Shlama Nochi and welcome ot wikipedia. If you have any questions on how to do things, please do ask. But I dont think that kind of talk is approriate in an encyclopedia. Pshena. Chaldean 04:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Shrug people ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of the Sorani people people.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reason why you reverted my reversion to your version of the page? I think yours is by far the most accurate. Irrer 18:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:IraqiJewishman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Greetings, Nochi. Two things about our present "Riffian" disagreement on the
Berber people article:
First, I want to ensure that you are aware of the
3-revert rule. In short, it says that editors are forbidden to make more than 3 reverts on the same article within 24 hours. I mention this because you are up to 3 reverts already. Please take this as a friendly warning not to revert that article again for a while.
Second, I want to ensure that you understand why I have taking "Riffian" back out of the article at the spot where you have been adding it: Right there, the text is giving examples of Berbers outside of Morrocco who tend not to refer to themselves as "Imazighen". Riffians are, on the contrary, Berbers inside Morrocco who do refer to themselves as "Imazighen". So they are just not useful as examples, there. This is not to impugn their credentials as Berbers. Aside from that, there is no need for more than two examples. One would be enough, really.
I hope that explanation satisfies your objection, and that you can now see why it is not sensible to mention the Riffians at that point in the article. I suggest that you find a good place elsewhere in the article to do that. Perhaps you should make a section that lists the various Berber groups.
Cordially,
Lonewolf BC 07:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arabjews.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
First of all, I too am a Chaldean Catholic. But if your going to completely change the article, then you have to address everyone at the talk page first before you do so. Please be more aware of how wikipedia works. Chaldean 15:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gilgamesssh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Instead of just deleting it all, why not propose a merger, a lot of content would be lost by just redirecting the page. Deflagro Contribs/ Talk 15:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ack, sorry. That wasn't supposed to be a warn!
Deflagro
Contribs/
Talk 15:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well I don't know a lot about Egyptians, but maybe you could propose that the section is merged into it. Or if you disagree with somethin, you could ask for a reference using the {{ fact}} template. But it is probably not a good idea to delete the whole article. Deflagro Contribs/ Talk 15:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ack, sorry. That wasn't supposed to be a warn!
Deflagro
Contribs/
Talk 15:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hello Nochi. I'm Lanternix, an Egyptian Copt. Egyptians are indeed an ethnic group. Clearly, like any other ethnicities, they have some outside influence due to various immigrations (Greeks and Arabs mainly). Yet, these foreign immigrants came to Egypt when Egypt was alreadyy having millions of Egyptians living there. You can compare the way modern Egyptians look with the Portraits of Faiyum from the 2nd century BC to see the striking similarities between both groups. I'll be glad to answer any more questions. Cheers. -- Lanternix 17:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Dear Nochi, I noticed you did a pretty large deletion of information from the article Sumer. I checked the article's discussion page and found no conversation regarding massive deletions. Please go back to the history and compare your versions, to be sure you meant to delete the sections you did. If you are working on the article, please please, put in the edit summary box, details of what you're doing so the monitors do not revert your work. Thank you, Ariel♥ Gold 17:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Again, please, do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. When you blank a page to work on it for revision, the monitors will come and revert it. Better yet, I'd suggest that you create a sandbox of your own, such as User:Nochi/Sumer and work on the article there until you're ready to publish it. Thank you! Ariel♥ Gold 17:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arabjewws.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arabjewwss.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Nochi. I have reverted your cut-and-paste redirecting job. Don't do it that way, please - it destroys a page's edit history. If you want to rename an article, or merge two articles, [a] get consensus from these who have worked on the article, and [b] delete the article with the destination name, [c] move the source article there, and [d] restore the destination article and merge it into the source article. If you're not an administrator, you can ask me or any other administrator (there's over a thousand of us) to do it for you. Sounds complicated? Well, yes, it's made deliberately difficult. It's not meant to be kid's play, because if articles are moved around willy-nilly for no good reason, we won't know where we are.
Don't take this as a criticism - just a word of advice. I was new to wikipedia once, and made lots of mistakes like this one, so please don't think I'm dumping on you. Anyway, welcome to wikipedia! David Cannon (administrator) 16:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'll be happy to do as you said. Please give me about 12-18 hours, as I'm supposed to be working at the moment, but will attend to it when I get home tonight:-) David Cannon 21:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the award :) — EliasAlucard| Talk 21:15 30 Jul, 2007 (UTC)
Shlama aziza,
Please consult the talk page on Wikiproject Assyria, where I proposed to have a vote on who to include in the Assyrian people infobox. As you may already be aware, there is a bit of disagreement between myself and EliasAlucard as to who to include, and he recently changed the picture without consulting anybody. So if you could check out the page and perhaps provide some input as to how we can do this vote (if it is a good idea at all). We need to set some guidelines, because people such as EliasAlucard are making major edits without discussing them in the talk page first.
Thanks. Posh bshena.
Šarukinu 23:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Assyrians55 people.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Assyrianrs55 people.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Assyrianwrs55 people.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Assyrians55 people.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you reverted an edit by a user who changed Berber to Amazigh. Please note that that is actually a correct word and widely used not only by Berbers themselves but also by Arab Moroccans, in France, and elsewhere. The two words are for all intents and purposes synonyms. Cheers! -- Targeman 22:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- No I do not belive we should use the word "Amasigh" its not widely used its only used by berber themselfs wich mean "Free men" beacause they belive thats Berber is insulting word. its a nationalist term and if u rad it u think its a berber's work and not a neautral worl. Nochi 22:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I must disagree with you. "Amazigh" is quite mainstream. Berbers refer to themselves by both names interchangeably (think British-English, Persian-Iranian, etc.) The fact that you are bothered by the word's etymology and/or by a Berber contributing to an article on Arabs is rather tasteless IMO. --
Targeman 22:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Eh no!, Persian is an ethnic group while Iranian are a nationality wich means citizen of iran, like Perisan-Iranian means a ethnic persian who are a citizen of Iran, like Azeri-Iranian, Arab-Iranian, Balochi Iranian and so on... same with English people wich are citizens of Great Bretain, welsh-britsish scotish british....u shud know thaht?.. Berber is not a natriopnaly and Amasigh is a ethnic group- corect term are Moroccan-Berber. i have nothing against berbers look at my userpage i am not even from the Maghreb nor am i arab? sop why shud i care? i only care if someone places Natinalists terms in a article wich are suppusd to be neatraul. Nochi 22:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think you are overreacting. Every nation has the right to call itself whatever it wants, and it's absolutely nobody else's business even if the nation doesn't have "its own country". Following the same logic, one could consider that "Assyrian" is a nationalist term because there is no such country as Assyria. You wouldn't like I that, I imagine? As per the UK, most sane people there don't give a damn how you call their nation. May be a good example to follow. --
Targeman 22:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Your are talking nonsense and talking about thins you do not know alot about. Assyrians have never used the term "Assyrian" for nationalist term. its only used by ethnicity. u may confuse with Kurds, they use the tern Kurds as natinaluism and ethnicsm. Assyrians do not. they even say Iraqi Christians. anyway it seems ur a berber and thats great. i have nothing against berbers or the term amasigh its sounds beautiful. but like i said i wud rather have a term wich are widely used. thanks Nochi 16:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- You seem to jump to conclusions pretty fast. It may surprise you that I am not a Berber, not even close. And I do know that many Berbers refer to themselves simply as Moroccan or Algerian just like many Assyrians identify with Iraq. There's no need to get all worked up because someone put "Amazigh" in an article. It's the same kind of pettiness we see in the Greek opposition to "Macedonia". The world would be much better off if people grew out of this silliness. --
Targeman 16:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry for ansewring too late, Aha u arnt berber but i guess u have berber freidns whjo u "Support". Listen, you are protecting the Term "Amasigh" and u say that its used by as many as Berber users. then why not suggest to change the artice berber people to Amasigh people? ;) Nochi 22:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- You seem to jump to conclusions pretty fast. It may surprise you that I am not a Berber, not even close. And I do know that many Berbers refer to themselves simply as Moroccan or Algerian just like many Assyrians identify with Iraq. There's no need to get all worked up because someone put "Amazigh" in an article. It's the same kind of pettiness we see in the Greek opposition to "Macedonia". The world would be much better off if people grew out of this silliness. --
