Greetings all -- Nicu Farcaş ( talk) 14:16 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Salut. Inainte sa lansati vreun proiect de anvergura, as vrea sa va spun ca aici pe en.wiki s-a hotarat prin consens sa nu avem articole separate despre sate romanesti, ci sa ne oprim la nivelul comunei. Satele sunt tratate in cadrul articolelor despre comune, iar se ajunge la ele prin redirectionare. De ce? Fiindca e mai normal ca toate informatiile despre o comuna sa se poata citi intr-un singur loc decat sa fie raspandite in 3, 4, 15 articole mici despre care cititorul poate nici nu stie cum se leaga si care il trimit de colo-colo fara rost. Asta e motivul principal. Pe urma, sub modelul actual de aici, exista sanse ca un articol despre o comuna sa capete proportiile si conturul unui articol bine dezvoltat. Faramarea lui in sate individuale inseamna ca ramanem cu mii (insumand toate comunele tarii) de cioturi care vor ramane asa in permanenta. Deci v-as ruga cu toata bunavointa sa va continuati lucrarile aici despre satele si comunele Romaniei, insa cu aceasta mica precizare, ca satele sa fie tratate in cadrul articolelor despre comune, si nu separat. - Biruitorul Talk 16:06, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
The article Sânmartin, Bihor was moved to that name after a move request. If you think it should be moved to another name, you should should start a discussion or move request to get further input. Thanks, Cúchullain t/ c 12:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- The original name is Sînmartin (see official site
Sînmartin commune) --
Nicu Farcaş (
talk) 13:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but Wikipedia articles use common names rather than official (or original) names. I also see that your link is located at sanmartin.ro. At any rate, as the article's current title was determined through a move discussion, it should not be moved back without another one. Cúchullain t/ c 14:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Template:Cizersj has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 ( talk) 13:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Agree to delete -- Nicu Farcas ( talk) 14:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Buna, am vazut din intamplator acest mesaj (observasem articolul despre Gălpâia si vroiam sa vad ce e cu el). As vrea sa va zic, in caz ca nu era clar, ca eu (si, din cate stiu, toti de pe en.wiki) nu avem nici o problema cu continut despre sate, incurajam acest lucru, numai sub conditia sa apara ca sectii subordonate comunei. Si, in caz ca vor deveni prea mari, ca articole separate, dar mai e pana atunci. Deci daca vreti sa traduceti sau stiu eu ce, pe mine personal m-ar bucura sa vad mai multe despre sate romanesti aici. Ei, ar fi bine si cu surse citate, dar nu e chiar obligatoriu daca nu se poate.
Dupa mine un exemplu foarte bun de o comuna romaneasca cu articol pe en.wiki ar fi Coronini. Altele, putin mai slabe si scrise de mine, sunt Bazna sau Berzasca. Concluzia: sa apara informatii despre sate, dar in cadrul unei structuri bine definite. - Biruitorul Talk 06:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- Și eu spuneam exact acelaşi lucru în mesajul trimis colegului Dorin Rodina. -- Nicu Farcas ( talk) 10:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Defileul Mureşului Superior Natural Park may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- sites/Defileul_Muresului_Superior_Natural_Park Defileul Mureşului Superior Natural Park location)]; retrieved on June 11, 2012</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Nicu farcas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
If you ever come back and edit again, please note that External links goes after the References section. Also nav boxes go at the bottom as well. Thanks -- Jennica✿ / talk 08:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nicu farcas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nicu farcas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Greetings all -- Nicu Farcaş ( talk) 14:16 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Salut. Inainte sa lansati vreun proiect de anvergura, as vrea sa va spun ca aici pe en.wiki s-a hotarat prin consens sa nu avem articole separate despre sate romanesti, ci sa ne oprim la nivelul comunei. Satele sunt tratate in cadrul articolelor despre comune, iar se ajunge la ele prin redirectionare. De ce? Fiindca e mai normal ca toate informatiile despre o comuna sa se poata citi intr-un singur loc decat sa fie raspandite in 3, 4, 15 articole mici despre care cititorul poate nici nu stie cum se leaga si care il trimit de colo-colo fara rost. Asta e motivul principal. Pe urma, sub modelul actual de aici, exista sanse ca un articol despre o comuna sa capete proportiile si conturul unui articol bine dezvoltat. Faramarea lui in sate individuale inseamna ca ramanem cu mii (insumand toate comunele tarii) de cioturi care vor ramane asa in permanenta. Deci v-as ruga cu toata bunavointa sa va continuati lucrarile aici despre satele si comunele Romaniei, insa cu aceasta mica precizare, ca satele sa fie tratate in cadrul articolelor despre comune, si nu separat. - Biruitorul Talk 16:06, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
The article Sânmartin, Bihor was moved to that name after a move request. If you think it should be moved to another name, you should should start a discussion or move request to get further input. Thanks, Cúchullain t/ c 12:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- The original name is Sînmartin (see official site
Sînmartin commune) --
Nicu Farcaş (
talk) 13:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but Wikipedia articles use common names rather than official (or original) names. I also see that your link is located at sanmartin.ro. At any rate, as the article's current title was determined through a move discussion, it should not be moved back without another one. Cúchullain t/ c 14:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Template:Cizersj has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 ( talk) 13:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Agree to delete -- Nicu Farcas ( talk) 14:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Buna, am vazut din intamplator acest mesaj (observasem articolul despre Gălpâia si vroiam sa vad ce e cu el). As vrea sa va zic, in caz ca nu era clar, ca eu (si, din cate stiu, toti de pe en.wiki) nu avem nici o problema cu continut despre sate, incurajam acest lucru, numai sub conditia sa apara ca sectii subordonate comunei. Si, in caz ca vor deveni prea mari, ca articole separate, dar mai e pana atunci. Deci daca vreti sa traduceti sau stiu eu ce, pe mine personal m-ar bucura sa vad mai multe despre sate romanesti aici. Ei, ar fi bine si cu surse citate, dar nu e chiar obligatoriu daca nu se poate.
Dupa mine un exemplu foarte bun de o comuna romaneasca cu articol pe en.wiki ar fi Coronini. Altele, putin mai slabe si scrise de mine, sunt Bazna sau Berzasca. Concluzia: sa apara informatii despre sate, dar in cadrul unei structuri bine definite. - Biruitorul Talk 06:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- Și eu spuneam exact acelaşi lucru în mesajul trimis colegului Dorin Rodina. -- Nicu Farcas ( talk) 10:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Defileul Mureşului Superior Natural Park may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- sites/Defileul_Muresului_Superior_Natural_Park Defileul Mureşului Superior Natural Park location)]; retrieved on June 11, 2012</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Nicu farcas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
If you ever come back and edit again, please note that External links goes after the References section. Also nav boxes go at the bottom as well. Thanks -- Jennica✿ / talk 08:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nicu farcas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nicu farcas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)