Muffinator is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia on February 11 to appeal an erroneous topic ban after waiting the usual 6 months. They may still be inactive while the appeal is processed. They will not be checking in to respond to comments, even if the comments are outside the scope of the topic ban. |
If I post on your talk page, I have watchlisted it, so whether you reply here or there, I will see it either way.
The Socratic Barnstar | ||
To Muffinator, for a well-reasoned argument advocating the phrase "autistic person". Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Muffinator. Thanks for the barnstar, which I've move to my talk page and replied there, saying that of course you may quote me outside WP. Your contributions on Talk:Autism were very helpful to my understanding of this whole area. Regards, -- Stfg ( talk) 19:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
I saw your comments on the disability talk page and read them to my autistic son. He agrees with you, and (without reading your comment about the term used as a noun) brought up the fact that he considers it's use like that offensive and compared it to looking at someone on the street and referring to the as black to define them. Ian Furst ( talk) 02:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Muffinator. What's the rationale for adding this article to WikiProject Autism? Forgive me if I thought this had something to do with article content. I see there is that one ref:Fitzgerald, Michael. "Did Ludwig Wittgenstein have Asperger's syndrome?", European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, volume 9, number 1, pp. 61–65. Four pages in a rather specialist journal, 14 years ago? You seem to be on a bit of a mission. Martinevans123 ( talk) 09:17, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. I've responded on my talk page. - User:MiscGezork
Re my edit to Jacob Barnett that you thanked me for, it has been reverted despite that fact that it was not opposed on the talk page when I put it there. I am going to take it to an authoritative source. Viewfinder ( talk) 22:29, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
I saw "This user is autistic" wholly three times on your user page. How was I to know that you don't mean it?? I can apologize for "misunderstanding", if you like, but I thought those labels spoke for themselves. If those user-boxes are just meant as examples or something, please add some text to that effect in that section! Thanks, Hordaland ( talk) 17:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Despite your good intentions to help in the topic of Autism, your argumentative and aggressive approach to other editors has led to a conclusion that your behavior is disruptive and the decision that it is necessary to topic ban you from all articles and talk pages related to autism. You may appeal this decision at any time to a community noticeboard or Arbcom, but it is recommended you wait at least 6 months. Any edits to articles or talk pages about autism, or sections about autism in articles about other subjects, will lead to escalating blocks.--v/r - T P 21:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Grognard 123chess456 ( talk) 22:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Grognard 123chess456 ( talk) 22:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Medical model of autism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical model of autism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Holdek ( talk) 02:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
thanks for your efforts about autism and Humanitarian efforts in Wikipedia ♥
محمد بوعلام عصامي «Md.Boualam» ( talk) 23:56, 22 December 2014 (UTC) |
WikiProject Disability Barnstar | ||
Thank you so much for improving coverage on the autism spectrum and the neurodiversity movement. :) Ms. Andrea Carter here ( at your service | my evil deads) 09:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect MOS:DISABILITY. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 20#MOS:DISABILITY until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 15:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Muffinator is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia on February 11 to appeal an erroneous topic ban after waiting the usual 6 months. They may still be inactive while the appeal is processed. They will not be checking in to respond to comments, even if the comments are outside the scope of the topic ban. |
If I post on your talk page, I have watchlisted it, so whether you reply here or there, I will see it either way.
The Socratic Barnstar | ||
To Muffinator, for a well-reasoned argument advocating the phrase "autistic person". Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Muffinator. Thanks for the barnstar, which I've move to my talk page and replied there, saying that of course you may quote me outside WP. Your contributions on Talk:Autism were very helpful to my understanding of this whole area. Regards, -- Stfg ( talk) 19:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
I saw your comments on the disability talk page and read them to my autistic son. He agrees with you, and (without reading your comment about the term used as a noun) brought up the fact that he considers it's use like that offensive and compared it to looking at someone on the street and referring to the as black to define them. Ian Furst ( talk) 02:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Muffinator. What's the rationale for adding this article to WikiProject Autism? Forgive me if I thought this had something to do with article content. I see there is that one ref:Fitzgerald, Michael. "Did Ludwig Wittgenstein have Asperger's syndrome?", European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, volume 9, number 1, pp. 61–65. Four pages in a rather specialist journal, 14 years ago? You seem to be on a bit of a mission. Martinevans123 ( talk) 09:17, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. I've responded on my talk page. - User:MiscGezork
Re my edit to Jacob Barnett that you thanked me for, it has been reverted despite that fact that it was not opposed on the talk page when I put it there. I am going to take it to an authoritative source. Viewfinder ( talk) 22:29, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
I saw "This user is autistic" wholly three times on your user page. How was I to know that you don't mean it?? I can apologize for "misunderstanding", if you like, but I thought those labels spoke for themselves. If those user-boxes are just meant as examples or something, please add some text to that effect in that section! Thanks, Hordaland ( talk) 17:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Despite your good intentions to help in the topic of Autism, your argumentative and aggressive approach to other editors has led to a conclusion that your behavior is disruptive and the decision that it is necessary to topic ban you from all articles and talk pages related to autism. You may appeal this decision at any time to a community noticeboard or Arbcom, but it is recommended you wait at least 6 months. Any edits to articles or talk pages about autism, or sections about autism in articles about other subjects, will lead to escalating blocks.--v/r - T P 21:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Grognard 123chess456 ( talk) 22:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Grognard 123chess456 ( talk) 22:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Medical model of autism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical model of autism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Holdek ( talk) 02:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
thanks for your efforts about autism and Humanitarian efforts in Wikipedia ♥
محمد بوعلام عصامي «Md.Boualam» ( talk) 23:56, 22 December 2014 (UTC) |
WikiProject Disability Barnstar | ||
Thank you so much for improving coverage on the autism spectrum and the neurodiversity movement. :) Ms. Andrea Carter here ( at your service | my evil deads) 09:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect MOS:DISABILITY. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 20#MOS:DISABILITY until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 15:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)