird user can change. WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 10:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Funny they also complain about censorship of their disruptive edits, considering
WP:CENSOR. (Wouldn't be surprised if they don't read the essays)
WannurSyafiqah74 (
talk) 10:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
-- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 20:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I don't think so — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.68.223 ( talk) 12:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Long-winded rant
|
|---|
|
It was quite aggressive deletion of content I had taken time to build up which had been around for two years. I was called a dumb ass or a dumb ass ranter at one point just for claiming the obvious which was that I was being bullied on Wikipedia.I do not like bullies .
You claim that it is an encyclopedia in the making so shouldn't be allowed yet Wikipedia is exactly that a Social encyclopedia for the spread of encyclopaedic knowledge which should be free for everyone not for someone to suddenly get all their content deleted so yes there is something wrong, and yes it did feel like bullying. It was an irrational perspective to hold, to say the least!!! To call someone a dumb ass is a vulgar terminology to use but it was the other user Cullen who began all the bullying by his constant deletions of any input whatsoever, not so much only those things he disagreed with. Although I coolly made my point and told it like it was to him I was by no means angry or aggressive and did not display this type of behaviour at all. Often bullies will distort the facts to make themselves look in the right and put you in the wrong when the reality of the facts is that they are the aggressors. This is a time honoured tradition whenever censorship or oppression has been afoot!!..Also the fact that you are deleting and blocking indefinitely through some kind of narrow minded pomposity seems to denote jealousy of some kind. Perhaps this is due to the fact that I can spontaneously provide facts and knowledge on an interesting range of subjects!! The constant deletions were in fact coming across not only as bullying behaviour but also wholly unconstructive, demeaning and childish behaviour! There is nothing remotely aggressive in appealing to say I felt bullied, it isn't anger, it was detached observation so to reiterate into make out otherwise is downright fact distortion!! Also I wasn't so much mourning our monarch on Wikipedia I was merely making a factual dedication in light of the present state of national mourning in our country the UK but I wasn't elaborating on the issue as I am now. I was just showing due deference on my page as there is not often such a historical occurrence. When people don't rationalise what is being presented or don't want to read interesting information they can mark it off as a rant or calling dumb 😹🤣 but surely this is irony in the making. A complete parody of that which is real which is probably that it wasn't dumb , far from it lol 😅 I take it you are totally against Facebook links so will not antagonise whoever by creating links to them, especially not my Facebook group which had the title Cut the Crap..and think like a barrister!! I fear it could only make you become more obstreperous and persecutory towards me, and who knows I would never be free to edit again despite the craziness of the logic itself 😂 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peonydanvers ( talk • contribs) September 10, 2022 17:41 (UTC) |
- FYI: I do have to admit this user frustrated me, with their rants and all (I called those dumb and they doubled down), but honestly? This rant is so long, I put it in a collapsible, and I can't even imagine how long their unblock request would be... at least it's all over. Thank god. -- WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 09:34, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) -- Peonydanvers ( talk) 22:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
It is my personal property band has viable information about dogs and astrology on it.It is a family history site.
Peony Danvers Peonydanvers ( talk) 22:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Per
WP: User pages,
While considerable leeway is allowed in personalizing and managing your user pages, they are community project pages, not a personal website, blog, social networking medium, or a Wikipedia article. They should be used to better participate in the community, and not used to excess for unrelated purposes nor to bring the project into disrepute.
. Cullen328 ( talk) 22:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Stop persecuting please, this is just not on!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Do not restore your inappropriate user page after an administrator has deleted it. That is disruptive editing. Cullen328 ( talk) 23:45, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, Peonydanvers,
- All Wikipedia pages are the property of Wikipedia, they are not yours or mine. All content on them should exist to enhance this encyclopedia. If you want to have a personal profile about your interests, please start a blog or website or make use of social media. We are in the business of working on an encyclopedia here, not getting to know each other better. Liz Read! Talk! 23:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
It wasn't purely about my interests there as a lot of valuable information upon dogs, ancestors and also some on astrology which was entirely useful and was of no harm to anyone . So entirely no need to block it which was what happened when after constant deletion I Ike out. It was persecutory and definitely bullying in nature and as I'd had my page for the past two years with no trouble from any other people and then suddenly a whole load of deletions I dedicated it instead to the late monarch, Elizabeth 11 and also to King Charles 111 knowing them to be liberal representative s of the nation. Blocking any form of learning and research is clearly censorship which is bad news!!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 17:02, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
|
|
I don't want to be part of Teahouse, anymore, I'm sure it's a minority but articles I've had for two years have been deleted and when I try to conserve them they threaten to delete them again only if it's one person, I can present my own knowledge with minimal citation and this obviously bugs this one person, I have a good memory for details and facts, I don't want to belong to such forums due to this one person at present, I can't even present knowledge and all I'm currently being permitted to do is read, read, read which is something I've done from infancy anyway to laugh out loud.. unfortunately U will have to leave the forum because of this one person, please permit me to do this before I get any more of this misery, such a shame!!
Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I will have to leave the forum to correct the typo because of this bully!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Someone is bullying me about a harmless inoffensive page I have had running for two years, they won't let me publish my research, it is getting quite persecutory and nasty!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 23:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- You must comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. This is not negotiable. Cullen328 ( talk) 00:00, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
You are unstable surely !! Peonydanvers ( talk) 06:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Yes sincerely I do feel I am being bullied of recent days quite a shame because of recent years I have always felt proud of my page!! And will continue to assert my rights to use Wikipedia freely because this is what it was originally intended for, Penelope Clare Davies, how absolutely crazy!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 06:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
This person says it is non negotiable to keep removing my pages, he shouldn't have this right , it should be negotiable otherwise it is psychopathology!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I've never had any such problems before over a whole two year period and more, seems a nasty piece of work, something must've have skewered the guy?? Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- All we are trying to tell you is that you, like every other editor here, has to abide by Wikipedia policies and guidelines. And it is not permitted to use your User page to list your family and personal history along with a list of your interests. Every page on Wikipedia is devoted to improving this encyclopedia. This is not persecution, you just don't seem to understand what it is we do here. I couldn't have a page like that and I've been an active editor here since 2013! It's not personal. This is just not the place to assemble a personal profile. What you have now is fine, just leave it with a short introduction and it won't be tagged for deletion.
- This will probably not help but hundreds of pages get deleted daily for exactly this reason. You are not being singled out. Any User page that is not being used properly is tagged for deletion as soon as an editor spots it. If you want this to change, you'll need to get support for changing Wikipedia policies. But this project has been around for 21 years so changing policy is like trying to change the direction of a cargo ship...difficult to do and it requires the help of a lot of other people who share your opinion for how things should be changed. Liz Read! Talk! 00:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
It should be permitted because it was a reference to genealogy rather than individual traits. There was plenty of useful information on different subject areas such as animals and new philosophies, Wikipedia should be free to use without useful information being deleted, absolutely crazy. It's principles of freedom of input should be abided by or else it becomes repressive and unpleasant!!..how do I report to Wikipedia itself, although I've already made my opinions pretty clear on the matter I would have thought!!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I've had a user page and been using Wikipedia for a good two years by the way!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:28, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Not permitted!!..It was totally innocuous not harming anybody!! Peonydanvers ( talk) 00:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- WP:UP is a guideline for what is and what is not appropriate for a User page. Anything else, and it will be deleted by an Administrator. Matters naught for how long it has been there. David notMD ( talk) 02:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
The latest version of your userpage has been deleted per WP:POLEMIC since it contained personal attacks on other Wikipedia editors, which is not permitted on this website. Do not engage in any more disruptive editing. Cullen328 ( talk) 05:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- The next time you engage in polemical personal attacks, you will be blocked. If you want to keep editing Wikipedia, you must stop your misconduct now.
Cullen328 (
talk) 06:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Voted the article for speedy - this person now just some dumb ass rant badmouthing high-ranked editors and mourning the Royal Family (???) WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 13:28, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey! Please don't make frankly crappy user pages that say "the admins are BULLIES and I have every right to make my own fucking page!!!" because that counts as bad manners. As such, I've marked it as deletion.
Like, people have told you countless times not to behave like this. As cranky as you are, Wikipedia is not for your band (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not). I might as well tell you this until you actually listen.
Thank you. WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 12:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- As such, I've reported your userpage on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Restrict creation of User:Peonydanvers to staff? to be restricted to Wikipedia staff members. Until further notice, people are going to keep telling you to stop throwing around insults. WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 13:25, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
DatGuy
Talk
Contribs 14:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)My concern is that when I reported bullying it as seen as a personal attack/s. Clearly people who report bullies are trying to get the bully to account for their behaviour/s. It is not a personal attack on them it is just a call for them to diminish their persecutory behaviours and assaults in whatever form it takes.It is unpleasant human behaviour and Wikipedia in its advice pages suggest that discouraging those who are newcomers and unnecessary overbearing deletions goes well against the grain and could count as bullying. So no to cite Anthony Bradbury so called reason to complain feeling bullied and overly harassed/discriminated against, rather than encouraged and speaking out against people for having content removed that has been there for over two years is not personally attacking anyone.How can reporting bullying or harassment be personally attacking people?? Maybe I was telling it how it was and the people involved couldn't bear to be thought of as overbearing bullies and decided to get worse , accuse me of personal attacks and block me from making any contribution whatever which is completely O.T.T.! Also calling my well outlined argument a long winded rant is a form of attack!! The person who has accused me is doing the very thing they have tried to accuse me of!! It merely shows that they cannot be bothered to read or digest the information presented to them and so scoff at it pompously or mark it off as long-winded. What is long -winded to them may indeed not prove long -winded to the more educated or erudite person. Indeed the Wikipedia forum often attracts the more educated person, myself included! However passing people off by remarking upon them with very basic vocabulary which doesn't ascribe much meaning or value comes across as using a little bit of an ignoramus system which I'm sure the more conscientious and welcoming Wikipedia administrator or editor wouldn't use. It was simply my hard luck then to come across rather a small bunch of bad apples 🤣, indeed in that respect!! Certainly if with limited administrative powers they seek to indefinitely block or censor my creative input I may have come across a very bad bunch indeed, in consideration of the fact that I am certainly not evil or a terrorist myself, the mind boggles at some of the people who gain power and authority over such forums?? Peonydanvers ( talk) 19:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm sure you're much smarter than all of us. You're welcome to go be very smart on some other website. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 20:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- "I do not attack people! The admins are just bullies! Anyway, I wrote a userpage mourning the Royal Family and mocking the admins for telling me what to do!"
- Surely a smart person, indeed! Thank GOD all of this is over. That, and their wall of texts surely aren't helping. WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 07:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thats disciminatory snide language 2.25.68.223 ( talk) 12:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I know you are blocked, but the "people" are following policy.
71.228.112.175 (
talk) 09:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Funny they also complain about censorship of their disruptive edits, considering
WP:CENSOR. (Wouldn't be surprised if they don't read the essays)
WannurSyafiqah74 (
talk) 10:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- I also reported the user on WP:ANI for their dumbass rant on their userpage that blatantly attacked high-ranked editors. Needless to say, I'm not sure how much convincing it takes until this weird user can change. WannurSyafiqah74 ( talk) 10:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Funny they also complain about censorship of their disruptive edits, considering
WP:CENSOR. (Wouldn't be surprised if they don't read the essays)
WannurSyafiqah74 (
talk) 10:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
-- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 20:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC)