An article you recently created, Amar (2017 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 ( talk) 06:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDB is not a reliable source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amar (2017 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amar (2017 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic ( talk) 16:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmypapas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic ( talk) 16:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amar (2017 film). Thanks! KylieTastic ( talk) 16:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello Jimmypapas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lebanese Transparency Association for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kges1901 ( talk) 18:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC) reply

The content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa ( talk) 00:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on WinZip Computing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 19:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC) reply

The article WinZip Computing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks reliable, independent secondary sources necessary to establish notability. Sources offered are either primary or routine financial coverage. Their WinZip product is definitely notable; this limited bit of information about the company could certainly go there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Msnicki ( talk) 17:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Inexpiable was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence of notability and insufficient references provided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New England Commission of Higher Education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:New England Commission of Higher Education, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Inexpiable ( talk) 19:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Lynn (preacher) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lynn (preacher) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ThurstonMitchell ( talk) 19:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, BankMed, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GSS  ^💬 05:38, 17 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong ( talk) 10:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noidaabc was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There's already an existing draft at Draft:BankMed. Also please try adding more reliable sources WP:RS to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bankmed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bankmed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lord Grandwell ( talk) 23:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jimmypapas/Gus Farah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jimmypapas/Gus Farah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash ( talk) 17:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pol Monen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pol Monen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SpareSeiko ( talk) 18:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Mona Fayad, from its old location at User:Jimmypapas/Mona fayad. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. SK2242 ( talk) 09:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SK2242 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Every sentence needs to cite a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mona Fayad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mona Fayad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 ( talk) 09:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ousama Saad, from its old location at User:Jimmypapas/Ousama Saad. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055 ^{talk - contribs} 19:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ziad Njeim, from its old location at User:Jimmypapas/Ziad Njeim. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055 ^{talk - contribs} 19:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Your edit to Intercontinental Bank of Lebanon (IBL) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Hut 8.5 20:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Martin Urbanec was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ousama Saad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ousama Saad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Martin Urbanec ( talk) 23:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Thanks for contributing to the article Joud el Bayeh. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Again, it is disruptive to add references that you know to be false. You re-added the reference to the mirror that was clearly pointed out to you above. Do not do so again. Kuru (talk) 13:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ziad Doueiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Diego University. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Ibrahim Kanaan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961 Talk 19:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on David Lynn (pastor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ThurstonMitchell ( talk) 08:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Jimmy, IMHO moving it to draft space won’t give this article a chance since younrecreated an article that was deleted by AFC consensus simply by changing preacher to pastor in the title. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 13:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi thank you for clarification, I tried to move it to draft, in order to work it there, and without 'disruption', so that it would be reviewed and maybe somebody can give me their opinion. Jimmy, 27 feb 2021.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Lynn (pastor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lynn (pastor) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ThurstonMitchell ( talk) 15:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC) reply

We have had two debates that decided he's not notable: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lynn (preacher) in January and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lynn (pastor) in 2015. You must stop recreating this, as it is disruptive. If you want to create this article, you need to find better evidence for notability and go to WP:DRV. Fences& Windows 18:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC) reply

He has recreated the article AGAIN. And again I put it up for speedy. He either doesn’t understand or doesn’t care. I want the topic protected from recreation under all possible titles and I am asking the powers that be that Jimmy be banned from future editing because of disruptive editing based not only on this subject but also other topics that have been discussed on his talk page. ThurstonMitchell ( talk) 20:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi, thank you for your feedback. I'm just new here and the reasoon I recreated this subject "david lynn" over and over again, and other subjects too, is because I though maybe I should make another trial, since my first trial(s) was not successful. Sometimes an article gets approved the second time. Please don't treat me as if I'm trying to vandalize wikipedia. please let me know if it's wrong to try and recreate a page. Jimmy 27feb2021.

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Lynn (pastor). Thanks! Paul ❬ talk❭ 10:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Ain El Remmaneh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. You must also remove the content which is copied from the source website, unless an appropriate licence can be demonstrated. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing ( talk) 20:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC) reply

The page Bank of Beirut and the Arab Countries has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.beirut.com/l/3486. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa ( talk) 22:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs coverage in places that Wikipedia would see as reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joel Richardson (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joel Richardson (author), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Jimmypapas/Federal Bank of Lebanon. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Federal Bank of Lebanon. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Federal Bank of Lebanon. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. WWGB ( talk) 09:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi, thank you for your help, actually I did duplicate this by mistake, but I'm glad that the subject passed and it's live now! Jimmy.

A tag has been placed on Draft:David Lynn (pastor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ThurstonMitchell ( talk) 19:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC) reply

I was very clear before about David Lynn: "You must stop recreating this, as it is disruptive. If you want to create this article, you need to find better evidence for notability and go to WP:DRV". If you create another article or draft about him, I will block you.

Your persistence with that article and your other editing gives a suspicion of a conflict of interest. See WP:COI and WP:PAID. If you have been paid to edit or create an article, you must declare it. If you have a connection to the subject, you should declare it and avoid directly editing those articles.

