|
The Special Barnstar | |
| For your adding a map showing the location of the Straits of Malacca to the Malaysia Airlines 370 article, thereby improving readers' understanding of the subject, I hereby award you this Barnstar. YSSYguy ( talk) 07:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC) |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks, Paulo! I am interested and I appreciate your offer to help with the article about the UPPs. For the moment, I do not have the time to devote to this, but perhaps in the coming months I will do a little research and put something together. I’ll be in touch… Valeu! — giso6150 ( talk) 14:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi I see you tied to revert my edit on the "Tire" article, ( /info/en/?search=Tire)where I removed this statement :
" Typically, studs are never used on heavier vehicles, except for some emergency vehicles like ambulances and fire trucks. Ice resurfacers also use studded tires."
For your information, this is wrong. It may be the case in North America, but in Scandinavia where I live and work as a truck driver stud tires for trucks are common. I could verify this by finding an ad for truck stud tires, but as I removed an (unverified), incorrect statement rather than adding one there is nothing to verify. Please make sure to make a proper background check before you revert my edits in the future. Thanks Rolling Phantom ( talk) 10:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
The quotes are there because the string of text in question is a direct quotation from the report. There's no reason to edit war in continuing to change it back to the emphasis template. Geogene ( talk) 19:12, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Your changes to Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 completely removed the source named "dsb1", and instead started using that name for a second source name "dsbprelim" regarding the preliminary report.
This is a mistake. The original "dsb1" source states when the report was released, while the original "dsbprelim" does not.
Please fix your incorrect merging of those two sources. When doing so please note the warning at the top of the page that includes Please edit carefully.
If you think I made a mistake while quoting the two original sources, feel free to fix any such mistake or to discuss it with me first. Thanks. Lklundin ( talk) 20:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Paulo. I saw you tagged the MH370 article saying some of the citations were not formatted correctly. Did my edits fix them up, or were there other issue? Stickee (talk) 05:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Ozires Silva may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | website = [http://www.blogdoozires.com.br/ozires/ Ozires Silva]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:39, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
-
List of municipalities in the state of São Paulo by population
- added links pointing to Dumont, Quadra, Bananal, Pedro de Toledo, Canas, Buri, Mendonça, Lins, Santa Rosa de Viterbo, Rio das Pedras, Monte Alto, Amparo, Cardoso, Serrana, Salto Grande and Quintana
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk) 09:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Done (
links fixed)
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 09:55, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Paulo. Long live the Latin International. Tell me what was wrong, in your opinion, about my Dead Sea edit? And: it had two parts, why revert both? If it was about the list: a long sausage is hard to visualise as a list, what I did was keeping the lines together and the columns neatly visible. I strongly tend to redo the edit, and do some more - please don't revert me en-masse :) Cheers, Arminden ( talk) 18:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)Arminden
You may want to file a sockpuppet report here . KoshVorlon Rassekali ternii i mlechnye puti 13:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- @
KoshVorlon::I'm grateful for your feedback. I will analyze the actions here in pt.wiki, along with other colleagues.
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 03:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I usually do general vandalism patrol WP:RCP using wp:Huggle. You can see a (HG) automatically tacked onto the edit summary. Huggle puts up a diff and I can either skip it, revert with a warning, or go to my browser for further inspection. My wp:watch list is rather overloaded to add more items. If you are very concerned about a few articles, you can watch them and enable getting an email if the page is changed. Here is a lit of commonly used warning and messaging templates:
Avoid using "vandalism" if some other description is more valid, such as a
wp:content dispute, editing test {{
uw-test1}}, etc.
Typically, one adds the article it refers to (but not all the time) Example: {{subst:uw-vand3|User talk:PauloMSimoes}}
Also, one typically increases the level for each recent warning. After a fifth time, report to
wp:AIV. If the vandalism is rather nasty such as
wp:blp violations, or extreme racial or sexual in nature, a more rapid escalation of levels is warranted. The warning level should reset after a few days. If one vandalizes up to the limit, waits for awhile and does it again, you can add {{subst:
longterm4im}}
For decorating your user page:
A bit of advice: (not saying you have!)
- Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars
- User:DESiegel/Template the regulars dissenting opinion
An engineer at Embraer? A good place to work? Did you enjoy it? I am an engineer in the biotech field. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 19:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- @
Jim1138: thanks for the explanation and excuse my poor knowledge of English. I have few issues and I think that not even need these tools. It would be a bit complicated for me (perhaps later). I'm afraid to make a mistake. The
pages that I edit are all monitored and I am warned when there is any change. Right now, for example, the IP sock is
reverting my most recent editions. I'll let him have some fun ...
. I want the sysops becoming aware of this situation. I'll wait a few days and then warn them. Regarding my job at Embraer, there were eleven years (retired in 1997) I worked in development tests laboratory for landing gear components and loved my activity. Congratulations for your career in biotechnology. Cheers
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 21:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
I notice that an anon removed content to
LyondellBasell
here without an explanation. You appear to be familiar with the company. This was immediately before your edit. Should it be restored, and if so, would you please do it so I don't mess up what you have done? (a bit of a
cop out, I know).
BTW: you can
wp:ping me by adding {{
ping|Jim1138}} to your reply here. You do need to sign your edit "~~~~" and save both the ping and your signature at the same time or I won't get the ping. Cheers
Jim1138 (
talk) 19:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- @
Jim1138: it seems that issue was correct, per
this source and
this source. I currently have a small transport business and perform some services for the company here in Brazil.
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 21:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
The translation of this is rather bizarre. Lord Mota? Off the deep end? Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 20:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- @
Jim1138:
, isn't "Mr. Motorcycle", neither I... User "Lord Mota" is a sysop
which discovered the socks of user "Transeunte da Wikipédia" (editor blocked, who is vandalizing as anom here). Cheers.
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 22:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Please be aware that WP:AIV on the English Wikipedia is for reporting vandalism on the English Wikipedia only. If you have a concern about vandalism on the Commons, you need to report it to their administrators. Although complimentary, the two projects are distinct and have separate groups of administrators. Waggers TALK 10:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- @
Waggers: I apologize for the mistake. Regards.
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 16:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Impeachment process against Dilma Rousseff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simple majority. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Link fixed.
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 13:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for your Thank. I speak only English and it's possible I may have misinterpreted what the article was trying to say. I did my best to interpret only the English, so I may have got some subtle meanings wrong. Akld guy ( talk) 23:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- @ Akld guy: I really appreciate your fixes, is all correct. My knowledge of English is basic and I have a great difficulty in the editing. Hereafter, when I find out any question about English, I will ask you. And also, for any questions about the Portuguese in the sources, you can ask me. Regards PauloMSimoes ( talk) 00:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Será que você poderia traduzir o artigo Nazismo no Brasil para o inglês? Agradeço desde já. 150.164.100.160 ( talk) 20:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Estou sem tempo, mas coloquei aqui a solicitação de tradução. PauloMSimoes ( talk) 21:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, PauloMSimoes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
is there another editor who should be notified of the NPOV discussion? By the way, I like your user page. Elinruby ( talk) 22:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Elinruby. User Akld guy got involved in some edits in article. PauloMSimoes ( talk) 23:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. I made some edits to the Lede months ago to turn it into more acceptable English. I do not speak or understand Portuguese, but am very fluent in English, my native language. I'm not willing to get involved with the NPOV discussion because I have no comprehension whatsoever of the political situation in Brazil. I would be willing to put phrases into good English, but that would probably involve interpretation of legalese or the intention of the writer, and I might make very serious misinterpretations that would themselves be NPOV violations. Probably better that I stay away, unless you want to submit English text to me for rendering into normal English, and also include an explanation of what you're trying to say. Akld guy ( talk) 00:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @
Akld guy: This is not that different from the reason I showed up, I am an English speaker with some knowledge of romance languages who cleans up machine translation. I appreciate your caution, as someone who has seen really important misunderstandings based on cognates, word order and bad machine translation -- but if we can improve the english that we can improve, and ask questions about the rest (?) we can do some good, I think. Caution is the key -- I have done this before. The alternative, to do nothing, is unacceptable. I came across
Operation Car Wash in the course of working on the
Panama Papers and know just a little about that but I am sure there are complexities beyond complexities, which is why it is important to have the good-faith participation of people like
PauloMSimoes. Which we do seem to have. The NPOV discussion is not directed at any particular editor. My position is simply that she is the central figure in the article and yet we hear only brief one-sentence (and dismissive) summaries of her side of the events for which she was impeached. Clearly her point of view is important and should be included, attributed to her if necessary. I think what we have is a misunderstanding of WEIGHT -- prior editors did not believe her and therefore did not quote her. But the article is a BLP and she should have a say imho, regardless of the correctness of her statements. Anyway, I am just saying that the article could use the help
Elinruby (
talk) 02:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @
Elinruby: Ok. My only area of expertise on this article would be English sentence construction and grammar. I know nothing of the political situation in Brazil or the legal manoeuverings in the case.
Akld guy (
talk) 03:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @ Akld guy: I am there because it is listed in articles in need of cleanup. Just saying. Editors who do know the facts have asked for help with the english. If you are willing/have time then fix what you see or have time to fix, and skip what you do not understand. That alone would be helpful. as it would free me up a bit from the English mechanics, which is what I came there for, but is only one of the article's problems. Take it in small steps so people who want to can review your changes. This can be done even on very contentious articles. If you have time, it would really help. Elinruby ( talk) 03:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @
Elinruby: Ok. My only area of expertise on this article would be English sentence construction and grammar. I know nothing of the political situation in Brazil or the legal manoeuverings in the case.
Akld guy (
talk) 03:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @
Akld guy: This is not that different from the reason I showed up, I am an English speaker with some knowledge of romance languages who cleans up machine translation. I appreciate your caution, as someone who has seen really important misunderstandings based on cognates, word order and bad machine translation -- but if we can improve the english that we can improve, and ask questions about the rest (?) we can do some good, I think. Caution is the key -- I have done this before. The alternative, to do nothing, is unacceptable. I came across
Operation Car Wash in the course of working on the
Panama Papers and know just a little about that but I am sure there are complexities beyond complexities, which is why it is important to have the good-faith participation of people like
PauloMSimoes. Which we do seem to have. The NPOV discussion is not directed at any particular editor. My position is simply that she is the central figure in the article and yet we hear only brief one-sentence (and dismissive) summaries of her side of the events for which she was impeached. Clearly her point of view is important and should be included, attributed to her if necessary. I think what we have is a misunderstanding of WEIGHT -- prior editors did not believe her and therefore did not quote her. But the article is a BLP and she should have a say imho, regardless of the correctness of her statements. Anyway, I am just saying that the article could use the help
Elinruby (
talk) 02:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, PauloMSimoes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
In item "4.Acting President / Public Opinion "has all that information and much more. Dont you think? V Spartacus ( talk) 22:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Survey after impeachment isn´t same that after "acting presidency". Please don´t remove sourced text.
PauloMSimoes (
talk) 22:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Its not exactly the same survey? Ok. But there is a lot of information about this kind of survey in Acting President. At least this information should be together, in the same topic. Its so disorganized that way. V Spartacus ( talk) 11:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, PauloMSimoes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of free-kick goals by Lionel Messi in official matches for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of free-kick goals by Lionel Messi in official matches until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
|
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
| Your help at Operation Carwash, Impeachment of Dilma Rousseff and List of scandals in Brazil has been far more helpful than you probably realize. Keep keeping on my friend Elinruby ( talk) 18:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| For your adding a map showing the location of the Straits of Malacca to the Malaysia Airlines 370 article, thereby improving readers' understanding of the subject, I hereby award you this Barnstar. YSSYguy ( talk) 07:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC) |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks, Paulo! I am interested and I appreciate your offer to help with the article about the UPPs. For the moment, I do not have the time to devote to this, but perhaps in the coming months I will do a little research and put something together. I’ll be in touch… Valeu! — giso6150 ( talk) 14:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi I see you tied to revert my edit on the "Tire" article, ( /info/en/?search=Tire)where I removed this statement :
" Typically, studs are never used on heavier vehicles, except for some emergency vehicles like ambulances and fire trucks. Ice resurfacers also use studded tires."
For your information, this is wrong. It may be the case in North America, but in Scandinavia where I live and work as a truck driver stud tires for trucks are common. I could verify this by finding an ad for truck stud tires, but as I removed an (unverified), incorrect statement rather than adding one there is nothing to verify. Please make sure to make a proper background check before you revert my edits in the future. Thanks Rolling Phantom ( talk) 10:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
The quotes are there because the string of text in question is a direct quotation from the report. There's no reason to edit war in continuing to change it back to the emphasis template. Geogene ( talk) 19:12, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Your changes to Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 completely removed the source named "dsb1", and instead started using that name for a second source name "dsbprelim" regarding the preliminary report.
This is a mistake. The original "dsb1" source states when the report was released, while the original "dsbprelim" does not.
Please fix your incorrect merging of those two sources. When doing so please note the warning at the top of the page that includes Please edit carefully.
If you think I made a mistake while quoting the two original sources, feel free to fix any such mistake or to discuss it with me first. Thanks. Lklundin ( talk) 20:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Paulo. I saw you tagged the MH370 article saying some of the citations were not formatted correctly. Did my edits fix them up, or were there other issue? Stickee (talk) 05:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Ozires Silva may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | website = [http://www.blogdoozires.com.br/ozires/ Ozires Silva]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:39, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
-
List of municipalities in the state of São Paulo by population
- added links pointing to Dumont, Quadra, Bananal, Pedro de Toledo, Canas, Buri, Mendonça, Lins, Santa Rosa de Viterbo, Rio das Pedras, Monte Alto, Amparo, Cardoso, Serrana, Salto Grande and Quintana
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk) 09:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Done (
links fixed)
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 09:55, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Paulo. Long live the Latin International. Tell me what was wrong, in your opinion, about my Dead Sea edit? And: it had two parts, why revert both? If it was about the list: a long sausage is hard to visualise as a list, what I did was keeping the lines together and the columns neatly visible. I strongly tend to redo the edit, and do some more - please don't revert me en-masse :) Cheers, Arminden ( talk) 18:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)Arminden
You may want to file a sockpuppet report here . KoshVorlon Rassekali ternii i mlechnye puti 13:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- @
KoshVorlon::I'm grateful for your feedback. I will analyze the actions here in pt.wiki, along with other colleagues.
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 03:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I usually do general vandalism patrol WP:RCP using wp:Huggle. You can see a (HG) automatically tacked onto the edit summary. Huggle puts up a diff and I can either skip it, revert with a warning, or go to my browser for further inspection. My wp:watch list is rather overloaded to add more items. If you are very concerned about a few articles, you can watch them and enable getting an email if the page is changed. Here is a lit of commonly used warning and messaging templates:
Avoid using "vandalism" if some other description is more valid, such as a
wp:content dispute, editing test {{
uw-test1}}, etc.
Typically, one adds the article it refers to (but not all the time) Example: {{subst:uw-vand3|User talk:PauloMSimoes}}
Also, one typically increases the level for each recent warning. After a fifth time, report to
wp:AIV. If the vandalism is rather nasty such as
wp:blp violations, or extreme racial or sexual in nature, a more rapid escalation of levels is warranted. The warning level should reset after a few days. If one vandalizes up to the limit, waits for awhile and does it again, you can add {{subst:
longterm4im}}
For decorating your user page:
A bit of advice: (not saying you have!)
- Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars
- User:DESiegel/Template the regulars dissenting opinion
An engineer at Embraer? A good place to work? Did you enjoy it? I am an engineer in the biotech field. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 19:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- @
Jim1138: thanks for the explanation and excuse my poor knowledge of English. I have few issues and I think that not even need these tools. It would be a bit complicated for me (perhaps later). I'm afraid to make a mistake. The
pages that I edit are all monitored and I am warned when there is any change. Right now, for example, the IP sock is
reverting my most recent editions. I'll let him have some fun ...
. I want the sysops becoming aware of this situation. I'll wait a few days and then warn them. Regarding my job at Embraer, there were eleven years (retired in 1997) I worked in development tests laboratory for landing gear components and loved my activity. Congratulations for your career in biotechnology. Cheers
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 21:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
I notice that an anon removed content to
LyondellBasell
here without an explanation. You appear to be familiar with the company. This was immediately before your edit. Should it be restored, and if so, would you please do it so I don't mess up what you have done? (a bit of a
cop out, I know).
BTW: you can
wp:ping me by adding {{
ping|Jim1138}} to your reply here. You do need to sign your edit "~~~~" and save both the ping and your signature at the same time or I won't get the ping. Cheers
Jim1138 (
talk) 19:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- @
Jim1138: it seems that issue was correct, per
this source and
this source. I currently have a small transport business and perform some services for the company here in Brazil.
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 21:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
The translation of this is rather bizarre. Lord Mota? Off the deep end? Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 20:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- @
Jim1138:
, isn't "Mr. Motorcycle", neither I... User "Lord Mota" is a sysop
which discovered the socks of user "Transeunte da Wikipédia" (editor blocked, who is vandalizing as anom here). Cheers.
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 22:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Please be aware that WP:AIV on the English Wikipedia is for reporting vandalism on the English Wikipedia only. If you have a concern about vandalism on the Commons, you need to report it to their administrators. Although complimentary, the two projects are distinct and have separate groups of administrators. Waggers TALK 10:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- @
Waggers: I apologize for the mistake. Regards.
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 16:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Impeachment process against Dilma Rousseff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simple majority. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Link fixed.
PauloMSimoes ( talk) 13:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for your Thank. I speak only English and it's possible I may have misinterpreted what the article was trying to say. I did my best to interpret only the English, so I may have got some subtle meanings wrong. Akld guy ( talk) 23:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- @ Akld guy: I really appreciate your fixes, is all correct. My knowledge of English is basic and I have a great difficulty in the editing. Hereafter, when I find out any question about English, I will ask you. And also, for any questions about the Portuguese in the sources, you can ask me. Regards PauloMSimoes ( talk) 00:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Será que você poderia traduzir o artigo Nazismo no Brasil para o inglês? Agradeço desde já. 150.164.100.160 ( talk) 20:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Estou sem tempo, mas coloquei aqui a solicitação de tradução. PauloMSimoes ( talk) 21:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, PauloMSimoes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
is there another editor who should be notified of the NPOV discussion? By the way, I like your user page. Elinruby ( talk) 22:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Elinruby. User Akld guy got involved in some edits in article. PauloMSimoes ( talk) 23:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. I made some edits to the Lede months ago to turn it into more acceptable English. I do not speak or understand Portuguese, but am very fluent in English, my native language. I'm not willing to get involved with the NPOV discussion because I have no comprehension whatsoever of the political situation in Brazil. I would be willing to put phrases into good English, but that would probably involve interpretation of legalese or the intention of the writer, and I might make very serious misinterpretations that would themselves be NPOV violations. Probably better that I stay away, unless you want to submit English text to me for rendering into normal English, and also include an explanation of what you're trying to say. Akld guy ( talk) 00:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @
Akld guy: This is not that different from the reason I showed up, I am an English speaker with some knowledge of romance languages who cleans up machine translation. I appreciate your caution, as someone who has seen really important misunderstandings based on cognates, word order and bad machine translation -- but if we can improve the english that we can improve, and ask questions about the rest (?) we can do some good, I think. Caution is the key -- I have done this before. The alternative, to do nothing, is unacceptable. I came across
Operation Car Wash in the course of working on the
Panama Papers and know just a little about that but I am sure there are complexities beyond complexities, which is why it is important to have the good-faith participation of people like
PauloMSimoes. Which we do seem to have. The NPOV discussion is not directed at any particular editor. My position is simply that she is the central figure in the article and yet we hear only brief one-sentence (and dismissive) summaries of her side of the events for which she was impeached. Clearly her point of view is important and should be included, attributed to her if necessary. I think what we have is a misunderstanding of WEIGHT -- prior editors did not believe her and therefore did not quote her. But the article is a BLP and she should have a say imho, regardless of the correctness of her statements. Anyway, I am just saying that the article could use the help
Elinruby (
talk) 02:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @
Elinruby: Ok. My only area of expertise on this article would be English sentence construction and grammar. I know nothing of the political situation in Brazil or the legal manoeuverings in the case.
Akld guy (
talk) 03:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @ Akld guy: I am there because it is listed in articles in need of cleanup. Just saying. Editors who do know the facts have asked for help with the english. If you are willing/have time then fix what you see or have time to fix, and skip what you do not understand. That alone would be helpful. as it would free me up a bit from the English mechanics, which is what I came there for, but is only one of the article's problems. Take it in small steps so people who want to can review your changes. This can be done even on very contentious articles. If you have time, it would really help. Elinruby ( talk) 03:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @
Elinruby: Ok. My only area of expertise on this article would be English sentence construction and grammar. I know nothing of the political situation in Brazil or the legal manoeuverings in the case.
Akld guy (
talk) 03:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @
Akld guy: This is not that different from the reason I showed up, I am an English speaker with some knowledge of romance languages who cleans up machine translation. I appreciate your caution, as someone who has seen really important misunderstandings based on cognates, word order and bad machine translation -- but if we can improve the english that we can improve, and ask questions about the rest (?) we can do some good, I think. Caution is the key -- I have done this before. The alternative, to do nothing, is unacceptable. I came across
Operation Car Wash in the course of working on the
Panama Papers and know just a little about that but I am sure there are complexities beyond complexities, which is why it is important to have the good-faith participation of people like
PauloMSimoes. Which we do seem to have. The NPOV discussion is not directed at any particular editor. My position is simply that she is the central figure in the article and yet we hear only brief one-sentence (and dismissive) summaries of her side of the events for which she was impeached. Clearly her point of view is important and should be included, attributed to her if necessary. I think what we have is a misunderstanding of WEIGHT -- prior editors did not believe her and therefore did not quote her. But the article is a BLP and she should have a say imho, regardless of the correctness of her statements. Anyway, I am just saying that the article could use the help
Elinruby (
talk) 02:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, PauloMSimoes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
In item "4.Acting President / Public Opinion "has all that information and much more. Dont you think? V Spartacus ( talk) 22:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Survey after impeachment isn´t same that after "acting presidency". Please don´t remove sourced text.
PauloMSimoes (
talk) 22:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Its not exactly the same survey? Ok. But there is a lot of information about this kind of survey in Acting President. At least this information should be together, in the same topic. Its so disorganized that way. V Spartacus ( talk) 11:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, PauloMSimoes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of free-kick goals by Lionel Messi in official matches for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of free-kick goals by Lionel Messi in official matches until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
|
|
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
| Your help at Operation Carwash, Impeachment of Dilma Rousseff and List of scandals in Brazil has been far more helpful than you probably realize. Keep keeping on my friend Elinruby ( talk) 18:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC) |