|
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Adding
{{ unblock-un|your new username here}}below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page. - At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
- Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.
- Adding
{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 01:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Marguerite2003 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Accept reason:
I globally renamed MargueriteBot to Marguerite2003. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MrMimikyu1998. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
2021 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Kyu (
talk) 21:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2021 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kyu ( talk) 21:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your
sandbox. Thank you.
Suffusion of Yellow (
talk) 21:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
2021.
Suffusion of Yellow (
talk) 21:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots 21:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Marguerite2003 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I think I am ready to return to editing. I have been engaged in an edit war on the 2021 article. I like to be unblocked just now and I will make contributions instead. I will learn to organized to learn in a community’s way. I ready to go back to Wikipedia. I have waited just now without touching Wikipedia in any way. I am eager for making vandalism on the 2021 article. Marguerite2003 (talk) 21:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Read our guide to improving articles.
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see
this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
- Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
- Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
{{infobox name|...}}); - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this:
[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]); - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
[[Category:Name]]); - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
{{Foo stub}});
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
- Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this:
== [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet; - Place your cursor in the
edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory
copyright attribution): "
Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution." - You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include
citations to
reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose:
{{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
- Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
- When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an
administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{
Help me|your question here ~~~~}}
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock|I think I am ready to return to editing. I have engaged in an edit war on 2021 article. I will get unblocked from Wikipedia and edit about. I will make edits to Wikipedia. I am sorry for vandalism on 2021. I hope to organize to learn in a community’s way. I edited the 2021 article in vandalism. Marguerite2003 ( talk) 21:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)}
As you are clearly just trolling and actively setting out to harm the project, I have revoked talk page access. -- Yamla ( talk) 21:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- For those following along, this is now checkuser-confirmed as a Pcgmsrich sock. -- Yamla ( talk) 21:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
|
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Adding
{{ unblock-un|your new username here}}below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page. - At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
- Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.
- Adding
{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 01:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Marguerite2003 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Accept reason:
I globally renamed MargueriteBot to Marguerite2003. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MrMimikyu1998. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
2021 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Kyu (
talk) 21:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2021 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kyu ( talk) 21:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your
sandbox. Thank you.
Suffusion of Yellow (
talk) 21:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
2021.
Suffusion of Yellow (
talk) 21:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots 21:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Marguerite2003 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I think I am ready to return to editing. I have been engaged in an edit war on the 2021 article. I like to be unblocked just now and I will make contributions instead. I will learn to organized to learn in a community’s way. I ready to go back to Wikipedia. I have waited just now without touching Wikipedia in any way. I am eager for making vandalism on the 2021 article. Marguerite2003 (talk) 21:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Read our guide to improving articles.
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see
this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
- Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
- Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
{{infobox name|...}}); - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this:
[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]); - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
[[Category:Name]]); - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
{{Foo stub}});
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
- Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this:
== [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet; - Place your cursor in the
edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory
copyright attribution): "
Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution." - You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include
citations to
reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose:
{{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
- Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
- When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an
administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{
Help me|your question here ~~~~}}
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock|I think I am ready to return to editing. I have engaged in an edit war on 2021 article. I will get unblocked from Wikipedia and edit about. I will make edits to Wikipedia. I am sorry for vandalism on 2021. I hope to organize to learn in a community’s way. I edited the 2021 article in vandalism. Marguerite2003 ( talk) 21:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)}
As you are clearly just trolling and actively setting out to harm the project, I have revoked talk page access. -- Yamla ( talk) 21:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- For those following along, this is now checkuser-confirmed as a Pcgmsrich sock. -- Yamla ( talk) 21:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.