Targeman 16:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Your are talking nonsense and talking about thins you do not know alot about. Assyrians have never used the term "Assyrian" for nationalist term. its only used by ethnicity. u may confuse with Kurds, they use the tern Kurds as natinaluism and ethnicsm. Assyrians do not. they even say Iraqi Christians. anyway it seems ur a berber and thats great. i have nothing against berbers or the term amasigh its sounds beautiful. but like i said i wud rather have a term wich are widely used. thanks Nochi 16:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think you are overreacting. Every nation has the right to call itself whatever it wants, and it's absolutely nobody else's business even if the nation doesn't have "its own country". Following the same logic, one could consider that "Assyrian" is a nationalist term because there is no such country as Assyria. You wouldn't like I that, I imagine? As per the UK, most sane people there don't give a damn how you call their nation. May be a good example to follow. --
Targeman 22:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Eh no!, Persian is an ethnic group while Iranian are a nationality wich means citizen of iran, like Perisan-Iranian means a ethnic persian who are a citizen of Iran, like Azeri-Iranian, Arab-Iranian, Balochi Iranian and so on... same with English people wich are citizens of Great Bretain, welsh-britsish scotish british....u shud know thaht?.. Berber is not a natriopnaly and Amasigh is a ethnic group- corect term are Moroccan-Berber. i have nothing against berbers look at my userpage i am not even from the Maghreb nor am i arab? sop why shud i care? i only care if someone places Natinalists terms in a article wich are suppusd to be neatraul. Nochi 22:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I must disagree with you. "Amazigh" is quite mainstream. Berbers refer to themselves by both names interchangeably (think British-English, Persian-Iranian, etc.) The fact that you are bothered by the word's etymology and/or by a Berber contributing to an article on Arabs is rather tasteless IMO. --
Targeman 22:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hey Nochi, what's your obsession with Berbers? I'm not Berber and, surprise, I have never even met a Berber except the guy who sold me a teapot in Marrakesh eight years ago. Amazigh redirects to Berber people and has been doing so for 3 years - as I said, both words mean exactly the same. Cheers! -- Targeman 23:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey fellow Mesopotamian, just checkin out ur page. BTW, if u need me to lend a hand in particular just tell me. Tourskin 03:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Assyrians55 people.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Assyrianwrs55 people.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Aramaeanss flag.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Aramaentrrs.jpg. The copy called Image:Aramaentrrs.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 23:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Aramaean people. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a
consensus among editors.
Gscshoyru 12:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- CUT THE CRAP. You have made a mockery out of yourself since you have arrived. What on earth are you doing? The Aramaean people page has always been ridecrected to Aramaeans for a reason - NOBODY IN THE MIDDLE EAST CALLS THEMSELVES ARAMAYA. You can't just come here like superman and create a new ethnicity. STOP IT. Chaldean 12:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Shlomo Nochi,
I also believe Aramaean people should be merged with Aramaeans. Both titles mean the same thing. I think we should include information about the current situation of the Aramaean people in the existing article, rather than creating a separate one. -- Benne ['bɛnə] ( talk) 13:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. dab (𒁳) 13:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:Arab Jews, you will be
blocked for
vandalism.
Gscshoyru 15:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Are you really the author of Image:Gilgamesssh.jpg? This seems to be a professionally edited image and it really looks like something you copied straight from a museum website. If that's the case, then this is a copyright infraction and the image should be deleted. Thank you for clarifying its status. Pascal.Tesson 17:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:FlagofChaldea.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. — EliasAlucard| Talk 23:42 09 Aug, 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Allow me to explain why Assyrians don't like the term Nestorian. One of the reasons is that Nestorianism view Jesus Christ as two forms or two distinct persons. However, many Assyrians deny this theology, even members of the Assyrian Church of the East deny this. They instead have another theology believing that Jesus Christ has two essences that are unmingled but eternally united in personality.
Furthermoore, Nestorian was a by-word for Heretic in Byzantine / Late Roman times and the Assyrians know this. Its not nice to call people from the Assyrian Church of the East Heretics (which is what you are saying by calling them Nestorians). And as I have already mentioned, many Assyrians are now in full communion with the Holy See of Rome, the Pope and are therefore do not even relate to Nestorius or his Nestorian theology in any way.
I hope this helps.
Regards.
Tourskin 03:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Sumerian people
Sumerian people, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Sumerian people satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumerian people and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Sumerian people during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. THF 11:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Shlama Nochi and welcome ot wikipedia. If you have any questions on how to do things, please do ask. But I dont think that kind of talk is approriate in an encyclopedia. Pshena. Chaldean 04:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Shrug people ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of the Sorani people people.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reason why you reverted my reversion to your version of the page? I think yours is by far the most accurate. Irrer 18:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:IraqiJewishman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Greetings, Nochi. Two things about our present "Riffian" disagreement on the
Berber people article:
First, I want to ensure that you are aware of the
3-revert rule. In short, it says that editors are forbidden to make more than 3 reverts on the same article within 24 hours. I mention this because you are up to 3 reverts already. Please take this as a friendly warning not to revert that article again for a while.
Second, I want to ensure that you understand why I have taking "Riffian" back out of the article at the spot where you have been adding it: Right there, the text is giving examples of Berbers outside of Morrocco who tend not to refer to themselves as "Imazighen". Riffians are, on the contrary, Berbers inside Morrocco who do refer to themselves as "Imazighen". So they are just not useful as examples, there. This is not to impugn their credentials as Berbers. Aside from that, there is no need for more than two examples. One would be enough, really.
I hope that explanation satisfies your objection, and that you can now see why it is not sensible to mention the Riffians at that point in the article. I suggest that you find a good place elsewhere in the article to do that. Perhaps you should make a section that lists the various Berber groups.
Cordially,
Lonewolf BC 07:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arabjews.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
First of all, I too am a Chaldean Catholic. But if your going to completely change the article, then you have to address everyone at the talk page first before you do so. Please be more aware of how wikipedia works. Chaldean 15:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gilgamesssh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Instead of just deleting it all, why not propose a merger, a lot of content would be lost by just redirecting the page. Deflagro Contribs/ Talk 15:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ack, sorry. That wasn't supposed to be a warn!
Deflagro
Contribs/
Talk 15:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well I don't know a lot about Egyptians, but maybe you could propose that the section is merged into it. Or if you disagree with somethin, you could ask for a reference using the {{ fact}} template. But it is probably not a good idea to delete the whole article. Deflagro Contribs/ Talk 15:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ack, sorry. That wasn't supposed to be a warn!
Deflagro
Contribs/
Talk 15:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hello Nochi. I'm Lanternix, an Egyptian Copt. Egyptians are indeed an ethnic group. Clearly, like any other ethnicities, they have some outside influence due to various immigrations (Greeks and Arabs mainly). Yet, these foreign immigrants came to Egypt when Egypt was alreadyy having millions of Egyptians living there. You can compare the way modern Egyptians look with the Portraits of Faiyum from the 2nd century BC to see the striking similarities between both groups. I'll be glad to answer any more questions. Cheers. -- Lanternix 17:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Dear Nochi, I noticed you did a pretty large deletion of information from the article Sumer. I checked the article's discussion page and found no conversation regarding massive deletions. Please go back to the history and compare your versions, to be sure you meant to delete the sections you did. If you are working on the article, please please, put in the edit summary box, details of what you're doing so the monitors do not revert your work. Thank you, Ariel♥ Gold 17:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Again, please, do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. When you blank a page to work on it for revision, the monitors will come and revert it. Better yet, I'd suggest that you create a sandbox of your own, such as User:Nochi/Sumer and work on the article there until you're ready to publish it. Thank you! Ariel♥ Gold 17:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arabjewws.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arabjewwss.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Nochi. I have reverted your cut-and-paste redirecting job. Don't do it that way, please - it destroys a page's edit history. If you want to rename an article, or merge two articles, [a] get consensus from these who have worked on the article, and [b] delete the article with the destination name, [c] move the source article there, and [d] restore the destination article and merge it into the source article. If you're not an administrator, you can ask me or any other administrator (there's over a thousand of us) to do it for you. Sounds complicated? Well, yes, it's made deliberately difficult. It's not meant to be kid's play, because if articles are moved around willy-nilly for no good reason, we won't know where we are.
Don't take this as a criticism - just a word of advice. I was new to wikipedia once, and made lots of mistakes like this one, so please don't think I'm dumping on you. Anyway, welcome to wikipedia! David Cannon (administrator) 16:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'll be happy to do as you said. Please give me about 12-18 hours, as I'm supposed to be working at the moment, but will attend to it when I get home tonight:-) David Cannon 21:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the award :) — EliasAlucard| Talk 21:15 30 Jul, 2007 (UTC)
Shlama aziza,
Please consult the talk page on Wikiproject Assyria, where I proposed to have a vote on who to include in the Assyrian people infobox. As you may already be aware, there is a bit of disagreement between myself and EliasAlucard as to who to include, and he recently changed the picture without consulting anybody. So if you could check out the page and perhaps provide some input as to how we can do this vote (if it is a good idea at all). We need to set some guidelines, because people such as EliasAlucard are making major edits without discussing them in the talk page first.
Thanks. Posh bshena.
Šarukinu 23:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Assyrians55 people.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Assyrianrs55 people.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Assyrianwrs55 people.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Assyrians55 people.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you reverted an edit by a user who changed Berber to Amazigh. Please note that that is actually a correct word and widely used not only by Berbers themselves but also by Arab Moroccans, in France, and elsewhere. The two words are for all intents and purposes synonyms. Cheers! -- Targeman 22:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- No I do not belive we should use the word "Amasigh" its not widely used its only used by berber themselfs wich mean "Free men" beacause they belive thats Berber is insulting word. its a nationalist term and if u rad it u think its a berber's work and not a neautral worl. Nochi 22:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I must disagree with you. "Amazigh" is quite mainstream. Berbers refer to themselves by both names interchangeably (think British-English, Persian-Iranian, etc.) The fact that you are bothered by the word's etymology and/or by a Berber contributing to an article on Arabs is rather tasteless IMO. --
Targeman 22:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Eh no!, Persian is an ethnic group while Iranian are a nationality wich means citizen of iran, like Perisan-Iranian means a ethnic persian who are a citizen of Iran, like Azeri-Iranian, Arab-Iranian, Balochi Iranian and so on... same with English people wich are citizens of Great Bretain, welsh-britsish scotish british....u shud know thaht?.. Berber is not a natriopnaly and Amasigh is a ethnic group- corect term are Moroccan-Berber. i have nothing against berbers look at my userpage i am not even from the Maghreb nor am i arab? sop why shud i care? i only care if someone places Natinalists terms in a article wich are suppusd to be neatraul. Nochi 22:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think you are overreacting. Every nation has the right to call itself whatever it wants, and it's absolutely nobody else's business even if the nation doesn't have "its own country". Following the same logic, one could consider that "Assyrian" is a nationalist term because there is no such country as Assyria. You wouldn't like I that, I imagine? As per the UK, most sane people there don't give a damn how you call their nation. May be a good example to follow. --
Targeman 22:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Your are talking nonsense and talking about thins you do not know alot about. Assyrians have never used the term "Assyrian" for nationalist term. its only used by ethnicity. u may confuse with Kurds, they use the tern Kurds as natinaluism and ethnicsm. Assyrians do not. they even say Iraqi Christians. anyway it seems ur a berber and thats great. i have nothing against berbers or the term amasigh its sounds beautiful. but like i said i wud rather have a term wich are widely used. thanks Nochi 16:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- You seem to jump to conclusions pretty fast. It may surprise you that I am not a Berber, not even close. And I do know that many Berbers refer to themselves simply as Moroccan or Algerian just like many Assyrians identify with Iraq. There's no need to get all worked up because someone put "Amazigh" in an article. It's the same kind of pettiness we see in the Greek opposition to "Macedonia". The world would be much better off if people grew out of this silliness. --
Targeman 16:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry for ansewring too late, Aha u arnt berber but i guess u have berber freidns whjo u "Support". Listen, you are protecting the Term "Amasigh" and u say that its used by as many as Berber users. then why not suggest to change the artice berber people to Amasigh people? ;) Nochi 22:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- You seem to jump to conclusions pretty fast. It may surprise you that I am not a Berber, not even close. And I do know that many Berbers refer to themselves simply as Moroccan or Algerian just like many Assyrians identify with Iraq. There's no need to get all worked up because someone put "Amazigh" in an article. It's the same kind of pettiness we see in the Greek opposition to "Macedonia". The world would be much better off if people grew out of this silliness. --
Targeman 16:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Your are talking nonsense and talking about thins you do not know alot about. Assyrians have never used the term "Assyrian" for nationalist term. its only used by ethnicity. u may confuse with Kurds, they use the tern Kurds as natinaluism and ethnicsm. Assyrians do not. they even say Iraqi Christians. anyway it seems ur a berber and thats great. i have nothing against berbers or the term amasigh its sounds beautiful. but like i said i wud rather have a term wich are widely used. thanks Nochi 16:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think you are overreacting. Every nation has the right to call itself whatever it wants, and it's absolutely nobody else's business even if the nation doesn't have "its own country". Following the same logic, one could consider that "Assyrian" is a nationalist term because there is no such country as Assyria. You wouldn't like I that, I imagine? As per the UK, most sane people there don't give a damn how you call their nation. May be a good example to follow. --
Targeman 22:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Eh no!, Persian is an ethnic group while Iranian are a nationality wich means citizen of iran, like Perisan-Iranian means a ethnic persian who are a citizen of Iran, like Azeri-Iranian, Arab-Iranian, Balochi Iranian and so on... same with English people wich are citizens of Great Bretain, welsh-britsish scotish british....u shud know thaht?.. Berber is not a natriopnaly and Amasigh is a ethnic group- corect term are Moroccan-Berber. i have nothing against berbers look at my userpage i am not even from the Maghreb nor am i arab? sop why shud i care? i only care if someone places Natinalists terms in a article wich are suppusd to be neatraul. Nochi 22:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I must disagree with you. "Amazigh" is quite mainstream. Berbers refer to themselves by both names interchangeably (think British-English, Persian-Iranian, etc.) The fact that you are bothered by the word's etymology and/or by a Berber contributing to an article on Arabs is rather tasteless IMO. --
Targeman 22:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hey Nochi, what's your obsession with Berbers? I'm not Berber and, surprise, I have never even met a Berber except the guy who sold me a teapot in Marrakesh eight years ago. Amazigh redirects to Berber people and has been doing so for 3 years - as I said, both words mean exactly the same. Cheers! -- Targeman 23:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey fellow Mesopotamian, just checkin out ur page. BTW, if u need me to lend a hand in particular just tell me. Tourskin 03:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Assyrians55 people.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Assyrianwrs55 people.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Aramaeanss flag.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Aramaentrrs.jpg. The copy called Image:Aramaentrrs.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 23:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Aramaean people. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a
consensus among editors.
Gscshoyru 12:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- CUT THE CRAP. You have made a mockery out of yourself since you have arrived. What on earth are you doing? The Aramaean people page has always been ridecrected to Aramaeans for a reason - NOBODY IN THE MIDDLE EAST CALLS THEMSELVES ARAMAYA. You can't just come here like superman and create a new ethnicity. STOP IT. Chaldean 12:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Shlomo Nochi,
I also believe Aramaean people should be merged with Aramaeans. Both titles mean the same thing. I think we should include information about the current situation of the Aramaean people in the existing article, rather than creating a separate one. -- Benne ['bɛnə] ( talk) 13:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. dab (𒁳) 13:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:Arab Jews, you will be
blocked for
vandalism.
Gscshoyru 15:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Are you really the author of Image:Gilgamesssh.jpg? This seems to be a professionally edited image and it really looks like something you copied straight from a museum website. If that's the case, then this is a copyright infraction and the image should be deleted. Thank you for clarifying its status. Pascal.Tesson 17:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:FlagofChaldea.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. — EliasAlucard| Talk 23:42 09 Aug, 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Allow me to explain why Assyrians don't like the term Nestorian. One of the reasons is that Nestorianism view Jesus Christ as two forms or two distinct persons. However, many Assyrians deny this theology, even members of the Assyrian Church of the East deny this. They instead have another theology believing that Jesus Christ has two essences that are unmingled but eternally united in personality.
Furthermoore, Nestorian was a by-word for Heretic in Byzantine / Late Roman times and the Assyrians know this. Its not nice to call people from the Assyrian Church of the East Heretics (which is what you are saying by calling them Nestorians). And as I have already mentioned, many Assyrians are now in full communion with the Holy See of Rome, the Pope and are therefore do not even relate to Nestorius or his Nestorian theology in any way.
I hope this helps.
Regards.
Tourskin 03:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Sumerian people
Sumerian people, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Sumerian people satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumerian people and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Sumerian people during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. THF 11:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)