I removed the misinformation on Margaret Sanger's page because it has never been verified by historians. A common practice of the anti-choice movement is to take Mrs. Sanger's comments and quote them out of context in order to perpetuate the idea that she was in favor of negative eugenics. The Margaret Sanger Papers Project has indicated that this is a very frequent problem that has not resulted in helpful dialogue with the anti-choice community. If users continue to promote claims that cannot be verified, they should be removed from her page. User:naha8 21:30, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
JJMC89. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Margaret Sanger with
this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
JJMC89 (
T·
E·
C) 20:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Margaret Sanger with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 20:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Margaret Sanger shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favonian ( talk) 21:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
ceradon (
talk •
edits) 04:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Hello, Ceradon. I have read the information under build an encyclopedia. I wonder if you could clarify for me which item(s) in that list I have been blocked in accordance with. That will allow me to construct my appeal in an appropriate manner. Thank you for your help. naha8
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I am trying to ask for arbitration about the misinformation that is being promoted on the Margaret Sanger page, but as I have been completely blocked from editing, I have no way to do this. From the posts on the talk page, it is clear that I am not the only user who has been trying to revise certain portions of the text to reflect a more neutral perspective with verifiable sources; however, these other users and I have received strong pushback from one user in particular, who has also posted on my talk page. If the goal of Wikipedia is to present unbiased information that can be independently verified with the sources provided, it should not be permissible for one user to deny requests for revision due to obvious partisan alignment. Thank you for your help.
Naha8 ( talk) 18:17, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Naha8 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am requesting an unblock with a topic ban on the Margaret Sanger page, as it is clear that others have taken on the responsibility to advocate for a neutral representation of information regarding her views. I have read the Wikipedia guidelines, and would like to contribute to other topics in a collaborative and non-confrontational way. Thank you for your help. Naha8 ( talk) 19:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Naha8 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am requesting an unblock with a topic ban on the Margaret Sanger page, as it is clear that others have taken on the responsibility to advocate for a neutral representation of information regarding her views. I have read the Wikipedia guidelines, and would like to contribute to other topics in a collaborative and non-confrontational way. Thank you for your help. Naha8 ( talk) 19:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Accept reason:
So in other words, it was all just personal interest. (We have to ask since sometimes we will have people representing an organization coming in to edit on a related topic, like someone working for a charity editing an endorsing celebrity's page to make it more positive in tone.) Since you're asking for an unblock and are OK with a topic ban about Sanger, I actually don't have an issue unblocking you. Just make sure that you're aware that if this happens again on another page, you'll likely be reblocked and will be unlikely to receive an unblock at that time. (I need to make sure that you understand this.) Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
-- 23:05, Wednesday, September 2, 2015 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
I removed the misinformation on Margaret Sanger's page because it has never been verified by historians. A common practice of the anti-choice movement is to take Mrs. Sanger's comments and quote them out of context in order to perpetuate the idea that she was in favor of negative eugenics. The Margaret Sanger Papers Project has indicated that this is a very frequent problem that has not resulted in helpful dialogue with the anti-choice community. If users continue to promote claims that cannot be verified, they should be removed from her page. User:naha8 21:30, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
JJMC89. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Margaret Sanger with
this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
JJMC89 (
T·
E·
C) 20:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Margaret Sanger with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 20:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Margaret Sanger shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favonian ( talk) 21:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
ceradon (
talk •
edits) 04:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Hello, Ceradon. I have read the information under build an encyclopedia. I wonder if you could clarify for me which item(s) in that list I have been blocked in accordance with. That will allow me to construct my appeal in an appropriate manner. Thank you for your help. naha8
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I am trying to ask for arbitration about the misinformation that is being promoted on the Margaret Sanger page, but as I have been completely blocked from editing, I have no way to do this. From the posts on the talk page, it is clear that I am not the only user who has been trying to revise certain portions of the text to reflect a more neutral perspective with verifiable sources; however, these other users and I have received strong pushback from one user in particular, who has also posted on my talk page. If the goal of Wikipedia is to present unbiased information that can be independently verified with the sources provided, it should not be permissible for one user to deny requests for revision due to obvious partisan alignment. Thank you for your help.
Naha8 ( talk) 18:17, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Naha8 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am requesting an unblock with a topic ban on the Margaret Sanger page, as it is clear that others have taken on the responsibility to advocate for a neutral representation of information regarding her views. I have read the Wikipedia guidelines, and would like to contribute to other topics in a collaborative and non-confrontational way. Thank you for your help. Naha8 ( talk) 19:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Naha8 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am requesting an unblock with a topic ban on the Margaret Sanger page, as it is clear that others have taken on the responsibility to advocate for a neutral representation of information regarding her views. I have read the Wikipedia guidelines, and would like to contribute to other topics in a collaborative and non-confrontational way. Thank you for your help. Naha8 ( talk) 19:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Accept reason:
So in other words, it was all just personal interest. (We have to ask since sometimes we will have people representing an organization coming in to edit on a related topic, like someone working for a charity editing an endorsing celebrity's page to make it more positive in tone.) Since you're asking for an unblock and are OK with a topic ban about Sanger, I actually don't have an issue unblocking you. Just make sure that you're aware that if this happens again on another page, you'll likely be reblocked and will be unlikely to receive an unblock at that time. (I need to make sure that you understand this.) Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
-- 23:05, Wednesday, September 2, 2015 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |