Welcome to Wikipedia, Karlpoppery! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Gilliam and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! – Gilliam ( talk) 06:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for all the work you've done to revive WikiProject Skepticism.
I notice that it's relatively rare for you to leave meaningful edit summaries for your edits. I implore you to try to improve on this front. Thanks. — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 07:50, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I started by doing it but gave up at some point. I'll work on that next time. Karlpoppery ( talk) 14:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
I've noticed that we've both been tagging for CSD quite a few pages at the same time. For this I'd like to thank you for your help with dealing with the oddly large amounts of Spam that some people are trying to get onto the Wiki. MuganiHakHakHak ( talk) 06:39, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you too, MuganiHakHakHak! I'm going for tonight, I leave the rest of them to you. KarlPoppery ( talk) 06:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Bianca Kmiec
Hello Karlpoppery. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bianca Kmiec, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Subject might be important/significant (see also Google News/Books hits for this subject) / use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead to allow other editors to participate in this decision. Thank you. So Why 07:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Karlpoppery. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | Talk 13:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{ re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 04:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Regarding one or more of your recent contributions to Triple parentheses have been undone because they did not appear constructive.
What I added to the top of the page was: Note: Article does not comply with Wikipedia rules: /info/en/?search=Help:Introduction_to_referencing_with_Wiki_Markup/1 Sources provided are not a reliable source.
The article has multiple mic.com sources which are not considered reliable. The entire article is baseless opinions and conjecture.
The only information in the article that's correct is the removal of the 'coincidence detector' app from the google store, backed up by multiple news articles.
My only other choice is to remove all of the un-sourced information, which a mod would've considered defacing. That's why I only left a note at the top for someone to handle it appropriately.
Can you explain how the disclaimer at the top that I added is not considered constructive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.7.34 ( talk) 05:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- ( talk page stalker) Who says Mic (media company) fails our criteria? In any case wee don't do disclaimers, the article talk page is the appropriate place. Doug Weller talk 05:40, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- I reverted your edit because you defaced the page with parentheses. If you have a problem with the article, I suggest you address it on the article talk page. KarlPoppery ( talk) 05:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
50.130.251.28. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Neanderthal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
- Note that I actually gave a valid reason for my edits, namely the inclusion of
duplicate arguments in the template call. Hence, your revert must be vandalism.
50.130.251.28 (
talk) 22:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- @ 50.130.251.28: I'm very sorry, I didn't mean to revert that at all! I must have pressed the wrong button. KarlPoppery ( talk) 22:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
| For reviewing and updating the categories and watchlist for many articles in relation to WikiProject Skepticism. — Paleo Neonate — 03:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC) |
@ PaleoNeonate: Hey, thanks a lot! Hopefully that work will pay off in the long term. KarlPoppery ( talk) 03:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
I saw your note. This is most unfortunate, it was great to meet you and to occasionally work with you. Farewell, — Paleo Neonate - 04:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Karlpoppery. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg)
|
Happy New Year! Best wishes for 2018, — Paleo Neonate – 23:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
@ PaleoNeonate: Thanks a lot! :) Happy New Year!
Hello, Karlpoppery. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Podcasts with educational YouTubers has been nominated for deletion
Category:Podcasts with educational YouTubers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TipsyElephant ( talk) 01:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Karlpoppery! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Gilliam and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! – Gilliam ( talk) 06:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for all the work you've done to revive WikiProject Skepticism.
I notice that it's relatively rare for you to leave meaningful edit summaries for your edits. I implore you to try to improve on this front. Thanks. — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 07:50, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I started by doing it but gave up at some point. I'll work on that next time. Karlpoppery ( talk) 14:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
I've noticed that we've both been tagging for CSD quite a few pages at the same time. For this I'd like to thank you for your help with dealing with the oddly large amounts of Spam that some people are trying to get onto the Wiki. MuganiHakHakHak ( talk) 06:39, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you too, MuganiHakHakHak! I'm going for tonight, I leave the rest of them to you. KarlPoppery ( talk) 06:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Bianca Kmiec
Hello Karlpoppery. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bianca Kmiec, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Subject might be important/significant (see also Google News/Books hits for this subject) / use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead to allow other editors to participate in this decision. Thank you. So Why 07:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Karlpoppery. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | Talk 13:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{ re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 04:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Regarding one or more of your recent contributions to Triple parentheses have been undone because they did not appear constructive.
What I added to the top of the page was: Note: Article does not comply with Wikipedia rules: /info/en/?search=Help:Introduction_to_referencing_with_Wiki_Markup/1 Sources provided are not a reliable source.
The article has multiple mic.com sources which are not considered reliable. The entire article is baseless opinions and conjecture.
The only information in the article that's correct is the removal of the 'coincidence detector' app from the google store, backed up by multiple news articles.
My only other choice is to remove all of the un-sourced information, which a mod would've considered defacing. That's why I only left a note at the top for someone to handle it appropriately.
Can you explain how the disclaimer at the top that I added is not considered constructive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.7.34 ( talk) 05:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- ( talk page stalker) Who says Mic (media company) fails our criteria? In any case wee don't do disclaimers, the article talk page is the appropriate place. Doug Weller talk 05:40, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- I reverted your edit because you defaced the page with parentheses. If you have a problem with the article, I suggest you address it on the article talk page. KarlPoppery ( talk) 05:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
50.130.251.28. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Neanderthal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
- Note that I actually gave a valid reason for my edits, namely the inclusion of
duplicate arguments in the template call. Hence, your revert must be vandalism.
50.130.251.28 (
talk) 22:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- @ 50.130.251.28: I'm very sorry, I didn't mean to revert that at all! I must have pressed the wrong button. KarlPoppery ( talk) 22:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
|
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
| For reviewing and updating the categories and watchlist for many articles in relation to WikiProject Skepticism. — Paleo Neonate — 03:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC) |
@ PaleoNeonate: Hey, thanks a lot! Hopefully that work will pay off in the long term. KarlPoppery ( talk) 03:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
I saw your note. This is most unfortunate, it was great to meet you and to occasionally work with you. Farewell, — Paleo Neonate - 04:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Karlpoppery. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Happy New Year! Best wishes for 2018, — Paleo Neonate – 23:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
@ PaleoNeonate: Thanks a lot! :) Happy New Year!
Hello, Karlpoppery. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Podcasts with educational YouTubers has been nominated for deletion
Category:Podcasts with educational YouTubers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TipsyElephant ( talk) 01:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)