This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Coudl you please tell me why did you take 26 september 1830 as provisional government out off the text?J.

"preceding version, m = Minor edit.

(cur) (last) 21:20, 6 October 2006 Alex9891 (Talk | contribs) m (Reverted 2 edits by 81.242.247.16 (talk) to last revision (79509636) by 83.70.244.164 using VP2) (cur) (last) 21:19, 6 October 2006 81.242.247.16 (Talk) (→Opera riot) "

Why please ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.242.247.16 ( talk • contribs)

Hi. 26 September 1830 should be linked as 26 september 1830, and not the whole date. Feel free to add it back that way. -- Alex ( Talk) 21:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you Alex,I'll try to do it also for the other date , 10 november 1830, J.23.46h —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.68.231.217 ( talk • contribs)

Thank you for watching my user page so much lately. I have noticed you have reverted dozens of vandalized messages. I dont know why these guys keep doing this to me H.J. Bellamy 22:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi there, Thanks for the welcome (albeit the 30 seconds to subst the template and save the page). To tell the truth, I'd rather not open an account for other reasons, and I'm quite happy to hack away at WP:MWT so that I can fight vandalism from an IP, but thanks for the suggestion. Just out of interest, how did you find me? -- 59.167.101.149 07:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

I saw you working through WP:AFC and doing a good job of it too! -- Alex ( Talk) 13:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a tally of 91/1/4. I can't express how much it means to me to become an administrator. I'll work even more and harder to become useful for the community. If you need a helping hand, don't hesitate to contact me. NCurse work 15:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Sure does. Already been protected; couldn't reply sooner: was having a bit of cake. ^_^ Thanks, Iola k ana• T 16:35, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

LOL. Thanks for blocking anyway. -- Alex ( Talk) 16:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Alex, I want to make sure that I didn't violate any protocol - I am new to Wikipedia (as you note), and your welcome message to me included the phrase "Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes..." which I have seen on other users' talk pages as an indication that they did *not* do so. I *thought* that I had signed the only Talk page that I edited - did I miss one? Did I edit one and forget? Pawl Kennedy 21:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

No, that was just part of the standard message I left you. Thanks. -- Alex ( Talk) 21:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which finished with a tally of 52/6/1 (~90%). It was an interesting process which gave me a chance to learn a bit about myself and about the community. My intention now is to slowly ease into using those additional buttons on my page. No use being over eager and mucking up the works. The support of all those who went over my record and/or rallied to my defense after the big oppose vote was instumental to the success of this review. Again, thank you! -- StuffOfInterest 11:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 16:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Alex

the wikipedia on human urine is not correct. Urine makes a good neutroliser for jelly fish stings (lion mane ones!) this is tried and tested as I am a commercial diver and come into contact with these critters on a daily bases. Urine definiately has a dumbing affect, better than some of the anti sting creams. I would say that although it is a myth it is at least plausable.

Cheers

Craig —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.86.32.239 ( talk • contribs)

You're good I think you found it. - Justin (koavf)· T· C· M 17:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Why did you revert me on Big Brother (UK series 5)? I was correcting an editor who had removed Dan's third place vote and put the final week evictees in alphabetical rather than vote order. Fys. “ Ta fys aym”. 16:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Oops, very sorry. I had intended to revert what you reverted, but was too late. Thanks. -- Alex ( Talk) 16:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Alex, Sorry about not signing my edits. I'm fairly new to editing Wikipedia entries. I just noticed a few things that seemed gramatically awkward, so I tried re-wording them. Ognolman 17:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Only sign your edits on talk pages. Thanks. -- Alex ( Talk) 17:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks much for providing the link to WP:RV, I really appreciate it! Also, good luck on getting BBUK7 into Good Article standing. It really helped with following along with the show's website. (I'm over in the US and can't get the show ... *sigh*) fmmarianicolon | Talk 22:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Cheers. It has quite a while to go yet, but it'll get there eventually! -- Alex ( Talk) 22:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate the WP:RV advice concerning Naming the American Civil War. Can't say I'm surprised, but my RV was swiftly RV'd -- and I was accused of incivility (or something like it).

I am stepping back, and have asked the 10 most recent editors to step in and apply a little peer pressure. I did not pick them according to ideology, and made sure to include editors I think are friends of my accuser.

If you would check in as well, or give counsel, I would appreciate it. No obligation. -- Alarob 00:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

I suggest that those of us who watch the article were otherwise engaged. A great many of the edits on articles within The Beatles wikiproject are vandalism and subsequent reverts, and the various members seem to concentrate on their own pet subjects. Sometimes persistent vandalism gets through, and is not noted for some time. In these cases the efforts of passing editors in combating it is appreciated; I therefore wish to thank you for your time and application in resolving this example of vandalism. Cheers. LessHeard vanU 12:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello. I uploaded an image (Image:South asia local.png) in wikimedia commons, but I found that I had made a mistake in this image. but i can't edit this image online. so i have to upload a new image (Image:South asia local lang.PNG). please tell me how to edit this image. thx.-- Apengu 16:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm very sorry, I have little experience with images. Have you tried looking at the help page? -- Alex ( Talk) 19:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

why do i have recieved a warnign message from you? who the hell are you? since when did i do any attempt of vandalism to your article, are you insane? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themanwhosoldtheworld ( talk • contribs)

