Hello, I'm
Adam9007. I noticed that in
this edit to
Eudlo, Queensland, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Adam9007 (
talk) 00:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Eudlo, Queensland, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Tillerh11 (
talk) 03:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
This was unsourced. See WP:Verifiability. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 05:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in
Chocolate. There is a
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please don't create empty sections without doing the work to construct content supported by reliable sources,
WP:RS.
Zefr (
talk) 12:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald Duck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torrance ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Donald Duck you included material from the Disney Wiki, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license.. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 12:06, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to
French fries has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Material you added on 29 April 2019 that was taken from
https://www.wonderopolis.org/wonder/belgian-fries has been deleted.
IamNotU (
talk) 00:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at
Drug, you may be
blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop creating empty "History" sections in articles.
IamNotU (
talk) 18:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the
Manual of Style, as you did at
Religion. Stop creating hundreds of empty "History" sections containing only an "expand section" template. It is not helpful. See
MOS:BODY.
IamNotU (
talk) 02:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
French fries, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This edit on 7 May:
[1] did not cite any sources.
IamNotU (
talk) 02:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Countless empty "History" sections, plus copyright violations, etc..
IamNotU (
talk) 22:49, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did on
Phage therapy. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
IamNotU (
talk) 01:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Laterthanyouthink (
talk) 05:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Flavignerot.
This edit, where you wrote: "On 17 March 1979, the
Carmelites of Dijon transferred the monastery to a hill, just 13 kilometres southeast of Flavignerot
" was unsourced. It also gave incorrect information about the location of the monastery. Furthermore, it made no sense, since there was no prior mention of a monastery in the article.
IamNotU (
talk) 14:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I understand that you're trying to improve Wikipedia. But there are very serious problems with some of the things you are doing. One of those is not communicating! I'm asking you to understand that if you don't stop what you have been doing - adding unsourced material, copyright violations, not providing edit summaries, not answering questions, creating unnecessary "History" sections, etc. - there will be no choice but to block you and stop you from editing Wikipedia, indefinitely. That means you will not be able to edit Wikipedia anymore. If you need help learning how to provide citations, how to write things in your own words, use edit summaries, or other questions, just ask! If your English is not very good, it's ok, you still should try to communicate. Please tell me if you understand what I said. Thanks... -- IamNotU ( talk) 19:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- So I'll take today's addition of two large, blatant copyright violations as a "no" then. -- IamNotU ( talk) 12:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to
Espionage has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
IamNotU (
talk) 12:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to
Mentha has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
IamNotU (
talk) 12:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
You've been blocked indefinitely for repeated block evasion and sock puppetry. See above for how to appeal. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 04:37, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Adam9007. I noticed that in
this edit to
Eudlo, Queensland, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Adam9007 (
talk) 00:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Eudlo, Queensland, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Tillerh11 (
talk) 03:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
This was unsourced. See WP:Verifiability. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 05:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in
Chocolate. There is a
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please don't create empty sections without doing the work to construct content supported by reliable sources,
WP:RS.
Zefr (
talk) 12:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald Duck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torrance ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Donald Duck you included material from the Disney Wiki, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license.. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 12:06, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to
French fries has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Material you added on 29 April 2019 that was taken from
https://www.wonderopolis.org/wonder/belgian-fries has been deleted.
IamNotU (
talk) 00:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at
Drug, you may be
blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop creating empty "History" sections in articles.
IamNotU (
talk) 18:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the
Manual of Style, as you did at
Religion. Stop creating hundreds of empty "History" sections containing only an "expand section" template. It is not helpful. See
MOS:BODY.
IamNotU (
talk) 02:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
French fries, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This edit on 7 May:
[1] did not cite any sources.
IamNotU (
talk) 02:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Countless empty "History" sections, plus copyright violations, etc..
IamNotU (
talk) 22:49, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did on
Phage therapy. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
IamNotU (
talk) 01:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Laterthanyouthink (
talk) 05:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Flavignerot.
This edit, where you wrote: "On 17 March 1979, the
Carmelites of Dijon transferred the monastery to a hill, just 13 kilometres southeast of Flavignerot
" was unsourced. It also gave incorrect information about the location of the monastery. Furthermore, it made no sense, since there was no prior mention of a monastery in the article.
IamNotU (
talk) 14:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I understand that you're trying to improve Wikipedia. But there are very serious problems with some of the things you are doing. One of those is not communicating! I'm asking you to understand that if you don't stop what you have been doing - adding unsourced material, copyright violations, not providing edit summaries, not answering questions, creating unnecessary "History" sections, etc. - there will be no choice but to block you and stop you from editing Wikipedia, indefinitely. That means you will not be able to edit Wikipedia anymore. If you need help learning how to provide citations, how to write things in your own words, use edit summaries, or other questions, just ask! If your English is not very good, it's ok, you still should try to communicate. Please tell me if you understand what I said. Thanks... -- IamNotU ( talk) 19:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- So I'll take today's addition of two large, blatant copyright violations as a "no" then. -- IamNotU ( talk) 12:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to
Espionage has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
IamNotU (
talk) 12:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to
Mentha has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
IamNotU (
talk) 12:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
You've been blocked indefinitely for repeated block evasion and sock puppetry. See above for how to appeal. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 04:37, 25 May 2019 (UTC)