This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome...

Hello, Jcovarru, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Gimme danger 16:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

		The California Star
		For your contributions to LA transit-related articles, I award you this star. Keep it up! TorriTorri( Talk to me!) 17:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Sweet, thanks! Jcovarru ( talk) 22:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

They are not needed when only two articles exist. Please undo the mess you've created with Expo Line. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 00:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

I redid the move. Rather than using religious references to Wikipedia edits, I used a Wikipedia directive - which is simply: "Be Bold." Even though the Vancouver Expo line wiki has been around longer, I could easily argue that the Los Angeles version has actually been in existence longer and/or that there is simply more media coverage of the Los Angeles Expo, line making it more suitable for the main "Expo Line" page with hat note to the Vancouver version.

However, because this could easily turn into a pissing contest and because there are conceivably more (non transit) uses for the term "Expo Line" (as evidenced by searching that term), I opted to move the Vancouver version to the name Expo Line (TransLink) following the existing convention for other TranLink systems with conflicting names.

Los Angeles Expo is exponentially gaining coverage in online reference and is searched for more often than Vancouver. Doing this now, while a pain in the ass, is easier than doing it later and provides a better, clearer user experience for the reader who would probably have no idea there were two system with the same name. It also levels the field, eliminating any need for a pissing contest. Lexlex ( talk) 22:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I have finished moving all links for the Canadian Expo Line to Expo Line (TransLink). Is it just me, or did these guys seem particularly cranky to you? Anyway, done and will no longer have to deal with it. Do you think the hat notes on either should stay? Lexlex ( talk) 04:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Cranky is a good word for it. I know Mr. Görlitz was quite upset by the whole thing. Anyway thanks for completing the move. I think the hat notes are fine. -- Jcovarru ( talk) 16:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I would hardly call this vandalism. Please remember to assume good faith. Thanks! -- TorriTorri^{( Talk to me!)} 01:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

All use the 'LACMTA' name. Following your recent changes, wouldn't it make sense to standardize there as well? For example Universal City (LACMTA station) could become Universal City (Los Angeles Metro Station). What do you think? Lexlex ( talk) 17:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

That does make sense. I hadn't given it much thought yet, because fixing all the redirects from my most recent moves is taking all my time. Jcovarru ( talk) 19:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to jump in here, but FYI it's usually better to leave redirects alone. -- TorriTorri^{( Talk to me!)} 22:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Here are the official colors of all the LA Metro lines. http://la.curbed.com/uploads/2010_04_colors.jpg Lexlex ( talk) 09:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Template:Infobox LACMTA station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Great job on the LA Metro templates! They look great. I also noticed your recent edits to the Union Station (Los Angeles) page. While I thank you for the work, I think the page looked better with all of the lines in the top infobox. Its more confusing now, and the multiple infoboxes push the boundaries down to create lots of blank white space. I started a discussion on this here so please comment, and we can figure something out. Thanks!-- Jkfp2004 ( talk) 20:55, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 05:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Please read the discussion under the Expo Line route-diagram template. Blue color must be used for all metro, subway, light-rail, streetcar, i.e. all urban-transit, lines. Red color is reserved for heavy rail, which means freight rail or commuter rail worldwide. Heavy rail in US means rapid transit, but worldwide and on Wikipedia, it means freight or commuter rail (like Metrolink in Los Angeles). Please see [1].

7th/St Metro Station is a cross-platform interchange but now this is being shown incorrectly on the new route diagrams. I will correct this on the Expo Line template. [I have now corrected this. Esirgen ( talk) 00:51, 23 July 2010 (UTC)] Actually this was incorrect. Cross platform refers to platforms on the same level. Reverting back to a regular hub but with correct icons (t for tunnel) and color (blue for metro and light-rail). Esirgen ( talk) 08:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Also, National/Palms Station and the right-of-way section between National/Palms and Motor is not on a a bridge but at-grade. That section sits at the edge of a natural hill and even though it appears elevated, it's perfectly at-grade and at the natural, untouched ground level of this hill.

Esirgen ( talk) 20:52, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:ExpoFarmdaleStation LAMetro.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Your excellent work with LA Metro pages is highly commendable! Thank you for all you have done. I am curious as to your views of a proposed merge of the Crenshaw Line and Crenshaw Corridor pages. The information on both pages is fairly similar. With construction work on the line will begin in a few months, it seems appropriate to merge the two articles. I would suggest moving much of the Crenshaw Line article into the the "Proposed Route" section of Crenshaw Corridor.-- Jkfp2004 ( talk) 00:40, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Jcovarru/Archive01! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

-- Kumioko ( talk) 18:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to the Project! Please let me know if you have any questions, comments or suggestions.-- Kumioko ( talk) 02:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

With the first of what I hope will be monthly newsletters I again want to welcome you to the project and hope that as we all work together through the year we can expand the project, create missing articles and generally improve the pedia thought mutual cooperation and support. Now that we have a project and a solid pool of willing members I wanted to strike while the iron is hot and solicite help in doing a few things that I believe is a good next step in solidifiing the project. I have outlined a few suggestions where you can help with on the projects talk page. This includes but is not limited too updating Portal:United States, assessing the remaining US related articles that haven't been assessed, eliminating the Unrefernced BLP's and others. If you have other suggestions or are interested in doing other things feel free. I just wanted to offer a few suggestions were additional help is needed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or suggestions or you can always post something on the projects talk page. If you do not want to recieve a monthly message please put an * before your name on the members page.-- Kumioko ( talk) 03:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Starting with the February 2011 issue WikiProject United States has established a newsletter to inform anyone interested in United States related topics of the latest changes. This newsletter will not only discuss issues relating to WikiProject United States but also:

1. Portal:United States
2. the United States Wikipedians Noticeboard
3. the United States Wikipedians collaboration of the Month - The collaboration article for February is Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
4. and changes to Wikipolicy, events and other things that may be of interest to you.

You may read or assist in writing the newsletter, subscribe, unsubscribe or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following this link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page or the Newsletters talk page. -- Kumioko ( talk) 20:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumioko ( talk) 19:33, 6 April 2011 (UTC)