Note: I reserve the right to edit and delete
irrelevant or
obsoletecomments/
information at my
discretion. I do this because I hate clutter & redundant statement, however stuff that I find
relevant, and up todate, I will keep. Please keep your comments as
thrift as possible, and to the point. Staments of
Apology or
justification for ones actions will be deleted, I do not want to hear it, all I want to hear is
constructive criticism, leave yourself out of the statement. Please read the following tips before posting a comment.
Paul.Paquette 15:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Asset Allocation Project
Firstly thank you for inviting me to help in your project.
I have looked at the
Asset Allocation page. My thoughts are these:
Also, the "type, market and time horizon" indicators you have chosen are very narrow and specific. This type of data is generally only provided by specialist data providers. Why not take a more global approach and consider broader markets and different types of sector definitions. Try
IMA sectors and
Morningstar Categories for inspiration. Ask yourself why the US market classifies equities in Japan and Spain in the same "international" equity sector, and almost everywhere else in the world, markets are differetiated into broad geographic devisions at the very least. The definition of the sector has an enormous effect on the types of data you are seeking and therefore impacts on it's usefulness.
I hope you find this input useful, regards
simonthebold 21:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)reply
This is a Wikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a
mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Paul.Paquette/Wikipedia.
Note: I reserve the right to edit and delete
irrelevant or
obsoletecomments/
information at my
discretion. I do this because I hate clutter & redundant statement, however stuff that I find
relevant, and up todate, I will keep. Please keep your comments as
thrift as possible, and to the point. Staments of
Apology or
justification for ones actions will be deleted, I do not want to hear it, all I want to hear is
constructive criticism, leave yourself out of the statement. Please read the following tips before posting a comment.
Paul.Paquette 15:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Asset Allocation Project
Firstly thank you for inviting me to help in your project.
I have looked at the
Asset Allocation page. My thoughts are these:
Also, the "type, market and time horizon" indicators you have chosen are very narrow and specific. This type of data is generally only provided by specialist data providers. Why not take a more global approach and consider broader markets and different types of sector definitions. Try
IMA sectors and
Morningstar Categories for inspiration. Ask yourself why the US market classifies equities in Japan and Spain in the same "international" equity sector, and almost everywhere else in the world, markets are differetiated into broad geographic devisions at the very least. The definition of the sector has an enormous effect on the types of data you are seeking and therefore impacts on it's usefulness.
I hope you find this input useful, regards
simonthebold 21:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)reply
This is a Wikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a
mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Paul.Paquette/Wikipedia.