From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2019

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Somalis in Norway, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Cordless Larry ( talk) 16:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Additionally, please take care not to delete the code of references, such as you did here. Cordless Larry ( talk) 16:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC) reply

thank you and i wont edit the article anymore i am going to seek consensus in the talk page of the article with other users about the sources and references and i have quoted directly from the reports which i will furthur explain in the talk page i appreciate the feedback and criticism, i will do this sensibly and in accordance with other users i apologize for any inconveniences-- Kndnm64 ( talk) 16:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC) reply

You've made a lot of very bad edits today, in poor English so it is almost impossible to understand what you meant to say. Please don't do this any more or you will get blocked. Deb ( talk) 20:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC) reply

thank you for the warning Deb-- Kndnm64 ( talk) 20:34, 22 November 2019 (UTC) reply

I got your message but I don't see any reason why the article needs a new lead paragraph. What is it that you think is wrong with the existing one? Deb ( talk) 11:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC) reply
I have added some more general content which I think should be in the lead, and moved some of the controversial content to appropriate sub-paragraphs. Deb ( talk) 13:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC) reply

thank you so much for your recent edit, i also believe the lead should include every aspect of the article-- Kndnm64 ( talk) 13:17, 25 November 2019 (UTC) reply

ArbCom block

ArbCom logo

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-en@wikimedia.org).


Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

Mkdw talk 00:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2019

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Somalis in Norway, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Cordless Larry ( talk) 16:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Additionally, please take care not to delete the code of references, such as you did here. Cordless Larry ( talk) 16:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC) reply

thank you and i wont edit the article anymore i am going to seek consensus in the talk page of the article with other users about the sources and references and i have quoted directly from the reports which i will furthur explain in the talk page i appreciate the feedback and criticism, i will do this sensibly and in accordance with other users i apologize for any inconveniences-- Kndnm64 ( talk) 16:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC) reply

You've made a lot of very bad edits today, in poor English so it is almost impossible to understand what you meant to say. Please don't do this any more or you will get blocked. Deb ( talk) 20:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC) reply

thank you for the warning Deb-- Kndnm64 ( talk) 20:34, 22 November 2019 (UTC) reply

I got your message but I don't see any reason why the article needs a new lead paragraph. What is it that you think is wrong with the existing one? Deb ( talk) 11:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC) reply
I have added some more general content which I think should be in the lead, and moved some of the controversial content to appropriate sub-paragraphs. Deb ( talk) 13:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC) reply

thank you so much for your recent edit, i also believe the lead should include every aspect of the article-- Kndnm64 ( talk) 13:17, 25 November 2019 (UTC) reply

ArbCom block

ArbCom logo

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-en@wikimedia.org).


Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

Mkdw talk 00:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook