This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hello! Wishing you a Happy Earth day on the behalf of WikiProject Environment and WikiProject Ecology.
What is this?
What you can do!!
Newly nominated content
Similar events
|
|
|
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plastic Pollution Coalition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastic Pollution Coalition until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies ( talk) 14:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Casini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Casini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti ( talk) 22:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Ruud Jacobs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
John B123 (
talk) 21:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
DGG (
talk ) 23:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Climate and energy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate and energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Kku!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk) 22:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
|
Hi a few weeks ago you created Information creation as a disambiguation page. I’m a bit puzzled by it. First, we don’t have disambiguation pages with only two elements, and second it’s not clear to me why “information creation” could mean “information retrieval”. So I’m not really seeing the purpose of the page at all. Am I missing something? Thanks Mccapra ( talk) 04:06, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Kku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 00:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Sound Attenuators. This is known as a " cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Polyamorph ( talk) 16:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi! In the past, you commented on the Communication theory page, and now I've written a replacement article (discussion at Talk:communication_theory#Proposed_replacement). I'm eager for feedback on the overhaul -- I put the new article in my sandbox. Kaylea Champion ( talk) 22:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply; I like the idea of trying to "rehome" what's in the current article into either a new page or finding it a home in the info theory page. I'll give it a try; info theory isn't a specialty of mine but I've been meaning to learn it....! Kaylea Champion ( talk) 16:13, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Kku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruud Jacobs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Kku!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk) 09:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello, Kku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 21:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 ( talk) 15:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— stv.tv—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. GMc (talk?) 13:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Plant resources, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk) 13:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
The article Orlandus Wilson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Stub on non-notable person, and no reason or ability to expand. He's a member of the Golden Gate Quartet, which has a long article. He's not independently notable. The scant info in this article -- birth year, vocal range -- is in that article already, so no merge. And there's nothing about him in that article to bring over here and make a proper article. Anything new about him that comes to light can go into that article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Herostratus (
talk) 17:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there,
Hopefully you are doing well!
A long time ago, in the article "Analytics," you wrote "Thus, analytics is not so much concerned with individual analyses or analysis steps, but with the entire methodology. There is a pronounced tendency to use the term analytics in business settings (e.g. text analytics vs. the more generic text mining), presumably to lay emphasis on the interdisciplinary and integrative aspect.": https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Analytics&oldid=500770361
Would you happen to have source for this info? Tommyren ( talk) 18:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you were linking Fuel efficiency from many aircraft articles. Note there is a more specific article Fuel economy in aircraft if you want to link to instead. Bye!-- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 15:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC) thanks for pinging me if you reply as i don't follow your talk page
Hello, Kku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Please be aware we normally use "anti-abortion" rather than "pro-life", especially in links, as pro-life redirects to Anti-abortion movements. See the FAQ on the talk page there. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:16, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on NAPAW requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram ( talk) 08:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Kku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Plant resources, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 14:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Hola Kku, I have seen that you are maybe doing automated edits in the Spanish Wikipedia where you create internal links in pages related to the campain #WikiForHumanRights. How do you do it? Recently an article was created: Gleba (micología) and there are many articles about funga where it would be great that the word "gleba" in them is linked to this new article. Can you do it? Cheers, Cbrescia ( talk) 17:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Kku
Thank you for creating ChemIDplus.
User:Dr vulpes, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hey Kku your article is really important, I have friends who have used ChemIDplus and I didn't even know it wasn't a page here on Wikipedia. I merged your work over to the United States National Library of Medicine page as I felt it would mesh better with the other services NLM offers and have more exposure. You're doing great work and I hope to see more of your contributions to Wikipedia. If you need anything help or have any questions please feel free to message me on my talk page. Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 04:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dr vulpes}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Violence in movies and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 3#Violence in movies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 11:38, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
The article William Schiøpffe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't pas WP:GNG and only had one reference.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Dr vulpes (
💬 •
📝) 05:06, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Schiøpffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 21:37, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kku,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 18:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 18:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NantWorks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rhadow ( talk) 01:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Kennst Du vielleicht jemanden, der in dieses Thema etwas Licht bringen könnte? /info/en/?search=Talk:2023_Black_Sea_drone_incident#Airspace Die Frage ist, wo und wann hat Russland seine Erklärung zum "temporary airspace regime" über der Krim abgegeben und wie sieht dieses Gebiet aus? Entweder weiß jemand, wie man gezielt nach diesen Daten sucht, oder jemand kann die verfügbaren Datenhaufen mit einem Script so durchsuchen, dass man nicht Tage braucht, um den richtigen Datensatz zu finden. Manorainjan 16:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Kku,
Thank you for your comments on my Talk Page. You are most definitely correct - leaf litter is important to most rainforests and to a few species of Sarcochilus. However, it is most unlikely that a reader of either article would stop to read the article about leaf litter. Most (all?) readers know what leaf litter is. The purpose of a link is to aid understanding, not because the linked word or phrase is important.
The Manual of Style/Linking is worth a read, especially the sections on underlinking, overlinking and [Note 1].
I'm happy to continue this discussion here, or on my Talk Page. Gderrin ( talk) 21:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi! As part of my university curriculum, I've contributed to the banking lobby wiki article which I believe you've contributed to before. I'm contacting past editors seeking feedback on my contributions, so if you could take a look at it, I would appreciate it. I am new to Wikipedia, so I apologize for any mistakes in the article. No problem if you cannot take a look, thank you for your previous contributions to the article! Peanutbutterisbad ( talk) 20:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Any given link should probably only be included once per article, according to MOS:REPEATLINK. In cases like https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Frown&diff=prev&oldid=1155306316 you're adding the same link twice in the same paragraph. Belbury ( talk) 15:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Green sport event, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 12:37, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Plastic card has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 12 § Plastic card until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew ( talk) 21:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Touchpoint, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 09:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#Duplicate_and_repeat_links each article linked to is only supposed to be linked once. You are spamming links into articles where links to the trilobite article are already present, which is disruptive. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 13:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
I noticed you have been linking energy efficiency in a lot of articles. This links to a disambiguation page. Can you please fix all these links with the proper link or revert the edits? In most cases the link should be to efficient energy use Ita140188 ( talk) 12:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I've noticed you've been adding a lot of links to "scientific evidence". Don't you think that goes against
MOS:OVERLINK? Specifically Everyday words understood by most readers [should not be linked]
. Everyone knows what scientific evidence is. —
Panamitsu
(talk) 07:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link). This said, if you still feel unhappy with those links, please prove to me that the average WP reader will actually understand the meaning of "scientific evidence" on the spot, whereever mentioned. --
Kku (
talk) 08:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)The redirect Native forest has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 17 § Native forest until a consensus is reached. Hildeoc ( talk) 10:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add links to titles of references or publications [1]. Please do not add links to text in disambiguation pages or other lists that are designed to have one bluelink per entry [2]. In general, please check MANUALLY whether each link you add fulfils a constructive purpose, rather than just adding links by text matching. — David Eppstein ( talk) 18:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I've noticed you're very active adding links. Have you tried the oabot tool? I'd love to hear about your experience doing some edits with it. There are new suggested edits in the queue. Nemo 21:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
A few of the pages with links to national conservative seem like they're more about conservatives with a national audience rather than the National Conservatism movement. See Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham and Conservative talk radio. Faolin42 ( talk) 03:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I am not too experienced in this area of Wikipedia, but it appears that you may be running a bot on this account because I've been seeing edit summaries like "kku bot link XXX" which imply bot editing. If you want to run a bot, please file a BRFA afte reading the bot policy and run those edits from an authorized bot alt account if your BRFA is accepted instead of running it on your main account. #prodraxis connect 18:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
I see lots of bot activity from you - I recommend reading WP:OVERLINK; edits like this one are not really useful. Thanks, Mr.choppers | ✎ 18:50, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kku, please make sure not to insert links when the degradation of materials/chemicals in the environment is referred to (e.g. Special:Diff/1141788662, Special:Diff/1189604224). Leyo 01:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions in the area of wikilinks, which is part of the goal of improving the encyclopedia by linking Wikipedia articles together. I noticed this edit of yours, adding brackets to turn junk science into a wikilink at Rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy. This was a problematic addition, because the link was inside a quotation. After crediting your good-faith edit, I reverted with this edit summary:
There are other reasons for not inserting a link, some of which have to do with polysemy and other reasons. I see you like to do runs of missing link insertions in articles, such as these 65 contributions linking cognitive dissonance, these 33 linking photoluminescence, and these 50 for junk science. I think that 99% of the time your added links are an improvement to the article in question; but just slow down a wee bit to make sure that you're not hitting one of those 1% cases where it isn't. Maybe have another look at WP:MOSLINK#Principles, and 'Note 2' at MOS:NOLINKQUOTE. Thanks again for your contributions to the encyclopedia! Mathglot ( talk) 22:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
In the three interactions you have had on my Talk page, is intensely personal. Extracts from those three comments:
You would be better off trying to WP:AVOIDYOU. As well as being antagonistic, an argument which boils down to "if you do not agree with me you are flawed and should leave Wikipedia" is unconvincing and is (ironically) an appeal to your own "infallibility". Bon courage ( talk) 08:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Kku!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kku, you may be interested in a discussion at Talk:Cross-country skiing#Travel vs transport. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 18:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Ecological rehabilitation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 26 § Ecological rehabilitation until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:Family businesses of Germany has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 06:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Kku. Your editing pattern indicates that you are in violation of the
bot policy. Specifically, you have been adding large numbers of links to articles, and
previously disclosed that this was being done only mostly in supervised, i.e. interactive mode. But not always.
You have been marking these edits as
minor, which should be done only for edits that could never be the subject of a dispute
. However, editors have repeatedly raised concerns that many of these edits are
overlinks (see
here,
here, and
here). I noticed your recent run adding links to
financial risk e.g.
here, which is questionable given that "financial risk" is both a concept too broad to be all that useful in most contexts (where a specific type of financial risk is normally being alluded to) and one that's pretty easily understood without the link. Additionally, concerns about linking within quotes were raised
here. Granted, given your large link-adding editing volume, these concerns may represent only a small fraction of the edits. Still, they indicate that these edits not just could be but in some portion of cases actively are controversial.
Please take the following steps:
Adding links can be a positive contribution to the encyclopedia, and many of the links you add are useful. But adding unwarranted links at the scale you operate can also do significant damage, which is why the bot policy requirements are in place. And inappropriate bot-like editing has and can lead to sanctions including blocks.
Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Sdkb talk 18:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. There's no need to go from article to article linking "drainage basin". I can see I'm not the first to mention your overlinking. Magnolia677 ( talk) 18:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
[[Pileus (mycology)]]
is a problem but the real issue is that the original is explaining that "pileus" is the technical term for the
Cap. Please stop looking for terms that might be changed in mass edits. That kind of editing requires bot approval as indicated above.
Johnuniq (
talk) 23:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Burnin Red Ivanhoe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable band which fails WP:NBAND. Has lacked any references for months now and doesn't look like it would survive an AFD.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Vladimir Kunin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Entirely unsourced for nearly 8 years. Unclear claim to notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
0634352123 154.115.223.80 ( talk) 01:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hello! Wishing you a Happy Earth day on the behalf of WikiProject Environment and WikiProject Ecology.
What is this?
What you can do!!
Newly nominated content
Similar events
|
|
|
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plastic Pollution Coalition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastic Pollution Coalition until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies ( talk) 14:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Casini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Casini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti ( talk) 22:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Ruud Jacobs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
John B123 (
talk) 21:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
DGG (
talk ) 23:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Climate and energy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate and energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Kku!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk) 22:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
|
Hi a few weeks ago you created Information creation as a disambiguation page. I’m a bit puzzled by it. First, we don’t have disambiguation pages with only two elements, and second it’s not clear to me why “information creation” could mean “information retrieval”. So I’m not really seeing the purpose of the page at all. Am I missing something? Thanks Mccapra ( talk) 04:06, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Kku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 00:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Sound Attenuators. This is known as a " cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Polyamorph ( talk) 16:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi! In the past, you commented on the Communication theory page, and now I've written a replacement article (discussion at Talk:communication_theory#Proposed_replacement). I'm eager for feedback on the overhaul -- I put the new article in my sandbox. Kaylea Champion ( talk) 22:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply; I like the idea of trying to "rehome" what's in the current article into either a new page or finding it a home in the info theory page. I'll give it a try; info theory isn't a specialty of mine but I've been meaning to learn it....! Kaylea Champion ( talk) 16:13, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Kku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruud Jacobs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Kku!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk) 09:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello, Kku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 21:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 ( talk) 15:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— stv.tv—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. GMc (talk?) 13:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Plant resources, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk) 13:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
The article Orlandus Wilson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Stub on non-notable person, and no reason or ability to expand. He's a member of the Golden Gate Quartet, which has a long article. He's not independently notable. The scant info in this article -- birth year, vocal range -- is in that article already, so no merge. And there's nothing about him in that article to bring over here and make a proper article. Anything new about him that comes to light can go into that article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Herostratus (
talk) 17:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there,
Hopefully you are doing well!