Alex, I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but it's been agreed at Talk:Cane_Toad#spelling to keep the article to Australian English (ie. humourous). Thanks for your understanding.  :) - Malkinann 11:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

OK, sure thing. -- Alex ( Talk) 11:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Alex, you were right here and I have changed it back. Humorous is the right spelling worldwide, see [1]. -- Guinnog 13:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair point. I'll drop them a message. -- Guinnog 12:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

this guy edits like 100 times a day, and spends all his free time on wikipedia!!! and he did it in the summer holidays!!! get a life you fag —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric shin ( talk • contribs)

I have a life, thanks for the suggestion though. -- Alex ( Talk) 14:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay u r gay gay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric shin ( talk • contribs)

No, actually, I'm not. By the way I've had to cut your message down as it was taking up too much space. -- Alex ( Talk) 14:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

why don't you tell me what you mean by the vanadalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruinfan13 ( talk • contribs)

This kind of edit is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Alex ( Talk) 20:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Alex9891, thanks for your welcome message. I'm wondering, was there an edit in particular that prompted you to contact me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamC387 ( talk • contribs)

No, I just saw you had not been welcomed yet, so I thought I should. See you around! -- Alex ( Talk) 14:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Can you tell me why you flagged my amendment for vandalism please? I was just trying to add additional information to the page and it's quite annoying to be accused of vandalism and have the changes instantly reverted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brilliantinemortality ( talk • contribs)

I understand it may be annoying, but "and featured an attractive, but quirky teenage boy and a catchy song which repeated several times the line "It's gonna taste GREAT". Many people found the advert annoying." does not belong here. You need to source things like attractive, quirky and catchy. Also, who are the "many people" who found it annoying? You need to back your infrmation up with reliable sources. Thanks. -- Alex ( Talk) 21:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brilliantinemortality ( talk • contribs)

Ok, I understand. I wasn't happy with the text and would have gone back to edit it again but I guess next time I should just preview, that's what it's for! I do have a genuine question though, is it usual to flag vandalism if people don't attribute? It just seems slighty harsh and could put people off contributing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brilliantinemortality ( talk • contribs)

As it wasn't really vandalism, I shouldn't have made the mistake of labelling it as such. However, the message I gave you was just a standard message to remind you to make useful contributions. They are only useful if they are verified. It shouldn't put people off, only remind them to make more useful edits. Thanks. -- Alex ( Talk) 21:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, thanks and thanks for the welcome, the links look helpful for a newbie ;-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brilliantinemortality ( talk • contribs)

Thank you for helping to monitor quality on the Hinduism page. I've been working hard on that article lately, so I appreciated that you noticed one editor deleted a cited statement and replaced it with an uncited one of doubtful veracity, and you fixed it. Good work!! HeBhagawan 21:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

You are not the most popular person here I see either. What's the deal with that argument on your page. Anyway, do not delete any of my comments. This is against wiki policy Hungrygirl 14:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

There are many arguments on this page, all of which were solved very quickly. As you say it is against Wiki policy to edit others' comments, so why did you? -- Alex ( Talk) 14:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Alex9891! Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of 75/0/1! I hope I can live up to the standards of adminship, and I will try my best to make Wikipedia a better place. Feel free to send me a message if you need any assistance. :)

-- Core des at 14:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I request the unblock of User:Brya for flagrant violation of the Wikipedia:Blocking policy: lack of community consensus. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.Thanks Berton 16:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm you'll have to speak with the blocking admin about that. Sorry. -- Alex ( Talk) 16:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

• hangs head in shame* I should have known better. Thanks for catching that. -- BradBeattie 16:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

This user has violated that warning with this edit, and another one previous to this one which I just corrected (it wasn't picked up originally).-- Tiresais 18:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

There's nothing I can do about that. If the user has not yet been blocked, report at WP:AIV. Thanks. -- Alex ( Talk) 18:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Announcement: It's an administrator!

---

Alex9891, thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was a robust 62/1/1, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any questions about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks again, Chris Griswold

Well well you think I am spoiling the article then why did God make Alphin's And Pope's birthday on the same day.The world has to know that the Great Alphin was born on may 18 —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-gr8 ( talk • contribs)

Thank you for contributing to my RFA. Unfortunately it failed (final tally 26/17/3). As a result of the concerns raised in my RFA, I intend to undergo coaching, get involved in the welcoming committee and try to further improve the quality of my contributions to AFD and RFA. All the best. Cynical 14:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

In order to revert a change that is vandalism, incorrect, advertising etc, do you have to be admin? of course, i can just delete the text that has been written, but every time yourevert, the summary is always the same as every one elses reverts... am i able to do this? do you understand what i am asking? —Preceding unsigned comment added by -jmac- ( talk • contribs)

Yes. Take a look at my monobook, which you can copy into your own - add on monobook.js after your username as I have done to create one. Thanks. -- Alex ( Talk) 20:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey Alex, I see you all the time on RCP. Have you ever considered adminship? I'm sure the extra, shiny buttons help considerably with the vandal-fighting, and judging by all the nastiness above this message, you're more than capable of handling the pressure that comes with being an administrator.

I'm somehow sure that someone's already asked you this, and you've declined, but I'll ask again anyway :)

Cheers, riana_ dzast a 00:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page -- Alex ( Talk) 11:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

In this edit, you wrote "Reverted vandalism by 82.6.105.184 to version 81457505 by Dismas". That was the right idea, unfortunately, you didn't get it all, and merely reverted to an earlier vandalized version. Go back one more diff to see what the vandal had deleted and you didn't quite revert. Not blaming you, of course, you were trying to help, but thought you might like to know. I'll fix the missing text. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 20:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

That would be due to the script I was using at the time. I have since removed it and got a more reliable one. Thanks for telling me though. -- Alex ( Talk) 20:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh dear. So you did a lot with this script? Any prospects of writing another script to go over your edits from that time period and fixing similar issues? Or maybe doing it manually?

See, at least for Jenna Jameson, that page is heavily vandalized, nearly every day, sometimes several times a day. I watch that page, but if the last edit that shows up on my watchlist has a summary about "reverted to good edit", I tend not to look so closely at it. Quite a few other people also watch that page for the same reason. But since your reversion masked the more blatant vandalism, I, and presumably every other watcher, didn't check too closely - so the article sat without roughly half its content for six days, and might have sat longer had I not looked at the article and remembered that it used to be quite a bit longer.

I'm worried about how many other articles could be are in a similar shape right now due to similar issues with that script incompletely reverting, but claiming it had completely reverted. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 21:09, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm. I didn't do too much with it I don't think. I'll look through my contribs. It's actually one from User:Lorian, but it was pretty hopeless so I got the God Mode one (I think?). Thanks again. -- Alex ( Talk) 21:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I can imagine it must be tedious, I appreciate you making the effort. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 21:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey Alex9891, thanks a lot for supporting me in my recent RfA. It succeeded, and I am very grateful to all of you. If you ever need help with anything, please don't hesitate to ask. Also, feel free point out any mistakes I make! Thanks again, — Khoi khoi 03:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

I just wanted to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed unanimously with a final tally of 38/0/0. I appreciate your trust, and will do my best to uphold it. Don't hesitate to let me know if you ever need anything. — TKD:: Talk 05:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

The link you changed to Hovercraftmodels.com on the Hovercraft page for the book 'Discover the Hovercraft' was correct in pointing to Amazon.com. I have reverted it to pointing to Amazon. Please don't change it again. I am the author of the book and I own Hovercraftmodels.com, the link is correct as is in pointing to Amazon.com who stock and sell my books. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.88.197.210 ( talk • contribs)

Thank you for experimenting with the page User:Mr. Lefty on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Steel 17:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Clearly Alex's edits where not vadalism and so I have striked the test-1, not funny, if not offensive to do that. thanks/ Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 17:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure Alex is able to detect jokes. -- Steel 17:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

I don' this one was very funny, and I'm pretty sure test warnings are only meant to be used in cases of vandalism, with no exceptions. jd || talk || 18:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, I don't think there were any hard feelings on anyone's part. -- Mr. Lefty ( talk) 18:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Do you know what the flag of Korea was before the country split up? Brownsc 18:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

No idea, sorry. -- Alex ( Talk) 18:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Try Flag of Korea, and if that doesn't tell you, try asking at the reference desk. jd || talk || 18:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't even remember what I removed. But I remember I did it for a reason. How is anything ever updated if things can't be removed? I don't even know how all of this works, but why give users the power to edit pages if it's considered vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.175.38.129 ( talk • contribs)

Why the strong oppose?-- Hamedog _Talk| ^@ 11:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

It says in the explanation - per your answer to question 10. -- Alex ( Talk) 11:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The question is not clear at all. It says "the AfD". "this AfD" refers to the said AfD in my understanding of English, which I guess is kinda high as I do top level english.-- Hamedog _Talk| ^@ 11:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Do you know what an AfD is? -- Alex ( Talk) 11:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion. I have changed my answer.-- Hamedog _Talk| ^@ 12:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of (97/4/4)! I've never been able to accept compliments gracefully, and the heavy support from this outstanding community left me at a complete loss for words -- so, a very belated thank you for all of your kind words. I have done and will continue to do the utmost to serve the community in this new capacity, wherever it may take me, and to set an example others might wish to follow in. With a little luck and a lot of advice, this may be enough. Maybe someday the enwiki admins of the future will look back and say, "Yeah, that guy was an admin." Hopefully then they don't start talking about the explosive ArbComm case I got tied into and oh what a drama that was, but we'll see, won't we? Surely some of you have seen me in action by now; with that in mind, I openly invite and welcome any feedback here or here -- help me become the best editor and sysop I can be. Again, thank you. – Luna Santin

Best luck with your current RfA! Luna Santin 12:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)