Welcome!
Hello, Neckrub, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
WikiDan61
ChatMe!
ReadMe!! 21:38, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Yury G. Kronn, Ph.D. (October 8)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. Yury G. Kronn, Ph.D..
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Neckrub,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Note my comments (highlighted) throughout your draft; scroll all the way to the end to see all comments: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yury G. Kronn Neckrub ( talk) 22:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your helpful edits, Matthew Vanitas!
No worries; you can delete any of my in-line comments once you've addressed them, just make sure you leave the pink boxes at top for reviewers to see the progress so far. The main thing you want to do moving forward: footnotes are not for "here's the paper by him I mentioned", but instead are for "here's a neutral academic/media authority that backs up what I just said." We don't need footnotes to prove he wrote XYZ Paper, what we need is if you say "XYZ Paper really opened the field of whatchamaphysics", then you add a footnote to Dr Whosit's book on science from 1998 which on pg 43 says "Kronn's XYZ Paper was amazing, and here's how it impacted whatchamaphysics", and then you cite Whosit's book. So generally speaking there shouldn't be citations to Kronn's work, though you can list his key publications under "Selected works" or whatnot. Footnotes should be about Kronn by others, not by him. Hope this helps. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 23:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Yury G. Kronn was accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 17:33, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Neckrub, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
WikiDan61
ChatMe!
ReadMe!! 21:38, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Yury G. Kronn, Ph.D. (October 8)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. Yury G. Kronn, Ph.D..
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
|
|
Hello! Neckrub,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Note my comments (highlighted) throughout your draft; scroll all the way to the end to see all comments: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yury G. Kronn Neckrub ( talk) 22:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your helpful edits, Matthew Vanitas!
No worries; you can delete any of my in-line comments once you've addressed them, just make sure you leave the pink boxes at top for reviewers to see the progress so far. The main thing you want to do moving forward: footnotes are not for "here's the paper by him I mentioned", but instead are for "here's a neutral academic/media authority that backs up what I just said." We don't need footnotes to prove he wrote XYZ Paper, what we need is if you say "XYZ Paper really opened the field of whatchamaphysics", then you add a footnote to Dr Whosit's book on science from 1998 which on pg 43 says "Kronn's XYZ Paper was amazing, and here's how it impacted whatchamaphysics", and then you cite Whosit's book. So generally speaking there shouldn't be citations to Kronn's work, though you can list his key publications under "Selected works" or whatnot. Footnotes should be about Kronn by others, not by him. Hope this helps. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 23:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Yury G. Kronn was accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 17:33, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)