A long time ago, in the article "Analytics," you wrote "Thus, analytics is not so much concerned with individual analyses or analysis steps, but with the entire methodology. There is a pronounced tendency to use the term analytics in business settings (e.g. text analytics vs. the more generic text mining), presumably to lay emphasis on the interdisciplinary and integrative aspect.": https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Analytics&oldid=500770361
Would you happen to have source for this info? Tommyren ( talk) 18:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you were linking Fuel efficiency from many aircraft articles. Note there is a more specific article Fuel economy in aircraft if you want to link to instead. Bye!-- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 15:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC) thanks for pinging me if you reply as i don't follow your talk page
Hello, Kku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Please be aware we normally use "anti-abortion" rather than "pro-life", especially in links, as pro-life redirects to Anti-abortion movements. See the FAQ on the talk page there. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:16, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on NAPAW requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram ( talk) 08:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Kku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Plant resources, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 14:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Hola Kku, I have seen that you are maybe doing automated edits in the Spanish Wikipedia where you create internal links in pages related to the campain #WikiForHumanRights. How do you do it? Recently an article was created: Gleba (micología) and there are many articles about funga where it would be great that the word "gleba" in them is linked to this new article. Can you do it? Cheers, Cbrescia ( talk) 17:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Kku
Thank you for creating ChemIDplus.
User:Dr vulpes, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hey Kku your article is really important, I have friends who have used ChemIDplus and I didn't even know it wasn't a page here on Wikipedia. I merged your work over to the United States National Library of Medicine page as I felt it would mesh better with the other services NLM offers and have more exposure. You're doing great work and I hope to see more of your contributions to Wikipedia. If you need anything help or have any questions please feel free to message me on my talk page. Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 04:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dr vulpes}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Violence in movies and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 3#Violence in movies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 11:38, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
The article William Schiøpffe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't pas WP:GNG and only had one reference.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Dr vulpes (
💬 •
📝) 05:06, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Schiøpffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 21:37, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kku,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 18:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 18:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NantWorks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rhadow ( talk) 01:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Kennst Du vielleicht jemanden, der in dieses Thema etwas Licht bringen könnte? /info/en/?search=Talk:2023_Black_Sea_drone_incident#Airspace Die Frage ist, wo und wann hat Russland seine Erklärung zum "temporary airspace regime" über der Krim abgegeben und wie sieht dieses Gebiet aus? Entweder weiß jemand, wie man gezielt nach diesen Daten sucht, oder jemand kann die verfügbaren Datenhaufen mit einem Script so durchsuchen, dass man nicht Tage braucht, um den richtigen Datensatz zu finden. Manorainjan 16:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Kku,
Thank you for your comments on my Talk Page. You are most definitely correct - leaf litter is important to most rainforests and to a few species of Sarcochilus. However, it is most unlikely that a reader of either article would stop to read the article about leaf litter. Most (all?) readers know what leaf litter is. The purpose of a link is to aid understanding, not because the linked word or phrase is important.
The Manual of Style/Linking is worth a read, especially the sections on underlinking, overlinking and [Note 1].
I'm happy to continue this discussion here, or on my Talk Page. Gderrin ( talk) 21:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi! As part of my university curriculum, I've contributed to the banking lobby wiki article which I believe you've contributed to before. I'm contacting past editors seeking feedback on my contributions, so if you could take a look at it, I would appreciate it. I am new to Wikipedia, so I apologize for any mistakes in the article. No problem if you cannot take a look, thank you for your previous contributions to the article! Peanutbutterisbad ( talk) 20:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Any given link should probably only be included once per article, according to MOS:REPEATLINK. In cases like https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Frown&diff=prev&oldid=1155306316 you're adding the same link twice in the same paragraph. Belbury ( talk) 15:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Green sport event, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 12:37, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Plastic card has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 12 § Plastic card until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew ( talk) 21:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Touchpoint, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 09:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#Duplicate_and_repeat_links each article linked to is only supposed to be linked once. You are spamming links into articles where links to the trilobite article are already present, which is disruptive. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 13:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
I noticed you have been linking energy efficiency in a lot of articles. This links to a disambiguation page. Can you please fix all these links with the proper link or revert the edits? In most cases the link should be to efficient energy use Ita140188 ( talk) 12:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I've noticed you've been adding a lot of links to "scientific evidence". Don't you think that goes against
MOS:OVERLINK? Specifically Everyday words understood by most readers [should not be linked]
. Everyone knows what scientific evidence is. —
Panamitsu
(talk) 07:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link). This said, if you still feel unhappy with those links, please prove to me that the average WP reader will actually understand the meaning of "scientific evidence" on the spot, whereever mentioned. --
Kku (
talk) 08:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)The redirect Native forest has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 17 § Native forest until a consensus is reached. Hildeoc ( talk) 10:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add links to titles of references or publications [1]. Please do not add links to text in disambiguation pages or other lists that are designed to have one bluelink per entry [2]. In general, please check MANUALLY whether each link you add fulfils a constructive purpose, rather than just adding links by text matching. — David Eppstein ( talk) 18:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I've noticed you're very active adding links. Have you tried the oabot tool? I'd love to hear about your experience doing some edits with it. There are new suggested edits in the queue. Nemo 21:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
A few of the pages with links to national conservative seem like they're more about conservatives with a national audience rather than the National Conservatism movement. See Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham and Conservative talk radio. Faolin42 ( talk) 03:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I am not too experienced in this area of Wikipedia, but it appears that you may be running a bot on this account because I've been seeing edit summaries like "kku bot link XXX" which imply bot editing. If you want to run a bot, please file a BRFA afte reading the bot policy and run those edits from an authorized bot alt account if your BRFA is accepted instead of running it on your main account. #prodraxis connect 18:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
I see lots of bot activity from you - I recommend reading WP:OVERLINK; edits like this one are not really useful. Thanks, Mr.choppers | ✎ 18:50, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kku, please make sure not to insert links when the degradation of materials/chemicals in the environment is referred to (e.g. Special:Diff/1141788662, Special:Diff/1189604224). Leyo 01:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions in the area of wikilinks, which is part of the goal of improving the encyclopedia by linking Wikipedia articles together. I noticed this edit of yours, adding brackets to turn junk science into a wikilink at Rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy. This was a problematic addition, because the link was inside a quotation. After crediting your good-faith edit, I reverted with this edit summary:
There are other reasons for not inserting a link, some of which have to do with polysemy and other reasons. I see you like to do runs of missing link insertions in articles, such as these 65 contributions linking cognitive dissonance, these 33 linking photoluminescence, and these 50 for junk science. I think that 99% of the time your added links are an improvement to the article in question; but just slow down a wee bit to make sure that you're not hitting one of those 1% cases where it isn't. Maybe have another look at WP:MOSLINK#Principles, and 'Note 2' at MOS:NOLINKQUOTE. Thanks again for your contributions to the encyclopedia! Mathglot ( talk) 22:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
In the three interactions you have had on my Talk page, is intensely personal. Extracts from those three comments:
You would be better off trying to WP:AVOIDYOU. As well as being antagonistic, an argument which boils down to "if you do not agree with me you are flawed and should leave Wikipedia" is unconvincing and is (ironically) an appeal to your own "infallibility". Bon courage ( talk) 08:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Kku!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kku, you may be interested in a discussion at Talk:Cross-country skiing#Travel vs transport. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 18:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Ecological rehabilitation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 26 § Ecological rehabilitation until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:Family businesses of Germany has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 06:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Kku. Your editing pattern indicates that you are in violation of the
bot policy. Specifically, you have been adding large numbers of links to articles, and
previously disclosed that this was being done only mostly in supervised, i.e. interactive mode. But not always.
You have been marking these edits as
minor, which should be done only for edits that could never be the subject of a dispute
. However, editors have repeatedly raised concerns that many of these edits are
overlinks (see
here,
here, and
here). I noticed your recent run adding links to
financial risk e.g.
here, which is questionable given that "financial risk" is both a concept too broad to be all that useful in most contexts (where a specific type of financial risk is normally being alluded to) and one that's pretty easily understood without the link. Additionally, concerns about linking within quotes were raised
here. Granted, given your large link-adding editing volume, these concerns may represent only a small fraction of the edits. Still, they indicate that these edits not just could be but in some portion of cases actively are controversial.
Please take the following steps:
Adding links can be a positive contribution to the encyclopedia, and many of the links you add are useful. But adding unwarranted links at the scale you operate can also do significant damage, which is why the bot policy requirements are in place. And inappropriate bot-like editing has and can lead to sanctions including blocks.
Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Sdkb talk 18:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. There's no need to go from article to article linking "drainage basin". I can see I'm not the first to mention your overlinking. Magnolia677 ( talk) 18:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
[[Pileus (mycology)]]
is a problem but the real issue is that the original is explaining that "pileus" is the technical term for the
Cap. Please stop looking for terms that might be changed in mass edits. That kind of editing requires bot approval as indicated above.
Johnuniq (
talk) 23:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Burnin Red Ivanhoe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable band which fails WP:NBAND. Has lacked any references for months now and doesn't look like it would survive an AFD.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Vladimir Kunin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Entirely unsourced for nearly 8 years. Unclear claim to notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
0634352123 154.115.223.80 ( talk) 01:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)