So - do you have any COIs you need to declare? Fences& Windows 21:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi, thank you for your message. I hope you can help. You said: "you need to find better evidence for notability", and that's what I did, i tried to recreate it with better sources... I don't understand what I did wrong. I even submitted it as draft in order to avoid disruption. Let me know where I went wrong. Yes I am persistent, that's my character, it has nothing to do with being paid. I am always persistent when I see an article has a chance to get accepted, especially when I believe it should be on Wikipedia. I have never been paid and never had any connection with any subject. Wikipedia is a very difficult place, I think you should bear with me. I have put a tremendous amount of work to create and become an editor, I have contributed a lot of positive stuff. Jimmypapas ( talk) 06:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Jimmy, 27feb2021. reply

OK, so long as you're familiar with the COI policy I'm happy with your reply. Bear in mind that appearing too keen to have certain people or organisations written about, particularly when they are of marginal notability, may make you fall under suspicion.

You either ignored or did not understand "and go to WP:DRV". You need to go to deletion review to argue for restoration of an article on David Lynn, presenting evidence that the issues that led to deletion twice in Articles for Deletion debates can be overcome.

If you're too persistent, that's a failure or refusal to "get the point", which is a form of disruptive editing. Don't plough ahead regardless: you need to listen to all the feedback you've received about your editing. Wikipedia editing can be tricky to get right, but you'll succeed when you get used to adapting your ways and reaching and following consensus. Fences& Windows 14:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Credit Libanais, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 ( talk) 00:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi, thank you for your message, I think the original article I create had a lot of citations, however, a user edited it, and removed all citations. can you help? is there anything i can do to return back the article? maybe revert to a previous version? Jimmypapas ( talk) 06:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)jimmyp reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fadi Sawan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lebanese.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joud el Bayeh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joud el Bayeh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra ( talk) 07:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Jean-Marie Riachi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.usek.edu.lb/alumni/wall-of-fame/jean-marie-riachi. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi, if possible, I will try to edit the text so that no text is copied from another source Jimmypapas ( talk) 13:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Cedrus Bank, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi, I created this page, as part of the lebanon banks pages that i've created, and i have nothing to do with the owners of the bank, and no intentions of promoting the brand was in mind. Is it possible to retrieve the page, which took a lot of effort to create, in order to fix the issue? Jimmypapas ( talk) 05:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmypapas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Amar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 23:43, 18 March 2021 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Saradar Bank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://addiyar.com/article/1762556-%d8%a8%d9%86%d9%83-%d8%b3%d8%b1%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1-%d9%88%d8%aa%d8%ad%d8%af%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b9%d9%88%d8%af%d8%a9. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC) reply

I restructured article so that it doesn't violate any copywriting, removed data that doesn't have sources, or that relies heavily on one source only. I have removed the "speedy deletion" tag as well as the "additional citations needed" tag. Let me know if that works. Jimmypapas ( talk) 09:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghassan Sarkis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ghassan_Sarkis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:48, 23 May 2021 (UTC) reply

I fixed the link above. Jimmypapas, I encourage you to participate in the discussion! Zagalejo ( talk) 22:23, 30 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hey there, well as usual I think that any subject should be present on Wikipedia as long as it has the right sources. Also this guy is pretty famous in Lebanon, so it's up to you guys Jimmypapas ( talk) 05:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Can anyone help please? I have created this article, and it seems I lost it, because I kep moving it from article to draf, to draft talk... until I lost the main article. Can anyone help retreive it? Jimmypapas ( talk) 10:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC) reply

• Look in Special:Contributions/Jimmyp3. Cabayi ( talk) 07:31, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BankMed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:03, 25 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joel Richardson (author), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 06:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New England Commission of Higher Education, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 01:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mike Feghali, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sawt El Mada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:20, 7 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Joel Richardson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jimmypapas/Riad Kobaissi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Riad Kobaissi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Common countries are not linked. See MOS:OL. MB 17:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Moneytrees🏝️ ^{Talk/ CCI guide} 16:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

You've received five warnings above for copyright violations. Today I revision deleted Amin Salam, where you added "He is an international consultant in economics and social development, management, strategic leadership, public affairs, and communications" which was copied from the cited source. Looking at recent edits of yours, I found this one to The Daily Star (Lebanon); In that edit you add:

"Eventhough it was owned by the former PM Saad Hariri, the publication struggling financially for years. The family also owned the Future TV and the Arabic-language newspaper Al-Mustaqbal, which both also closed in 2019."

The BBC source says:

"It had been struggling financially for years, despite its purchase a decade ago by the family of former Prime Minister Saad Hariri. The family also owned the Future TV channel and the Arabic-language newspaper Al-Mustaqbal, which both closed down in 2019.

I removed this content from the article. You cannot take content from sources like this, it is a copyright violation. If you want want to be unblocked, you will have to demonstrate a better understanding of copyright and commit to not copying from sources. Moneytrees🏝️ ^{Talk/ CCI guide} 16:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

It's terrible how Wikipedia treats people, after all the efforts and time and energy I spend to improved so much articles and create new ones, just a few mistakes that I made here and there gets me block INDEFINITELY. I don't know what to say. I'd like to as for an appeal for sure. I will not lose everything I did here. Jimmyp3 ( talk) 17:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

I'm sorry, but I don't have much of a choice. Copyright violations are difficult and time consuming to clean up; editors who repeatedly paste in content will be blocked, whether they mean to violate the rules or not. Moneytrees🏝️ ^{Talk/ CCI guide} 18:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Ok I understand that it's time consuming. Yeah it wasn't meant for sure, but I understand it's a mistake anyway. Is there a way to unblock me?

As my block template says, "If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}" Moneytrees🏝️ ^{Talk/ CCI guide} 19:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, so if I got it right, I should be appealing here right?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jimmyp3 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that since I joined the Wikipedia community, I have given a great amount of contribution, improvements and countless article creations, however, sometimes we do make mistakes, which in my case is violating copyright norms, by copying a material from another source, and which is definitely very time consuming to the community people to fix the mistakes. I believe that blocking me is not necessary anymore because I understand the reason why I was blocked, and I will do my best not to repeat it in the future. Jimmyp3 ( talk) 05:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

As copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, we must be sure that you understand what copyright is, when and how copyrighted content can be used on Wikipedia, and how Wikipedia content is licensed. Please see WP:COPYVIO for more information. 331dot ( talk) 10:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is there at least an expiry date for the block?

No, it is indefinite, it will be in place until it is lifted. As 331dot says, you'll have to be clear in your understanding of copyright if you want to be unblocked. Moneytrees🏝️ ^{Talk/ CCI guide} 17:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moneytrees🏝️ thank you for giving me the hints, please check below my new appeal:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jimmyp3 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

I did some research to find out where I was wrong, and below is my updated understanding: According to the "Wikipedia:Copyright violations" article, copying material from a "copyright holder" is a copyright violation, even the text was changed, because there may be obvious grammar/style similarities (AKA close paraphrasing), which can even lead to "plagiarism". Plagarism is taking credit for someone else's work, which, correct me if I'm wrong, isn't my main problem here, because I did introduce citations, but I think it's more of a "copyright violations". Here are 2 examples of copyright violations that I did (which you have already pointed out): - In the article Amin Salam that I created, I have added the sentence "international consultant in economics and social development, management, strategic leadership, public affairs, and communications" which was directly copy-pasted from " https://www.the961.com/amin-salam-lebanons-new-minister-of-economy/ copied from the cited source", which is a copyright violation. - In the article The Daily Star, I have copied the sentence "The family also owned the Future TV channel and the Arabic-language newspaper Al-Mustaqbal, which both closed down in 2019." directly from the following source: " https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-59134361", which is another copyright violation. Also, According to "Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources", copying text from other sources directly into Wikipedia is a copyright violation, I should instead write it in my "own words", which we've already established. Please let me know! Jimmyp3 ( talk) 06:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Thanks for the more detailed appeal, but with respect you've been an editor for too long to have only just discovered copyright as an issue. In addition the long list of deleted articles flagged on this page and in your "deleted contributions" log make clear there are significant issues with notability and reliable sourcing. Again, given the age of your account these can no longer be considered beginner mistakes. Am of the view the block remains necessary to prevent further disruption via poorly sourced or copyvio material. Although it's only an essay, please consider the content of WP:SO as a route to return to editing over time. -- Euryalus ( talk) 00:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Euryalus pleasure.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jimmyp3 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, It's been 2 years after the block, and I would like to check if you can remove the block so I can edit again. I understand that my mistake is that I can't copy directly any content from other sources and I'll be careful next time to rephrase content in my way before posting it. I understand that it was a beginner mistake but I wasn't aware of it, and now I am.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, It's been 2 years after the block, and I would like to check if you can remove the block so I can edit again. I understand that my mistake is that I can't copy directly any content from other sources and I'll be careful next time to rephrase content in my way before posting it. I understand that it was a beginner mistake but I wasn't aware of it, and now I am. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, It's been 2 years after the block, and I would like to check if you can remove the block so I can edit again. I understand that my mistake is that I can't copy directly any content from other sources and I'll be careful next time to rephrase content in my way before posting it. I understand that it was a beginner mistake but I wasn't aware of it, and now I am. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, It's been 2 years after the block, and I would like to check if you can remove the block so I can edit again. I understand that my mistake is that I can't copy directly any content from other sources and I'll be careful next time to rephrase content in my way before posting it. I understand that it was a beginner mistake but I wasn't aware of it, and now I am. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

)

The page Federal Bank of Lebanon has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.independentarabia.com/node/145696/%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A9/%D9%85%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%AA/%D9%85%D8%A7-%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%81%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AA-%D8%A8%D8%B4%D8%A8%D9%83%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D8%AA%D9%87%D9%85%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%AA%D9%85%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%9F Translation violation. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Moneytrees🏝️ ^{Talk/ CCI guide} 17:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Jimmyp3/Ctroniq, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 08:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Jimmyp3/Gus Farah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 08:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please contact the election coordinators for assistance. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Al-Madina Bank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jimmyp3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Al-Madina Bank".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:26, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply