This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, -- El on ka 03:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Good to see you agian MONGO. Happy editing, Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 08:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the PBS tip. I'd like to watch it. Rlevse 18:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
MONGO, here, you accused me of mounting personal attacks against you. When I pressed you on what those personal attacks consisted of, you again accused me of attacking you. When I pressed you further, you responded:
So twice today you have accused me of attacking you and have refused to substantiate your charges. Until such time as you can substantiate your accusation, please stop accusing me of attacking you. — goethean ॐ 21:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
You forgot to sign a comment [2]. — AldeBaer 17:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
from making changes to my userpage describing myself without consensus. VanTucky (talk) 18:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
MONGO, I would like to see you run for admin. Of course, it will fail, but just for kicks, just to see how many people's heads will explode with their SUPERSONIC STRONG OPPOSEs. :) The Evil Spartan 19:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks guys...but I am on a lot of enemies lists. Right now, I am pretty angry about this website.-- MONGO 22:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
I saw your post about Smedley's 'friends list'. I'm in a similar situation, where despite my plain request (and my removal of his name from my talk page after a long lull in our interaction) TDC has refused to remove my name (and my name alone) for months on a 'friends list' of his own [3]. If you could help TDC to understand your viewpoint that excessive use of such lists can be perceived by some as stalking, and work to have him remove my name from his 'user' page, I'd be grateful... since there's no call for it whatsoever. If you'd like to see links about the context, I'm happy to provide them. Thanks, MONGO. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 00:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
You mean the links that are being edit warred over? I can, but first can you explain what the edit war was all about and what the point of the links are? MessedRocker ( talk) 01:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I understand that things are quite heated at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Crockspot, but calling someone a jerk can very easily be considered a personal attack. Reverting someone's removal of your comment (when they had very clearly identified it as a personal attack) under the guise of reverting vandalism is a bit shady. Try stepping away for a little while. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I tried to make this as clear as possible Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Lovelight. Let me know if it's confusing. -- Tbeatty 07:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I find your note attached to my vote on Crockspot's RFA that it is my "first edit in two weeks" patently offensive and belittling of my contributions, however frequently or infrequently I am able or willing to make them. I request that you remove or redact it. Awaiting your reply, ➪ HiDrNick! 05:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I reiterate my request. Your SPA-style tagging of my vote implies that you feel my opinion should not be counted. Is this true? How frequently and to what extent do you think that I should contribute for my opinions to be worthwhile? Is this codified in a policy somewhere that I missed? Is it rather that you don't care much for my type of contributions, or the articles that I choose to work on? Should I make an edit to my userpage every once in awhile, or perhaps fix a comma splice just so that people know I'm still participating?
Your comment, while obviously true on its face, was uncivil in its context. Please remove it. Sincerely, ➪ HiDrNick! 07:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Specifically this one. It's uncalled for. Please ... step back for a minute and tone it down - Alison ☺ 16:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
No, you're not, but take a deep breath, please, now. Go outside and take some photos and breathe the air. Please. Bishonen | talk 16:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC).
+. Proabivouac 01:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, -- El on ka 03:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Good to see you agian MONGO. Happy editing, Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 08:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the PBS tip. I'd like to watch it. Rlevse 18:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
MONGO, here, you accused me of mounting personal attacks against you. When I pressed you on what those personal attacks consisted of, you again accused me of attacking you. When I pressed you further, you responded:
So twice today you have accused me of attacking you and have refused to substantiate your charges. Until such time as you can substantiate your accusation, please stop accusing me of attacking you. — goethean ॐ 21:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
You forgot to sign a comment [2]. — AldeBaer 17:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
from making changes to my userpage describing myself without consensus. VanTucky (talk) 18:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
MONGO, I would like to see you run for admin. Of course, it will fail, but just for kicks, just to see how many people's heads will explode with their SUPERSONIC STRONG OPPOSEs. :) The Evil Spartan 19:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks guys...but I am on a lot of enemies lists. Right now, I am pretty angry about this website.-- MONGO 22:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
I saw your post about Smedley's 'friends list'. I'm in a similar situation, where despite my plain request (and my removal of his name from my talk page after a long lull in our interaction) TDC has refused to remove my name (and my name alone) for months on a 'friends list' of his own [3]. If you could help TDC to understand your viewpoint that excessive use of such lists can be perceived by some as stalking, and work to have him remove my name from his 'user' page, I'd be grateful... since there's no call for it whatsoever. If you'd like to see links about the context, I'm happy to provide them. Thanks, MONGO. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 00:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
You mean the links that are being edit warred over? I can, but first can you explain what the edit war was all about and what the point of the links are? MessedRocker ( talk) 01:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I understand that things are quite heated at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Crockspot, but calling someone a jerk can very easily be considered a personal attack. Reverting someone's removal of your comment (when they had very clearly identified it as a personal attack) under the guise of reverting vandalism is a bit shady. Try stepping away for a little while. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I tried to make this as clear as possible Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Lovelight. Let me know if it's confusing. -- Tbeatty 07:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I find your note attached to my vote on Crockspot's RFA that it is my "first edit in two weeks" patently offensive and belittling of my contributions, however frequently or infrequently I am able or willing to make them. I request that you remove or redact it. Awaiting your reply, ➪ HiDrNick! 05:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I reiterate my request. Your SPA-style tagging of my vote implies that you feel my opinion should not be counted. Is this true? How frequently and to what extent do you think that I should contribute for my opinions to be worthwhile? Is this codified in a policy somewhere that I missed? Is it rather that you don't care much for my type of contributions, or the articles that I choose to work on? Should I make an edit to my userpage every once in awhile, or perhaps fix a comma splice just so that people know I'm still participating?
Your comment, while obviously true on its face, was uncivil in its context. Please remove it. Sincerely, ➪ HiDrNick! 07:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Specifically this one. It's uncalled for. Please ... step back for a minute and tone it down - Alison ☺ 16:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
No, you're not, but take a deep breath, please, now. Go outside and take some photos and breathe the air. Please. Bishonen | talk 16:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC).
+. Proabivouac 01:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)