A couple of things, your username does not fall within the guidelines of the user name policy, and second and more important you mentioned this is a shared account. Any user account should represent an individual and not a group (and an individual should normally only have one user account; see next section). Sharing an account – or the password to an account – with others is not permitted, and evidence of doing so will result in the user being required to stop the practice and change their password, or in sanctions (up to and including the account being blocked), depending on circumstances. -- VViking _{Talk Edits} 13:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the message, I will make sure I'm the only person using this account and will edit the talk user page accordingly. However, how can I change my username?

Wikipedia:Changing username-- VViking _{Talk Edits} 13:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thank you, my user page has been updated accordingly and I have requested a name change at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Changing_username/Simple

Please see my reply to your question on my talk page. As I mentioned there, I would include more information about editing with a conflict of interest:

Hello, PerformanceMedia. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{ request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spencer ^{T• C} 14:06, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi PerformanceMedia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned ( talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Metamucil instead.

There has previously been an article at Metamucil. It has sometimes been stubbed down to a redirect to Psyllium. The article has then been restored, and is currently stubbed down to a redirect. This draft appears to be the same as the most recent version of the article before it was stubbed down. Therefore the version with the history should be the version that is kept if a separate article is in order.

The recent history is a slow-motion redirect war, which should not continue. Whether a separate article is in order for Metamucil should be decided by a rough consensus process. The method that is appropriate in view of the status quo appears to be a Redirect for Discussion of the current redirect, to request to replace it with the article. If approved, that will create a rough consensus that a separate article is in order and the article should not be stubbed down to a redirect.

An alternative would be to restore the article, in which case an Article for Deletion could be used to request redirection. However, that would be preceded by restoration of the article, which would be a resumption of the edit-war. Therefore RFD seems the least disruptive approach.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Metamucil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Metamucil, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, KrzysztofC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Metamucil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:41, 5 November 2020 (UTC) reply