From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Aračinovo—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 22:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, adding on to what is stated above, you cannot make changes to article content without sources as you have done at Aračinovo and a few others. Thanks. -- Local hero talk 22:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Your edits continue to insert unsourced information. Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for more information. We don't use information that comes from editors' personal estimates. If you continue to edit this way, it is considered vandalism and you may be blocked from editing. -- Local hero talk 18:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Local hero talk 01:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC) reply


Hello sorry for not making it clear ! I'm from Aracinovo and I did a little research asking the people in Aracinovo , their answer was the same Some said it's over 20,000 Some said 30,000 So please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Losuro ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I'm from the village Losuro ( talk) 17:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

While I do not necessarily disbelieve you, we have no way of knowing if you are or not. As such, we cannot accept your word as the source of an edit. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources that can be verified say. I am declining your request, to be unblocked early, you will need to commit to using sources. 331dot ( talk) 19:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Aračinovo—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 22:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, adding on to what is stated above, you cannot make changes to article content without sources as you have done at Aračinovo and a few others. Thanks. -- Local hero talk 22:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Your edits continue to insert unsourced information. Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for more information. We don't use information that comes from editors' personal estimates. If you continue to edit this way, it is considered vandalism and you may be blocked from editing. -- Local hero talk 18:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Local hero talk 01:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC) reply


Hello sorry for not making it clear ! I'm from Aracinovo and I did a little research asking the people in Aracinovo , their answer was the same Some said it's over 20,000 Some said 30,000 So please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Losuro ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I'm from the village Losuro ( talk) 17:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

While I do not necessarily disbelieve you, we have no way of knowing if you are or not. As such, we cannot accept your word as the source of an edit. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources that can be verified say. I am declining your request, to be unblocked early, you will need to commit to using sources. 331dot ( talk) 19:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook